banned from Kos (3,120 posts)
Please do not attack Ann Romney in public forums. [View all]
It is OK here of course. But -
1- Mitt provides plenty of opportunity.
2- Ann won't make policy decisions.
3- Independents will defend her! (like reasonable people defend Michelle)
4- It makes you look petty.
Thanks.
cali (71,797 posts)
23. bullshit. she's an entitled nasty piece of work.
The Velveteen Ocelot (31,423 posts)
29. It's easy to be "wonderful" and "brave" when you're richer than God
and have hired help to raise your kids and train your dressage horses and mow the lawns at all your houses and polish your Cadillacs and operate your car elevator and dust your priceless antiques and wash your clothes and pilot your airplane and fix your hair and and prepare your meals and polish your toenails and hand you your silk dressing gown and warmed towels as you emerge from your marble shower with gold faucets.
tpsbmam (3,577 posts)
30. Brave? Why.....because she has MS? Oooooo, I've had it for 26 years.....
that must make me brave.....wooohooo! Actually, I'm braver because during that time I went to grad school, completed a Ph.D., worked half time the entire time I was in grad school to support myself, and then worked my ass off for a couple of decades before FINALLY giving in to the ravages of MS and stopping work.....and then getting shut out of Medicare because of a preposterous loophole and now I support myself on the small IRA I built over the years, I've become a virtual shut-in due to lack of transportation beyond going to medical appointments for me and my power wheelchair (a second-hand one which I thankfully got donated).......I have one thing in my favor though.....with my myriad of medical problems caused primarily by the MS & associated autonomic dysreflexia, I'll likely die before I run through my entire IRA. Woohoo!
Ann Romney brave. Bite me. I know MANY brave people -- she ain't even close.
cali (71,797 posts)
22. I'll ****ing say what I please about her where I please to, and when I please.
thanks.
DonRedwood (114 posts)
36. Personal attacks-no. But what about when she wears a tshirt that costs more than most people
make in a couple of weeks. I believe that that excess like that in the family of a presidential candidate says a lot about the candidate himself.
But comparing her to a hog.... ;0(
RagAss (11,803 posts)
73. Please Don't Post About Who The **** We Can Attack !!!!
Do you see the ****ing Pukes doing that.??? And they tore us a new asshole in 2010 !!!!!!!!
**** gthis decency shit ! These mother****ers want us dead - and some of us are ****ing sick of it !
Who gives a shit about anything Romney !!
Michelle Obama wears $3,000 dresses with $500 tennis shoes, eats wagyu beef, and takes expensive vacations- and you and I are paying for all of it.
How much has Ann Romney cost me or my country in the past 4 years? Not one red cent.
Think on that, DUmmies.
They complain about the price of Ann Romney's clothing and her horses? What petty little ants they are. Her husband supports her and loves her and provides for her the way any man would who has been a successful businessman.
Without taxpayer dollars, the First Sasquatch wouldn't be dressing, eating, or flying around like she does.
(http://i1127.photobucket.com/albums/l631/emjwarner/michelle-obama-ugly-15.jpg)
cali (71,797 posts)
22. I'll ****ing say what I please about her where I please to, and when I please.
thanks.
Do you realize you are responding to an attack on Ann Romney be attacking Michelle Obama?
Classic
Do you realize you are responding to an attack on Ann Romney be attacking Michelle Obama?
Classic
and the attacks continue... the OP at DU was trying to keep things civil, that seems to have escaped many who responded to him/her, and many here.
and the attacks continue... the OP at DU was trying to keep things civil, that seems to have escaped many who responded to him/her, and many here.
Being partially right is not like being.............right.
So it is O.K. to attack someone on the left using the exact same techniques that you are condemning the left of doing to the right?
Some other examples from the same thread:
Seems like this person has a political point of view but agrees with the OP.
"Those on the right that does often earns the disdain and contempt of the more moderate element of society. They LOSE ground and support when they go to those levels.
It only makes sense.. Those on the right that attack First Lady Michelle Obama, or the children, and those who support those who would stoop to that level.. those persons never were, are not now, nor ever will be potential supporters of Democrats in any election. However, the moderate element, you know, the ones that really decides the vote for the President, the Senate, and the House... They tend to find such attacks offensive.
Let them focus on the first Lady and the family.. it will help us.
Let us focus on Mittens, his corporatist positions, his own words from the primaries.. THAT will help us.
That's my hones opinion at least.
Yeah, it does feel good to lower ourselves to the same level some times.. that temporary good feeling of hitting back below the belt with the same sucker punches.. but that is a temporary feeling of euphoria. The real, and lasting enjoyment is kicking their collective arses in the election process..
Let's Keep the Presidency...
Let's Keep and GROW the Senate majority...
Let's Reclaim the House of Representatives...
Let's get Kennedy and Scalia replaced with Democrat nominated, and Democrat confirmed Justices!!!!"
Did you write that?
Nope, just cross checking the two threads.
Some other examples from the same thread:
Seems like this person has a political point of view but agrees with the OP.
"Those on the right that does often earns the disdain and contempt of the more moderate element of society. They LOSE ground and support when they go to those levels.
It only makes sense.. Those on the right that attack First Lady Michelle Obama, or the children, and those who support those who would stoop to that level.. those persons never were, are not now, nor ever will be potential supporters of Democrats in any election. However, the moderate element, you know, the ones that really decides the vote for the President, the Senate, and the House... They tend to find such attacks offensive.
Let them focus on the first Lady and the family.. it will help us.
Let us focus on Mittens, his corporatist positions, his own words from the primaries.. THAT will help us.
That's my hones opinion at least.
Yeah, it does feel good to lower ourselves to the same level some times.. that temporary good feeling of hitting back below the belt with the same sucker punches.. but that is a temporary feeling of euphoria. The real, and lasting enjoyment is kicking their collective arses in the election process..
Let's Keep the Presidency...
Let's Keep and GROW the Senate majority...
Let's Reclaim the House of Representatives...
Let's get Kennedy and Scalia replaced with Democrat nominated, and Democrat confirmed Justices!!!!"
Matthew 7:3.
Get back to us when you've spoken truth to power at the DUodenum.
I offer Luke 6:42
“How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take out the speck that is in your brother's eye.â€
The problem BeMature is that poster is incorrect in thinking that it feels good for the left to lower themselves to the same level sometimes. If the poster, or you, spent much time reading DU instead of just posting on it he/she/it would realize that the left in general and DU in specific stays in the sewer.
If you wish to deny it, we can post examples.
Well, you are the one bitching about the DU & you claim to be a member. How are we supposed to straighten them out?
I offer Luke 6:42
“How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take out the speck that is in your brother's eye.â€
Not here to defend DU, a Google search resulted in the flame wars going on between the sites. Just having a little fun holding up a mirror and wasting a bit of time.
I'm done with your group now, got my hour of research done. Have a great day.
You can access both sites without being a member, amazing thing about most discussion forms on the web.
You can post on DU without being a member? I did not know that.
Not here to defend DU, a Google search resulted in the flame wars going on between the sites. Just having a little fun holding up a mirror and wasting a bit of time.
I'm done with your group now, got my hour of research done. Have a great day.
QuoteNot here to defend DU, a Google search resulted in the flame wars going on between the sites. Just having a little fun holding up a mirror and wasting a bit of time.
I'm done with your group now, got my hour of research done. Have a great day.
Not here to defend DU, a Google search resulted in the flame wars going on between the sites. Just having a little fun holding up a mirror and wasting a bit of time.
I'm done with your group now, got my hour of research done. Have a great day.
Not here to defend DU, a Google search resulted in the flame wars going on between the sites. Just having a little fun holding up a mirror and wasting a bit of time.
I'm done with your group now, got my hour of research done. Have a great day.
Dude, you can access both sites. One of your other members asked me if I wrote the one response and the answer was "nope."Dude? You don't suppose that BeMature could be Ol' Stinky, do you?
Food gets done, people become finished... and we are supposed to be the knuckle dragging neanderthals? I know that and grammar isn't even my strong point!!
Here is the way I see it, BeMature. Your side consistently spews virulent hatred to anyone that does not agree with them. They attack, attack, attack! Your side consistently tells me I am voting against my best self interest. Your side calls me an ignorant raaaacist because I do not agree politically with obama. Your side compares me to a nazi. Your side celebrates the death of anyone that does not agree with them politically and would dance on my grave if I were to pass. Your side puts down my religion and yet you come over here and proceed to lecture me on civility?
You can partake of organic waste matter and perish as far as I am concerned. Go back to your hatred filled echo chamber. You fit in well there.
Do you realize you are responding to an attack on Ann Romney by attacking Michelle Obama?
Classic
Well done Sir/Madam, you found the exact reason for my contempt. While going back and forth between the sites I found a thread in which your side appears to be doing some grave dancing. The only thing that the sides seem to agree upon is a person died.
Funny thing is it took a bit of digging to find it at DU, found multiple threads here though. I think certain cave dwellers need a hug! And this it what you call game set and match folks. Needed a great internet battle for some research and you gave it to me, with all the internal conflicts complete with the lead of accusations of grave dancing while the person is simultaneously grave dancing. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
"I KNEW it! That's what I thought when I was looking at his pic. "I'm looking at a fat, gay Conan O'Brien!"
Sorry. Where are my manners, a late fat, gay Conan O'Brien."
"and in a ghoulish twist DU now uses the death as a means to attack any and all enemies of the site. Andy is no martyr. He was a DUmmy through and through. A political activist, his wages were skimmed off the money he raised for various causes. Hence it was normal for Andy to not give a full accounting of what he did with his fundraising: its the cause/never question the cause. Andy lived the DU dream, never really working a day in his life. '
"You know what, DUmbass lurkers? **** Andy. Idiots like him are why we have millions of people out of work right now not being able to provide for their families. Your, and his, Damn ideology is destroying our economy, you ****ing idiots. I'm supposed to care about some idiot who died because he was too Damn stupid to get the right care?
Again, **** ANDY. "
"I kinda wondered if he didn't die of aids.
Was there any definitive cause of death published? (by the state, not DU)"
"I just assumed he had gay cancer and that panceatic cancer was just a cover story. "
Interesting BeMature doesn't seem to hold the DUmp to the same standards he wants to hold us to.
For sheer vile hate, DU eclipses all other sites.
I repeat my challenge. Go back to DU and post that verse you quoted. Tell them to calm down and lets asee how well you are received.
Oh and one last thing. You can come here and say these things...I cannot go there without being banned. Thus we see why we will always be better than the slime at DU. We are not afraid of free speech.
Outstanding suggestion, I am going to post the same thing over there. Under same name.
Outstanding suggestion, I am going to post the same thing over there. Under same name.I get a strong sense you have been to CC before under at least one pseudonym. The moral equivalency you have a deathgrip on isn't anywhere near equal. Libs behave badly, and when conservatives point the fact out using the lib behavior as a model, the hypocrisy goes off the scale.
BeMature (1 post)
99. WHOA!!!
Do many of you realize you are responding to attacks on Michelle Obama with attacks on Ann Romney?
Classic
Look at the hate filled responses in this thread then compare them to the Conservative Cave responses.
Outstanding suggestion, I am going to post the same thing over there. Under same name.
Outstanding suggestion, I am going to post the same thing over there. Under same name.If you were brave you would use your DU name.
It's there. BeMature at DU (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002914372#post99)
cali (71,797 posts)
22. I'll ****ing say what I please about her where I please to, and when I please.
thanks.
cali (71,797 posts)Isn't Cali the one that got fired for lying about the restaurant she worked at. Telling people she assumed to be republicans that the place was infested with insects? Online. Public domain...
22. I'll ****ing say what I please about her where I please to, and when I please.
thanks.
He/ahe/it is going to get smacked around for that. Notice he/she/it didn't use their regular DUmmy name.
First response is in: (I got a welcome!)
"Welcome to DU!
BeMature! "
Star Member demtenjeep (21,315 posts):tongue: :tongue: :tongue:
85. like this
View profile
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,75143.0.html
God bless them one and all. (OK, he didn't say that, I just didn't want to repeat his foul language.)
He/ahe/it is going to get smacked around for that. Notice he/she/it didn't use their regular DUmmy name.
Post that verse, and I'll Hi5 you.
I offer Luke 6:42
“How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take out the speck that is in your brother's eye.â€
He/she/it (didn't make fun of your misspelling)
That is right out of the Saul Alinsky handbook..
First response is in: (I got a welcome!)
"Welcome to DU!
BeMature! "
Star Member Bluenorthwest (19,706 posts)
103. Any other Republican operatives you'd like to protect?
She's an important facet of their campaign, she is active. And you think she should be allowed massive media time without facing criticism, why exactly? Please be specific. And list the other Mitt surrogates you think should float above all criticism.
Be Mature. You are a COWARD! I thought you were brave enough to post this verse. Post that verse, and I'll Hi5 you.
Why am I a coward, if someone quotes scripture I will respond, exactly like I did on this forum.
So far I have a welcome that posters here claim is a threat, we shall see.
Note, I did not receive a welcome here, and have had numerous assumptions and accusations thrown at me.
If the welcome was a threat, at least the person attempted to be civil, perhaps to gain a bit more understanding of my intent.
Why am I a coward, if someone quotes scripture I will respond, exactly like I did on this forum.
So far I have a welcome that posters here claim is a threat, we shall see.
Note, I did not receive a welcome here, and have had numerous assumptions and accusations thrown at me.
If the welcome was a threat, at least the person attempted to be civil, perhaps to gain a bit more understanding of my intent.
Ruby the Liberal (19,394 posts)
105. Conservative Cave?
Guessing that there aren't any references to Moochelle or The First Chimp (etc) over there, right?
Ruby the Liberal (19,396 posts)
109. Like this one? Google: Michelle dress
First Wookie wears dress
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=72363.0
First Wookie? Stay classy, y'all.
Why am I a coward, if someone quotes scripture I will respond, exactly like I did on this forum.Nice dodge. You will use scripture here, but your afraid to use it there.
Nice dodge. You will use scripture here, but your afraid to use it there.
I stand by my statement. You are a coward.
Nice dodge. You will use scripture here, but your afraid to use it there.
I stand by my statement. You are a coward.
Calling the first lady Pickles? Stay classy, y'all.
BeMature (4 posts)
110. If she comments on policy then I think she is fair game.
View profile
I believe the OP was talking about petty issues such as what someone wears. Ann and Michelle will certainly get drawn into policy debates and if they make a comment that should be fair game. People making fun of minor children or wives appearance should not be accepted.
Same thing with Michelle and what she wrote in college, that is out of bounds, and I personally don't care what a person wrote for a paper when he or she was 20 or 21. Two reasons, I know how those papers are written and edited.
So to be clear, I don't believe she should be protected when she discusses policy positions.
111. Whatever ...false comparison ...epic fail defending repukes.
Enjoy your stay.
I did google 'Michelle dress' and this site did not come up at all. Those racist bigots at the DUmp are so stupid.
They all champion Mooch-elle and her high flying 'TAX PAYER' life style, and degrade Ann with her 'SELF PAYING' life style. Typical hypocrites they are.
And this ..... I can guarantee that if BM did post anything scripture wise over there, they would hide the post and ban him. He should learn that they hate Christianity, babies, the flag, the troops, this country, and God.
I think I know what they are referring too. Michelle wore a very hideous dress in public, on more than one occasion, and everyone said it was 'ugly'. It must have really really upset the DU members. :(
I must have missed that one?Remember those boob belts Moochelle wears? I once said, "Michelle wears suicide belt: blows up fashion sense."
Remember those boob belts Moochelle wears? I once said, "Michelle wears suicide belt: blows up fashion sense."
I don't believe I ever seen those. Or maybe I did and didn't know what they were, or wasn't paying attention?Oh no. You're going to make me post a picture?
Oh no. You're going to make me post a picture?
(http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/6940/51152399.jpg)
BeMatrue wooses out. Pathetic. He's a DUmmy through and through.
No courage to stand up to the herd mentality.
How would that be "wussing" out? Think for a minute, a spouse of a candidate should be able to be questioned on policy as should anyone in the campaign. They should not be called out for appearance.
Rather than personal attacks from your site the person responding to me, although annoyed, asked me a question in a respectful manner.
How would that be "wussing" out? Think for a minute, a spouse of a candidate should be able to be questioned on policy as should anyone in the campaign. They should not be called out for appearance.Yeah right. LIAR. I read the responses, and we posted them here for all to see.
Rather than personal attacks from your site the person responding to me, although annoyed, asked me a question in a respectful manner.
Yeah right. LIAR. I read the responses, and we posted them here for all to see.
Now quote the scripture you quoted here. Come on. You took the challenge.
Stop trying to weasel out of it.
What did/do you think of all the crap that Sarah Palin and her family took/take?
This is a good question -- DU and other liberal sites attacked her for reasons well beyond the scope of politics - from 'Caribou Barbie' to conspiracy theories about whose kids are whose.
They photoshopped the bejeesus out of her.
They wrongly attributed a quote by Tina Fey to her ( I can see Russia from my house )- and even when presented with that fact, they continued to do so, in the spirit of 'fake, but accurate'
They cheered when a reporter moved in next door to her, because his intentions were to dig up as much dirt on Palin as humanly possible.
They insulted everything about her, from her weight, clothes, eyeglasses, and accent.
Its easy enough to find using Google - not to mention the hundreds of references linked to right here.
Well done Sir/Madam, you found the exact reason for my contempt. While going back and forth between the sites I found a thread in which your side appears to be doing some grave dancing. The only thing that the sides seem to agree upon is a person died.
Funny thing is it took a bit of digging to find it at DU, found multiple threads here though. I think certain cave dwellers need a hug! And this it what you call game set and match folks. Needed a great internet battle for some research and you gave it to me, with all the internal conflicts complete with the lead of accusations of grave dancing while the person is simultaneously grave dancing. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
"I KNEW it! That's what I thought when I was looking at his pic. "I'm looking at a fat, gay Conan O'Brien!"
Sorry. Where are my manners, a late fat, gay Conan O'Brien."
"and in a ghoulish twist DU now uses the death as a means to attack any and all enemies of the site. Andy is no martyr. He was a DUmmy through and through. A political activist, his wages were skimmed off the money he raised for various causes. Hence it was normal for Andy to not give a full accounting of what he did with his fundraising: its the cause/never question the cause. Andy lived the DU dream, never really working a day in his life. '
"You know what, DUmbass lurkers? **** Andy. Idiots like him are why we have millions of people out of work right now not being able to provide for their families. Your, and his, Damn ideology is destroying our economy, you ****ing idiots. I'm supposed to care about some idiot who died because he was too Damn stupid to get the right care?
Again, **** ANDY. "
"I kinda wondered if he didn't die of aids.
Was there any definitive cause of death published? (by the state, not DU)"
"I just assumed he had gay cancer and that panceatic cancer was just a cover story. "
Again, think for a minute. I responded to someone who posted scripture by quoting scripture and said I would do the same if someone at DU posted scripture. Why is that difficult for you to understand?
You incorrectly called me a LIAR and I attempted to weasel out of JACK!
Interesting BeMature doesn't seem to hold the DUmp to the same standards he wants to hold us to.
For sheer vile hate, DU eclipses all other sites.
I repeat my challenge. Go back to DU and post that verse you quoted. Tell them to calm down and lets asee how well you are received.
Oh and one last thing. You can come here and say these things...I cannot go there without being banned. Thus we see why we will always be better than the slime at DU. We are not afraid of free speech.
Outstanding suggestion, I am going to post the same thing over there. Under same name.
Amerigo Vespucci (29,854 posts)
113. I think that if she keeps her ****ing YAP shut about politics, no one will attack her
With all due respect, I don't believe that reacting to Ann's "armchair quarterbacking" of how Obama's done his job makes anyone "look petty."
So far, I see a rival to Lynne Cheney in the "I just don't know when to shut the **** up" sweepstakes. Nothing wrong with her having an opinion. But that puts her in the public debate arena and that means....
Fair game. Peace and OUT.
Nope. The challenge was:
Again -- "I repeat my challenge. Go back to DU and post that verse you quoted. Tell them to calm down..."
You said:
You didn't.
.
The hypocracy is from the banned from kos pirimitive saying "let's lay off." If they really meant that, they wouldn't be a participant on a site like DU because they wouldn't want to be associated with a site that has, does, and will continue to do just that. The whole OP was hypocritical from the onset.
.
Please do not attack Ann Romney in public forums.
It is OK here of course. But -
1- Mitt provides plenty of opportunity.
2- Ann won't make policy decisions.
3- Independents will defend her! (like reasonable people defend Michelle)
4- It makes you look petty.
Thanks.
Banned is blatantly suggesting to the hive to hide their opinions from the public. In essence, to lie. Which we all know is one of the things that the primitives do best.
Quite the reception you got at DU, BeMature,
Posting Privileges Revoked
Revoked on Reason Revoked by
Jul 8, 2012 Right wing troll.
Quite the reception you got at DU, BeMature,S
Posting Privileges Revoked
Revoked on Reason Revoked by
Jul 8, 2012 Right wing troll.
That's a shame... [/Seinfeld]
And BM... Not to brag, but I told you that 'welcome' was a threat. I also told you that 'enjoy your stay' was a threat before anyone posted it. The only thing that hasn't happened so far is a reference to pizza. That may still show up 'after the fact'
So, either I need to quit my job delivering mail, and go to work for Mrs. Cleo, or maybe the primitives are as predictable as the sunrise in the east.
Has anyone heard from BeMature lately? Been looking all over.
Again, think for a minute. I responded to someone who posted scripture by quoting scripture and said I would do the same if someone at DU posted scripture. Why is that difficult for you to understand?Liar, liar pants on fire.
You incorrectly called me a LIAR and I attempted to weasel out of JACK!
I was thinking about what a boring day it's been and then I come here and see we have a new toy to play with.
:nelson:
BTW, I just gave you that hi5, for learning a hard lesson about the tolerance of liberals. You softened your message, and still they banned you for working outside of their belief system ever so slightly.
You can add that to your research - that the self-professed party of peace, love, and tolerance is anything but, and us narrow-minded hardnose rethuglikkkan knuckledraggers are still willing to read what you type here.
Ain't learning new things grand ?
I wouldn't be too proud. One site did not spend a whole lot of time trying to determine my opinion and banned me, the other immediately attacked and made incorrect assumptions. Both seemed to fail miserably at having any type of thought questioned.
:cheersmate:
I wouldn't be too proud. One site did not spend a whole lot of time trying to determine my opinion and banned me, the other immediately attacked and made incorrect assumptions. Both seemed to fail miserably at having any type of thought questioned.
:cheersmate:
We disagreed with you. Incorrect assumptions my butt. You got your ass handed to you in what? 30 min. over there. If you come to a forum without a proper introduction and immediately spout condescending criticism, you better expect return fire.
The proof is in the pudding. You are still here whining.
You should be the proudest, because you are the biggest ass between both sites. You start with a welcome jumping on a minor typo even though you had typos in your replies, and later jumped to numerous incorrect conclusions. You my man, are a keyboard warrior of the lamest degree. You have my respect for your absolute lameness exceeded by no others.
I wouldn't be too proud. One site did not spend a whole lot of time trying to determine my opinion and banned me, the other immediately attacked and made incorrect assumptions. Both seemed to fail miserably at having any type of thought questioned.
:cheersmate:
Do you realize you are responding to an attack on Ann Romney by attacking Michelle Obama?
Classic
Look at the hate filled responses then compare them to the DU responses. :argh:
and the attacks continue... the OP at DU was trying to keep things civil, that seems to have escaped many who responded to him/her, and many here.
You should be the proudest, because you are the biggest ass between both sites. You start with a welcome jumping on a minor typo even though you had typos in your replies, and later jumped to numerous incorrect conclusions. You my man, are a keyboard warrior of the lamest degree. You have my respect for your absolute lameness exceeded by no others.
Do you realize you are responding to an attack on Ann Romney by attacking Michelle Obama?
Classic
Look at the hate filled responses then compare them to the DU responses. :argh:
and the attacks continue... the OP at DU was trying to keep things civil, that seems to have escaped many who responded to him/her, and many here.
You can access both sites without being a member, amazing thing about most discussion forms on the web.
Ruby the Liberal (19,396 posts)
109. Like this one? Google: Michelle dress
First Wookie wears dress
http://www.conservativeca...m/index.php?topic=72363.0
First Wookie? Stay classy, y'all.
I went to DU and posted the exact same thing I posted in the opening post on this forum. Only change was to reverse Obama/Romney. The objective was to see what paths the posts would take on two different sites. I am not going to respond to someone or put in a post out of context to meet your objective. If you want to engage in that experiment you create some accounts. Again, if someone responds to me with scripture I will respond in kind.
Oh, it sounds like your butt hurts. Try some A&D ointment.
You probably shouldn't call Bad Dog your man. People will talk.
Leave it to you to find the smutty angle. What ImMature & I have is very special much like some prison romances. If I might be so bold, perhaps your time would be better spent on your OS treatise.
Do you realize you are responding to an attack on Ann Romney by attacking Michelle Obama?
Classic
Look at the hate filled responses then compare them to the DU responses. :argh: