The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dane on July 07, 2012, 05:14:38 AM

Title: Potential 'add on' to Nad's resume. Magazine critic.
Post by: dane on July 07, 2012, 05:14:38 AM
Quote
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10366648
nadinbrzezinski (105,886 posts)
 Time life got a basic photography mag
It's a guide to digi photography, pretty good. 

But even this short critique is not clear

Quote
canonfodder (31 posts)
1. Don't understand
I'm afraid I don't understand what you're refering to.
Some help would be appreciated.
Title: Re: Potential 'add on' to Nad's resume. Magazine critic.
Post by: jukin on July 07, 2012, 06:32:47 PM
IIRC, nadainthebrain had just topped six figures in the post count in January. How the hell do you post 6000 times in six months?
Title: Re: Potential 'add on' to Nad's resume. Magazine critic.
Post by: ChuckJ on July 07, 2012, 06:41:35 PM
IIRC, nadainthebrain had just topped six figures in the post count in January. How the hell do you post 6000 times in six months?

Well, she does have to say, "You're wrong" and "look it up" a lot. Plus every time a raindrop falls she has to explain what to do to the DUmmies.
Title: Re: Potential 'add on' to Nad's resume. Magazine critic.
Post by: Skul on July 07, 2012, 07:05:33 PM
Kind of bad when she baffles even pro photographers.  :rotf:
Title: Re: Potential 'add on' to Nad's resume. Magazine critic.
Post by: Ballygrl on July 07, 2012, 07:33:43 PM
Is this worthy to put on the Resume?
Title: Re: Potential 'add on' to Nad's resume. Magazine critic.
Post by: dane on July 07, 2012, 08:02:19 PM
Is this worthy to put on the Resume?

Absolutely.  When one looks at the most recent resume update (June), any and all obscure facets of her ever-widening skillset have been included.
Title: Re: Potential 'add on' to Nad's resume. Magazine critic.
Post by: Ballygrl on July 07, 2012, 09:22:10 PM
Absolutely.  When one looks at the most recent resume update (June), any and all obscure facets of her ever-widening skillset have been included.

OK!