The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Aristotelian on May 31, 2012, 02:17:53 PM

Title: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Aristotelian on May 31, 2012, 02:17:53 PM
Get ready for some staggering mental disconnect.

Quote
Purveyor (8,961 posts)

House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban

Source: Associated Press

(05-31) 11:33 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --

House Republicans lost an attempt to pass legislation making it a federal crime to carry out gender-based abortions.

In a campaign year when Democrats are accusing Republicans of waging a war against women, Republicans sought to portray the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act as a women's rights issue.

But the legislation required a two-thirds majority for passage, because of procedural rules, and had no future in the Democratic Senate.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/05/30/national/w223051D82.DTL

So far so good - simple quoting of a news article, a saddening one but mere the repetition of facts.

Quote
PeaceNikki (17,349 posts)
1. Good. Stupid anti-choice, women-hating, bullshit.

 :banghead:

You heard it right - according to the staggeringly mentally impaired "PeaceNikki" thinking that unborn girls shouldn't be killed merely because they're female is women-hating...which implies that wanting baby girls to die because they are girls is pro-women.

I suspect that the thread will quickly fall out of sight...but that's a perfect demonstration that they aren't "pro-choice" but are genuinely in favour of abortion in itself.

DUmp link (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014132722)
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: obumazombie on May 31, 2012, 02:19:47 PM
Sparks are sure to fly when lib sacred cows are pitted against each other.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: jukin on May 31, 2012, 02:20:33 PM
Why do all the DUchebags hate women?

As Rush says if in fact there is a gay gene and it can be tested for, the homos will be in full uproar over aborting those babies.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: obumazombie on May 31, 2012, 02:26:20 PM
Why do all the DUchebags hate women?

As Rush says if in fact there is a gay gene and it can be tested for, the homos will be in full uproar over aborting those babies.
Wow, a sacred cow trifecta.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Ballygrl on May 31, 2012, 02:29:29 PM
The Bill should've said "gender and sexual orientation", then it would've passed.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Aristotelian on May 31, 2012, 02:30:39 PM
Why do all the DUchebags hate women?

As Rush says if in fact there is a gay gene and it can be tested for, the homos will be in full uproar over aborting those babies.

Now that would be interesting to see - especially as some of the DUmmy feminists despise teh gheys with an utter passion.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Ballygrl on May 31, 2012, 02:31:53 PM
Quote
MicaelS (3,454 posts)
4. If Republicans could PROVE Homosexuality had a specfic genetic marker

And there was an amniocentesis based test for said marker, they would be ENCOURAGING women to have the test and abort each and every homosexual fetus.

I know this for a fact, because I have talked to several Republicans that have said exactly this.


No we wouldn't! that's the difference between you and us, we would be consistent with our views, you wouldn't though.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Skul on May 31, 2012, 02:32:20 PM
Quote
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:18 PM
MicaelS (3,454 posts)
4. If Republicans could PROVE Homosexuality had a specfic genetic marker

And there was an amniocentesis based test for said marker, they would be ENCOURAGING women to have the test and abort each and every homosexual fetus.

I know this for a fact, because I have talked to several Republicans that have said exactly this.  
No you haven't, you're a liar. Just like so many of the primatives.

Dang it, Bally, beat me to it.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: obumazombie on May 31, 2012, 02:33:10 PM
^A bouncey uncovered ?
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: wasp69 on May 31, 2012, 02:37:15 PM
Quote
PeaceNikki (17,349 posts)
1. Good. Stupid anti-choice, women-hating, bullshit.

Wow....   :o  That's a butt-ton of stupid right there.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: GOBUCKS on May 31, 2012, 03:30:50 PM
No we wouldn't! that's the difference between you and us, we would be consistent with our views, you wouldn't though.
Uhh...I might waver on that.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Skul on May 31, 2012, 04:17:10 PM
Uhh...I might waver on that.
Cut that out, there are women present.  :whistling:
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: jukin on May 31, 2012, 04:51:39 PM
Uhh...I might waver on that.

Yeah about that... :whistling:
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: movie buff on May 31, 2012, 04:53:23 PM
Sparks are sure to fly when lib sacred cows are pitted against each other.
Yes, it's always a lot of fun to see the DUmp's reactions when two groups/ causes they support conflict with each other (i.e. a Middle Eastern Muslim cleric making homophobic statements or condemning a liberal celebrity or something).
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Skul on May 31, 2012, 06:30:42 PM
Yes, it's always a lot of fun to see the DUmp's reactions when two groups/ causes they support conflict with each other (i.e. a Middle Eastern Muslim cleric making homophobic statements or condemning a liberal celebrity or something).
Well, it is a fluster cluck.
Then we get to watch them squibble squabble over the "wordage".  :lmao:
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Duke Nukum on May 31, 2012, 06:48:14 PM
If there was a genetic marker for DUmmieism, I might have to winnow and sift.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: sybilll on June 01, 2012, 01:00:12 AM
As Mark Levin explains, this was not only about sex-selection abortion, but race selection abortion as well. (did you know that? hear that? was it reported?).   Both of which I find incredibly offensive  http://www.therightscoop.com/mark-levin-what-the-media-isnt-telling-you-about-the-failed-bill-banning-sex-selective-abortion/
I have never been a rabid anti-abortion crusader, but the left is infuriating me on this issue.  So, you know you have to have an ultrasound between 16 and 23 weeks to determine the sex of the baby, right? When the baby is admittedly by any standard, a BABY.  But, you screamed bloody F'ing murder (how ironic) about an ultrasound being performed before an abortion because it was "RAPE!!!!".  I honestly pity all of you Democratic so-called feminists defending the right to kill unborn baby girls.  You sicken me.  But then again, your Messiah supports the killing of babies that survive botched abortions. 
~Rant off, but blood pressure still sky high
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: Skul on June 01, 2012, 01:13:02 AM
I dearly wish the left would support/advocate race or gender abortion.
Even though they support the thought, thay will never state it.
Title: Re: House Rejects Sex-Selection Abortion Ban
Post by: obumazombie on June 01, 2012, 11:13:06 AM
Is there a test that will tell if an unborn child will be an occupooper ?