The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: miskie on September 06, 2012, 10:49:52 PM

Title: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: miskie on September 06, 2012, 10:49:52 PM
What a coincidence - I just read something really strange - here - http://demu.gr/10021291418 - I can only assume Nadin was watching BizarroDNC, because the one I saw was a ClusterBiden of epic proportion - where Delegates voice votes get overruled, DNC mouthpieces lie and claim there is no discord, speakers are moved/removed/reassigned seemingly at random, and the President's speech was relocated because of an abundance of sunshine.

Quote from:  nadinbrzezinski (108,607 posts)

We just saw something really strange


 
Last week we saw the RNC have zero message discipline. Beyond the "we built that" there was none... and the usual RNC themes, foreign policy, wars, even 9-11 as a noun, were mostly gone.

This week we saw a DNC that had message discipline, amazing framing... and talked about policy as policy.

Kids, we just watched the kind of historic two weeks we have not seen in a while.

I am serious, I do not remember the the DNC this disciplined. I mean demorats do not belong to an organized party, but this week, you saw an organized party.

I am in shock.

And it was not just the President.

Where there groups ignored? Yup, Labor, organized labor... where there groups included that have not ever before, who wants to start the list? I will, LGBT was there big time.

The lesson for labor is that it needs to get it's mojo back... that's the truth.

But my lord, we just saw a convention that actually had some hell of a framing effort and it worked.

Will the election be closed? Yup, it has to do with voting dynamics in the United States.

Will there be a bump? I expect it.

And one thing I do these days is that I really do not watch it, too distracting. Yes, there is physically a wall between me and the tv... so I listen to it, mostly. It helps to concentrate on framing far better.

Who do you thank? Wasserman Shultz, she was responsible for this one...

Got to hand it to her, she is faithfully committed. Perhaps to the point where she should be physically committed as well.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: BlueStateSaint on September 07, 2012, 04:29:35 AM
What a coincidence - I just read something really strange - here - http://demu.gr/10021291418 - I can only assume Nadin was watching BizarroDNC, because the one I saw was a ClusterBiden of epic proportion - where Delegates voice votes get overruled, DNC mouthpieces lie and claim there is no discord, speakers are moved/removed/reassigned seemingly at random, and the President's speech was relocated because of an abundance of sunshine.

Got to hand it to her, she is faithfully committed. Perhaps to the point where she should be physically committed as well.

One of her two remaining brain cells has finally said, "**** IT!"  And it left.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Carl on September 07, 2012, 04:57:45 AM
Nads,your side is endlessly talking about "framing" things.
Facts don`t need to be framed,they speak for themselves and their truth does not waiver.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: franksolich on September 07, 2012, 05:55:09 AM
Nads,your side is endlessly talking about "framing" things.
Facts don`t need to be framed,they speak for themselves and their truth does not waiver.

I think the oblate spheroid is seeing things nobody else is seeing.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Skul on September 07, 2012, 07:11:17 AM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,607 posts)

We just saw something really strange Who is "we", got a turd in your pocket?
 
Last week we saw the RNC have zero message discipline. Beyond the "we built that" there was none... and the usual RNC themes, foreign policy, wars, even 9-11 as a noun, were mostly gone.

This week we saw a DNC that had message discipline, amazing framing... and talked about policy as policy.

Kids, we just watched the kind of historic two weeks we have not seen in a while.
<snip>
If I ever addressed the members of CC, in such a manner, I'd get BS'd to hell and back.
Why they put up with it, I'll never understand.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: franksolich on September 07, 2012, 07:13:31 AM
If I ever addressed the members of CC, in such a manner, I'd get BS'd to hell and back.

Why they put up with it, I'll never understand.

Uh huh, you most assuredly would.

In her use of the patronizing "kids," Vlada Mitty's once again betraying her contempt for her fellow primitives.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: miskie on September 07, 2012, 07:14:32 AM
If I ever addressed the members of CC, in such a manner, I'd get BS'd to hell and back.
Why they put up with it, I'll never understand.

Many of them don't - between the primitives who ignore Nadin, and the primitives Nadin ignores, I suspect only 15% of Skin's active users have the ability to interact with her.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Karin on September 07, 2012, 08:34:08 AM
Much the same way I am allergic to The Magistrate, I am becoming allergic to Nadine's use of the word "Yup."
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Gina on September 07, 2012, 09:00:02 AM
SO did Zappo respond?   :popcorn:
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: jukin on September 07, 2012, 09:27:21 AM
Did nada go by a mirror?
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: USA4ME on September 07, 2012, 09:38:27 AM
When I read the title, I though she had probably been standing in front of a mirror naked, so I wasn't going to click. But I knew miskie well enough he would have posted a *WARNING* in the title.

.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: hillneck on September 07, 2012, 09:41:52 AM
Nads must be drinking the printers ink again.     :lmao: 
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: franksolich on September 07, 2012, 10:42:28 AM
SO did Zappo respond?   :popcorn:

No, but more nuggets of wisd--er, shit, from Vlada at this campfire:

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

4. You know what is funnier

the spell checker missed it. Thanks

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

11. I dare say more

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

28. Gary Johnson

and the media forgot to tell you that he is courting Paulists hard.

I expect him to syphon at least some (that will be noticeable in the results)

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

30. Well, talking to a few hundred Paul supporters here in San diego, they will vote for him.

You have not heard of him partly due to the media... to be fair, he should be in the debates, since the libertarian party actually polls enough.

But he is also the reason Ron Paul is NOT running on the Libertarian ticket. That was settled even before the RNC.

Oh by the way, thank small media, indie media, for pointing to you he exists. More on him, he USED to be a republican, and actually ran early on in the R primary.

He pulled out early on and instead ran in the Libertarian party primary.

<------ Just doing my job.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

10. One reason for that lack of discipline is the internal civil war...

It is very obvious now, even to the casual observer. which we are not.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

12. They were doing policy right and left

every speaker was, almost.

Top policy speeches, Michelle, Bill Clinton. John Kerry and Barack Obama...

Off prime time... we also had a few good ones from people like Grahnholm, the head of NARAl, it just kept on coming. Policy wonks were in heaven and there was real world arithmetic.

And dopey me, forgot Elizabeth warren... the game is rigged, elizabeth warren.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

18. I am talking in the final speech

I know they were there in other speeches.

It was the, it's my beat, local labor...

They have slowly edged out Occupy.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

17. She is the chairwoman of the Democratic Party... it is one of her jobs.

She did well, the last chairman to put one of these well was Doctor Dean four years ago, also in his capacity as Chairman. I would not be surprised if she asked for pointers. Usually when one does well, the next one asks for them. So whoever succeeds her, will ask her, and hopefully we will see some institutional memory develop.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

21. They are as disjouinted and disunited as at least the '68 Dems

I suspect it is actually deeper... but I would not count them off... that is the common mistake.

(That does not mean that if they go away I will cry, ok I will ask them to cry me a river)... But their choice is simple and could take anywhere from four to eight years... it's faster these days. They need to figure out how to kick out the crazee uncle again... which they did after '64, when they were this divided.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

23. That has always been a worry... a good vibrant speaker.

why dems need to work hard to get rid of citizens united... as to fox news, well... there is a generation right now that is not watching tv that much... and in the intertubes NEITHER side has figured how to dominate.

Yup, I can even watch shows in that new fangled android phone. That is becoming more of a factor.

Granted, there were a few of those who did not watch either convention... to be fair.

Things are right now in flux when it comes to media and how to harness it.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

32. That is a good question

If they lose, we will find the answer pretty quick I suspect.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

26. I am far more impartial than you are

and trust me, you put it well. That analogy works.

Yawn.   :blah: :blah:
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on September 07, 2012, 10:43:13 AM
The only message discipline I saw was blaming Republicans for everything bad that has ever happened or ever will happen, and lots of promises to deliver those free ponies that didn't show up so far if they get four more years to do it.  That Ba'athist travesty of a voice vote on 'Jerusalem is the capital of Israel' was anything BUT message discipline.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Airwolf on September 07, 2012, 11:53:44 AM
Shes got to be on some serious drugs.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: miskie on September 07, 2012, 12:10:34 PM
Quote from: nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

12. They were doing policy right and left

every speaker was, almost.

Top policy speeches, Michelle, Bill Clinton. John Kerry and Barack Obama...

Off prime time... we also had a few good ones from people like Grahnholm, the head of NARAl, it just kept on coming. Policy wonks were in heaven and there was real world arithmetic.

And dopey me, forgot Elizabeth warren... the game is rigged, elizabeth warren.

How could you possibly forget Fauxcahontas, as she makes out with herself onstage ?

[youtube=560,315]YBtij5dR3dA[/youtube]

-Its really quite disturbing. Not quite as disturbing as Obama caressing Big Dawg after he finished speaking but disturbing.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Jasonw560 on September 07, 2012, 01:09:59 PM
The only strange things people saw were the assorted Anti-American and brain dead freaks at the DNC. And I'm not just talking about the speakers.
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Skul on September 07, 2012, 02:03:03 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (108,643 posts)

26. I am far more impartial than you are
and trust me, you put it well. That analogy works.
You're kidding, she actually said that?
Must go look.


edit.... She sure did. :lmao:
Title: Re: Nads - We just saw something really strange
Post by: Chris_ on September 07, 2012, 02:16:59 PM
Nads is far more everything than you are.  Deal with it, peon.

:rofl: