The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on August 27, 2012, 07:53:14 PM
-
Vox Moi (35 posts)
Romney can't go any lower than this: Obama's 'base' is welfare recipients
Unbelievable.
From the Huffington Post:
<snip>
And so they said, you must be preparing for work, looking for work or actually working to qualify for this section. And the president has decided, through a statement to the states, we’re going to waive that anyway, despite the language of the bill. That opens the door to removing the serious work requirement that was in the bill. I disagree with that approach. There's no question in mind that the president’s action in this regard was calculated to build support for him among people he wants to have excited about his reelection, just as so many of the things he’s done were designed to try to shore up his base.
<snip>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/mitt-romney-welfare-waivers_n_1832871.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021211561
How is that wrong? Which party would those on the dole vote for? I will give you a hint, it's the party that not only promises them more, but the party who demonizes those who work hard and are successful.
liberal N proud (39,938 posts)
1. Can I ask Romney to send me a check?
Since I consider myself part of Obama's base and I currently am not on welfare, I think Mittens owes me some money.
Typical DUmmy you think everyone owes you something.
Blue Owl (7,033 posts)
2. You mean the welfare recipients created when Republicans were in office?
Excuse me but go **** OFF now, Mitt.
:mental:
azureblue (447 posts)
29. of course
Romney has no idea at all that the majority of welfare recipients are white. He's just using the usual "them lazy black people are getting all the welfare" scare tactic. Racist, through and through.
You are the one associating black people with welfare and Romney is the racist? :banghead:
Skittles (80,825 posts)
16. as he gets more desperate, Romney's dog whistle is turning into a blow horn
and here's a tip for you, Vox Moi - no matter HOW LOW repukes go, they can - and DO - ALWAYS GO LOWER
The only people who seem to be hearing these dog whistles are you idiots.
CabCurious (912 posts)
32. It's dispicable, but let's not support the stereotype, either. Most welfare recips are non-black.
Freeper troll!!!!11111
-
Since the moment he too the oath O has done nothing but pander to those in some way depend on a publicly funded check fo their existence.
-
I actually worked for SEIU Local 22 out of Chicago many years ago, they shared an office with ACORN. They were one in the same, just different on paper.
Guess where they had voter registration drives and set up bus rides to the polls? Public housing. I wonder who those residents voted for?
-
Most welfare recips are non-black.
In terms of raw numbers, true. But when African-Americans make up 12 percent of the population, it's not a huge stretch to make that claim.
Now in terms of PERCENTAGES of a particular demographic, whoops--you lose.
But then again, that's what Democrats want--a permanent slave class beholden to them for a bare-bones existence. In exchange for said "gimmes", they will dutifully pull the "D" lever lest their sugar teat be cut off and they be cast off the plantation.
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021211561
How is that wrong? Which party would those on the dole vote for? I will give you a hint, it's the party that not only promises them more, but the party who demonizes those who work hard and are successful.
It can't answer you. It's almost the first of the month so the DUmmie is busy figuring how many bags of Cheetos we're going to buy for it this go around.
-
In terms of raw numbers, true. But when African-Americans make up 12 percent of the population, it's not a huge stretch to make that claim.
Now in terms of PERCENTAGES of a particular demographic, whoops--you lose.
But then again, that's what Democrats want--a permanent slave class beholden to them for a bare-bones existence. In exchange for said "gimmes", they will dutifully pull the "D" lever lest their sugar teat be cut off and they be cast off the plantation.
In 1860 the Democrats ran on slavery for blacks.
2012 a black democrat is running on slavery for all the American people. :banghead:
-
The DUmmies aren't the only ones who hate the Republican candidate.
Check out the loony owner of FR:
To: Bigtigermike
We’re looking at the most leftist RINO SOB ever to run for the presidency as a Republican. He’s already pushing his own version of socialized healthcare. Things are gonna get hot no matter what.
10 posted on Monday, August 27, 2012 9:25:36 PM by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2923557/posts
Anyone so detested by lunatics at both ends of the spectrum must be okay.
-
Romney can't go any lower than this: Obama's 'base' is welfare recipients
Huh, I thought it was morons...
-
The DUmmies aren't the only ones who hate the Republican candidate.
Check out the loony owner of FR:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2923557/posts
Anyone so detested by lunatics at both ends of the spectrum must be okay.
I don't know a whole lot about Robinson, but yeah....anything pro-Romney, for awhile, was flamed almost instantly.
It would seem that that has backed off considerably once they grasped the concept of "we gotta get rid of President Training Wheels".
-
Romney just seems to be stating the obvious here. In every left-wing party in the developed world, there is a lot of pandering done to those on welfare.
-
Romney just seems to be stating the obvious here. In every left-wing party in the developed world, there is a lot of pandering done to those on welfare.
It's much easier and safer to rob the industrious with a vote.
-
Vox Moi (35 posts)
Romney can't go any lower than this: Obama's 'base' is welfare recipients
Unbelievable.
From the Huffington Post:
<snip>
And so they said, you must be preparing for work, looking for work or actually working to qualify for this section. And the president has decided, through a statement to the states, we’re going to waive that anyway, despite the language of the bill. That opens the door to removing the serious work requirement that was in the bill. I disagree with that approach. There's no question in mind that the president’s action in this regard was calculated to build support for him among people he wants to have excited about his reelection, just as so many of the things he’s done were designed to try to shore up his base.
<snip>
http://www.huffingtonpost...re-waivers_n_1832871.html
You lost all credibiilty with the Puffington Post link.
-
You lost all credibiilty with the Puffington Post link.
Vox Moi (35 posts)
Not much to begin with.
-
I don't know a whole lot about Robinson, but yeah....anything pro-Romney, for awhile, was flamed almost instantly.
Ever since his fundraisers went into the shitter, that is.