The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Skul on May 05, 2012, 03:02:58 PM
-
We already know this campfire is going to be good.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014113836
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:12 PM
alp227 (14,154 posts)
Arizona bans funding to Planned Parenthood in abortion fight
Source: Reuters
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on Friday signed into law a bill banning abortion providers like Planned Parenthood from receiving money through the state, her office said in a statement.
The Republican-backed Whole Woman's Health Funding Priority Act cuts off funding for family planning and health services delivered by Planned Parenthood clinics and other organizations offering abortions.
"By signing this measure into law I stand with the majority of Americans who oppose the use of taxpayer funds for abortion," Brewer said in a statement.
Arizona joins six other states with similar laws, officials said. But three of those states -- Indiana, Kansas and North Carolina -- are facing legal challenges.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/05/us-usa-abortion-arizona-idUSBRE84402Y20120505
Denying taxpayer funds for sluts!!! Oh, the Whore. :whatever:
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:26 PM
otohara (20,178 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. If I Had A College Age Daughter
there would be no way in hell I'd send her to any of the states with these draconian abortion laws.
Perhaps if your could be daughter, wasn't a slut, you wouldn't have to worry about it.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat May 5, 2012, 01:04 AM
LynneSin (85,201 posts)
4. Majority of Americans?
What in her house?
Step out side idiot - you'll see more Americans support a woman's right to choose
If that were true, why should taxpayers have to pay for sluts?
Justice wanted (2,287 posts)
7. I NEVER thought a woman would actually do this to her fellow women.
She's not doing a thing to another woman.
The bill is just to keep taxpayers from funding sluts.
Response to Trillo (Reply #19)
Sat May 5, 2012, 12:48 PM
HockeyMom (8,274 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
20. When I got my BC pills from PP,
I already HAD children and didn't want more. I had a ring on my finger too. Guess they think married couples don't need BC and will happy for have endless children, and will be able to afford all of them too. On what Planet? Of course a husband will never lose his job, not find another for over year, and already have two little mouths to feed.
Ya, BC pills will drive you to bankruptcy.
Corks are cheap, consider it.
Nice little hate-fest going on.
-
Morons.
PP & other outfits are not being removed, they just need to find something other than taxpayer money to operate with. If THe Salvation Army can survive on donations, so can Planned Parenthood.
-
:lmao: the title of the thread!
-
Carefull about calling unwed single mothers sluts.
just sayin'
-
Carefull about calling unwed single mothers sluts.
Whatever they are, the taxpayer shouldn't be on the hook for their abortions.
The girl and her Romeo should be able to pawn enough X-boxes, iPhones, and iPods to pay the abortion mill.
-
Whatever they are, the taxpayer shouldn't be on the hook for their abortions.
The girl and her Romeo should be able to pawn enough X-boxes, iPhones, and iPods to pay the abortion mill.
I just recently got raked over the coals and called everything imaginable for daring to say out of wedlock single mothers was a bad thing and not necessarily a conservative trait. Calling them sluts will bring out the long knives.
just sayin'
-
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:26 PM
otohara (20,178 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. If I Had A College Age Daughter
there would be no way in hell I'd send her to any of the states with these draconian abortion laws.
You DUmb bitch. You don't send your kids to college. They sponge off of tax payers, get grants and borrow from the 1% with no intention of ever repaying the money.
-
Just wondering how much money these staunch supporters of Planned Parenthood donate to PP?
If I were a betting person I would say $0.00
-
I just recently got raked over the coals and called everything imaginable for daring to say out of wedlock single mothers was a bad thing and not necessarily a conservative trait. Calling them sluts will bring out the long knives.
just sayin'
(http://i41.tinypic.com/qoipdy.jpg)
You got your ass handed to you for being an arrogant, pompous ass. No one in that thread said out of wedlock single mothers was a good thing, but we didn't shit all over another Cave member and their family for handling their personal situations in a manner that didn't meet YOUR approval. See the difference? Probably not.
I'd BS you, but you're not worth it.
-
Why would PP need tax payer money if such a strong majority of Americans support it? Wouldn't there be enough people to voluntarily contribute to it without need of taxpayer money starting with all you ass wipes at the DUmp? No, the dirty little secret is that you want tax money funding abortion as a big **** YOU to people who do not want to support abortions because they find the practice abhorrent.
-
Carefull about calling unwed single mothers sluts.
just sayin'
Check over the comments again.
The needle was pointed at "taxpayer" needs to pay.
I kinda screwed it up a bit.
Should have been a bit more clear.
Not a slam at single mothers, just a hit on those that demand taxpayers pay for promiscuous sex.
When you demand payment of any kind for sexual favors, what would you refer to them?
-
Proletariatprincess
13. The real issue is allowing politics into women's health care
Last edited Sat May 5, 2012, 08:37 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
As long as there are clinics that exclusively provide gyno care to poor and working class women, they will be targets for religion and sectarian politics and the violence that accompanies those forces. Hospitals? Not so much. We know why don't we? Because hospitals must provide care for everyone and, by law, must provide a level of privacy. It is nobody's business why you seek care or treatment for your health....even if you are a women.
To end this debate once and for all, Congress should make a law that requires that every health care provider and hospital which provides gynecological services, must include therapeutic abortion and birth control. This is health, not politics. If a hospital or clinic wants to deliver babies, it must also provide treatment for all gyno services including abortion or find some other area of health care to specialize. No one could be singled out for persecution. But just like the so called War on Drugs, reactionary puritan values are blocking progress and creating misery for people and strife in our society.
Good idea! And then watch the Catholic hospitals and health facilities close, thereby leaving many poor communities without hospitals. Excellent plan!
What a ****ing moron. :banghead:
What this titan of intellect fails to realize is that not only would Catholic institutions close, but so would many other religiously-funded medical care centers, as well as many individual OB/GYNs. So in order to keep your precious sacrament of killing children, you'd risk the health of millions of people? Well, at least we know where your priorities are.
-
About that not sending her daughter to any of those states with what these morons call draconian rules, I think you DUmbasses may be on to something here. Why don't ALL of you idiots get the hell out of conservative states?
-
Proletariatprincess
13. The real issue is allowing politics into women's health care
Last edited Sat May 5, 2012, 08:37 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
As long as there are clinics that exclusively provide gyno care to poor and working class women, they will be targets for religion and sectarian politics and the violence that accompanies those forces. Hospitals? Not so much. We know why don't we? Because hospitals must provide care for everyone and, by law, must provide a level of privacy. It is nobody's business why you seek care or treatment for your health....even if you are a women.
To end this debate once and for all, Congress should make a law that requires that every health care provider and hospital which provides gynecological services, must include therapeutic abortion and birth control. This is health, not politics. If a hospital or clinic wants to deliver babies, it must also provide treatment for all gyno services including abortion or find some other area of health care to specialize. No one could be singled out for persecution. But just like the so called War on Drugs, reactionary puritan values are blocking progress and creating misery for people and strife in our society.
Theraputic abortion? :wtf2:
-
Theraputic abortion? :wtf2:
Maybe liberal wimminz enjoy having their uterus scraped. :thatsright:
-
Theraputic abortion? :wtf2:
Gina, she's referring to a D&C. It's the way liberals try to pull in women who are prolife and have had to have the 'remnants of incomplete miscarriage' removed by medical assistance. They try to make them believe that they would not have received medical help of this kind had abortion not been available. We all know this is patently untrue, but it doesn't keep the dishonest people that are liberals from trying to scare your average woman struck by tragic circumstances.
-
Gina, she's referring to a D&C. It's the way liberals try to pull in women who are prolife and have had to have the 'remnants of incomplete miscarriage' removed by medical assistance. They try to make them believe that they would not have received medical help of this kind had abortion not been available. We all know this is patently untrue, but it doesn't keep the dishonest people that are liberals from trying to scare your average woman struck by tragic circumstances.
I was thinking that the only "theraputic abortion" was one performed on a lefty--post-birth. :hammer: :killemall:
-
We could eliminate 98% of our troubles within one generation by offering free abortions to women who were also willing to be sterilized while their feet were in the stirrups.
-
I have had many d & c's due to miscarriages and they are not therapeutic in the least. Damn libby's.
-
Gina, she's referring to a D&C. It's the way liberals try to pull in women who are prolife and have had to have the 'remnants of incomplete miscarriage' removed by medical assistance. They try to make them believe that they would not have received medical help of this kind had abortion not been available. We all know this is patently untrue, but it doesn't keep the dishonest people that are liberals from trying to scare your average woman struck by tragic circumstances.
Some people aren't aware of the high percentage of first time pregnancies that end in miscarriage. Back in the early eighties when my ex had her first miscarriage I think the Dr. said it was 1 in 3 or something like that. My ex had three before my first was born.
-
I have had many d & c's due to miscarriages and they are not therapeutic in the least. Damn libby's.
They wouldn't be, to a real woman like yourself. To a liberal chick, who basically treats her uterus like an old man treats his lawn, nothing feels better than a little curettage. To them it feels like freedom, I guess.
-
I have had many d & c's due to miscarriages and they are not therapeutic in the least. Damn libby's.
Yeah, they like to play on medical terminology to make it sound like people who did not have the choice are in league with those who did. It's disgusting and manipulative. Sorry to hear about that, Gina. :(
-
Some people aren't aware of the high percentage of first time pregnancies that end in miscarriage. Back in the early eighties when my ex had her first miscarriage I think the Dr. said it was 1 in 3 or something like that. My ex had three before my first was born.
Yes, this is true. Most people never even know they were pregnant.