The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Tess Anderson on July 21, 2012, 02:05:29 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002986378
the original post by Nadin:
nadinbrzezinski (106,468 posts)
Don't shoot the messenger
When Columbine happened I went... this has to finally click.
Nope.
When Tucson happened, same thing.
When Virginia tech happened, well you get the picture.
I expect to have reasonable laws SOMEDAY... but that will only happen only after shootings, mass casualty shootings, become such a new normal that people finally get it. Mostly because they get tired of it.
Chalk it to years in the streets as a medic, but Columbine horrified me... this... not really, not anymore... and I know now a lot more of these incidents will occur, before we, as a people, finally get it.
And no, this does not mean I want to grab your guns... but when we cannot even have a civilized discussion on background checks at the local gun show... well then... this is the result, and we will get more of then, more often... until politicians say enough is enough, and citizens say enough is enough. Until then, welcome to the new normal.
Of course politicians may also over react and increase the security state, but hey... it would be a consequence of this.
My question now, should I go watch a movie at a movie theater or just wait for it to come out in DVD and rent it? And no, that is not a question in jest. What other places should I avoid, unless the job requires it? Again, not kidding... but if this is the new normal, one has to adjust to the new normal. I am reminded of the conversations I had with Israelis, who avoided things like Pizza shops after they became well... targets...
By the way, getting it also means taking mental health seriously. It also means taking things like what some of our radio shock jocks say seriously as well.
Yup, if I could, at times I wish I could leave this insane asylum... which is what at times the country is starting to resemble.
first reply:
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 07:33 PM
Tejas (4,478 posts)
1. As a cause, why do you put guns ahead of mental health?
cart/horse
Nadin fires back:
Response to Tejas (Reply #1)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 07:34 PM
nadinbrzezinski (106,468 posts)
2. Can you think parallel tracts?
Or is this too difficult for you?
then:
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 07:50 PM
zappaman (5,446 posts)
4. "Yup, if I could, at times I wish I could leave this insane asylum"
What's stopping you?
Can I be of assistance?
:lol:
Finally:
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 08:01 PM
cali (72,083 posts)
10. whatever. another condescending misguided faux knowledgeable
post.
I never do it, but I'm making an exception and putting you on ignore.
Response to cali (Reply #10)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 08:02 PM
zappaman (5,446 posts)
13. Don't do that!
Where else can you learn there are 60cm in a meter or that the US has 51 states!
and:
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #36)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:24 PM
zappaman (5,446 posts)
45. "Been in a few shoot outs myself"
OH
MY
GOD
:rotf:
-
I saw that earlier when the cave went down. Doubt she cares though. She doesn't look fondly on all the lowly peasants in DUmmie land anyway.
-
Nads is screaming about background checks and the gun show loophole so I have a question for the good people here who I know will know the answer. It's my understanding that there are a couple of type of gun shows. The first type is like a flea market for firearms. People in the firearm business (licensed dealers) go there to sell and private individuals also go there to sell. The second type of gun show only allows people in the firearm business to sell. No private sellers are allowed. Regardless of the type of gun show a licensed dealer has to do a background check. A private individual, whether he is selling a gun at a show or his house, does not have to do a background check. Is this correct? If it is, wouldn't this mean that the so-called gun show loophole doesn't really exist?
Also, I assume for a background check to get a firearm you would have to prove who you are which would include providing picture ID. Is this correct? Haven't we learned that forcing someone to produce an ID is a suppression of that person's rights?
Finally, nads lunacy and delusion is making her one of the greatest DUers of all time.
-
Nads is screaming about background checks and the gun show loophole so I have a question for the good people here who I know will know the answer. It's my understanding that there are a couple of type of gun shows. The first type is like a flea market for firearms. People in the firearm business (licensed dealers) go there to sell and private individuals also go there to sell. The second type of gun show only allows people in the firearm business to sell. No private sellers are allowed. Regardless of the type of gun show a licensed dealer has to do a background check. A private individual, whether he is selling a gun at a show or his house, does not have to do a background check. Is this correct? If it is, wouldn't this mean that the so-called gun show loophole doesn't really exist?
Also, I assume for a background check to get a firearm you would have to prove who you are which would include providing picture ID. Is this correct? Haven't we learned that forcing someone to produce an ID is a suppression of that person's rights?
Finally, nads lunacy and delusion is making her one of the greatest DUers of all time.
Nads will be happy to know that Virginia repealed its "one gun per month" law this year.
Prior, one could purchase 1 handgun/per month. If you had a CCW permit, this didn't apply to you. Your permit allowed you to be "fasttracked" when buying a handgun: no background check, no waiting period, since all that was done to get the permit in the first place.
Since so many residents now have CCW permits, the law was basically useless.
Where I live here in the "boonies", the only people who end up DRT (Dead Right There) are druggies and transients who don't realize we are extremely well armed, and not afraid to use them. IOW, you shoot at us, we WILL shoot back!
As far as the "gun show loophole", it doesn't exist. Nads is full of shit, as usual. If she is "seeing" people buying guns at gun shows and leaving with them the same day, they are CCW permit holders. No background check needed. Otherwise, they are shipped to the buyer (actually a gun dealer close to where the buyer lives) after the background check is performed.
NYC mayor Bloombutt had to remove his foot from his mouth years ago when he accused Virginia and other southern states of "supplying" the guns used by NYC criminials thru gun shows. He found out the criminal's guns came from B&E crimes, not gun shows. :lmao:
-
nadinbrzezinski (106,468 posts)
36. Been in a few shoot outs myself
And it could work
Update the resume: Gunslinger. Nadin had gunfights at the OK Corral. more than once. Bad guys were shot, but Nadin ** the dwarf with a gun ** came through unscathed.
Nadin is the new Yosemite Sam, the rootin tootin shootinist dwarf with a gun ever!
and she hates the sacking fracking rrrrabit.
-
nadinbrzezinski (106,468 posts)
36. Been in a few shoot outs myself
Nads is the one with mental health issues.
-
The Straight Story (37,642 posts)
34. Oh, and while you are looking up things
How many of our troops have used their guns to kill innocent people? And is that percentage close to the one of people getting guns from gun shows and using those guns to kill people close?
Who do you trust more with guns and other weapons - we the people or the government and their Xe warriors/troops? Cops?
I tend to trust my fellow American more because I have still not bought into the whole 'the government is best' scenario of things.
I, for one, don't want to live in a society where the government has easier access to guns than it's citizens. It's a trust issue - and I think the government has done more wrong with said weapons than the avg person here - and yet some want us to fear one another more.
Dude....
-
Okay. I went and read the whole campfire in its original state on Skins's island.
What's up with this? Another one of nadin's cryptic remarks?
It also means taking things like what some of our radio shock jocks say seriously as well.
Now, really, who's going to take Mike Malloy or Ed Schmultz or that Turkish guy or Randi Rhodes seriously?
-
Okay. I went and read the whole campfire in its original state on Skins's island.
What's up with this? Another one of nadin's cryptic remarks?
Now, really, who's going to take Mike Malloy or Ed Schmultz or that Turkish guy or Randi Rhodes seriously?
Welcome back Frank! I missed you!
-
Okay. I went and read the whole campfire in its original state on Skins's island.
What's up with this? Another one of nadin's cryptic remarks?
Now, really, who's going to take Mike Malloy or Ed Schmultz or that Turkish guy or Randi Rhodes seriously?
DUmmies????????
-
GB shows up to brag about her new pink lady.
-
DUmmies????????
You know I don't listen to radio or watch television; all that I get is via text.
I fail to understand how a "right wing" radio host can inspire left wing lunatics to go out and hurt other people.
I suppose when one looks at text of comments, rather than hearing them, one gets a different "read" off of them.
If nadin wants to take radio (and television) "shock jocks" seriously, and their influence on the actions of nuts, when it comes to incendiary, inflammatory, baiting, bullying, divisive, violence-inspiring comments, she needs to read what.....the current president of the United States says.
-
You know I don't listen to radio or watch television; all that I get is via text.
I fail to understand how a "right wing" radio host can inspire left wing lunatics to go out and hurt other people.
I suppose when one looks at text of comments, rather than hearing them, one gets a different "read" off of them.
If nadin wants to take radio (and television) "shock jocks" seriously, and their influence on the actions of nuts, when it comes to incendiary, inflammatory, baiting, bullying, divisive, violence-inspiring comments, she needs to read what.....the current president of the United States says.
"If they bring a knife to the fight, we'll bring a gun."
I posted the below in another thread.........
Last night the wife was fussing ABC, CBS, NBC all were running a "Shooting Special" and she couldn't watch "Her Show". I was minding my own business and not paying much attention to the TV....then it happened...dude was describing the mental state of a person like this shooter and other shooters in his catergory. He said they think of themselves as having superior intelligence, better equipped than others blah-blah-blah and blame others for their problems/failures....WAIT A MINUTE WAIT A MINUTE....He just described every DUmmie and the President too....I asked the wife exactly what the guy had said and she wasn't listening closely either but I thought how ironic that one of the MSM TV channels just described every left wing idiot, DUmmie, the prez and maybe even themselves and aired it.
-
Welcome back Frank! I missed you!
Hey, I don't mean to thread-jack, but this is as good a place as any--what's going on here?
There appears to be something new.
Once in a while a word in a comment--anyone's comment--is underlined, and if one punches it, one gets a link to something.
When and why did this happen? Or am I the only one it's happening to?
-
Nads is screaming about background checks and the gun show loophole so I have a question for the good people here who I know will know the answer. It's my understanding that there are a couple of type of gun shows. The first type is like a flea market for firearms. People in the firearm business (licensed dealers) go there to sell and private individuals also go there to sell. The second type of gun show only allows people in the firearm business to sell. No private sellers are allowed. Regardless of the type of gun show a licensed dealer has to do a background check. A private individual, whether he is selling a gun at a show or his house, does not have to do a background check. Is this correct? If it is, wouldn't this mean that the so-called gun show loophole doesn't really exist?
Also, I assume for a background check to get a firearm you would have to prove who you are which would include providing picture ID. Is this correct? Haven't we learned that forcing someone to produce an ID is a suppression of that person's rights?
Finally, nads lunacy and delusion is making her one of the greatest DUers of all time.
Chuck,
Gun sales by a gun dealer (FFL holder) are subject to the NICS background check, unless the purchaser holds a concealed carry license issued by the state of residence. Gun sales by private citizens (from me to you, for example) are not subject to the NICS check.
Many private citizens sell their personal weapons at gun shows, which is the so-called "gun show loophole". The only way to "close the "loophole" is to outlaw private sales, which is the real goal of anti-gunners.
-
Hey, I don't mean to thread-jack, but this is as good a place as any--what's going on here?
There appears to be something new.
Once in a while a word in a comment--anyone's comment--is underlined, and if one punches it, one gets a link to something.
When and why did this happen? Or am I the only one it's happening to?
I think what you are seeing Frank is, sometimes when someone makes a comment they add a link to that comment which you can do in 2 ways, 1 the traditional link where the url shows up, or 2 you can make the link appear as a single word. Posters like Mosh Master D do that when they post a DUmp link.
-
I think what you are seeing Frank is, sometimes when someone makes a comment they add a link to that comment which you can do in 2 ways, 1 the traditional link where the url shows up, or 2 you can make the link appear as a single word. Posters like Mosh Master D do that when they post a DUmp link.
Unfortunately no, sir, that's not what I'm seeing.
I'll find an example and screen-capture it, to show what I'm seeing.
I hope I'm not going nuts.
-
Unfortunately no, sir, that's not what I'm seeing.
I'll find an example and screen-capture it, to show what I'm seeing.
I hope I'm not going nuts.
Look on the bright side, if you are going nuts you already have a mole at the nation's number one nuthouse.
-
Look on the bright side, if you are going nuts you already have a mole at the nation's number one nuthouse.
Please notice "arrested" on the signature line above Skul's comment, and the word "printer" on thundley4's quote of something, and his comment. If one clicks on the word, one gets a link.
Surely I'm not the only one who sees this.
-
I see what you're talking about. The strange thing is that I'm using the Leviathan theme for the board on one browser and the default on the other and I'm not getting the link on either.
-
I see what you're talking about. The strange thing is that I'm using the Leviathan theme for the board on one browser and the default on the other and I'm not getting the link on either.
Oh my God, I must be going nuts--or this computer is.
When I punch on the underlined word, I get a little square box that announces I can find out more by clicking on the link in the little square box.
-
Oh my God, I must be going nuts--or this computer is.
When I punch on the underlined word, I get a little square box that announces I can find out more by clicking on the link in the little square box.
Firefox here. Not getting the links.
-
When I move the cursor over the underlined word "continue" for example, this is what I get:
-
Oh my God, I must be going nuts--or this computer is.
When I punch on the underlined word, I get a little square box that announces I can find out more by clicking on the link in the little square box.
I notice that you're using Internet Explorer for a browser so I opened the site with that, and I'm still not getting it. I did used to be a member of a site a couple of years ago that did advertising like that. You didn't even have to click on the word. Just move your mouse over it and a pop-up would appear. Pissed me off.
I'm sure the computer savvy folks here can tell you what's going on.
-
Firefox here. Not getting the links.
That's very odd. Because firefox is exactly what I'm using.
-
I notice that you're using Internet Explorer for a browser so I opened the site with that, and I'm still not getting it. I did used to be a member of a site a couple of years ago that did advertising like that. You didn't even have to click on the word. Just move your mouse over it and a pop-up would appear. Pissed me off.
Uh uh. No way. I use Explorer only as a last resort. I'm on firefox.
-
Uh uh. No way. I use Explorer only as a last resort. I'm on firefox.
Yeah. My bad. It's been so long since I've used Windows exclusively that I noticed the "start" button and jumped to conclusions. If I keep that up the DUmp might welcome me. :-)
-
That's very odd. Because firefox is exactly what I'm using.
Omaha Steve would say that's because we're the same person.
:cheersmate:
-
That is odd. Now I have to go look.
Nope, not getting that, Frank.
I'm suspecting a bit of malware snuck into your machine.
-
That is odd. Now I have to go look.
Nope, not getting that, Frank.
I'm suspecting a bit of malware snuck into your machine.
Yes...has happened to me when our virus protection lapsed. Got that back, and my husband did some resetting on the computer and it went away.
-
nadinbrzezinski (106,478 posts)
11. Sorry, but we do have a direct correlation
between states with what I will call stricter laws and lower gun violence.
Also the idea of a background check at a gun show sends people into fits of fear. We already do this.
Don't worry, none of this will happen, until we have at least twenty more mass shootings, if not more.
So in the meantime, I gotta ask... is it really worth it for me to go to a public space, just in case? That is essentially the choice many people will have to make. Personally, due to the risk of copy cats, at this point I'd rather wait for this movie to come out in DVD...
Nadine, dear ... could you please provide some proof of that? How about whole states, then cities. I'd put the whole state of Texas up against Chicago and DC and Philly and ... I haven't even looked it up but our whole state probably has less gun crime than any ONE of those cities.
KC
-
Yes...has happened to me when our virus protection lapsed. Got that back, and my husband did some resetting on the computer and it went away.
Well, okay, you probably didn't know this, but this computer did some funny things a couple of months--or so--ago, but I'm waiting for it to irretrievably break down, before I bother with hooking up the new one.
One of the mysterious things it did was shift things over to files I can't access.
I'll get around to hooking up the new one sooner or later.....
-
That is odd. Now I have to go look.
Nope, not getting that, Frank.
I'm suspecting a bit of malware snuck into your machine.
That's what happened to me some time back. I wish I could remember what I did to deactivate it. :thatsright:
-
frank, if you don't have Malwarebytes (http://download.cnet.com/Malwarebytes-Anti-Malware/3000-8022_4-10804572.html) I would recommend going to that link and clicking on the green download button. Let that scan your machine and see if it comes up with anything.
KC
-
If Nads could be any more delusional then I bet shes going to give it a huge try.
-
If Nads could be any more delusional then I bet shes going to give it a huge try.
I'm starting to slowly come to the conclusion that nadin might have a mental problem.
Even lunatics, when they've made enough of an ass of themselves, pull back in shame and embarrassment, hoping to hide in the shadows, so others won't see them any more, and think about what an ass they made of themselves.
But nothing stops nadin; like the Eveready Bunny, she goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on, making an ass of herself with no shame.
I'll have to consult Freud, to see if this indicates a mental problem.
-
I think it is simply that, over time, liberal beliefs erode intellectual capacity and in a relatively short while, liberal people end up as little more than arc-reflex machines, always looking for ways to make reality fit their liberal delusions.
Take Roger Ebert, for example, the man cannot be as old as he is and as successful as he's been and yet be as stupid as he appears. Liberal thinking is the link between Ebert, Nads, and the rest of the Reality Challenged.
-
Liberal thinking is the link between Ebert, Nads, and the rest of the Reality Challenged.
Those are two words that don't belong together.
Liberalism is the triumph of emotion over reason.
- David Mamet, The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture
-
I'm starting to slowly come to the conclusion that nadin might have a mental problem.
Even lunatics, when they've made enough of an ass of themselves, pull back in shame and embarrassment, hoping to hide in the shadows, so others won't see them any more, and think about what an ass they made of themselves.
But nothing stops nadin; like the Eveready Bunny, she goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on, making an ass of herself with no shame.
I'll have to consult Freud, to see if this indicates a mental problem.
Here's a DUmmy that asks a simple question about gNads' resume, an easy question to answer, but it won't be answered:SlimJimmy (1,477 posts)
63. I asked before, so this seems like a good time to ask again.
You stated before that you were an ex-cop. When and where?
-
I'm starting to slowly come to the conclusion that nadin might have a mental problem.
Even lunatics, when they've made enough of an ass of themselves, pull back in shame and embarrassment, hoping to hide in the shadows, so others won't see them any more, and think about what an ass they made of themselves.
But nothing stops nadin; like the Eveready Bunny, she goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on, making an ass of herself with no shame.
I'll have to consult Freud, to see if this indicates a mental problem.
Still going. :rotf: Still wrong on most points. :-)
Response to beevul (Reply #59)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:49 AM
nadinbrzezinski (106,560 posts)
62. Nah I am not, just showing how unreasonable some folks really are
Last edited Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:54 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I have been for full, 100% backgrounds for years.
Now here is a question for you though, according to ABC news he actually looked at guns at the local gun store... I even think I know which one it is... but chose to buy his weapons in Colorado and NOT California, Colorado has much loser laws, and no required registration, or background check at the state level. I know, it could be as simple as he didn't want to carry them across state lines... possible. But it could also be because the CALIFORNIA laws are that much stricter and might have "caught him."
Don't worry, the NRA will never, ever let that happen. So these shootings are indeed the new normal. I wonder how many thousands, perhaps even in the tens of thousands of victims, will it take for state and federal legislatures to find one of these... (Yes we have lost over the thousand number of death already when you start adding just the major shootings)
Until then, I expect more mass shootings, and I expect more of this crap. This is the new normal.
And I will have to ask you, why not take the lowest common denominator? Will it stop everyone? Nope, but will it stop enough people to make it worth it? Yup.
Reasonable people agree that REDUCING this is a good thing... not the NRA, but hey.
I know the slippery slope argument, OH MY, next they will come for my guns, RUN! That is an NRA fear based campaign... you seriously think anybody could confiscate 300 million guns? I don't... so no, I am not afraid somebody will take MY guns away. I can still enjoy a shooting day at the range, with no worries whatsoever.
-
Now here is a question for you though, according to ABC news he actually looked at guns at the local gun store... I even think I know which one it is... but chose to buy his weapons in Colorado and NOT California, Colorado has much loser laws, and no required registration, or background check at the state level. I know, it could be as simple as he didn't want to carry them across state lines... possible. But it could also be because the CALIFORNIA laws are that much stricter and might have "caught him."
Background checks were done. He had a clean record with only 1 traffic violation on it. The guns were probably a lot cheaper in Colorado than in Commiefornia, just from taxes alone.
-
I see NAdinnobrains knowledge of gun laws is like her knowledge of everything else loosly based on some liberals version of reality. It's a fact that any place with the strictest gun laws like Australia or Great Britain or New york or D.C. have the highest crime rates but don't let those facts get in your way Nads of posting stupid shit online because there are still some DUmmies left that cheer you on.
-
Nads bouncy on guns from the distant past:
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-11-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. actually at the range when we go it is funny
one guy said, strange to see a girl here, member of the NRA?
Nope, and now no way, them Feds are confiscating guns down south, the Feds are, and the NRA are making the sound of crickets...
Hmm, you liberal?
Was cute
Yes, actually and it is my constitutional right to have a gun, so why is the NRA silent?
His shooting improved.... then he said, you know you are right, they should be making noise, it is them republicans who will take them away, so what you shooting,
Sig 9mm
Here are some pointers... on gun safety... when we left he took his NRA card and tore it apart in front of the gun store staff, and started tellng them about them republcians confiscating gusn down south and the NRA being more silent than crickets...
You just need to know how to talk the talk at times...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=4725725&mesg_id=4737716
Sure he said that Nads. :popcorn:
-
Nads bouncy on guns from the distant past:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=4725725&mesg_id=4737716
Sure he said that Nads. :popcorn:
What the **** was that? Can we add "redneck gun clingin' retard" to it's resume?
-
Here are some pointers... on gun safety... when we left he took his NRA card and tore it apart in front of the gun store staff, and started tellng them about them republcians confiscating gusn down south and the NRA being more silent than crickets...
How does she know what he did once she left?
And the NRA card...Mine's plastic...like a credit card. Kind of hard to "tear it apart"
-
Here are some pointers... on gun safety... when we left he took his NRA card and tore it apart in front of the gun store staff, and started tellng them about them republcians confiscating gusn down south and the NRA being more silent than crickets...
How does she know what he did once she left?
And the NRA card...Mine's plastic...like a credit card. Kind of hard to "tear it apart"
She meant to say before they left, and he used the 8 inch knife that gnads carries on airplanes to cut it up.
-
Sure he said that Nads. :popcorn:
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-11-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. actually at the range when we go it is funny
one guy said, strange to see a girl here.....
That's where nadin stretched things.
A male of average discernment, including those blind, upon encountering nadin for the first time, would never say, ".....strange to see a girl here....."
He'd probably want to be a little more earthy, but being a gentleman, he'd say, "strange to see you here....." staying away from disparaging terms about little women or ugly people.
-
She meant to say before they left, and he used the 8 inch knife that gnads carries on airplanes to cut it up.
I stand corrected... :rofl:
-
That's where nadin stretched things.
A male of average discernment, including those blind, upon encountering nadin for the first time, would never say, ".....strange to see a girl here....."
He'd probably want to be a little more earthy, but being a gentleman, he'd say, "strange to see you here....." staying away from disparaging terms about little women or ugly people.
Having witnessed nadin first hand, no one is ever going to refer to her as a "girl".
-
Having witnessed nadin first hand, no one is ever going to refer to her as a "girl".
That's what I thought.
When looking at nadin, "girl" is about the last word to come to mind.
But we being gentlemen, instead of saying one of the words that do come immediately to mind, would be gracious and just say, ".....to see you here...."
-
Update the resume: Gunslinger. Nadin had gunfights at the OK Corral. more than once. Bad guys were shot, but Nadin ** the dwarf with a gun ** came through unscathed.
Nadin is the new Yosemite Sam, the rootin tootin shootinist dwarf with a gun ever!
and she hates the sacking fracking rrrrabit.
:rotf:
Woah mule, wooooooooooooooooooooah!
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
-
When I says whoa, I means WHOA!!!!
-
It was 2005. She was relatively new. She had to stake a claim as one of the group so she experimented with this story telling (which for a writer, was a rather lacking attempt).
I find it fascinating. Fast-forward to 2012 and she dropped the narrative portion of these fabricated stories and just outright makes stuff up about herself.
-
Cali vs. Nads, fight club, circa 2005:
cali (1000+ posts) Fri Apr-17-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. actually, the focus of the trials- and the first trial- was on the bigwigs
Subsequent trials focused on medical personnel, judges, industrialist such as Krupp and Farbenl, generals and other people who were decidedly not grunts. The closest one comes to the prosecution of grunts is the Einsatzgruppen trial in which SS officers were tried. Most were found guilty, some weren't.
But as usual, you simply make a vague and essentially incorrect and incomplete statement. shoddy, scholarship, Ms. Historian.
My observation indicates that Cali is swift with the google also.
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Fri Apr-17-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You expanded on what I just said
mrs perfeta
Now you want to tell me why you are so against prosecuting these assholes?
Oh wait... never mind mrs. imperial citizen.
Now that is a real dig at Cali referring to her as "mrs." Below the belt Nads. tsk, tsk....
cali (1000+ posts) Fri Apr-17-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. what's with the pathological need to put words in my mouth, dear?
Au contraire, I am for prosecuting the CIA agents who tortured. I am even more pro prosecuting assholes like Bybee and those up the food chain, all the way to bush and cheney.
Is that clear enough for you, sweetie?
And hate to break this to you, Ms. Morally Superior, but you too are a citizen of the Empire.
Oh, and no, my post did not elaborate on yours. It contradicted it and your claim about grunts being prosecuted. Fact is, very, very few were prosecuted.
This may have been the knock-out blow to Nads, the forever American English speaking Mexican who married a gay sailor....
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Fri Apr-17-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Changed your views... GOOD
now time to again ignore what you have to say
By the by... glad to see you changed your views from this morning
As to who is putting words Dearie,that is you
And this is a classic by the way
Good bye...snuckums
Nads was ignoring back in 2005. Snuckums?
cali (1000+ posts) Fri Apr-17-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. wrong once again. nope. my views are exactly the same as they've ever been
just do a search. I absolutely did not say this morning that I was against prosecution of CIA agents who tortured. I tried explainging to you what the legal arguments were. That you can't discern that explaining something is not a de facto endorsement, nadine, is just, well, pathetic.
And really, sweetums, your lack of intellectual dishonesty, is tiresome.
but your pretentious crap, is always good for a laugh or two.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5478962&mesg_id=5480201
Cali 1, Nads 0
-
Snuckums.
That one actually made me smile.
-
Well someone needs to stick up for Nads, so I will be the devils advocate - ready, set. go.
Nads is into the new speak we run across every day. A person that works as a hair washer needs no license in most states but go on to tell people she is a Hair Stylist.
A 16 year old that works part time changing oil at local garage now calls themselves a Mechanic.
A 15 year old girl that babysits for friends and neighbors is now a child care specialist.
You do understand, I hope that he guys that ride on the back of a garbage truck are now environmental clean up specialists.
A checker at the grocery store are now customers relations specialist. Anyone that ever sold Avon door to door is now a Beautician. The people that fry french fries at Burger King are now a cook at a major nationally known restaurant.
So Nads may in fact be a free lance reporter for cat bites dog stories, Just because her name is used on a news paper site does not mean she is being paid a salary to do so. Perhaps by the story printed.
At one time a patient came in from an accident and I spent 30 minute picking shards of glass out of their arm, so now I can say I operated on them. I am a Surgeon.
New speak, changing the names of things to maximise the idea that we are better then others.
The being in a gun fight may have meant as an EMT they responded to a police call and kept the Ambulance 200 yards back from the area and the police and Perp shot it out. OK, as the EMTS moved in to pick up the wounded or dead Nads felt she had been in the middle of a gun fight.
All of us are trained Historians if we ever took a class in History in grade school. New Speak.
Got to read between the lines with Nads, so she takes out her garbage a couple times a week, now she is an expert on toxic substances and disposal.
-
Damn, vesta dear, that's good.
No sarcasm intended; trust me, that's good.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
-
I agree with frank. Vesta, that has to be one of your best posts.
-
Bravo Zulu, vesta!
-
Hi 5 Vesta!
-
Kudos grudgingly given Vesta.
As to Nads, a term I picked up in the real military comes to mind, "crazier than a shit house rat". I really have no idea exactly what it means but, it sounds appropriate.
-
Kudos grudgingly given Vesta.
As to Nads, a term I picked up in the real military comes to mind, "crazier than a shit house rat mouse". I really have no idea exactly what it means but, it sounds appropriate.
:-)
-
:runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:
IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!!!
Vesta, I gave you another H5. That's 3 or 4 in the last few days. :thatsright:
-
Frank,
Did you fix the problem with links you mentioned? If not, look at your Firefox extensions and see if you have something called Yontoo. If so, disable it (and uninstall if Firefox will allow), and then uninstall the program from Control Panel > programs.
I had a few problems with my laptop a few weeks ago, and this was one of them. I think Yontoo was the issue. Some type of malware installed it.
-
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-11-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. actually at the range when we go it is funny
one guy said, strange to see a girl here, member of the NRA?
Every range I've been on for handguns, indoor or outdoor, has a table you stand behind while shooting. The table defines the firing line, and provides a place for your gunbox, targets, ammunition, scope, and whatever other junk you bring to the range. That table is invariably higher than nutcase nadin's head. I wonder if range rules allow you to shoot from underneath the table. I don't believe I've ever heard the question arise.
-
vesta is REALLY coming around. Her posts of late are MUST READS, and even franksolich has been complimentary. When franksolitch speaks, people listen, especially me !
-
Frank,
Did you fix the problem with links you mentioned? If not, look at your Firefox extensions and see if you have something called Yontoo. If so, disable it (and uninstall if Firefox will allow), and then uninstall the program from Control Panel > programs.
I had a few problems with my laptop a few weeks ago, and this was one of them. I think Yontoo was the issue. Some type of malware installed it.
No, I just took them down, period, as they had a little tiny bit of "too much information" about three posters here; posters whom I greatly admire and respect. (But even if they weren't posters I admire and respect, I would've taken them down anyway.)
I had forgotten, when screen-capturing them, that as a moderator, I have more stuff on my screen than a member has. I need to keep this in mind. "My" screen is NOT the same as everybody else's.
If the elusive enigmatic Elad had come across the thread, he would've been able to spot that, and detect whether or not any of these three members have moles on Skins's island. But in between the time they were posted, and then deleted, only six or half a dozen people (members or lurkers) had read the thread, so the odds are pretty good nobody caught anything.
My thanks to Ballygrl for having yelled at me about this (in a members-only forum).
-
Ah- I didn't even see the screenshots you took down. I was thinking in general. I had that same problem and I think I first noticed it on DU. All those blue links reminded me of Prononsense's posts.
-
H5 Vesta
-
vesta is REALLY coming around. Her posts of late are MUST READS, and even franksolich has been complimentary. When franksolitch speaks, people listen, especially me !
We are curative! But, I refer you to my post of a few, above . . . :runaway:
-
And the NRA card...Mine's plastic...like a credit card. Kind of hard to "tear it apart"
Exactly. I knew she was full of shit (at least with this post) the minute she bounced on that fact. :lmao: