The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Tucker on May 17, 2012, 08:04:00 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124093317
iverglas (38,285 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
View profile
jurors - did you just vote on a post about burqas?
If so, drop me a PM, would you?
Just something I'd like to share.
iverglas (38,285 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. oh, I suppose curiosity is killing cats
View profile
Last edited Thu May 17, 2012, 05:56 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I sometimes just want to get the actual jurors in question and grab their ears and make them look.
JURY RESULTS
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Rather than hide the post, educate the poster with these words, "This is a stereotyped, bigoted attack on two fronts.
on a woman, as being motivated by sexual frustration
on a religious/ethnic group/nationality, with the outrageous suggestion that women in the United Arab Emirates are "forbidden to talk, wear clothing other than a burqua, etc."
Please educate yourself, poster; there is a world outside your backyard with real people in it -- women in the UAE have higher literacy rates than men, are active in business and go to university at astounding rates, and there is even a woman subway driver -- see e.g. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-izzillo/united-arab-emirates_b_1522362.html
This post is an expression of pure ignorance and bigotry ... exactly what the poster is supposed to be denouncing ..."
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: This post is an expression of pure ignorance and bigotry ... exactly what the poster is supposed to be denouncing
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: More ignorance than bigotry. The alerter's comment should have been a reply in the thread.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: I must agree with the alerting member, while it is simply their opinion, the poster appears to be misinformed on the situation on the ground in the UAE.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Why not simply post your opposing position in the thread? Why waste 5 people's time with your little disagreement?
So, listen up, jurors.
Stop ****ing telling alerters to post their objections in the thread.
If a post is a violation of some standard, it is YOUR job to deal with it. The post should not be in the thread. It should not be getting answered in the thread. It should be hidden in the thread. And in many cases, somebody up there should be taking a look at the person who posted it.
If you don't do your damned job, bigoted filth sits in threads at DU, just for example. Or a person who has been attacked is left to either suffer the attack in silence or start defending themself all over a thread.
Hide the bleeding post. Don't tell alerters what to do when what they have asked you to do is your job. If you don't want to do it, don't sit on a jury.
Oh, and Juror #6? If you think ignorant bigotry is a "little disagreement", maybe you need to find a new home.
How did you get out of the gungeon?
seabeyond (71,742 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
5. i had one yesterday. two jurors said "the whole thread is personal attacks, cant just hide this one"
View profile
what???
the stupid. i am series!!111!!
iverglas (38,285 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
6. I know, we went through that once this week already here
View profile
Last edited Thu May 17, 2012, 06:53 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Do your job or don't bother getting out of bed, is all I have to say.
The whole subthread (or thread) is quite probably a disaster because a bunch of bloody jurors all said This whole subthread is a disaster. This comment is no worse than every other vile offensive comment in the exchange. Leave it alone.
And as seabeyond has pointed out before, if the first jury or two had done their jobs, the whole subthread wouldn't exist.
Who are all these people who sit on juries but don't seem to otherwise have the first clue what it's all about??
just fixing the mandatory typo in the subject line
The DU MIRT team is under performing in their duties. Maybe again, we have penetrated the MIRT team.
-
This irritates the Hell out of me:
.....maybe you need to find a new home.
The iverglas primitive does not own and operate Skins's island; that's the prerogative of my fellow alum Skins, and my fellow alum Skins alone, to determine which primitives belong there, and which primitives don't.
The iverglas primitive does not own and operate Skins's island.
Perhaps the iverglas primitive needs to find a new home.
-
The DU jury system, the gift that keeps on giving. :rotf:
-
Insult to injury. :rofl:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124093080
iverglas (38,285 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
View profile
Message hidden by jury decision
A Jury voted 6-0 to hide this post on Wed May 16, 2012, 02:26 PM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See Community Standards.) When the original post in a discussion thread is hidden by Jury decision, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
ScreamingMeemie (59,555 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
3. At this point I am begging you (pleading with you) to take your concerns to admin.
View profile
Nothing is going to come of this thread but another 200-500 copy and pastes, and alerts, and hurts.
A big mistake is when we assume we know who an alerter is. We do not, and 90% of the time there is no "tell". This I know, there is a long standing feud here that is making DU suck. I wish those involved would put it to bed or take a break from DU.
This is a post to keep me off a jury for the million bits of nasty that are about to happen here (on both sides) and to air out my feelings as an observe
iverglas (38,285 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
6. perhaps you haven't followed closely
View profile
Last edited Wed May 16, 2012, 02:29 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I took my concerns to admin by checking TOS in 8 alerts.
I took my concerns to admin by alerting on all of the 7 jury results I received allowing the attacks to stand.
Several dozen people in the thread in question called for admin action to be taken. I actually didn't in that thread, as I recall.
This thread isn't about that.
This thread is about me being locked out of a thread that is about attacks on me, which contains post after post expressing horror at the attacks on me and calling for action against the attacker and calling the attacker a variety of unsavoury things (not one post of which has been hidden) ... because I said that I supported things said by the attacker generally and thought her animus against me arose from false beliefs about me propagated at DU -- because there just ain't no other explanation.
But mostly it's just about the supreme irony of me being locked out of a thread that is about a long series of attacks on me, for supposedly attacking the person the thread in question is all about attacking, when I actually didn't even do that.
Some people just aren't as easily amused as I am, I guess.
Oh, just snork.
Everybody kows the alert on the original post was bogus. Everybody.
And I'm the only person who has ever posted the content of a hidden post in H&M. Right.
Who doesn't realize that they're just making themselve Obvious every time they do this??
-
Insult to injury. :rofl:
Again, confirming my thoughts that perhaps the iverglas primitive needs to find a new home.
-
Damn the moles are EVERYWHERE! :hyper:
I applaud ya'll, youz kick liberal ass!
-
"If you don't do you job, bigoted filth would sit on DU."
If you want them to clear the bigoted filth off of DU, that could be done, but it would involve completely scrubbing the whole site and taking it off the Internet, never to appear again.
-
Hey iverglas, Have you ever thought they just may not like you?
-
As a whole, moles in DUmmie roles leave holes in DUmmies souls. ...... :-)
-
I just want to highlight this paragraph, because it is a masterpiece:
This thread is about me being locked out of a thread that is about attacks on me, which contains post after post expressing horror at the attacks on me and calling for action against the attacker and calling the attacker a variety of unsavoury things (not one post of which has been hidden) ... because I said that I supported things said by the attacker generally and thought her animus against me arose from false beliefs about me propagated at DU -- because there just ain't no other explanation.
The building hysteria and one run-on sentence paints a perfect picture of a downward spiral into insanity. The paranoia, the narcissism (notice all the me's and I's), the persecution complex, the obsession. It's just a delicious stew of madness. Hat's off, Iverglas.
-
I just want to highlight this paragraph, because it is a masterpiece:
The building hysteria and one run-on sentence paints a perfect picture of a downward spiral into insanity. The paranoia, the narcissism (notice all the me's and I's), the persecution complex, the obsession. It's just a delicious stew of madness. Hat's off, Iverglas.
The medication hasn't kicked in yet.
-
The medication hasn't kicked in yet.
The only med that will work, eventually, will be administered in 230-grain doses at 800 fps.
-
I just want to highlight this paragraph, because it is a masterpiece:
The building hysteria and one run-on sentence paints a perfect picture of a downward spiral into insanity. The paranoia, the narcissism (notice all the me's and I's), the persecution complex, the obsession. It's just a delicious stew of madness. Hat's off, Iverglas.
The irony is that she has attacked people for doing the same thing. That ivory tower she is in must be leaning or something.
-
The only med that will work, eventually, will be administered in 230-grain doses at 800 fps.
She lives in a lower flat in the ghetto of Toronto. She is totally anti gun.
She would be a wrist slitter.
-
She lives in a lower flat in the ghetto of Toronto. She is totally anti gun.
She would be a wrist slitter.
I don't believe she would have the balls to off herself.
-
The drama continues...
trumad (31,433 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
7. .
View profile
At Thu May 17, 2012, 09:13 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I know, we went through that once this week already here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=93332
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards[/url].)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Iverglas has a history of personally attacking jurors when she doesn't like their decisions, even when they state their opinions politely. Her first reply in this thread was left alone 3-3 but until a jury stops her she will keep on at this, all in an effort to create yet another divisive flamewar. Please let her know that this behavior is disruptive and unwelcome. Thanks for your time.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu May 17, 2012, 09:29 AM, and the Jury voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I agree with iverglas... I firmly believe that if you want to be a juror on DU, you first need to take a test to see if your IQ is over 30.---trumad
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: I think this poster is out of control, and could use a time out. My trouble is that I find the behavior of her detractors as blameworthy as the poster herself. That said, I'm ready to put an end to the incessant whining and drama that has infected DU3. Therefore, HIDE IT!
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: OTT criticism--this is flamebait, not garden-variety whining.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Why would any jury be interested in being dragged into certain DUers constant shitstorms? If they wish to post inflammatory and stupid comments, let them suffer the inevitable blowback. Alerter is right. The stuff probably should be hidden, but only because it spares the poster embarrassment. Why should we bother to do that? No skin off my nose if Iverglas starts divisive flamewars. It allows sensible DUers to put her on ignore, or think twice before posting comments to her.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Here's a juror who has a clue, just as poster asked, and will hide the post just as the poster asked. "Be careful what you ask for, you might get it", as the saying goes.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
seabeyond (71,743 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
14. funny...
View profile
see, you went up a notch. a flexible up and down, with you... lol. but it often settles at interesting
people... interesting. love 'em
i guess i am gonna see another hide for iverglas
i have been away..... behind on the drama and trauma of du
iverglas This message was hidden by Jury decision.
:rofl:
snooper2 (12,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
13. morning, yo iverglas, what you do for a living?
:whistling:
-
This is hilarious; this is an example of why the meta forum on Skins's island is such rich, fertile ground.
-
Again, confirming my thoughts that perhaps the iverglas primitive needs to find a new home.
Absolutely, let's invite the primative to join CC.
We're a nice group of people, the nicest group he would ever meet. O-)
-
Again, confirming my thoughts that perhaps the iverglas primitive needs to find a new home.
HE is an ass.
-
Absolutely, let's invite the primative to join CC.
We're a nice group of people, the nicest group he would ever meet. O-)
The iverglas primitive is a "she," and often gives clues she suffers from the same sorts of things the Die alte Sau, the Proud2BLibKansan primitive, does.
There's something wrong with her female plumbing below the navel, possibly an internal birth defect or something, that obstructs her being a woman, and turns her into a bitch instead.
Something that could probably be taken care of by a surgeon; a few snips here-and-there, a few re-routings, a few dead-ends opened up, and presto! problem solved.
But instead of that quick, easy, no-side-effects, procedure being done, the iverglas primitive tries to sedate her anger and bitterness with the use of mood-altering pharmaceuticals.
One can see how well that works.
-
It seems as though a single CC'er had multiple moles on a single jury...heh, that's fascinating. :whistling:
-
Iverglass, The man posing as a woman posing as a man posting as a woman... AGAIN on Juries:
iverglas (38,298 posts) <---- SHE'S A MAN, BABY!!!!
jurors - did you just vote on a post about burqas?
If so, drop me a PM, would you?
Just something I'd like to share.
What could that be Iverglass?
Capt. Obvious (410 posts) <-----Obvious Troll
1. This is odd
Sort of defeats the H&M purpose.
DU is odd. This is normal for DU.
iverglas (38,298 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. oh, I suppose curiosity is killing cats
Last edited Thu May 17, 2012, 08:45 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3)
I sometimes just want to get the actual jurors in question and grab their ears and make them look.
OP said:
jurors - did you just vote on a post about burqas?
If so, drop me a PM, would you?
Just something I'd like to share.
JURY RESULTS
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Rather than hide the post, educate the poster with these words, "This is a stereotyped, bigoted attack on two fronts.
on a woman, as being motivated by sexual frustration
on a religious/ethnic group/nationality, with the outrageous suggestion that women in the United Arab Emirates are "forbidden to talk, wear clothing other than a burqua, etc."
Please educate yourself, poster; there is a world outside your backyard with real people in it -- women in the UAE have higher literacy rates than men, are active in business and go to university at astounding rates, and there is even a woman subway driver -- see e.g. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-izzillo/united-arab-emirates_b_1522362.html
This post is an expression of pure ignorance and bigotry ... exactly what the poster is supposed to be denouncing ..."
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: This post is an expression of pure ignorance and bigotry ... exactly what the poster is supposed to be denouncing
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: More ignorance than bigotry. The alerter's comment should have been a reply in the thread.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: I must agree with the alerting member, while it is simply their opinion, the poster appears to be misinformed on the situation on the ground in the UAE.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Why not simply post your opposing position in the thread? Why waste 5 people's time with your little disagreement?
So, listen up, jurors.
Stop ****ing telling alerters to post their objections in the thread.
If a post is a violation of some standard, it is YOUR job to deal with it. The post should not be in the thread. It should not be getting answered in the thread. It should be hidden in the thread. And in many cases, somebody up there should be taking a look at the person who posted it.
If you don't do your damned job, bigoted filth sits in threads at DU, just for example. Or a person who has been attacked is left to either suffer the attack in silence or start defending themself all over a thread.
Hide the bleeding post. Don't tell alerters what to do when what they have asked you to do is your job. If you don't want to do it, don't sit on a jury.
Oh, and Juror #6? If you think ignorant bigotry is a "little disagreement", maybe you need to find a new home.
and editing to add -- the facts of what goes on in a place on earth, the thing we like to call "reality", is not an "opposing opinion". Not everything on earth is an opinion. Some things are just true. Or false.
Iverglass should be on Obama's SCOTUS. That way sHE could tell all the other Supremes why they are wrong on their vote, and change the vote to suit himself.
-
Perhaps the gender confused primative thinks heshe is immune due to its large post count. :whatever:
-
Yes, DUmmies, you have freedom of speech but not the freedom to be heard....at the DUmp. The DUmp jury just reminded you of that little fact. :lmao:
-
The only med that will work, eventually, will be administered in 230-grain doses at 800 fps.
MMMMMM .45 cal goodness.
-
The iverglas primitive is a "she," and often gives clues she suffers from the same sorts of things the Die alte Sau, the Proud2BLibKansan primitive, does.
There's something wrong with her female plumbing below the navel, possibly an internal birth defect or something, that obstructs her being a woman, and turns her into a bitch instead.
Something that could probably be taken care of by a surgeon; a few snips here-and-there, a few re-routings, a few dead-ends opened up, and presto! problem solved.
But instead of that quick, easy, no-side-effects, procedure being done, the iverglas primitive tries to sedate her anger and bitterness with the use of mood-altering pharmaceuticals.
One can see how well that works.
She is a pain in the ass alright...has a tongue like a scalpel.
-
MMMMMM .45 cal goodness.
The Judge, with 3" cylinder, any .410 shell ....and at point blank range that should blow all the dust outta their heads.
-
The iverglas primitive is a "she," and often gives clues she suffers from the same sorts of things the Die alte Sau, the Proud2BLibKansan primitive, does.
There's something wrong with her female plumbing below the navel, possibly an internal birth defect or something, that obstructs her being a woman, and turns her into a bitch instead.
Something that could probably be taken care of by a surgeon; a few snips here-and-there, a few re-routings, a few dead-ends opened up, and presto! problem solved.
But instead of that quick, easy, no-side-effects, procedure being done, the iverglas primitive tries to sedate her anger and bitterness with the use of mood-altering pharmaceuticals.
One can see how well that works.
ZOMG FRANK! You are cussing more and more :lmao: I LOVE IT :yahoo:
-
Apparently the gender-confused bitch-man has elected herself to be DU3 Site Admin.
:rotf:
-
Damn the moles are EVERYWHERE! :hyper:
I applaud ya'll, youz kick liberal ass!
Thank ya, thank ya very much! heh!
Ya know, people this anal retentive shouldn't be allowed on the net! The HaveAglassOfUrine primitive is so irritating as to have the need to be silenced! Good ****in' Grief!
Doncha just luv these "self appointed important" assholes? Wonder why Skins puts up with this bitch? She must be a major donator. Why else would ya put up with such condescending disruption?
-
I'm waiting for the first documented case of a single civilized person with two moles serving on the same jury.
To commemorate the event, the two moles should vote against one another.
-
So - iverglas is complaining about moles... interesting.
HA!! There, capitals and multiple explanation marks, just because you told me not to.
Me 'n Violet go way back, which is why I'm sticking this post here -- I was friends in real life with the person she referred to in her first post, after meeting her on line (at a matchmaker site, would you believe -- someone I met there, who it turned out knew me in real life from political things, thought we sounded like we were the same person). But that came to a sudden end with the sudden change, too. Never understood it either.
A different personals site led to a message from someone who frequented the bar where Violet's and my mutual friend's best friend's husband worked -- Canada is such a small world -- but I was jaded, so I said "tell me your thoughts on Kosovo", which was in the news that week, so he did, and now he lives with me and the three cats of the moment. And digs paths in the snow for us. This being Canada and there being more snow this year than in living memory.
Hobbies are mithering the gun nuts who infest DU (gun nuttery is just such a "liberal" ideology) and obsessing over genealogical mysteries -- mine own or anybody's who crosses my path.
<snipped excessive bitching - refer to the link below for the whole thing>
This is an old thread from another (not DU) forum. http://www.israelpalestineforum.com/forum/showthread.php?81-Let-me-introduce-myself.../page2
Anyway, it seems iverglas seems to have no problem trolling a forum when she is the one who is doing the trolling. I also seem to remember that intentionally trolling DU is a banworthy offense.
-
I'm waiting for the first documented case of a single civilized person with two moles serving on the same jury.
To commemorate the event, the two moles should vote against one another.
That would rival two moles from the same person sitting on a jury that is deciding the post of their other mole.
-
So - iverglas is complaining about moles... interesting.
This is an old thread from another (not DU) forum. http://www.israelpalestineforum.com/forum/showthread.php?81-Let-me-introduce-myself.../page2
Anyway, it seems iverglas seems to have no problem trolling a forum when she is the one who is doing the trolling. I also seem to remember that intentionally trolling DU is a banworthy offense.
I went looking for her on other boards a while back. I found her in a few places but not many. She doesn't make too many rounds.
-
I went looking for her on other boards a while back. I found her in a few places but not many. She doesn't make too many rounds.
Did you read any of her posts at http://feministshosts.boardhost.com/ ? She ran this board for about 24 hours, then she closed it. :rofl:
-
I can assure the DUmpmonkeys that I do not have an active mole on DU as of now.
Trust me. :-)
-
I can assure the DUmpmonkeys that I do not have an active mole on DU as of now.
Trust me. :-)
I can also say that I do not have one single mole on Skin's Island of Damned Souls.
-
I know several that do, and I ain't tellin'.
-
I can also say that I do not have one single mole on Skin's Island of Damned Souls.
I do have a single mole but he lives in red state hell and is in a long term commited relationship. :rotf:
-
iverglas is not very bright. She wandered over to CU having been challenged by Gern Blanstein, and Gern ripped her to shreads. Minus her protected status, she fell flat on her ugly mug.
.
-
Did you read any of her posts at http://feministshosts.boardhost.com/ ? She ran this board for about 24 hours, then she closed it. :rofl:
Good find, Miskie. H5 for that.
Interesting that the entire blog has 33 comments.
Most are related to banning someone or another. :mental:
-
Did you read any of her posts at http://feministshosts.boardhost.com/ ? She ran this board for about 24 hours, then she closed it. :rofl:
No. I found her on some Canadian socialist forum. Bitching and being her usual condescending self.
-
As a whole, moles in DUmmie roles leave holes in DUmmies souls. ...... :-)
Now all we need is a square peg !
-
Now all we need is a square peg !
I drink whiskey and beer. Mow the yard, clean the house, feed the critters, listen to classical music, go to church and scratch my butt when needed.
Call me Peg, one more time, and I'll hunt you down. :-)