The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on March 28, 2012, 11:17:12 AM

Title: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on March 28, 2012, 11:17:12 AM
Ass-Splatter is feeling it:

Quote
backscatter712 (14,871 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

What we need to be doing right now is delegitimizing the Supreme Court.

We should be demanding that the right-wing justices who've been palling around with right-wing lobbyists and industry groups, that have been shown to have already made up their mind to rule solely for partisan concerns.

We need to be asking our Congresscritters to haul Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas before the Judicial committees of both houses to answer questions about how they came up with their rulings. We should be talking about impeachments if anything the least bit unethical starts turning up.

We need to make it clear to the public that the Supreme Court is no longer a place of law, but a tyranny ruled by politicians in robes.

Delegitimize the court.

Roe V Wade?

Lawrence V Taylor

Kelo V New London?

What else can we throw out?

Meanwhile you have Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg telling the Egyptians our constitution is outdated and Sotomayor saying we should use international standards.

Quote
polichick (28,856 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

1. Dems didn't stand up to the court when they installed an unelected president...

...and they're not impeaching for the conflicts of interest that have become known.

Too often the parties do the good cop, bad cop routine and it serves to fool the people and keep us in this one-corporate-party-with-two-faces corrupt system.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002484233
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 28, 2012, 11:20:40 AM


Meanwhile you have Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg telling the Egyptians our constitution is outdated and Sotomayor saying we should use international standards.



Now why hadn't I ever thought of that.... :thatsright:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on March 28, 2012, 11:21:17 AM
Now why hadn't I ever thought of that.... :thatsright:

Actually, Rush started it.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on March 28, 2012, 11:31:52 AM
If we're really gonna talk 'Conflicts of interest,' Sotomayor should've publicly recused herself from this one entirely from the git-go.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: thundley4 on March 28, 2012, 11:32:39 AM
I think she sounds a little like Elmer Fudd.

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg[/youtube]
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: wasp69 on March 28, 2012, 11:34:35 AM
Quote
backscatter712 (14,871 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

What we need to be doing right now is delegitimizing the Supreme Court.

We should be demanding that the right-wing justices who've been palling around with right-wing lobbyists and industry groups, that have been shown to have already made up their mind to rule solely for partisan concerns.

We need to be asking our Congresscritters to haul Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas before the Judicial committees of both houses to answer questions about how they came up with their rulings. We should be talking about impeachments if anything the least bit unethical starts turning up.

We need to make it clear to the public that the Supreme Court is no longer a place of law, but a tyranny ruled by politicians in robes.

Delegitimize the court.

(http://www.everythingertel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tiny-impotent-rage.jpg)

Sucks to be you, DUmmie!  Maybe your president and party should have been a little more thorough when they wrote the law and a little less shitty when they slammed the Supreme Court on National Television.

 :lmao:

By the way, retard butt-splatter, you might want to be careful what you wish for.  Elections have a nasty tendency to go heavily against one side and you may not want to set any lasting precedence that can be used against you....

 ;)
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Rebel on March 28, 2012, 12:11:17 PM
Quote
backscatter712 (14,871 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

What we need to be doing right now is delegitimizing the Supreme Court.


Not "technically" in there, but...


http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm    :whistling:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Gina on March 28, 2012, 12:16:42 PM
Are they really serious?   :???:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 28, 2012, 12:18:55 PM
Quote
backscatter712 (14,871 posts)

What we need to be doing right now is delegitimizing the Supreme Court.
I wonder how DUmmy backscatternumbers would propose to do that.

He should be careful in how he wields the mighty power of the DUmp.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: BannedFromDU on March 28, 2012, 12:21:28 PM

     I think DU needs to boycott the SCOTUS right now, including all the sponsors who advertise on SCOTUS. Anyone who uses SCOTUS needs to be named and shamed. This is huge, folks.

     
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: 67 Rover on March 28, 2012, 12:30:20 PM
     I think DU needs to boycott the SCOTUS right now, including all the sponsors who advertise on SCOTUS. Anyone who uses SCOTUS needs to be named and shamed. This is huge, folks.

     

H5  :rofl:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 28, 2012, 12:40:50 PM
Are they really serious?   :???:

The Obama corps is dead series.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: jukin on March 28, 2012, 12:43:24 PM
The Obama corps is dead series.

I'm in the 57th state today, could you say that in Austrian?
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: GOP Congress on March 28, 2012, 12:49:45 PM
Looks like Ban has a whole slew of proteges trying to outdo the big doggie.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: AllosaursRus on March 28, 2012, 12:56:15 PM
Actually, Rush started it.

I think I heard it on Levin's show the day before Rush brought it up. I think it occurred after his show was over for the day.

Quote
backscatter712 (14,871 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

What we need to be doing right now is delegitimizing the Supreme Court.

Un****in' believable! WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOIN' RIGHT NOW, IS PUTTIN' TRAITORS LIKE YOU IN THE WORK CAMPS! Maybe then you might be able to explain your existence and the fact you waste our oxygen!
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 28, 2012, 01:01:47 PM
Sorry, the only language I know is English......and it's foreign to me. :-)
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: thundley4 on March 28, 2012, 01:05:19 PM
I think I heard it on Levin's show the day before Rush brought it up. I think it occurred after his show was over for the day.

Un****in' believable! WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOIN' RIGHT NOW, IS PUTTIN' TRAITORS LIKE YOU IN THE WORK CAMPS! Maybe then you might be able to explain your existence and the fact you waste our oxygen!

They want Obama to have sole dictatorial powers to make laws. They do not want the three branches of government to be separate and equal, which is why they have cheered most of Obama's Executive Orders that have bypassed congress.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Rebel on March 28, 2012, 01:09:12 PM
They want Obama to have sole dictatorial powers to make laws. They do not want the three branches of government to be separate and equal, which is why they have cheered most of Obama's Executive Orders that have bypassed congress. ...

...and which is why it's so damned easy to set up a leftwing dictatorship among Progressives, Marxists, and Socialists. The rights of the collective outweighs the rights of the individual. It's also why slavery and death camps are so prevalent among them.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on March 28, 2012, 02:05:54 PM
Different thread:

Quote
scheming daemons (19,845 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

hey trolls... can the govt require you to buy a photo id in order to vote?

Please explain the logical difference between that "forced purchase " and health care mandates?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002485056

Do you WANT to vote?

Do you HAVE to vote?

How much will it cost you if you decide you don't want to vote?
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Rebel on March 28, 2012, 02:08:26 PM
Quote
scheming daemons (19,845 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

hey trolls... can the govt require you to buy a photo id in order to vote?

No, which is why many states offer free "I.D." cards. Want to make it nationwide? Fine by me. Anything that gets Mickey Mouse and John Miller, Deceased 1973, off the voter roles. I'll even kick in the money to buy some leech's I.D. card if they do charge that whopping 5 dollar fee. I know it really digs into the budget. I don't know how they're going to get by without that 5 dollars for the next 5-7 years.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 28, 2012, 02:09:53 PM
Please explain the logical difference between that "forced purchase " and health care mandates?  

Lets see here...uh...a one time $5 fee vs a $1,000 a month for years and years.

Nope, not much difference at all if you're a free loading DUmmie on medicaid.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 28, 2012, 04:42:25 PM
No, which is why many states offer free "I.D." cards. Want to make it nationwide? Fine by me. Anything that gets Mickey Mouse and John Miller, Deceased 1973, off the voter roles. I'll even kick in the money to buy some leech's I.D. card if they do charge that whopping 5 dollar fee. I know it really digs into the budget. I don't know how they're going to get by without that 5 dollars for the next 5-7 years.
I don't believe voter fraud or ID cards will ever decide an election, outside of a few aldermen in Chicago, but anything that discourages 0bamaites from showing up is all good.

The real fraud, like when Mayor Daley elected Kennedy with 200,000 votes at 3 a.m., or the thousands of ghost indian votes in South Dakota, occur when totals are simply changed. No one has to mark a ballot when that happens.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Duke Nukum on March 28, 2012, 04:46:07 PM
Nobody knows how the court is going to rule. What if it rules the DUmmie's way?
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: thundley4 on March 28, 2012, 04:47:23 PM
Nobody knows how the court is going to rule. What if it rules the DUmmie's way?

Then Diebold will guarantee the GOP wins the Presidency and takes big margins in both houses.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: BEG on March 28, 2012, 04:50:18 PM
Quote
scheming daemons (19,845 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

hey trolls... can the govt require you to buy a photo id in order to vote?

You can get a government issued picture ID for free if you can't afford it.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Skul on March 28, 2012, 04:52:00 PM
DUmmie Crapsplatter doesn't understand squat about government. :loser:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: diesel driver on March 28, 2012, 05:00:13 PM
DUmmie Crapsplatter doesn't understand squat about government. :loser:

But, he DOES know how to get a check from the government every month.   :thatsright:

http://www.electstevedawes.com/
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: delilahmused on March 28, 2012, 05:09:05 PM
Quote
scheming daemons (19,845 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

hey trolls... can the govt require you to buy a photo id in order to vote?

Please explain the logical difference between that "forced purchase " and health care mandates?

Uh, two things...the ID requirement is being done in individual STATES, not the federal government. The fed is supposed to be limited so that states & individuals can have more freedom. Truly idiotic to not understand that. And one does NOT have to vote, thus getting an ID is optional (though how anyone of voting age has managed to go through life for without an ID is mind boggling). Voting is a privilege and carries with it certain responsibilities, among them following the rules of one's state.

But hey, you guys got Kagan on the court and she was responsible for writing the arguments in favor of 0bamacare. And the "wise Latina" is loaded with an abundance of empathy. Ruthie is trying to argue the administration's case for them and Breyer is an idiot who will follow whatever the left wants. Oh and two of the justices think the Constitution isn't worth the paper it's printed on and would rather follow ones from Cuba or Denmark or something.

Cindie
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Bondai on March 28, 2012, 05:16:38 PM
Quote
We need to be asking our Congresscritters to haul Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas before the Judicial committees of both houses to answer questions about how they came up with their rulings

Sorry boys and girls it doesn't work that way...call the SCOTUS before a judicial committee,oh brother  :lmao:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: AllosaursRus on March 28, 2012, 05:28:52 PM
I don't believe voter fraud or ID cards will ever decide an election, outside of a few aldermen in Chicago, but anything that discourages 0bamaites from showing up is all good.

The real fraud, like when Mayor Daley elected Kennedy with 200,000 votes at 3 a.m., or the thousands of ghost indian votes in South Dakota, occur when totals are simply changed. No one has to mark a ballot when that happens.

Well up here in WA state, they elected their Gubner by about 500 votes! they had to go back to the well 5 times and find those in a DUmpster, the trunk of a car, and I think in someone's bathroom, to do that! So, election fraud does make a diff!

The state really went downhill! Especially for those not livin' in Seattle, Olympia and suburbs of both. The folks in right wing enclaves like Spokane, got poked in the pooper!

The libs on the left coast are the reason I moved to Idaho and rather drive 140 miles a day rather than live in that sewer!
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: DefiantSix on March 28, 2012, 05:31:07 PM
Well up here in WA state, they elected their Gubner by about 500 votes! they had to go back to the well 5 times and find those in a DUmpster to do that! So, election fraud does make a diff!

The state really went downhill! Especially for those not livin' in Seattle, Olympia and suburbs of both. The folks in right wing enclaves like Spokane, got poked in the pooper!

The libs on the left coast are the reason I moved to Idaho and rather drive 140 miles a day rather than live in that sewer!

As I recall, didn't some of the precincts in King County turn in more Dhimmi'Rat votes for Gregoire than there were REGISTERED VOTERS in their precinct? :confused:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Rebel on March 28, 2012, 05:46:04 PM
Well up here in WA state, they elected their Gubner by about 500 votes! they had to go back to the well 5 times and find those in a DUmpster, the trunk of a car, and I think in someone's bathroom, to do that! So, election fraud does make a diff!

The state really went downhill! Especially for those not livin' in Seattle, Olympia and suburbs of both. The folks in right wing enclaves like Spokane, got poked in the pooper!

The libs on the left coast are the reason I moved to Idaho and rather drive 140 miles a day rather than live in that sewer!

Ah, you must mean the Gregoire/Rossi race that was straight out of the Farley/Spade movie "Black Sheep". Yeah, "Dry Washington" has wanted to secede from "Wet Washington" for a while. All the nuts, save for a few, live west of the Cascades. Gotta be something about that Pacific air. I mean, the closer people get to the Pacific, the fruitier they get.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 28, 2012, 05:48:26 PM
As I recall, didn't some of the precincts in King County turn in more Dhimmi'Rat votes for Gregoire than there were REGISTERED VOTERS in their precinct?
Those were votes that were never cast in the first place. I doubt a picture ID would have any effect on votes created out of thin air.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Rebel on March 28, 2012, 05:54:42 PM
Uh, two things...the ID requirement is being done in individual STATES, not the federal government. The fed is supposed to be limited so that states & individuals can have more freedom. Truly idiotic to not understand that. And one does NOT have to vote, thus getting an ID is optional (though how anyone of voting age has managed to go through life for without an ID is mind boggling). Voting is a privilege and carries with it certain responsibilities, among them following the rules of one's state.

But hey, you guys got Kagan on the court and she was responsible for writing the arguments in favor of 0bamacare. And the "wise Latina" is loaded with an abundance of empathy. Ruthie is trying to argue the administration's case for them and Breyer is an idiot who will follow whatever the left wants. Oh and two of the justices think the Constitution isn't worth the paper it's printed on and would rather follow ones from Cuba or Denmark or something.

Cindie

Actually Cindie, it's more complicated than that. No one has a right to vote in a federal election, which is the Presidential election since all others are state elections (See Bush v Gore), and electoral vote overrides popular vote because we're a Republic, not a Democracy. At the state level, state Constitutions lay forth who can vote. However, the US Constitution states in the 14th and 15th that when they allow people to vote, they can't put stipulations on which people can vote based on certain measures.


Oh, and lurking DUmpmonkies, if you think you have the right to vote in a federal election, you might want to tell Jesse Jackson Jr., one of your congressmen.

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/political_reform/amendment_constitutional_voting_right.html


...because, unlike you idiots, he realizes it.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Skul on March 28, 2012, 06:02:17 PM
Actually Cindie, it's more complicated than that. No one has a right to vote in a federal election, which is the Presidential election since all others are state elections (See Bush v Gore), and electoral vote overrides popular vote because we're a Republic, not a Democracy. At the state level, state Constitutions lay forth who can vote. However, the US Constitution states in the 14th and 15th that when they allow people to vote, they can't put stipulations on which people can vote based on certain measures.


Oh, and lurking DUmpmonkies, if you think you have the right to vote in a federal election, you might want to tell Jesse Jackson Jr., one of your congressmen.

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/political_reform/amendment_constitutional_voting_right.html


...because, unlike you idiots, he realizes it.
Interesting point in that said amendment.
Quote
SECTION 3. Each State shall provide any eligible voter the opportunity to register and vote on the day of any public election.
Eligibilty is detrmained how? ID card?
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: AllosaursRus on March 28, 2012, 06:18:26 PM
As I recall, didn't some of the precincts in King County turn in more Dhimmi'Rat votes for Gregoire than there were REGISTERED VOTERS in their precinct? :confused:

Yeah, I'm pretty sure those were the ballots found in someone's bathroom in the toilet, since not a single voter believed that BS, but the state Supremes let them stand, as they didn't want to disenfranchise any voters! Not even Mickey, Donald, SpongeBob, Spot, Garfield, Dracula or Frankenstein!
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: sybilll on March 28, 2012, 07:29:57 PM
MSLSD has been on suicide watch all afternoon.  Martin Bashir and his guest were discussing the grounds they may have to arrest Justice Roberts if Obamacare is overturned. 
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: BannedFromDU on March 28, 2012, 08:49:58 PM
Martin Bashir and his guest were discussing the grounds they may have to arrest Justice Roberts if Obamacare is overturned. 


     WHAT? Explain. Please.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: BattleHymn on March 28, 2012, 09:34:22 PM
If we're really gonna talk 'Conflicts of interest,' Sotomayor should've publicly recused herself from this one entirely from the git-go.

But it is so fun to hear Kagan, Sotomayor, and Buzzy try to help the solicitor general polish the turd he has been given.   :rotf:
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: sybilll on March 28, 2012, 10:03:51 PM

     WHAT? Explain. Please.

I am not making that up.  I flipped to it during a commercial and that was the discussion.  I sent a tweet to Newsbusters, RealClearPolitics and TheRightScoop asking them to check the replay and post it, but nothing so far. 
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Chris_ on March 28, 2012, 10:05:38 PM
Martin Bashir probably has as much understanding of our federal justice system as Robert Mugabe.

I don't think he graduated at the top of his class.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Rebel on March 28, 2012, 10:14:21 PM

I don't think he graduated at the top of his class.

Sadly, it depends on where he graduated. Harvard? Probably Magna. Ole Miss? He'd have flunked.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Rebel on March 28, 2012, 10:16:03 PM
BTW, Ole Miss was ranked by Princeton Review as being "most nostalgic for Reagan", parents. ;-)
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: Chris_ on March 28, 2012, 10:18:41 PM
Quote
Bashir was educated at King Alfred's College of Higher Education, Winchester (since 2004 the University of Winchester), studying English and History from 1982–1985, and at King's College London.
I'm assuming that is the equivalent of graduating from the local state college (UT or the University of Mississippi).  No small feat, but his claim to fame is browbeating Michael Jackson before he died.
Title: Re: ObamaCoup panic setting in
Post by: BEG on March 28, 2012, 10:24:25 PM
Hmmmm...He was against it before he was for it. Also...I thought Obama claimed he based Obamacare on Romneycare? Here he slams it because of the mandate.

[youtube=425,350]7AOJBiklP1Q[/youtube]