The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Skul on May 31, 2012, 11:10:20 PM
-
What does this scrunt have against the working people of America, I'll never know.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002751442
Thu May 31, 2012, 09:21 PM
kpete (34,262 posts)
The One MUST SEE Graphic That Will Shake Any Progressive From Their Complacency About 2012
larger image here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/31/1096412/-The-One-MUST-SEE-Graphic-That-Will-Shake-Any-Progressive-From-Their-Complacency-About-201219
Kpete, why do you hate working people?
Do you feel above the working masses?
Do you get a tingle up your leg when you mis-lead others at the DUmp?
Do you still gives dogs BJ's for beer money?
Kpete, you're just a married into wealth little scrunt.
Some day, the primatives will know the truth.
-
She has a point, though. That graphic is reason enough for any conservative , even an ultra conservative one,to hold their nose and vote for Romney.
-
Many years, I went to DC, and saw the actual document.
It was a very moving experience.
-
DUmmie Kaopectate touts that poster like it's a bad thing.
I see nothing wrong with it, especially the left side of it.
-
I may take some heat for this, oh well if I do, anyway I think having justices on the SC with a conservative or a liberal bias is a bad thing, they should have a good understanding of the Constitution and have the Constitution be their guide and nothing else. Granted a conservative is more likely to follow the Constitution than a liberal, but I think our founders had no intention of the SC being a political machine.
-
She has a point, though. That graphic is reason enough for any conservative , even an ultra conservative one,to hold their nose and vote for Romney.
Exactly!
-
Exactly!
I borrowed one reason from Beck to vote for Romney, he isn't a communist. The second reason is Eric Holder needs to go.
-
I may take some heat for this, oh well if I do, anyway I think having justices on the SC with a conservative or a liberal bias is a bad thing, they should have a good understanding of the Constitution and have the Constitution be their guide and nothing else. Granted a conservative is more likely to follow the Constitution than a liberal, but I think our founders had no intention of the SC being a political machine.
I won't give you any heat, you're entitled to your opinion, but I think Conservatives tend to follow the Constitution though, whereas the Left feels that the Constitution needs to evolve, and I don't trust Moderates enough because I think they'll lean left on decisions.
-
I borrowed one reason from Beck to vote for Romney, he isn't a communist. The second reason is Eric Holder needs to go.
You know what's exciting? I was reading some "conservative" I refuse to vote for Romney boards, and all of a sudden I'm seeing excitement, they're liking Romney taking the fight to Obama unlike McCain.
-
I won't give you any heat, you're entitled to your opinion, but I think Conservatives tend to follow the Constitution though, whereas the Left feels that the Constitution needs to evolve, and I don't trust Moderates enough because I think they'll lean left on decisions.
I did mention that a conservative is more likely to follow the Constitution, I just don't think any court especially the SC should be a political machine.
-
You know what's exciting? I was reading some "conservative" I refuse to vote for Romney boards, and all of a sudden I'm seeing excitement, they're liking Romney taking the fight to Obama unlike McCain.
Romney has been talking a good game let's just hope that he follows through. 0bama has go to go so people are rallying around Mitt.