The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Revolution on May 23, 2012, 09:38:48 AM
-
The Blaze has been alerted to an fake explicit image apparently published in Hustler magazine depicting GBTV host and conservative commentator S.E. Cupp engaged in a sex act with what appears to be a penis in her mouth.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fake-explicit-image-of-s-e-cupp-reportedly-appears-in-hustler-graphic/
I wonder if the beautiful S.E. Cupp can sue the crap outta Larry for this. What a fat, disgusting pig.
Go have sex with you mother in the outhouse you jackass.
-
Damn. I just posted the same thing in "Mind Numbing Stupidity."
-
I wonder if the beautiful S.E. Cupp can sue the crap outta Larry for this. What a fat, disgusting pig.
Go have sex with you mother in the outhouse you jackass.
Unfortunately, she can't. It's not considered libel, despite the fact that it is defamatory. Same way Sarah Palin has no legal recourse against Flynt for "Who's Nailin' Paylin?".
Best response to people like Flynt: :trolls:
-
Didn't he pull a stunt like this with a televangelist ?
-
Unfortunately, she can't. It's not considered libel, despite the fact that it is defamatory. Same way Sarah Palin has no legal recourse against Flynt for "Who's Nailin' Paylin?".
Best response to people like Flynt: :trolls:
How is it not liable? You can guarantee that if that was done to a liberal women, Gloria Allred would be at his doorstep serving him papers.
-
Didn't he pull a stunt like this with a televangelist ?
Jerry Falwell, he said slept with his mother in an outhouse. That sparked national rage. This kinda seems like smaller beans compared to that, but if he's capable of something like that, there's no telling what else he'll do.
-
How is it not liable? You can guarantee that if that was done to a liberal women, Gloria Allred would be at his doorstep serving him papers.
It's not libel because SE Cupp is a public figure (and WHAT a figure :naughty:). Being a public figure changes the standards on what is considered defamatory. You could just as easily publish a photoshopped picture of Pelosi or Hillary doing the same thing (AAAH, Mind Bleach, Stat!), and it wouldn't be libel.
-
It's not libel because SE Cupp is a public figure (and WHAT a figure :naughty:). Being a public figure changes the standards on what is considered defamatory. You could just as easily publish a photoshopped picture of Pelosi or Hillary doing the same thing (AAAH, Mind Bleach, Stat!), and it wouldn't be libel.
A daisy chain picture of Obama/Reid/Pelosi?
-
It's not libel because SE Cupp is a public figure (and WHAT a figure :naughty:). Being a public figure changes the standards on what is considered defamatory. You could just as easily publish a photoshopped picture of Pelosi or Hillary doing the same thing (AAAH, Mind Bleach, Stat!), and it wouldn't be libel.
I didn't think of that way. And I agree that SE Cupp is a babe *wolf Whistle* :naughty:
Oh, and thanks for putting the image of Hillary and Pelosi in my head. I had to go throw up afterwards.
A daisy chain picture of Obama/Reid/Pelosi?
Now that is just disgusting. Yuk!
-
Flynt responded to the backlash.
[snip]
Larry Flynt responded to The Blaze, saying: "That's satire. I'm able to publish this because of the Supreme Court case I won in 1984, Flynt v. Falwell."
Flynt v. Falwell was a 1988 case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment protects parodies of public figures as long as they cannot reasonably be perceived as legitimate. Hustler had published an article in 1983 claiming Rev. Jerry Falwell had engaged in a drunken sexual encounter with his mother. The case was decided 8-0.
[/snip]
Read more: http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/344959/20120524/se-cupp-hustler-photo-larry-flynt-responds.htm
Flynt should have died when he was shot. What a pathetic peace of trash.
-
Being a public figure changes the standards on what is considered defamatory. You could just as easily publish a photoshopped picture of Pelosi or Hillary doing the same thing (AAAH, Mind Bleach, Stat!), and it wouldn't be libel.
You mean something like this?
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y128/wasp69/4t9ym34.gif)
:-)
-
BS, because that's just crude!
as long as they cannot reasonably be perceived as legitimate
Well, as bad as it is for me to say, think, whatever, if Cupp does indeed engage in foreplay before sex, based on this above quote, she has a case. Simply because it COULD then be percieved as legit. I'm just saying this cause I want the fat prick to pay.
-
BS, because that's just crude!
Well, as bad as it is for me to say, think, whatever, if Cupp does indeed engage in foreplay before sex, based on this above quote, she has a case. Simply because it COULD then be percieved as legit. I'm just saying this cause I want the fat prick to pay.
Read the case Hustler v Falwell. Larry Flynt knows exactly what he can and cannot do. Though the article may be disgusting, a public figure's proof of harm is much higher than say if he had done the same column against you or me.
-
I've read it, researched it, and seen his little movie numerous times. (Back when Courtney Love was actually pretty hot) He seems to hide behind that little case back in '88 as if it were an iron clad shield. It's putrid. The Supreme Court were the ones who upheld his rights to be a disgusting pig. He didn't do jack. He needs to get off his high horse. It can't hold him anymore.
-
He is nothing but a loser he gets his rocks off by trashing real women because he can't get "little Larry" to work anymore
-
Well, as bad as it is for me to say, think, whatever, if Cupp does indeed engage in foreplay before sex, based on this above quote, she has a case. Simply because it COULD then be percieved as legit. I'm just saying this cause I want the fat prick to pay.
I am personally grateful that he won't. No matter how disgusting Larry the Hut is, I would rather correct judicial reviews of Constitutional law protect his right to be a slimy gutter bum and not be forced to pay because we want him to.
No thanks.
Much better that he runs his mouth and publicly aligns himself with the party of his choice. :-)
-
I am personally grateful that he won't. No matter how disgusting Larry the Hut is, I would rather correct judicial reviews of Constitutional law protect his right to be a slimy gutter bum and not be forced to pay because we want him to.
No thanks.
Much better that he runs his mouth and publicly aligns himself with the party of his choice. :-)
Larry Flynt, and the Democrat party, a marriage made in conservative heaven.
-
God i wish Joseph Paul Franklin had been a better shot!