The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CactusCarlos on March 06, 2012, 05:20:34 PM

Title: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: CactusCarlos on March 06, 2012, 05:20:34 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002392480

Quote
Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra Fluke and Sara Palin

Last edited Tue Mar 6, 2012, 04:37 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Okay. similar first names. Hahahahaha.

Sara Palin, they're stating, has had mean things said about her. She's had untrue things said about her. She has been ridiculed and her family dragged into it.

Sandra Fluke, we're stating, has had mean things said about her. She's had untrue things said about her. She has been ridiculed and her family dragged into it.

Sara Plain SOUGHT the public eye. She was an elected official. She was public property, so to speak. She insinuated herself in a US presidential bid as the second seat candidate. She PUT her family in the spotlight. She flogged her kids on stage for the publicity. Sara Palin is a firm believer in "say anything you wish about me, but don't spell my name wrong," and "there is no such thing as bad publicity."

Sandra Fluke is one of the hundreds and thousands who testify before congressional committees. You have never heard of most of them. Yes, technically, they all spoke on the public record and have no reasonable expectation of privacy. But she was culled from all the hundreds and thousands of others who testify solely to advance a right wing narrative. In almost every other case, the testimony is what is public. The testifier goes immediately back to anonymity. Unless Rush Limbaugh needs a punching bag.

Sara Palin The Story and Sandra Fluke The Story have absolutely no moral equivalency. None. Absolutely none.

Yet that is precisely the case some of the Limbaugh apologists and right wing nutters are attempting to make. It needs a good, strong beat down as soon as it bubbles up.

StinkyTheAssClown clears things up.

Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Skul on March 06, 2012, 05:24:06 PM
StinkDUde is doing his best to "out stupid" other DUmpmonkeys.
Dude is doing it right.  :mental:
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on March 06, 2012, 05:25:37 PM
What if we got her number off the bathroom wall?

And it was in her own handwriting?
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: obumazombie on March 06, 2012, 05:25:42 PM
As I understand it Sandra didn't testify before congress. She was put in a press conference made to look like a congressional testimony. Everything I have seen about Sandra is a complete fraud, like owebuma.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 06, 2012, 05:30:01 PM
Was Ms. Fluke froced to testify or did she volunteer to testify before congress DUmmie. She volunteered for the public eye just like Sarah Palin...then Fluke it appears is public property in more ways than one ..... Sarah Palin in only one way
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Duke Nukum on March 06, 2012, 05:35:31 PM
I hope the Stinky DoUche will remember that Clinton's sock puppets' first choice going up against Monica Lewinsky's allegations was the "nuts and sluts" defense which a brave woman by the name of Linda Tripp made impossible by deftly advising Lewinsky. And then taking many of the arrows.

Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Delmar on March 06, 2012, 05:42:56 PM
Dude, Fluke came of her own free will to the democrat dog and pony show after the real committee told her that they weren't interested in hearing what she had to say.  She didn't get a subpoena, she wasn't forced to testify.  She came and spouted so many obvious and easily disproved lies that she deserves to be mocked mercilessly.  Fluke, without a doubt, SOUGHT the public eye.  Fluke would have to stand on Nancy Pelosi's shoulders to kiss Sarah Palin's ass.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: BEG on March 06, 2012, 06:06:07 PM
What about the way Sarah Palin's children were treated asswipe?  Each of them were treated like shit by you pigs and your "media". Stop trying to excuse the way your people treat conservative women and minorities.  You always excuse it and join in on the "fun". What if one of Obama's kids were treated anywhere close to the way Sarsh Palin's children were treated?  Or even the way Bush's daughters were treated?  You people would be going ape shit.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Freeper on March 06, 2012, 06:06:58 PM
Ok Dude how about if I say Hillary Clinton is a stupid twat, and a ****?

She's a senator and everything that you said about Palin bringing herself and her family into the spotlight applies.

Apologies to the ladies for using those terms, I was making a point.

Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Splashdown on March 06, 2012, 06:12:05 PM
How about what Maher said about Bristol Palin? How about Trig? How about the viscous, despicable things they said about Santorum's children? How about Joe the Plumber?
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Freeper on March 06, 2012, 08:28:28 PM
How about what Maher said about Bristol Palin? How about Trig? How about the viscous, despicable things they said about Santorum's children? How about Joe the Plumber?

To be fair, Maher has an audience of about six, and Rush a couple million, so when Maher shoots his mouth off no one heard him.  :-)
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: USA4ME on March 06, 2012, 08:47:57 PM
Sandra Fluke is trash, and stupid.  Like the Ditch Witch, she's only as good as the mileage the whackos can get out of her, and then they'll toss her to the side.

.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Ogre on March 06, 2012, 08:51:53 PM
StinkDUde is doing his best to "out stupid" other DUmpmonkeys.
Dude is doing it right.  :mental:

If stupid Beth is the DUmbest women on the internet, is DUmbass DUde the stupidest man on the internet?

Or is he just the laughing stock of the internet?
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: DLR Pyro on March 06, 2012, 08:52:19 PM
It's Sarah you dumb****, not Sara.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Chris_ on March 06, 2012, 08:55:35 PM
It's Sarah you dumb****, not Sara.
The morons at DemocratUnderground are still laboring under the delusion that Sarah Palin was actually on 'Saturday Night Live' and could 'see Russia from her house.'
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: BEG on March 06, 2012, 09:05:14 PM
The morons at DemocratUnderground are still laboring under the delusion that Sarah Palin was actually on 'Saturday Night Live' and could 'see Russia from her house.'

My brother quoted Tina Fey this past Christmas attributing it to Sarah Palin.  Liberals repeat lies so much they believe their own BS.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: dandi on March 06, 2012, 09:33:03 PM
It's called rationalization, Stinky, and denial. Both are psychological defense mechanisms that come into play when you can't emotionally cope with reality, and the reality of this situation is that you, your buddies at DU and your fellow travellers in the media are scum-sucking hypocrites of the lowest order.

The funny thing is, you don't even care about Sandra Fluke. Not on a personal level. You couldn't care less if she and her college buds get birth control. She's just one more pawn for you to play off for crass political purposes, the endgame being attaining a position from which you can vote yourself money from the public treasure. You hope to do that, as always, by silencing conservative voices. It's just that simple and just that venal. You do the same thing over the bodies of dead soldiers, dead victims of gun violence, those that die from disease. Hell, when you're not pissing on a grave, you're standing atop it to use it as a soapbox, or pulling names off the headstones to put on the voter roles.

Between that and the 50,000,000 abortions, I'm beginning to think you nihilistic ****s thrive on death.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: BEG on March 06, 2012, 09:46:58 PM
It's called rationalization, Stinky, and denial. Both are psychological defense mechanisms that come into play when you can't emotionally cope with reality, and the reality of this situation is that you, your buddies at DU and your fellow travellers in the media are scum-sucking hypocrites of the lowest order.

The funny thing is, you don't even care about Sandra Fluke. Not on a personal level. You couldn't care less if she and her college buds get birth control. She's just one more pawn for you to play off for crass political purposes, the endgame being attaining a position from which you can vote yourself money from the public treasure. You hope to do that, as always, by silencing conservative voices. It's just that simple and just that venal. You do the same thing over the bodies of dead soldiers, dead victims of gun violence, those that die from disease. Hell, when you're not pissing on a grave, you're standing atop it to use it as a soapbox, or pulling names off the headstones to put on the voter roles.

Between that and the 50,000,000 abortions, I'm beginning to think you nihilistic ****s thrive on death.

H5
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: obumazombie on March 07, 2012, 12:12:53 AM
It's called rationalization, Stinky, and denial. Both are psychological defense mechanisms that come into play when you can't emotionally cope with reality, and the reality of this situation is that you, your buddies at DU and your fellow travellers in the media are scum-sucking hypocrites of the lowest order.

The funny thing is, you don't even care about Sandra Fluke. Not on a personal level. You couldn't care less if she and her college buds get birth control. She's just one more pawn for you to play off for crass political purposes, the endgame being attaining a position from which you can vote yourself money from the public treasure. You hope to do that, as always, by silencing conservative voices. It's just that simple and just that venal. You do the same thing over the bodies of dead soldiers, dead victims of gun violence, those that die from disease. Hell, when you're not pissing on a grave, you're standing atop it to use it as a soapbox, or pulling names off the headstones to put on the voter roles.

Between that and the 50,000,000 abortions, I'm beginning to think you nihilistic ****s thrive on death.
The libs have often been called the cult of death, a lot like the religion of peace.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: Airwolf on March 07, 2012, 11:26:21 AM
Hi5 Dandi
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on March 07, 2012, 12:21:50 PM
As I understand it Sandra didn't testify before congress. She was put in a press conference made to look like a congressional testimony. Everything I have seen about Sandra is a complete fraud, like owebuma.

Correct.
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: AllosaursRus on March 07, 2012, 01:50:00 PM
It's called rationalization, Stinky, and denial. Both are psychological defense mechanisms that come into play when you can't emotionally cope with reality, and the reality of this situation is that you, your buddies at DU and your fellow travellers in the media are scum-sucking hypocrites of the lowest order.

The funny thing is, you don't even care about Sandra Fluke. Not on a personal level. You couldn't care less if she and her college buds get birth control. She's just one more pawn for you to play off for crass political purposes, the endgame being attaining a position from which you can vote yourself money from the public treasure. You hope to do that, as always, by silencing conservative voices. It's just that simple and just that venal. You do the same thing over the bodies of dead soldiers, dead victims of gun violence, those that die from disease. Hell, when you're not pissing on a grave, you're standing atop it to use it as a soapbox, or pulling names off the headstones to put on the voter roles.

Between that and the 50,000,000 abortions, I'm beginning to think you nihilistic ****s thrive on death.

Very well said dandi! That ought to be posted on every blog, tweeted, facebooked, etc, etc. H5!!
Title: Re: Before it boils up, let's try to agree-there is little in common between Sandra
Post by: obumazombie on March 07, 2012, 05:16:09 PM
Correct.
Thank you kindly.