The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on August 06, 2012, 10:46:50 AM

Title: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: GOBUCKS on August 06, 2012, 10:46:50 AM
Try to grasp the scene she's laboring to describe.

Apparently nadin began to lie at an early age.

Quote
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:55 AM
nadinbrzezinski (107,420 posts)

Earliest space program memory
For me it was Armstrong landing and the moonshot.

I was three...it was my brother's graduation from Junior High, but I digress. My dad took me outside where a bunch of men were huddled around a black and white set, watching. Dad held me on his shoulders, the tv was hanging from the ceiling on large brackets. I remember Zabludovsky (this was in Mexico) with large earphones translating Armstrong's words. I was enthralled.

And that is one of my earliest memories. Not just of the space program, but my life.

I guess that touched me deeply. I have followed the space program since and am a geek when it comes to NASA. So what are your first memories of the space program?

(and dad I miss you, wish you were here to see this, just as impressive as that grainy image coming from the moon)
   
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021080156#post14
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Bad Dog on August 06, 2012, 10:50:08 AM
Considering the (mostly correct) spelling & syntax, I'm guessing she riped this off from some other person. 
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: thundley4 on August 06, 2012, 10:57:43 AM
Quote
My dad took me outside where a bunch of men were huddled around a black and white set, watching. Dad held me on his shoulders, the tv was hanging from the ceiling on large brackets.

Outside has a ceiling in Mexico?
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Airwolf on August 06, 2012, 11:01:13 AM
Not only that but that was broadcasted very late at night here in the midwest when Armstrong made his decent onto the moons surface so why was she up that late at about 2-3Am live? I was about 10 years old when he walked on the moon and there is no way the bald dwarf is younger then I am.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: ChuckJ on August 06, 2012, 12:09:27 PM
Not only that but that was broadcasted very late at night here in the midwest when Armstrong made his decent onto the moons surface so why was she up that late at about 2-3Am live? I was about 10 years old when he walked on the moon and there is no way the bald dwarf is younger then I am.

Considering all that she claims to have done she has to be around 1700 years old.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: GOBUCKS on August 06, 2012, 12:22:49 PM
Another DUmpmonkey misremembers:
Quote
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:21 AM
enlightenment (5,382 posts)
14. Earliest vague memory is standing in the back yard

looking up at the tiny spot of moving light that my dad told me was Friendship 7.


Friendship was the Mercury capsule that carried John Glenn.

Far too tiny to be visible with the naked eye.

(And despite claims, no one, anywhere could see the Sputnik satellite.)

Friendship 7 launched around 10am for about a four hour mission, so it wasn't up at night over the U.S.

Nearly all recollections people have from seeing spacecraft many years ago are from the Echo satellites, huge metallized balloons that were orbited around 1960.

They were over 100 feet in diameter, and were pretty easy to see reflecting the sun in the night sky.

I think visibility (in Russia) was their main purpose.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: thundley4 on August 06, 2012, 12:26:37 PM
I think nadin may have been one of the primary trainers for Laika
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: seahorse513 on August 06, 2012, 12:28:30 PM
What year was the first moon landing??
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Chris_ on August 06, 2012, 12:39:07 PM
What year was the first moon landing??
July 20, 1969
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: JakeStyle on August 06, 2012, 12:49:37 PM
She's an odd duck.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: GOBUCKS on August 06, 2012, 12:51:45 PM
She's an odd duck.

Yeah, odd.

She does walk like a duck, though.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Airwolf on August 06, 2012, 12:58:52 PM
They love to rewrite history if for no other reason then to build up their credibility at the DUmp. Seriously people do you have to lie about everything at the DUmp just because you feel a need to connect to some story in the news?
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Wineslob on August 06, 2012, 01:37:48 PM
Outside has a ceiling in Mexico?


No, but maybe Mexico does, or was that the floor?
Too much Tequila to recall.  :drunksailor:
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: franksolich on August 06, 2012, 03:13:17 PM
Yeah, odd.

She does walk like a duck, though.

My mental thesaurus has abandoned me, and I can't find the real book.

We all know that some people are "hourglass"-shaped.

What's the word for the opposite of that, hourglass?

Where the middle bulges out, and the top and bottom are thinner.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Chris_ on August 06, 2012, 03:16:07 PM
oblate sphereoid
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: franksolich on August 06, 2012, 03:17:12 PM
oblate sphereoid

Thanks sir--that was quick.

Now I have to figure out how to use it.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Airwolf on August 06, 2012, 03:17:44 PM
My mental thesaurus has abandoned me, and I can't find the real book.

We all know that some people are "hourglass"-shaped.

What's the word for the opposite of that, hourglass?

Where the middle bulges out, and the top and bottom are thinner.

Planetary mass?  
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Skul on August 06, 2012, 05:45:40 PM
Something to think about. :-)
Quote
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:55 AM
nadinbrzezinski (107,420 posts)

Earliest space program memory
For me it was Armstrong landing and the moonshot.

I was three...  Keep this in mind
Moon landing, 20 July 1969

Quote
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:21 AM
enlightenment (5,382 posts) edit because I missed this part during original comment :banghead:
14. Earliest vague memory is standing in the back yard

looking up at the tiny spot of moving light that my dad told me was Friendship 7.
Glenn/Friendship 7, launch and orbit.... 20 Feb. 1962

The great Gnads of Gnome is soooo great, she remembers stuff four years before her birth. :lmao: :loser: :loser: :loser:
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: franksolich on August 06, 2012, 05:47:35 PM
Something to think about. :-)Moon landing, 20 July 1969
Glenn/Friendship 7, launch and orbit.... 20 Feb. 1962

The great Gnads of Gnome is soooo great, she remembers stuff four years before her birth. :lmao: :loser: :loser: :loser:

You made the same mistake I almost did, sir.

Actually, it's not Baroness Munchausen who made the comment about Friendship 7; that was another primitive.

I always guessed Baroness Munchausen to have been born circa 1964-1965-1966, and it appears I wasn't far off.

<<if misses, at least comes close.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: seahorse513 on August 06, 2012, 05:48:54 PM
I am gonna start wearing my wading boots, whenever I read her posts from now on. The shit is either going to get deeper, or I will end up drowning in it... :thatsright:
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Skul on August 06, 2012, 05:49:22 PM
You made the same mistake I almost did, sir.

Actually, it's not Baroness Munchausen who made the comment about Friendship 7; that was another primitive.

I always guessed Baroness Munchausen to have been born circa 1964-1965-1966, and it appears I wasn't far off.

<<if misses, at least comes close.
I just realized that and came back to correct.  :rotf:
Ya beat me to it. :-)
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: franksolich on August 06, 2012, 05:50:41 PM
I just realized that and came back to correct.  :rotf:
Ya beat me to it. :-)

Yeah, when I first saw it, I started writing a comment about the inconsistency, but God told me to re-read it, and I discovered oops, it wasn't Baroness Munchausen.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: JakeStyle on August 06, 2012, 05:52:11 PM
My mental thesaurus has abandoned me, and I can't find the real book.

We all know that some people are "hourglass"-shaped.

What's the word for the opposite of that, hourglass?

Where the middle bulges out, and the top and bottom are thinner.

She is under-inflated beach balloon shaped. They made a new category.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: franksolich on August 06, 2012, 05:54:01 PM
She is under-inflated beach balloon shaped. They made a new category.

I like chris_'s term, "oblate sphereroid," and am trying to figure out how to use it creatively.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: Big Dog on August 06, 2012, 05:59:02 PM
Yeah, odd.

She does walk like a duck, though.

(http://img.geocaching.com/cache/091c07af-f9d1-4382-a97f-d80f39320bc4.jpg)
Kvack, Kvack.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: obumazombie on August 06, 2012, 06:04:38 PM
I like chris_'s term, "oblate sphereroid," and am trying to figure out how to use it creatively.
Radish. She looks radishing today. Pear. I've never seen a bigger pear.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: thundley4 on August 06, 2012, 07:18:07 PM
I just realized that and came back to correct.  :rotf:
Ya beat me to it. :-)

Don't feel bad.  So many DUmmies use ordinary words for screen names, and the piss poor format of Skin's Island makes it easy to be confused by posts.

You would have thought that by the time they got to the DU3, they could have come up with a decent format, but no, they are DUmmies after all.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: franksolich on August 06, 2012, 07:23:18 PM
Don't feel bad.  So many DUmmies use ordinary words for screen names, and the piss poor format of Skin's Island makes it easy to be confused by posts.

You would have thought that by the time they got to the DU3, they could have come up with a decent format, but no, they are DUmmies after all.

That, and that primitive comments on Skins's island are not listed chronologically; they sequentially jump all over in random disorder.

And some, like poor stupid Beth, have used that before, to their advantage when wanting to lie about something.

I suspect they don't do things in chronological order because Skins knew from the start that "quotes" in reference to a comment was too challenging for the primitives to figure out and use.
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: thundley4 on August 06, 2012, 07:29:33 PM
That, and that primitive comments on Skins's island are not listed chronologically; they sequentially jump all over in random disorder.

And some, like poor stupid Beth, have used that before, to their advantage when wanting to lie about something.

I suspect they don't do things in chronological order because Skins knew from the start that "quotes" in reference to a comment was too challenging for the primitives to figure out and use.

I like the chronological layout better like CC than DU.   It's distracting when reading their threads to see a comment that says something like : "see my comment below".
Title: Re: Crazy Bald Dwarf Lies For No Reason
Post by: franksolich on August 06, 2012, 07:35:47 PM
I like the chronological layout better like CC than DU.   It's distracting when reading their threads to see a comment that says something like : "see my comment below".

Uh huh.

Or using poor stupid Beth for an example again, a primitive can make a comment at a campfire, and as the campfire burns on, the primitive becomes aware his lie is blatantly obvious, and so manages to interject a comment further upthread to ameliorate the situation.

And so one sees the second comment covering the primitive's ass before one sees the first lie.

The reasonable thing is to assume comments are listed in chronological order (i.e., the lower down in the thread, the more recent the comment), and so one looks at the campfires that way, missing the lie.

During the Scamdal, Amityschild devised a program on Excel that put things (primitive comments) in chronological order, but nowadays I just look at a campfire and do that in my head, assorting the comments.