nadinbrzezinski
View profile
Well since call outs are A-Ok
those who do them can guarantee themselves a fast ignore...
Yup, that easy, just use the ignore poster... it works wonders... and makes life much easier, and yes this is one... I now can avoid what some folks seem to love...
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 11:52 PM
SidDithers (20,530 posts)
8. To anyone that nadin puts on Ignore...
she'll still be able to read everything you post. She has a long history of using "Print Friendly Format", or logging out, to see what Ignored is saying in her threads.
I've seen the trends, and that's my prediction.
Sid
I think this one has legs. :popcorn:
nadinbrzezinski
36. Well from a photo pov, which makes this even more funny and hilarious
View profile
and why I click on those threads... the first photo had a major gaffe... look carefully not at her, at him... I know he is probably saying hi... but the big no-no is he is grimacing in the photo.
I like to look at good and bad photography, learning shtick.
That is what makes this even more comedic.Quote
nadinbrzezinski
16. I don't take it seriously
Last edited Mon Apr 30, 2012, 12:22 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
DU serious. really? Serious is what is happening in Boards, city councils and congresses... not DU.
That said, tried to engage people and explain, they got more ugly so I just deleted it... why bother, and now they are on IGNORE and will remain there for perhaps always.
Tarheel_Dem
97. The fact that the poster has on occasion, claimed to be a "journalist" really bothers me.
This same poster posted a very incendiary article re: our involvement behind Syrian lines, and when some very astute DU'ers went to work to get to the root of the story, it was discovered that the story was created out of wholecloth from a facebook posting, which turned out to be false on every count. And after receiving a ton of replies, did the poster apologize? NO! She "self-deleted", after getting her a** handed to her on a platter, thereby shutting down the discussion. It's dishonest at best, and inciteful at the very worst. And she never has to apologize for getting caught making shit up.
A "journalist" stands by their story, or they issue a retraction. Self-delete does away with the need to be held accountable, and that's just sad.
I've asked this question before, but again:
Why does nadin think that by putting primitives on her "iggy" list, that she's punishing them, depriving them of something valuable?
It's kind of like being on a mosquito's "iggy" list, more of a blessing, not a curse at all.
Nads is a diabetic? Did anyone know that?
WOE now Frank, I call FOUL on your post.
Diet and genetics have to be taken into consideration. The difference in body shapes come from not just diet but to cultural practices.
ASIA a place when off the breast the people may never drink milk again in their life time. Lactose intolerant they become as they age.
Northern Europe where off the breast the people drink cow, goat, sheep and goat milk and all the items that come from that, butter, cheese and yogurt + the meat.
One eats what is available and if they stay in just one area after a few generations the body type, big boned or not short or tall is set until anther few generations head out to another place.
Things such as what I saw in Kiev (a male with a full adult-sized head but the body the size of an infant), or in Kishinev (a male with both eyes on the same side of his nose), or in Rostov (a little girl with full legs but no knees), among a multitude of lesser, but still pretty bad, deformities (such as those whose jaws melted into their necks, they having been born with no chin).Those Kiev unfortunates sound very similar to a family of Oklahoma cannibals.
And that was just the physical deformities, not to mention the mental ones.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 04:23 AM
pintobean (5,789 posts)
43. Was this meant to be a self call-out?
It sure turned out that way. It's really nice to see you expose yourself for what you are.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 04:38 AM
pecwae (7,623 posts)
44. This may come as a shock,
Last edited Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:38 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
but all those people you put on Ignore, then log out to read what they've said anyway, will learn to live again.
Oops edit: I'm using this thread to tell you to refrain from contacting me through DU Mail again. The mail was unsolicited, unwelcome and just plain bizarre.
Response to pecwae (Reply #44)
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:24 AM
nadinbrzezinski (104,470 posts)
53. I know, it's not about THEM
believe it or not, DO NOT THE IRRITATION, quite simply.
And log out, are you nuts?
Frankly my dear,they are not that important.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:20 AM
Tarheel_Dem (13,548 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
51. I'm just waiting for you to follow through with your last GBCW threat!
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:34 AM
SidDithers (20,538 posts)
57. Three GBCWs in a week must be some kind of record...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=439&topic_id=719412
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=439&topic_id=762544
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=439&topic_id=777837
Those Kiev unfortunates sound very similar to a family of Oklahoma cannibals.
They also remind me of the DUmp picture threads we used to enjoy.
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 11:01 AM
Kali (27,804 posts)
67. meh
once you've been given the nadin treatment you kind of start to notice it wasn't just some freak event that happened to you - it is - dare I say it? a pattern, a trend, her apparent schtick.
I dared to ask for some documentation on some claim she made last year - had no clue about her behavior regarding anybody questioning her pronouncements to any of this stuff since I mostly stay in the lounge. She snotted back to me and announced I was on ignore - WTF? don't think I had ever posted to her before that, or even noticed who/what she was all about. Well, after that I started clicking on threads she started and I observed the behavior over and over and over. Her pattern is one of condescension (frequently dramatic pronouncements that attempt to show her superiority and yet are often flat out WRONG), that generates pushback (or just reasonable questions for clarity for ****s sake!) which in turn begets announcements of ignore and then new threads about victimization. It doesn't take long to see that it is mostly bullshit.
Credibility - it isn't gained by the kinds of behaviors exhibited by this OP.
apocalypsehow
75. This will make about the eighth time you've publicly announced I was on *ignore*. Maybe this time
Last edited Mon Apr 30, 2012, 12:05 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
the button won't get stuck, and you'll be able to get some actual ignoring done! For once...
Edit: typo.
nadinbrzezinski
65. Well I find it an amazing coincidence
By the way what happened is I pointed out I did not care for such things like the Correspondents dinner. I posted the same thing when little boots was president, but pointing this out under a Republican is fine, but not with a Democrat. I guess a mirror of this would have happened at our mirror site, with a zott of course. It led to a small nuclear war... apparently I should LOOOVVVVEEEEE the dress... nice dress, well outside the buying capacity of most families. And I should love the jokes, the whole thing is not good for democracy with a small d of course.
But to some VE SHALL NOT BE CRITICAL OF THE LEADER... problem is I don't elect leaders... don't know about you.
I expect the usual ones to answer this as well... but since now they are on ignore... have at it.
And the best part is that photo had a major no-no... from an editorial perspective, which makes me wonder about the series in the SD card.
She really does go overboard sometimes, and I never heard of being able to delete posts after a certain amount of time has elapsed.
Nads is a diabetic? Did anyone know that?
Tarheel_Dem
97. The fact that the poster has on occasion, claimed to be a "journalist" really bothers me.
This same poster posted a very incendiary article re: our involvement behind Syrian lines, and when some very astute DU'ers went to work to get to the root of the story, it was discovered that the story was created out of wholecloth from a facebook posting, which turned out to be false on every count. And after receiving a ton of replies, did the poster apologize? NO! She "self-deleted", after getting her a** handed to her on a platter, thereby shutting down the discussion. It's dishonest at best, and inciteful at the very worst. And she never has to apologize for getting caught making shit up.
A "journalist" stands by their story, or they issue a retraction. Self-delete does away with the need to be held accountable, and that's just sad.
No, but it doesn't surprise me.
Again, I have to point out this is the tragedy of nadin, her stunted, out-of-proportion growth and all that, which reminds me of what I saw in the socialist paradises of the workers and peasants.
Generally, those of eastern European derivation who emigrated to the United States, over two or three generations grew up healthier and larger, due to the fruits of liberty and a free-market system, which allowed them to flourish and prosper.
Those who stayed behind, enduring the wars and famines and persecutions of socialism didn't fare so well, growing and developing only little better than their long-ago medieval ancestors; hunchbacks, dwarves, giants, the cripples, the deformed, the grotesque, the curiosities.
Because of her overwhelming arrogance, know-it-allism, and voluntary ignorance, one feels no pity for nadin.(http://i949.photobucket.com/albums/ad335/photoatcc/nadin1.jpg)
If she comes across as "ugly" in the physical sense, it's because she's ugly in the spiritual sense. If she were more modest, more humble, more gracious, more accepting of others, her physical ugliness would be minimized, if not utterly erased, in the eyes of those who behold her.
nadinbrzezinskiNads, deary, those are "pool" also known as "stock" shots. Do you know what those are?
36. Well from a photo pov, which makes this even more funny and hilarious
View profile
and why I click on those threads... the first photo had a major gaffe... look carefully not at her, at him... I know he is probably saying hi... but the big no-no is he is grimacing in the photo.
I like to look at good and bad photography, learning shtick.
That is what makes this even more comedic.
Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #40)Nads, your expertise is limited to an Instamatic with a flash-cube.
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:23 AM
nadinbrzezinski (104,491 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
52. With modern camera gear it is easy
and you can be pretty unobtrusive. Carrying a 1D or D3, you are not unobtrusive.I am really trying hard to remember the last time I used a flash. That's why you'll never be a pro. :rotf:
(Ok in Guanajuato and that was pitch dark) Sorry, Nads, jacking up the iso has major limitations.
And they fire so fast you can get a good photo, or rather a better one of a series. Greeting. at least five, most likely ten. You can learn something from studying those photos. Why haven't you learned?
WilliamPitt (50,721 posts) Mon Apr 30, 2012, 02:33 PM
The self-delete button is getting worn out around here.
0
Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)StinkDUde!! It's not about you. The interwebs is laughing again. :rotf:
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 02:36 PM
Stinky The Clown (46,124 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
1. DO NOT BLAME THE SELF DELETERS
Better yet, self delete this thread.
The hjosts have been discussion this with great care and a LOT of discussion. The hosts prevailed on some posters to self delete in an effort to put some oil on the waters.
this thread of yours is unhelpful.
If you need to blame someone, blame me. or blame your favorite hosts. But do not blame the deleters.
The hjosts have been discussion this with great care and a LOT of discussion. The hosts prevailed on some posters to self delete in an effort to put some oil on the waters.
Nads is a diabetic? Did anyone know that?
I feel sad for Nadin, that she has no friends in real life and her people skills are such that she alienates all of her like-kind at the DUmp.I saw one picture where nadin was covered with bruises...from people touching her with ten-foot poles.
This moment of empathy is brought to you by Duke Nukum.
I feel sad for Nadin, that she has no friends in real life and her people skills are such that she alienates all of her like-kind at the DUmp.
This moment of empathy is brought to you by Duke Nukum.
Oh good, I thought I was the only 1.
Oh now, use your empathy on those disfigured in body but aesthetic in soul.
Nadin added a lot of people to her block list. wow. she is a fugly troll, so it is no big loss. I find it funny to see the douchenozzles go against her.
I was a friend of her's on Facebook and Twitter once... but then the bitch deleted and blocked me.You should have used a different screen name.
You should have used a different screen name.
Oh good, I thought I was the only 1.
Response to Little Star (Reply #81)Nah, you have to be a guest or member.
Tue May 1, 2012, 05:37 AM
Codeine (11,796 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
103. The OP has had so many butts handed to her
she could be the ashtray in a VFW hall.
I do feel sorry for her physical appearance. She can't help most of her looks although there are things she could do.
I know people who are physically unattractive, but radiate such a love of life, inner happiness and care for others that their appearance fades to nothingness. It's a joy to be around them.
Much of Nads ugly is bone deep. I'm sure that, like most of us, she has worries and unhappiness. But, Nads has a home, plenty to eat, a family and is extremely fortunate to live in this country. She chooses to run down all the blessings she's been handed.
I think that Nads and most self described progs make a conscious decision to remain in anger, bitterness and unhappiness. They'd rather all the world adapt their negative outlook than admit their shortcomings and make positive changes.
The faith that so many of them proudly eschew could help remove them from those dark places.