The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on August 05, 2012, 02:02:35 PM

Title: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Freeper on August 05, 2012, 02:02:35 PM
Quote
ProSense (85,740 posts)

Reid’s spokesman: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"


 
Last edited Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:50 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

<...>

Late Sunday morning, Reid’s spokesman Adam Jentleson responded via email to TPM.

“Republicans can try to cover up for Mitt Romney’s stonewalling all they want, but this issue is not going away until Romney decides to be straight with the American people and release his tax returns. It is sad that the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon has forced his party to defend his decision to hide the truth about his tax returns. As Senator Reid has said, an extremely credible source informed him that Mitt Romney did not pay taxes for ten years. From the one year of returns Romney has released, we’ve seen that he uses secret offshore accounts in places like Switzerland and the Cayman Islands to avoid paying U.S. taxes. It’s clear Mitt Romney is hiding something, and the only way for him to clear this up is to be straight with the American people and release his tax returns.”

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/republicans-reince-priebus-harry-reid-dirty-liar-romney-taxes.php

Give 'em hell, Harry!

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10021076566

Hey Harry what about 0bama and all his sealed records?
 :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

Quote
Curtland1015 (3,444 posts)
3. Oooooooo... YES! Make that Nixon connection early and often!

Love it!

If anyone can be compared to Nixon it has to be Barry, he has an enemy list for Pete's sake.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: franksolich on August 05, 2012, 02:04:07 PM
Yeah, what about Barack Milhous?

Now, there's a guy who makes Nixon look wide open.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Carl on August 05, 2012, 02:06:01 PM
What they don`t realize is that all this dirt they are throwing makes the O campaign look like it is on the run and flailing about for anything.
It is having no affect other then to make them look as disgusting as they are.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Undies on August 05, 2012, 02:07:15 PM
Mitt's an open book.  He's been governor of Massachusetts for crispy's sake.  What else is there to know?
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on August 05, 2012, 02:07:51 PM
They have it backwards. Obama is the most secretive candidate ever. Then those retards also think that obama is the most vetted President ever. They look in the mirror and see stupid.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: JohnnyReb on August 05, 2012, 02:33:09 PM
They have it backwards. Obama is the most secretive candidate ever. Then those retards also think that obama is the most vetted President ever. They look in the mirror and see stupid.

I thought that when vampires(bloodsuckers) looked in the mirror they saw nothing?

Nothing = DUmmie = nothing....yeah, that's abot right.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on August 05, 2012, 04:25:21 PM
I thought that when vampires(bloodsuckers) looked in the mirror they saw nothing?

Nothing = DUmmie = nothing....yeah, that's abot right.

Nothing from nothing gets nothing I guess.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: delilahmused on August 07, 2012, 01:59:16 AM
What the hell are these idiots talking about? We know a helluva lot more about Mitt than we do about 0bama. Do the every think about what they're supposed believe and parrot? Heck, even Van Jones is dissing Reid.

Cindie
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on August 07, 2012, 02:32:48 AM
What the hell are these idiots talking about? We know a helluva lot more about Mitt than we do about 0bama. Do the every think about what they're supposed believe and parrot? Heck, even Van Jones is dissing Reid.

Cindie

Do you know how bad you have to screw up to have Van Jones diss you? Wow. That is like trying to get out of chuckie cheese. The liberal has to really lay an egg in that one.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Karin on August 07, 2012, 10:07:26 AM
Never mind the Cave, lurkers.  I went out to see what other people were saying, on non-partisan boards:

From Bangor, Maine:
Quote
HomerMaine  Today 07:22 AM 

Aww, Harry must have taken one punch too many
during his boxing career. I guess if Mitt didn't pay
taxes for 10 years then we should disband the IRS
for not doing their job. And this piece of info comes
from an investor? Like the average investor would
know about Romney's tax filings. Yeah...right! Maybe
they are talking about the no paying of taxes of his governor
salary and olympic salary of....$1 he took for pay.

Talk Pennsylvania website:

Quote
The media is trying to create a sense of momentum and of inevitability about the Obama candidacy. One benighted Newsweek reporter even speculated about a possible Democratic landslide.
On Friday, I saw the real numbers. These state-by-state polls, taken by an organization I trust (after forty years of polling) show the real story. The tally is based on more than 600 likely voter interviews in each swing state within the past eight days.
The trend line is distinctly pro-Romney. Of the thirteen states studied, he improved or Obama slipped in nine states while the reverse happened in only four. To read the media, one would think that Romney had a terrible month. In fact, the exact reverse is true.

Quote
That's why Reid and those making excuses for him, look like bumbling fools...right on national TV. Any well-educated 8th grader knows that you can't maintain your credibility by just going around making these kinds of accusations without also providing proof of them. And, this, right on the floor of the Senate.

I think this is a new low for the Democratic party (and, maybe, for American politics, in general).


Quote
Here's how bat-shit-crazy Princes Pelosi and most in congress are. Read her statement carefuly:


"Harry Reid made a statement that is true. Somebody told him. It is a fact," Pelosi told The Huffington Post in a Sunday interview.
She has less a clue about this than she did when she said "we have to pass it to find out what is in it."

 :lmao:  God, what an idiot she is! 

USA Today:

Quote
The only ones having a twit fit are you trolls. The rest of us don't care how he spends his money. WE CARE HOW OBAMA SPENDS OUR MONEY!

That site then fell into looney bin mode, with the libs even going back to GWB.   :lmao:
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: Gina on August 07, 2012, 10:10:03 AM
This is going to backfire so bad  :yahoo:
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: jukin on August 07, 2012, 10:17:31 AM
This is going to backfire so bad  :yahoo:

Yep the "smartest people in the room" AKA "the gang that can't shoot straight" just gave a couple more points to Romney.  The scary thing to me is that the "smartest people in the room" would be in charge if an external enemy attacks us.
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on August 07, 2012, 02:11:53 PM
Heck, even Van Jones is dissing Reid.

Cindie

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

 :-)

I know! 

 :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: BEG on August 07, 2012, 02:56:57 PM
Romney's tax returns.

LINK (http://www.mittromney.com/learn/mitt/tax-return/main)
Title: Re: Republicans forced to defend "the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon"
Post by: delilahmused on August 07, 2012, 03:21:55 PM
Romney's tax returns.

LINK (http://www.mittromney.com/learn/mitt/tax-return/main)

H5 for pointing out truth to idiots...though none of the lurkers will bother to check on the link and will think his documents are faked even if they did...at least you tried.

Cindie