The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on April 29, 2012, 08:57:32 PM

Title: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: CC27 on April 29, 2012, 08:57:32 PM
Quote
Star Member nadinbrzezinski

View profile
 
Demonstation in front of the San Onofre power plant today
So before it actually started I went down to the State Park. These are folks playing with their dog. The round thing in the back, that is the nuclear plant...

(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/546329_204318609686437_100003248998183_334488_1172420433_n.jpg)



This is Ray Lutz not in focus. On purpose I concentrated on the hat in front of me of one of the attendees. Realize I am shooting quite a bit of black and white (and color) since Black and white has that evocative feel to it. Also somethings never really change, serious...


(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/p480x480/294933_204324439685854_100003248998183_334532_203532563_n.jpg)


A man and his dog at the demonstration...


(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/522750_204331816351783_100003248998183_334573_1011830342_n.jpg)


Oh yes this is about shutting down San Onofre... so yes, I like this photo... evocative and I like the reflection on the glasses.


(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/p480x480/392452_204332829685015_100003248998183_334576_762693184_n.jpg)


Finally one of the speakers, Corie Shumacker,a world class surfer... notice the plant in the back? Yup got good shots in color too.


(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/558489_204335743018057_100003248998183_334593_806040619_n.jpg)

My favorite from this actually is one I cannot post, since the person fears for job. So that series will remain in my drive. I am dutiful about that. If somebody says please do not, because of whatever...

By the way this was organized in many ways by Occupy Encinitas and Vista members

She can't spell and her pictures suck. What a bitch.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12522389
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: franksolich on April 29, 2012, 09:01:53 PM
(http://i949.photobucket.com/albums/ad335/photoatcc/nadin4.jpg)
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: CC27 on April 29, 2012, 09:03:40 PM
(http://i949.photobucket.com/albums/ad335/photoatcc/nadin4.jpg)

Is that her?
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Chris_ on April 29, 2012, 09:04:00 PM
Quote
The round thing in the back, that is the nuclear plant...
:lmao: Honestly, I never would have figured that one out.  Thanks for the heads up.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Ballygrl on April 29, 2012, 09:04:06 PM
The dog is adorable at the protest. Why the heck are they protesting at a nuclear power plant?
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: franksolich on April 29, 2012, 09:05:41 PM
Is that her?

You've obviously been away for a while, sir.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: CC27 on April 29, 2012, 09:07:00 PM
You've obviously been away for a while, sir.

Yes, i have been busy. All i have to say is yikes to that picture.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: franksolich on April 29, 2012, 09:08:13 PM
Yes, i have been busy. All i have to say is yikes to that picture.

"Yikes" is an appropriate reaction; modest, understated.

There's even better ones of her that I guarantee will make you more than "yike!"
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Big Dog on April 29, 2012, 09:08:55 PM
She can't spell and her pictures suck. What a bitch.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12522389

nadin's word of the day was "evocative".

Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: CC27 on April 29, 2012, 09:09:31 PM
"Yikes" is an appropriate reaction; modest, understated.

There's even better ones of her that I guarantee will make you more than "yike!"

I might need to drink before hand.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: CC27 on April 29, 2012, 09:10:26 PM
nadin's word of the day was "evocative".



She would have fit in perfectly on pee wees playhouse.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: franksolich on April 29, 2012, 09:10:46 PM
I might need to drink before hand.

There's different ones posted in just about every nadin thread that's been posted here today and yesterday.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: CC27 on April 29, 2012, 09:11:26 PM
There's different ones posted in just about every nadin thread that's been posted here today and yesterday.

I will go look. Wish me luck.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: EagleKeeper on April 29, 2012, 09:12:18 PM
Ok, I think I've seen three pics of nadin today....

Maybe it's time for a warning?
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: franksolich on April 29, 2012, 09:12:30 PM
nadin's word of the day was "evocative".



Yeah, she stole that from me.

There's no way a primitive would even know the word exists unless they read franksolich first.

It's one of my favorite tricks, to get primitives to use certain words, although they've steadfastly refused to use "boryborygmous."
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: GOBUCKS on April 29, 2012, 09:17:53 PM
Quote
The round thing in the back, that is the nuclear plant...

The round thing in back of the camera is nadin.

It's always startling how poor her pictures are, when you consider this "assignment" got The Good Rig.

And recently she's apparently run across the word "evocative", since she's never used the word even once before, and used it twice to describe her pictures.

She doesn't understand the word. Her photos aren't "evocative".

They're pedestrian, boring, poorly framed, and technically atrocious.  
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Big Dog on April 29, 2012, 09:18:17 PM
Yeah, she stole that from me.

There's no way a primitive would even know the word exists unless they read franksolich first.

It's one of my favorite tricks, to get primitives to use certain words, although they've steadfastly refused to use "boryborygmous."

nads the Magnificent may not use the word, but it's better than even money you can hear her gurgle across a room.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: franksolich on April 29, 2012, 09:21:20 PM
nads the Magnificent may not use the word, but it's better than even money you can hear her gurgle across a room.

Leona Helmsley of DUmmieland, the now-departed (to the elmtreed shores) flyarm primitive, used to lift whole entire phrases from franksolich on the DUmmie FUnnies.

It's a good way of checking to see if any lurking primitives read me, by using words that are understood but not commonly used.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: NHSparky on April 29, 2012, 09:21:37 PM
I wonder how she feels knowing her husband was exposed to "nook-you-lar ra-dee-ay-shun" for all those years. I wonder how she feels knowing by sitting in the sun for a few hours she exposed herself to more radiation than she would have sitting in the friggin Control Room all year.

STFU and have another glass of milk, nads.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on April 29, 2012, 09:24:21 PM
"Demonstation" - an apt description of DU, ironically.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Big Dog on April 29, 2012, 09:25:05 PM
It's always startling how poor her pictures are, when you consider this "assignment" got The Good Rig.

She said she meant to focus on the hippie's hat, instead of the speaker at the podium.

nads, your Journalism 101 grade is...  

F

www.electstevedawes.com (http://www.electstevedawes.com)
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: thundley4 on April 29, 2012, 09:26:36 PM
Quote
This is Ray Lutz not in focus. On purpose I concentrated on the hat in front of me of one of the attendees. Realize I am shooting quite a bit of black and white (and color) since Black and white has that evocative feel to it. Also somethings never really change, serious.

Bull shirt.  You didn't isolate the subject of the picture, so the camera's autofocus picked what to focus on.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Mr Mannn on April 29, 2012, 09:31:33 PM
Bull shirt.  You didn't isolate the subject of the picture, so the camera's autofocus picked what to focus on.
Bingo.

also another sign of a poor photo-journalist: I can't tell there is a demonstration at the plant. I see a speaker, a few isolated people, but no crowd shots.

I can only conclude there was no protest. Just a few people at a park.

Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: chitownchica on April 29, 2012, 11:25:55 PM
Poor Nadin hasn't had one reply in the hours since she posted. Ha ha.

The blurry picture excuse is hilarious. She focused on an ordinary cap vs. the speaker? Yeah right. Reminds me of this:

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJXU7EVXs2A[/youtube]

Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Chris_ on April 29, 2012, 11:29:20 PM
The blurry picture excuse is hilarious. She focused on an ordinary cap vs. the speaker? Yeah right.
That must not be the good rig.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: chitownchica on April 29, 2012, 11:30:30 PM
That must not be the good rig.

It probably was. That's just how bad she is at photography.

Also, love your new house!
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Chris_ on April 29, 2012, 11:33:54 PM
At least I have an excuse... the autofocus on my good rig is busted.

That picture would have been easy enough to produce.  Open the aperture to it's widest point and focus on the closest object at hand.  Wallah, instant blurry background.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Chris_ on April 29, 2012, 11:41:09 PM
Photography 101:  How to create detailed pictures with blurry backgrounds. (http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/Music%20City/cat2.jpg)  (high school girls love these)

Nads 101:  How to completely screw up your pictures by not paying attention to your camera (http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/Music%20City/cat3.jpg)
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Evil_Conservative on April 30, 2012, 12:27:17 AM
That's a nuclear plant?  Wow... glad Nadin told me that.  I thought it was the mall. 
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Chris_ on April 30, 2012, 12:32:24 AM
That's a nuclear plant?  Wow... glad Nadin told me that.  I thought it was the mall. 
Nucular.  Nu-cu-lar.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Duke Nukum on April 30, 2012, 12:34:23 AM
Is the series she's dutifully keeping on her hard drive the demonstration on how to put a condom on a cucumber?
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: chitownchica on April 30, 2012, 12:50:47 AM
I thought someone had mercy on her. I was wrong.  Her one reply:

Quote
nadinbrzezinski
1. kick
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: GOBUCKS on April 30, 2012, 01:01:18 AM
That must not be the good rig.
She uses The Good Rig unless she's going into combat or rain.

It's evocative....or, parenteral...I forget which.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: miskie on April 30, 2012, 05:41:41 AM
(http://www.devilstrain.com/images/top.jpg)

Departing from the demonstation.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: JohnnyReb on April 30, 2012, 09:38:19 AM
World class sufer: Worthless dude with rich parents.

...and parents hope that someday the sharks will eat him or that he will drown.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: TVDOC on April 30, 2012, 11:32:51 AM
Bull shirt.  You didn't isolate the subject of the picture, so the camera's autofocus picked what to focus on.

Geez.....those are awful......no decent photographer EVER uses autofocus (professional cameras don't even have that feature), the key to good frame content is to highlight the subject manually........autofocus is for snapshots.

Also with all that friggen haze, a yellow filter to increase the contrast on monochrome photos is a must......

That's the "good rig"???  I'm no pro, but I can do better than that with a $3 disposable camera.

doc
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on April 30, 2012, 11:36:26 AM
My wife has a Bach degree in Photography. I will have to ask her about the picture. It looks bad to me. Then I have no idea what I am talking about.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Wineslob on April 30, 2012, 12:30:32 PM
(http://i949.photobucket.com/albums/ad335/photoatcc/nadin4.jpg)

Wow, barely taller than a chair rail, and makes the First Wookie look like a model.

No wonder she's so ****ed up.   
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Rebel on April 30, 2012, 12:37:15 PM
(http://i949.photobucket.com/albums/ad335/photoatcc/nadin4.jpg)


(http://www.meh.ro/thumbnail/2009_12/meh.ro3096.jpg)
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: thundley4 on April 30, 2012, 12:38:16 PM
Wow, barely taller than a chair rail, and makes the First Wookie look like a model.

No wonder she's so ****ed up.   

Notice the chic, in style rolled cuffs on her jeans.  They don't make a short enough inseam for her waist size.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: GOBUCKS on April 30, 2012, 12:38:26 PM
Wow, barely taller than a chair rail, and makes the First Wookie look like a model.

No wonder she's so ****ed up.

Some serious rollup on those jeans.

Don't "Big and Short" stores stock 50X22 jeans?
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Rebel on April 30, 2012, 12:38:44 PM
All of those moonbats should have their power cut off. If you idiots don't want to live with nuclear power and "fossil" fuels, find yourselves a f'n cave. We'll send in the coroner 2 weeks after you've expired.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: TVDOC on April 30, 2012, 01:07:27 PM
All of those moonbats should have their power cut off. If you idiots don't want to live with nuclear power and "fossil" fuels, find yourselves a f'n cave. We'll send in the coroner 2 weeks after you've expired.

They don't want it cut off.....they just want it to be generated somewhere else rather than their own "pristine" backyards........they expect someone else to do the dirty work, then send it to them free........

They wouldn't allow California to be paved with solar arrays and windmills........that would destroy the view.  They expect it to come from someplace of "lesser" importance.......

doc
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Rebel on April 30, 2012, 01:28:17 PM
Well, they keep pulling stupid shit like that and I'm sure Texas will send them all the energy they need, for a premium price. They did the last time they had brown outs due to their own epic stupidity.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: AllosaursRus on April 30, 2012, 02:43:09 PM
Ok, I think I've seen three pics of nadin today....

Maybe it's time for a warning?

We call 'em "Spork Alerts", just in case ya wanna post one. heh!

Bingo.

also another sign of a poor photo-journalist: I can't tell there is a demonstration at the plant. I see a speaker, a few isolated people, but no crowd shots.

I can only conclude there was no protest. Just a few people at a park.

Yeah, pretty much nuttin' more than an aging hippy dippy circle jerk! Did ya notice the average age of the "participants"? Hell, they look older than me, and I'm a ****in' antique!

Good grief, WTF?

Well, they keep pulling stupid shit like that and I'm sure Texas will send them all the energy they need, for a premium price. They did the last time they had brown outs due to their own epic stupidity.

The pricks caused our rates to go up since it was more lucrative to send our hydro electric volts to those cocksuckers than it was to send it to us, the ****in' people who paid for it's construction in the first ****in' place!

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Karin on April 30, 2012, 03:02:29 PM
Never mind that demonstation.  Why didn't Nadin cover the Million Ugly Women March? 

Moonbattery (http://moonbattery.com/?p=11179#comments)

Also featured at Zombie, whose photography is outstanding. 

Any DUmmie talk about that one? 
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Rebel on April 30, 2012, 03:11:46 PM
Never mind that demonstation.  Why didn't Nadin cover the Million Ugly Women March? 

Moonbattery (http://moonbattery.com/?p=11179#comments)

Also featured at Zombie, whose photography is outstanding. 

Any DUmmie talk about that one? 

(http://moonbattery.com/war-on-women-3.jpg)


"Free" abortion on demand? **** you, skank. No one is getting in the way of your choice. Just don't force your choice onto other people. You think people should have to do all that shit for free? Logic isn't you moonbats strong suit. This isn't a damn matter of choice.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Karin on April 30, 2012, 03:23:19 PM
(http://moonbattery.com/war-on-women-1.jpg)
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Chris_ on April 30, 2012, 03:26:33 PM
There will be consequences and repercussions... :rofl:
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Skul on April 30, 2012, 05:06:17 PM
Only photo that might have been worth a poop, was the old coot and dog.
Then the DUmps photography expert muffs the framing. :rotf:
Yo, Nads, try a fill-flash next time.
You also need to work more with settings.
Look them up, read, try to understand.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on April 30, 2012, 05:28:37 PM
Only sluts are for abortions. ****in skanks. Yes, Dummie Douchebags, I said it. If you are female and for abortions, that would mean that you are a slut.

Men who are for abortions are deadbeats who want so sleep with every woman they see, and want to get out of paying child support. You ****in ****nuts.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Skul on April 30, 2012, 07:10:34 PM
Geez.....those are awful......no decent photographer EVER uses autofocus (some
professional cameras don't even have that feature), the key to good frame content is to highlight the subject manually........autofocus is for snapshots.

Also with all that friggen haze, a yellow filter to increase the contrast on monochrome photos is a must......

That's the "good rig"???  I'm no pro, but I can do better than that with a $3 disposable camera.

doc
Just a minor fix.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Mr Mannn on April 30, 2012, 07:34:08 PM
(http://moonbattery.com/war-on-women-1.jpg)
Yeesh. Looks like this one has a had a few too many samiches.

Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on April 30, 2012, 07:38:48 PM
Yeesh. Looks like this one has a had a few too many samiches.



A 26 mile marathon couldn't help that. Those tattoos make her so attractive, NOT!
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: RWKindaGuy on April 30, 2012, 08:22:32 PM
Only sluts are for abortions. ****in skanks. Yes, Dummie Douchebags, I said it. If you are female and for abortions, that would mean that you are a slut.

Men who are for abortions are deadbeats who want so sleep with every woman they see, and want to get out of paying child support. You ****in ****nuts.

If you are trying to make conservatives look like a**holes, then you have succeeded.  BS for you.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Aristotelian on May 01, 2012, 07:49:50 AM
Thank goodness she got the 'good rig' out...I've taken better pictures using my mobile 'phone, come to think of it, my 6 year-old nephew has taken better pictures using my mobile 'phone.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Crazy Horse on May 01, 2012, 08:47:16 AM
All of those moonbats should have their power cut off. If you idiots don't want to live with nuclear power and "fossil" fuels, find yourselves a f'n cave. We'll send in the coroner 2 weeks after you've expired.

San Onfre has issues, but I will wait for nadin to inform us of all that is going on
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on May 01, 2012, 08:54:59 AM
If you are trying to make conservatives look like a**holes, then you have succeeded.  BS for you.


Thanks for the Bitch Slap  :-)

And think about it. Why else would a liberal woman be for abortions? This contraception issue brought out the light on a lot of it. Unless you think that there are more conservatives who are for abortions than liberals? I don't know of any conservative that is for abortion. If they are, then they are not a true conservative.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Ballygrl on May 01, 2012, 09:05:26 AM
Only sluts are for abortions. ****in skanks. Yes, Dummie Douchebags, I said it. If you are female and for abortions, that would mean that you are a slut.

Men who are for abortions are deadbeats who want so sleep with every woman they see, and want to get out of paying child support. You ****in ****nuts.

Oh, that's not nice, we have Republicans here who are pro-choice, we're inclusive as a party contrary to what the left says.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: RWKindaGuy on May 01, 2012, 09:59:59 AM
Thanks for the Bitch Slap  :-)

And think about it. Why else would a liberal woman be for abortions? This contraception issue brought out the light on a lot of it. Unless you think that there are more conservatives who are for abortions than liberals? I don't know of any conservative that is for abortion. If they are, then they are not a true conservative.

I, and most of the conservatives I know, generally don't go around calling any woman a s***, regardless of our view of their stance concerning abortion.  You don't do conservatism any favors when you spout this BS.

Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Kyle Ricky on May 01, 2012, 10:34:49 AM
Oh, that's not nice, we have Republicans here who are pro-choice, we're inclusive as a party contrary to what the left says.

I, and most of the conservatives I know, generally don't go around calling any woman a s***, regardless of our view of their stance concerning abortion.  You don't do conservatism any favors when you spout this BS.



This is true. I think I did cross the line here. I apologize, I shouldn't have said what I said.  :(
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: 67 Rover on May 01, 2012, 10:39:14 AM
Yeesh. Looks like this one has a had a few too many samiches.




That's awesome , The Ice cream cone on the right shoulder is a nice touch.  :rofl:
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: GOBUCKS on May 01, 2012, 10:51:49 AM
Only sluts are for abortions. ****in skanks. Yes, Dummie Douchebags, I said it. If you are female and for abortions, that would mean that you are a slut.

Men who are for abortions are deadbeats who want so sleep with every woman they see, and want to get out of paying child support. You ****in ****nuts.
I would be surprised if even DUmmy vestanumbers could make a comment more worthy of contempt.

Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: vesta111 on May 01, 2012, 02:07:24 PM
I would be surprised if even DUmmy vestanumbers could make a comment more worthy of contempt.



Well if you are not a hard ass today, if I didn't know better I would think you were my crazy EX-Mother-in Law.   

Her only complaint with me was I was a Damn Yankee and a Conservative. 
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski at a "Demonstation"
Post by: Rebel on May 01, 2012, 02:10:16 PM
Well if you are not a hard ass today, if I didn't know better I would think you were my crazy EX-Mother-in Law.   

Her only complaint with me was I was a Damn Yankee and a Conservative. 

You live in the South? If you don't live in the South, and from the North, you're not a "Damn Yankee".