The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on April 12, 2012, 02:23:36 PM

Title: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: BannedFromDU on April 12, 2012, 02:23:36 PM
What say you, CC?
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Rebel on April 12, 2012, 02:29:11 PM
Since it's apparent this case is being tried in the court of public opinion, Zim needs to come out and say he's a gay liberal Democrat and Tray'Von was calling him a faggot and started beating him, calling him gay slurs while doing it, making him fear for his life against the homophobe 17 Y/O. That should leave the DUmmies heads-a-spinning. Afterall, he does have the voter registration card to back it up.  :popcorn:
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: BannedFromDU on April 12, 2012, 02:33:02 PM
Since it's apparent this case is being tried in the court of public opinion, Zim needs to come out and say he's a gay liberal Democrat and Tray'Von was calling him a faggot and started beating him, calling him gay slurs while doing it, making him fear for his life against the homophobe 17 Y/O. That should leave the DUmmies heads-a-spinning. Afterall, he does have the voter registration card to back it up.  :popcorn:


     Holy LORD man, that is BRILLIANT. ^5.

     Wow. Stunning in its simplicity.

     Well said.  :bow:
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Karin on April 12, 2012, 02:33:16 PM
Interesting, Rebel.  Depending on the Liberal Poker rules of the day, anything could happen.  

I voted death penalty, but by mob.  They want him swinging from a lamppost.  
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: franksolich on April 12, 2012, 02:35:03 PM
Interesting, Rebel.  Depending on the Liberal Poker rules of the day, anything could happen.  

I voted death penalty, but by mob.  They want him swinging from a lamppost.  

So did I.

One wonders if the primitives remember Zacco and Venzetti.

That was a great liberal cause celebre in its time; who would've thought it'd flip-flop the other way now?
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: BlueStateSaint on April 12, 2012, 02:44:35 PM
I said they'd want a good, old-fashioned Islamic stoning.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: zeitgeist on April 12, 2012, 02:57:18 PM
I said they'd want a good, old-fashioned Islamic stoning.

Tough choices all but in the end I went with the Islamic stoning.  Which, by the way, will be the way for the Gay (and loose women), once the Islamists finish the jihad against the Jews, Christians, and others whom they don't agree with.   :fuelfire:
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: EagleKeeper on April 12, 2012, 03:52:06 PM
I went with...

"Another Nobel for Obama; Walmart liquidated and paid to the Martins as tribute"

Athough I rather doubt that they would want that money to go to the Martin family.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: thundley4 on April 12, 2012, 03:56:47 PM
Where is "all of the above" and "the Joooooos" options?
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Airwolf on April 12, 2012, 05:52:58 PM
I chose replace Jesus with Trayvon  on the cross. They want blood and they will do anything to get it.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Ballygrl on April 12, 2012, 06:05:21 PM
Since it's apparent this case is being tried in the court of public opinion, Zim needs to come out and say he's a gay liberal Democrat and Tray'Von was calling him a faggot and started beating him, calling him gay slurs while doing it, making him fear for his life against the homophobe 17 Y/O. That should leave the DUmmies heads-a-spinning. Afterall, he does have the voter registration card to back it up.  :popcorn:

We saw what happened when blacks overwhelmingly voted Yes on 8 in California, they were thrown under the bus by the left.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Rebel on April 12, 2012, 06:12:25 PM
Wait till the movie comes out. "Killing Trayvon" starring Nick Cannon as Trayvon and Danny Trejo as George Zimmerman.


(http://i2.listal.com/image/1528884/600full-danny-trejo.jpg)(http://www.howard.edu/newsroom/images/Nick%20Cannon.jpg)
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: BEG on April 12, 2012, 06:14:44 PM
Nothing...they will never be satisfied.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: longview on April 12, 2012, 06:20:35 PM
Nothing...they will never be satisfied.

^5.  I gave Rebel one,too, because it was brilliant, but I think yours is closer to the truth.  What an odd bunch they are.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Chris_ on April 12, 2012, 07:02:25 PM
Danny Trejo
:rotf:
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: GOP Congress on April 12, 2012, 07:19:51 PM
Speaking of DUmmie satisfication, I almost missed this gem. Ban is going bonkers on Zimmerman's attorney.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/101495643

Quote
BanTheGOP

View profile
Mark O'Mara is new Zimmerman Defense Lawyer

Last edited Wed Apr 11, 2012, 08:18 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3)
Source: Channel 6 Orlando

ORLANDO, Fla. -

Attorney Mark O'Mara, who was a legal expert for Local 6 in the Casey Anthony murder trial and the ongoing Trayvon Martin death investigation, is now representing George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watchman who shot and killed the teen in Sanford.

...(rest of news story)...

"I'm expecting a lot of work and hopefully justice in the end," said O'Mara, who added that Zimmerman is OK but concerned about his future. "He's frightened."

So far, humdrum...but then Ban goes off.

Quote
An attorney has been found lickety-split. He is Channel 6's LEGAL expert, fer crying out loud!

EVERYONE write to Channel 6 and DEMAND they get rid of O'Mara as their "legal expert" and boycott the show until a VERY VOCAL AND PUBLIC APOLOGY is forthcoming!!

I'm not complaining about Zimmerman's right to defense. BUT...we HAVE a right to make sure that nobody PROFITS off this, and Channel 6 should feel the pain until the do the right thing.

And you DAMN RIGHT Zimmerman should be frightened!! Serves him right.

DAG, this guy had DU-cojones. Trashing the attorney!! Understandably the peanut gallery is pissed on this one, but he's got a bunch of recs.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Chris_ on April 12, 2012, 07:27:23 PM
What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
They want a good old-fashioned lynching.  If this were a hundred years ago, I have no doubt a mob of Sharpton ideologues would have formed a posse and strung Zimmerman up a tree if they could have found him in time. 

Not a whole lot of difference between the Klan and the Panthers these days other than the color of their hoods.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Aristotelian on April 13, 2012, 08:01:32 AM
Torn limb from limb in the public square - but at the same time holding a candle-lit vigil to protest against the death penalty.

Not like we could ever acuse them of consistency.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: obumazombie on April 13, 2012, 09:44:41 AM
A right to ensure nobody profits from this. I'll let that sink in for awhile.
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Skul on April 13, 2012, 10:19:14 AM
As coach would say.... "Oh my".

Quote
(CNSNews.com) — “Inequities” in the criminal justice system go back to the time of Jesus, and protests stemming from the Trayvon Martin case — some of them led by the Rev. Al Sharpton — were intended to right some of those wrongs, Sharpton said.

“We believe in Jesus, they crucified him and never had a charge,” the Rev. Sharpton told a gathering of his National Action Network in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. “They never charged, there wasn’t no crime on his indictment. So we’ve got to deal with the inequities of the criminal justice system. The fact that we (black people) are overly-incarcerated, the fact that we go to court and are treated differently, and the fact that when we’re victimized there is not the same response. That’s what Trayvon was about.”
Title: Re: What would satisfy DUmmies in the Trayvon case?
Post by: Rebel on April 13, 2012, 10:20:54 AM
Quote
The fact that we (black people) are overly-incarcerated,

That's because you (black people) commit more ****ing crimes by percentage of population than any other ****ing race in the country. Hell, I'd venture to say MANY countries. Fix yo shit, dog. A lot of the reason is people tap dance around the race issue essentially giving you carte blanche to do whatever the hell you want to do and everyone else gets blamed in this politically correct world. Well **** political correctness.