The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on June 01, 2012, 08:00:25 AM
-
11 Bravo (13,559 posts)
BREAKING: DOJ to Florida ... Stop purging the voting lists ... MSNBC
Last edited Thu May 31, 2012, 08:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)
On edit: No doubt there will be more to come, but the DOJ has told the Florida Secretary of State that the voter purges which have been conducted are in violation of the Voting Rights Act. (Would it be really juvenile to insert "SUCK IT RICK!" at this point?)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002750740
Once again Holder proves he doesn't give a rats ass about justice, he has done more to protect the rights of those who want to commit fraud than anything else. :banghead:
-
Hopefully: Florida to DOJ - F%#^ OFF!! see ya in court
-
Hopefully: Florida to DOJ - F%#^ OFF!! see ya in court
Beat me to it.
You know things must be horrendous when Holder and the Department of Injustice is being so blatant about keeping up the voter fraud.
-
Hopefully: Florida to DOJ - F%#^ OFF!! see ya in court
Their evidence in court should consist of the lists of dead people and felons on the voting rolls.
Let the DOJ defend letting the dead vote.
-
Assuring that the voter lists are correct and up to date is a violation of the Voter Rights Act?
I must have bumped my head when I fell off the punkin' wagon.
-
Beat me to it.
You know things must be horrendous when Holder and the Department of Injustice is being so blatant about keeping up the voter fraud.
He does it because he knows that is the only way that Obama will win another term. That is how he won last time also, anyone remember Acorn and the 400,000 dead people they registered. Not to mention having Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy as a registered voter.
-
He does it because he knows that is the only way that Obama will win another term. That is how he won last time also, anyone remember Acorn and the 400,000 dead people they registered. Not to mention having Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy as a registered voter.
I have to say I thought the margin he won Florida by, considering how it went in 2004, was pretty damned fishy. Now we know why, and of course they want to stop Florida from stopping them.
Bush's margin over Kerry was nearly 400,000 votes:
http://enight.dos.state.fl.us/Index.asp?ElectionDate=11/2/2004&DATAMODE=
Obama's margin over McCain was a little over 240,000 votes
http://enight.dos.state.fl.us/Index.asp?ElectionDate=11/4/2008&DATAMODE=
IA swing of over 600,000 votes? BS.
-
I really don't know what to say to this Holder shit anymore. It's been going on since day one. I absolutely want to see this go to court, and I want egg all over that shitbird's muppet face.
-
Hey dummies? How about this:
They were among 13 registered voters who acknowledged they weren’t U.S. citizens, Miami-Dade’s election supervisor says. Since elections records show each voted — Cue once in 1996 and Walters seven times since 2000 (http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2012/06/take-that-doj-florida-voter-purge-yields-criminal-probe-into-2-noncitizen-voters.html)
Kinda put's a crimp in your argument that no non-US citizens are voting, don't it?
-
Hey dummies? How about this:
They were among 13 registered voters who acknowledged they weren’t U.S. citizens, Miami-Dade’s election supervisor says. Since elections records show each voted — Cue once in 1996 and Walters seven times since 2000 (http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2012/06/take-that-doj-florida-voter-purge-yields-criminal-probe-into-2-noncitizen-voters.html)
Kinda put's a crimp in your argument that no non-US citizens are voting, don't it?
That will be declared inoperative post haste.
-
There is a new thread at the DUmp.
It's closely enough related to Freepers, so I'll put it here, rahtre a new post.
One interesting comment in it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002755592
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 08:06 PM
bigtree (43,338 posts)
Attorney General Holder's Challenge to Florida's Voter Purge is a Shot Across the Bow
Providing the second blow in a one-two punch to Florida's republican governor Rick Scott's moves to disenfranchise the states' minority, immigrant, and Democratic voters, Attorney General Holder warned Florida's election authorities that they look to be running afoul of both the law and regulations requiring them to submit their plans for consideration under the Voting Rights Act.
LATimes: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-florida-election-laws-20120601,0,7018206.story
A federal judge struck down a key part of Florida’s new election laws, which would have applied to the 62 counties not subject to the Voting Rights Act.
A top lawyer for the Justice Department's civil rights division wants Florida officials to explain why they've unilaterally decided to purge the state's voter rolls of non-U.S. citizens just months before a key primary in the 2012 elections -- an apparent violation of provisions in the landmark Voting Rights Act.
>big snip<
Post went on and on.
Thought it best to grab the "interesting" one, in case it sort of disappears. :-)
Response to bigtree (Original post)
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 11:22 PM
girty (1 post) oh boy, run little mole, ruuuun
16. The Fourteenth Amendment
Part of Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment reads, "But when the right to vote at
any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of
the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial
officers of a State or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to
any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age,
and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for
participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation
therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male
citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of
age in such State." This seems to suggest that a State can deny the privilege of voting to eligible voters, and count those denied because of crime, for representation and direct tax purposes. What possible authority could national government have to affect the privilege of non eligible voters? And what possible jurisdiction could any "inferior" court of the United States have in a case to which a State is party? Article III. Section 2. clause 2.
"In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and
those in which a state shall be party, the supreme Court shall have
original jurisdiction."
Is a national "Voting Rights Act" a regulation of commerce? If not, I think it would not be within the authority of national government.
Sincerely; Girty
Three following comments, none addressing what was said.
-
The DUmp is all for voting fraud. They love them some illegals to help get their boy elected.
-
The DUmp is all for voting fraud. They love them some illegals to help get their boy elected.
:racista:
:rotf:
-
The DUmp is all for voting fraud. They love them some illegals to help get their boy elected.
That's racist.......but oh so true. :-)
-
:racista:
:rotf:
That's racist.......but oh so true. :-)
Oops! :thatsright: :-)
-
That's racist.......but oh so true. :-)
Thank you for bolding another word that I will be forced to add to my list of banned words that might offend someone somewhere somehow.
-
Thank you for bolding another word that I will be forced to add to my list of banned words that might offend someone somewhere somehow.
I will make sure that I never use that word on this board again.