The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: thundley4 on June 14, 2012, 01:27:32 PM
-
Why are the Democratic surrogates on the cable shows so crappy while the Repubs are so much better?
Is there a boot camp that the Dem. surrogates could go to please? The Republicans are totally full of shit, have their facts all wrong, BUT they all have the same playbook and same set of talking points and they stick to those points come Hell or High Water.
And the Democrats seem unable to refute even the most obvious of bullshit.
I just watched Debbie Dingell and Alfonse D'Amato on Faux News. He repeatedly kept pounding the "facts" that Pres. Obama has had him time to fix things and things have gotten WORSE. He shoudn't get a do-over yada yada.
Why was Dingell unable to come back with FACTS about how many jobs were being LOST when Pres. Obama took office versus GAINED now? Is that truly so difficult?
The best she could do was stammer something about well everyone agrees it is bad now, but Obama will win the argument about what to do for the future.
It was disgustingly embarassing.
The Republicans win the argument everytime even with Bullshit because they all say the same thing over and over and over and the general public starts to believe it. The Democratic surrogates are all over the place.
Where is the full throated defense of Obama and his policies? The full throated attack on the Republican Lies?
Is there no Democratic Frank Luntz who can give them their talking points?
Sorry for length of this whine, but it is so frustrating watching this over and over.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002807845
Sorry DUmmies. Just because you like to call something a fact, doesn't make it so.
jehop61 (81 posts)
1. Perhaps
your problem is that your watching Faux News. Check out Up with Chris Hayes on the weekends or anyone Rachel Maddow has on. I've never heard of the two you mentioned above. They can't be very important or informed.
Step into the echo chamber where no dissenting opinions are allowed.
russspeakeasy (3,554 posts)
2. I have wondered this for years. They come accross as a bunch
of followers. Too afraid to offend.
Liberals are always offensive. Still, you have a point about them being like sheep. Skinner has a nice flock.
BlueCaliDem (3,160 posts)
3. Faux News know which Democrats they book. They're the Republican media
and the last thing they want is to have a strong Democratic surrogate to defend President Obama.
What are you watching Faux News Channel? Don't you know that when you do, you support their fixing the viewership numbers?
Obama and Biden both have standing invitations from all Fox programs. Why are they afraid to go on Fox? They know their bullshit won't work.
FarLeftFist (5,919 posts)
4. We find it hard to delve into the world of bat-shittery the way they do. Plus,
Their tactic is one of uncivilized debate; just scream the loudest and over-talk your opponent. We were raised better than that.
:bwah:
-
It is always best to tell the truth. Then, you don't have to work so hard to keep your story straight. Billy Jeff exempted.
-
Why was Dingell unable to come back with FACTS about how many jobs were being LOST when Pres. Obama took office versus GAINED now? Is that truly so difficult?
Isn't that weird?
Kind of like how 9/11 was all Bush's fault even though the majority of the planning and staging had been done while Clinton was in office.
Funny how logic like that can come back to haunt you isn't it?
-
FarLeftFist (5,919 posts)
4. We find it hard to delve into the world of bat-shittery the way they do. Plus,
Their tactic is one of uncivilized debate; just scream the loudest and over-talk your opponent. We were raised better than that.
Ed (I generally stay drunk) Shultz - I rest my case.
-
FarLeftFist (5,919 posts)
4. We find it hard to delve into the world of bat-shittery the way they do. Plus,
Their tactic is one of uncivilized debate; just scream the loudest and over-talk your opponent. We were raised better than that.
Just mentioned MSNBC.
jehop61 (81 posts)
1. Perhaps
your problem is that your watching Faux News. Check out Up with Chris Hayes on the weekends or anyone Rachel Maddow has on. I've never heard of the two you mentioned above. They can't be very important or informed.
And anyone on MSNBC is informed? Why are MSNBC's ratings so bad again?
-
Just mentioned MSNBC.
And anyone on MSNBC is informed? Why are MSNBC's ratings so bad again?
According to the DUmmies it is because the Teabagging cable companies and satellite providers shoved MesSNBC to the 3rd tier of channels you have to pay extra for.
-
According to the DUmmies it is because the Teabagging cable companies and satellite providers shoved MesSNBC to the 3rd tier of channels you have to pay extra for.
We still get it. Would gladly swap for Mil, Nat Geo or another shopping chan.
-
Egalitarian Thug (1,634 posts)
15. Because the good are not allowed on. When was the last time you saw Alan Grayson
on one of those shows? When he is, he does exactly what you want, and exposes them. He is not invited back.
It's because he's unbearably embarrassing.
-
It's because he's unbearably embarrassing.
That and he is not very telegenic. Dude looks like a caveman.
-
Try watching Bob Beckel. :lmao:
-
Turns out the only way that big government totalitarians win in debates is on MSNBC where there are only hardcore leftists debating Stalinists.
-
That and he is not very telegenic. Dude looks like a caveman.
People tune in to MessNBC & think they are looking at an old SNL re-run. "CAVEMAN CONGRESSMAN" (I think they actually did that one.)
-
Try watching Bob Beckel. :lmao:
I like Bob as much as I like any liberal. At times he does show a human streak.
-
Try watching Bob Beckel. :lmao:
Ask yourself, would you leave your watch or wife alone with this guy?
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7c/David_Axelrod_at_Cleveland_Democratic_debate.jpg/220px-David_Axelrod_at_Cleveland_Democratic_debate.jpg)
Makes you wonder if the caption under this picture shouldn't be:
David Axelrod, testifying before the House Organized Crime Commission ....
-
Ask yourself, would you leave your watch or wife alone with this guy?
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7c/David_Axelrod_at_Cleveland_Democratic_debate.jpg/220px-David_Axelrod_at_Cleveland_Democratic_debate.jpg)
Makes you wonder if the caption under this picture shouldn't be:
David Axelrod, testifying before the House Organized Crime Commission ....
I wouldn't leave a young child with him.
-
I like Bob as much as I like any liberal. At times he does show a human streak.
He really sang Bush the Elder's praises this week on the Five.
-
My favorite line...
And the Democrats seem unable to refute even the most obvious of bullshit.
Wonder why that is? :whistling:
Why was Dingell unable to come back with FACTS about how many jobs were being LOST when Pres. Obama took office versus GAINED now? Is that truly so difficult? yes
Maybe Dingellberry just could find a single one. Ever think about that, DUmbass.
Your women and children are safe around Axelnut. He only finds your wallet to be sexy.
-
According to the DUmmies it is because the Teabagging cable companies and satellite providers shoved MesSNBC to the 3rd tier of channels you have to pay extra for.
Well, that crappy excuse ends for Comcast customers in Massachusetts (and maybe elsewhere) soon. The days of plugging a cable-ready set into live coax and getting basic cable are over. All cable now requires a converter, and all channel tiers are expanding.
The reason is simple -- and will certainly anger the primitives. Because they are to blame.
When one would sign up only for internet service, getting basic cable was a side effect. So, to induce the primitives to throw some money in for the nearly free TV they were getting, Comcast (and others) moved channels loved by primitives to one service tier higher.
It didn't work. The cheapass primitives continued to be cheapass primitives.
So now everybody needs a cable box.
-
Try watching Bob Beckel. :lmao:
I just love to see Bob Beckel on The Five. He seems to get his ass handed to him on a daily basis. :cheersmate:
-
We still get it. Would gladly swap for Mil, Nat Geo or another shopping chan.
The Military Channel is one of my new favorite stations. They show some great documentaries on that station.
According to the DUmmies it is because the Teabagging cable companies and satellite providers shoved MesSNBC to the 3rd tier of channels you have to pay extra for.
That is the biggest crock of crap I have ever heard. :lmao:
-
PMSNBC is part of the basic el-cheapo package.
I watch it now and then for intertainment value.
I miss Keef.
-
PMSNBC is part of the basic el-cheapo package.
I watch it now and then for intertainment value.
I miss Keef.
It is for Comcast too - it's part of the 'Digital Starter' package. However, one couldn't get it for free by plugging a cable ready TV into a live cable. And that pissed the primitives off to no end.
-
:cheersmate: I too miss Keith O, There must be some info-commercial, 4-AM channel home for him.
-
FarLeftFist (5,919 posts)
4. We find it hard to delve into the world of bat-shittery the way they do. Plus,
Their tactic is one of uncivilized debate; just scream the loudest and over-talk your opponent. We were raised better than that.
:bsmeter:
-
:cheersmate: I too miss Keith O, There must be some info-commercial, 4-AM channel home for him.
I think he advertises on Ron Pauls Drag Race, on the LOGO channel. :whistling:
-
I think he advertises on Ron Pauls Drag Race, on the LOGO channel. :whistling:
Olberman is still making money for MSNBC.. Sort of. :-)
http://www.nbcuniversalstore.com/keith-olbermann-talking-bobblehead/detail.php?p=88284&v=msnbc&fsal=true
(http://www.nbcuniversalstore.com/img/product/resized/023/00088284-426023_catl_348.jpg?k=f14c0405&pid=88284&s=catl&sn=nbcuniversalstore)
-
Olberman is still making money for MSNBC.. Sort of. :-)
http://www.nbcuniversalstore.com/keith-olbermann-talking-bobblehead/detail.php?p=88284&v=msnbc&fsal=true
(http://www.nbcuniversalstore.com/img/product/resized/023/00088284-426023_catl_348.jpg?k=f14c0405&pid=88284&s=catl&sn=nbcuniversalstore)
It's a damned shame your bobblehead likeness looks better than you do! :lol:
More "human", too! :lmao:
-
Let's see DUmmies. We can take one issue, the second amendment, and prove you right.
The pro constitution side uses facts and all you lot just want to use emotion. So that is why you keep pushing to ban all those high capacity clips. :rotf:
-
russspeakeasy (3,554 posts)
2. I have wondered this for years. They come accross as a bunch
of followers. Too afraid to offend.
Go against the pack ONE time at the DUmp and back up your post fervently, ****nuts.
I dare you.