The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on March 06, 2012, 10:45:03 AM
-
Dear Leftists, screw you and your Muslim sluts
Okay, so Rush Limbaugh popped-off on some slut who apparently can’t pay for her own birth control while attending a college where only the progeny of the 1% can afford the tuition costs. One wonders if Fluke went to a Catholic university for no reason except to agitate for the trampling of Catholic beliefs. It’s like watching David Duke trying to muscle his way into the African American Students Union on the basis of Affirmative Action.
I don’t know why she’s offended by the term slut. I like sluts (even though I don’t like Fluke, her jaw-line is too Brad Pittish). Some of my best friends over the years have been sluts and I look forward to meeting new sluts every day. Some people say slut like it’s a bad thing. I don’t understand this.
If you’re going to be a certain sort of person just be that person and who cares what others think about it. Who cares if your detractors give it a negative connotation? If it makes you feel bad then maybe you shouldn’t do it. In legal circles it’s called, consciousness of guilt. Among the clergy it’s called conviction.
Case in point: I have never once taken offense at being called an asshole.
A slut, near as I can tell, is a term for a woman who will consistently and regularly have sex for the purpose of self-gratification with serial partners without regard to long-term commitment in a relationship.
That’s awesome!
Men have needs too, you know! For every slut there are several men out there being well-serviced. In a world of sexual equality men deserve to have just as much sex as women and if too many women are waiting until marriage then it’s nice to know the Slut Brigade is there to bat clean-up. In the 80’s we moved past the social stigma associated with sloppy seconds; now our sexual relief is being assaulted on a new front.
Obviously stray offspring would only complicate matters so let’s make sure our sluts aren’t getting pregnant. There’s no reason 3 or 4 or more guys all have to wait nervously at the doctor’s office waiting for the DNA test to come back just to find out who is on the hook for the impending abortion/child support. That’s a lot of man-hours wasted which could have been spent on gainful employments and those bar tabs don’t pay for themselves.
And no, I’m not sporting for the cost of condoms. It’s her body so obviously it’s her choice…or so I’m told. If she doesn’t want HER body to become pregnant then SHE can use whatever contraceptive SHE feels appropriate.
What the Left is asking for is for Catholics – and everybody else for that matter – to subsidize their recreational sex. Supposedly to oppose this is to engage in a “war on women,†as termed by the decidedly un-Fluke-able, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D – FL, (813) 555-2546) because recreational sex is an integral part of a woman’s identity that she cannot control or delay. She has to have it NOW!
Just don’t call them sluts.
The Left has decided “slut†like “prostitute†is a bad word, even though it seems far more neutral than “whore.†Now we have the Orwellian euphemism of “sex worker.†Presenting one's vagina for the sole explicit purpose of sexually gratifying men is a time-honored liberal platform. Perhaps if Limbaugh had called Sandra Fluke a, “sex volunteer†they would have nodded approvingly.
Still, it is recreational sex we’re discussing. It is sex akin to playing video games and many a gamer has embraced the term “geek.†Conversely, liberals do not see Catholics as being permitted to have a personal identity. it's almost as if the Liberals consider them unviable tissue. To liberals the Church is less than recreational because it teaches a Catholic man having sex with a Catholic woman will be spiritually and legally bound to her and willing to gladly accept all offspring borne of their union.
Well, we certainly can’t have that! That’s obviously a threat to everything liberals stand/bend-over/kneel/prop-up for.
I’m not going to recite the litany of hypocrisy about Bill Maher, Ed Schultz and the rest of liberal crap-bags they allow to skate for much worse, much more frequently. I won’t even mention that one of their treasured talk show hosts—who can barely speak coherently—incited an anti-Semitic race that cost an innocent man his life.
Nope, I’m not going to mention any of this.
Instead I wish to return your attention to the riots in Afghanistan.
I know you’re probably wondering what non-sequitor this might be but in-between frothing spasms over Mr. Limbaugh’s comments the Left defends mass-murder over a book. Not just any book but a book that is far more misogynist than there mere refusal to subsidize the sexual relief of millions of American men.
The Left will even rail against laws designed to keep sharia from being used as a basis for law and jurisprudence in the US.
So, if I understand the Left correctly, they’re saying Catholics have no right to refrain from paying for contraceptives and abortificients for people who reject Catholic doctrine. Even during Prohibition there was a religious exemption for Communion wine but the Left won’t even concede them an exemption from what Catholics consider to be the taking of human life.
But we must adhere to every cockamamie scheme a bunch of lunatics whose most beloved prophet’s last wife didn’t need contraceptives because – at the tender age of 9 – she hadn’t reached puberty yet.
The Left can find common cause with hordes that take human life because a book was disposed of with the rest of the rubbish and you support US military personnel being punished—OFFICIALLY, ACTUALLY PUNISHED—to assuage a foreign religious law.
And yet they rail when laws are passed to prevent sharia from establishing itself here.
BTW – would sluts feel more inconvenienced by attending Georgetown or a madrassa?
Last month we had Keith Olbermann and Markos Moulitas joking that nobody cared about rapes occurring at the Occupy Wall Street camps around the country. After callously laughing about it they denied it ever occurred. When that failed they then parsed a few, select incidences into triviality; statutory rape, no less (perhaps that explains their comity with the Muhammedans).
During this on-going assault on Leftist women engaged in leftist protest actions in leftist governed shanty-panty towns the Left was silent. Apparently Sandra Fluke is only worth defending because she puts out willingly. To hell with rape victims, they just need to learn to take one for the team…from the team.
Let’s also talk about Rolling Stone writer Matt Tiabbi celebrating the death of Andrew Breitbart whom he calls a “douche.†Never mind the grave-dancing, if we take the Left’s standard that refusing to pay for someone else’s recreational activities is a “war on women†then by calling Breitbart a “douche†then Tiabbi shows an obvious disdain for feminine hygiene. Why does Tiabbi hate women or only love them if they’re scuzzy?
Actually, I lied. Let’s talk about the grave-dancing. If making tasteless statements is all that is required to land a job at Rolling Stone then let me just say Tiabbi will never be on the "caliber" of the other famous Rolling Stone writer, Hunter S. Thompson…unless he too decides to blow his brains out.
We certainly wish him all success but if his marksmanship is anything like his journalistic prowess I have my doubts.
Now, concurrently, we have radio talk show host Mike Malloy mocking people of faith and using the occasion of the tornadoes ravaging the southern US as his impetus. The god these people believe in has supposedly crushed them into “grease spots†with His almighty thumb.
Calling people by a common vernacular term when they proudly boast of engaging in uncommitted sex with an on-going series of partners is bad but the Left is silent about mocking people of faith while their families and lives are shattered. Apparently these country rubes earned their miseries for the sin of believing in God.
Unless they’re Muslims, that is; in which case we want any US service member who upsets them to suffer the weight of sharia. To hell with our constitution or Status Of Forces Agreement that make the US and its Uniform Code of Military Justice the sole governance of US armed forces. Now, suddenly, the Left demands religious sensibilities matter more than law.
Unless the Left is suggesting murderous riots is the only means to gaining their tolerance I’m not sure what message is supposed to be gained here.
Actually, I do.
You liberals are obviously not acting on principle but only political opportunism and for this I take umbrage. You have ruined the once noble cause of sluttery and turned it into a cheap political football.
Damn you! Damn you all!
Edited for major re-write.
-
You liberals are obviously not acting on principle but only political opportunism and for this I take umbrage. You have ruined the once noble cause of sluttery and turned it into a cheap political football.
Damn you! Damn you all!
That up there, right up there ^, THAT'S a good sentence right there. Hi5
-
Stolen.
-
I love the way they've tried to paint Fluke as some innocent, dewy college frosh, unable to defend herself from the old Republican meanies' slings and arrows, when in fact she's a thirtysomething, long-time political activist for the Left. Conservatives with far less exposure than her have been attacked viciously by liberals over the past few years, often for no more "putting themselves in the spotlight" than having the temerity to appear onstage with a parent who is a candidate for office. Lowlife, hypocritical bastards.
-
Ms. Fluke is not very attractive. So I in order for to get any, she would have to be a slut.
-
I love the way they've tried to paint Fluke as some innocent, dewy college frosh, unable to defend herself from the old Republican meanies' slings and arrows, when in fact she's a thirtysomething, long-time political activist for the Left. Conservatives with far less exposure than her have been attacked viciously by liberals over the past few years, often for no more "putting themselves in the spotlight" than having the temerity to appear onstage with a parent who is a candidate for office. Lowlife, hypocritical bastards.
I remember the hatred and vicious attacks toward Linda Tripp....
-
We may hate each other, but you nailed it right on.
Ms. Fluke is not very attractive. So I in order for to get any, she would have to be a slut.
I have seen those kind of people. Very bitter, rageful, and petty.
-
-- Reading this thread made me realize a simple & elegant solution to this problem --
Find a Muslim insurance agency, and ask them what they think about being required to pay for birth control. That'll put an end to this debate.
-
-- Reading this thread made me realize a simple & elegant solution to this problem --
Find a Muslim insurance agency, and ask them what they think about being required to pay for birth control. That'll put an end to this debate.
Or a Muslim university.
Oh wait, there are none.
-
Stolen.
Same here, with attribution to Sgt. Snuggle Bunny.
-
Or a Muslim university.
Oh wait, there are none.
Oh yes there are but the stupid, crazy 8itch ain't stupid or crazy enough to go there and try to stir up any shiite.
-
Oh yes there are but the stupid, crazy 8itch ain't stupid or crazy enough to go there and try to stir up any shiite.
Can you get a law degree from them? I bet they have great financial aid packages.
-
Can you get a law degree from them? I bet they have great financial aid packages.
Sharia Law....and being female and alone there without a male family member.... all the "packages" she can handle.
-
Sharia Law....and being female and alone there without a male family member.... all the "packages" she can handle.
Not to mention, the dress code.
-
Can you get a law degree from them? I bet they have great financial aid packages.
No interest loans. That should appeal to DUmmies. Oh wait, Muslims don't believe womyn should get an education, and they hate faggots. That leaves the DUmmies SOOL.
-
Not to mention, the dress code.
You know, being married to a muslim woman would be a cheap way to go. 2 black sacks for there wardrobe and you'd have them covered.
-
You know, being married to a muslim woman would be a cheap way to go. 2 black sacks for there wardrobe and you'd have them covered.
Yeah that is true. That would be pretty cheap.
-
Same here, with attribution to Sgt. Snuggle Bunny.
Thank-you, all.
Major re-write:
Dear Leftists, screw you and your Muslim sluts
Okay, so Rush Limbaugh popped-off on some slut who apparently can’t pay for her own birth control while attending a college where only the progeny of the 1% can afford the tuition costs. One wonders if Fluke went to a Catholic university for no reason except to agitate for the trampling of Catholic beliefs. It’s like watching David Duke trying to muscle his way into the African American Students Union on the basis of Affirmative Action.
I don’t know why she’s offended by the term slut. I like sluts (even though I don’t like Fluke, her jaw-line is too Brad Pittish). Some of my best friends over the years have been sluts and I look forward to meeting new sluts every day. Some people say slut like it’s a bad thing. I don’t understand this.
If you’re going to be a certain sort of person just be that person and who cares what others think about it. Who cares if your detractors give it a negative connotation? If it makes you feel bad then maybe you shouldn’t do it. In legal circles it’s called, consciousness of guilt. Among the clergy it’s called conviction.
Case in point: I have never once taken offense at being called an asshole.
A slut, near as I can tell, is a term for a woman who will consistently and regularly have sex for the purpose of self-gratification with serial partners without regard to long-term commitment in a relationship.
That’s awesome!
Men have needs too, you know! For every slut there are several men out there being well-serviced. In a world of sexual equality men deserve to have just as much sex as women and if too many women are waiting until marriage then it’s nice to know the Slut Brigade is there to bat clean-up. In the 80’s we moved past the social stigma associated with sloppy seconds; now our sexual relief is being assaulted on a new front.
Obviously stray offspring would only complicate matters so let’s make sure our sluts aren’t getting pregnant. There’s no reason 3 or 4 or more guys all have to wait nervously at the doctor’s office waiting for the DNA test to come back just to find out who is on the hook for the impending abortion/child support. That’s a lot of man-hours wasted which could have been spent on gainful employments and those bar tabs don’t pay for themselves.
And no, I’m not sporting for the cost of condoms. It’s her body so obviously it’s her choice…or so I’m told. If she doesn’t want HER body to become pregnant then SHE can use whatever contraceptive SHE feels appropriate.
What the Left is asking for is for Catholics – and everybody else for that matter – to subsidize their recreational sex. Supposedly to oppose this is to engage in a “war on women,†as termed by the decidedly un-Fluke-able, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D – FL, (813) 555-2546) because recreational sex is an integral part of a woman’s identity that she cannot control or delay. She has to have it NOW!
Just don’t call them sluts.
The Left has decided “slut†like “prostitute†is a bad word, even though it seems far more neutral than “whore.†Now we have the Orwellian euphemism of “sex worker.†Presenting one's vagina for the sole explicit purpose of sexually gratifying men is a time-honored liberal platform. Perhaps if Limbaugh had called Sandra Fluke a, “sex volunteer†they would have nodded approvingly.
Still, it is recreational sex we’re discussing. It is sex akin to playing video games and many a gamer has embraced the term “geek.†Conversely, liberals do not see Catholics as being permitted to have a personal identity. it's almost as if the Liberals consider them unviable tissue. To liberals the Church is less than recreational because it teaches a Catholic man having sex with a Catholic woman will be spiritually and legally bound to her and willing to gladly accept all offspring borne of their union.
Well, we certainly can’t have that! That’s obviously a threat to everything liberals stand/bend-over/kneel/prop-up for.
I’m not going to recite the litany of hypocrisy about Bill Maher, Ed Schultz and the rest of liberal crap-bags they allow to skate for much worse, much more frequently. I won’t even mention that one of their treasured talk show hosts—who can barely speak coherently—incited an anti-Semitic race that cost an innocent man his life.
Nope, I’m not going to mention any of this.
Instead I wish to return your attention to the riots in Afghanistan.
I know you’re probably wondering what non-sequitor this might be but in-between frothing spasms over Mr. Limbaugh’s comments the Left defends mass-murder over a book. Not just any book but a book that is far more misogynist than there mere refusal to subsidize the sexual relief of millions of American men.
The Left will even rail against laws designed to keep sharia from being used as a basis for law and jurisprudence in the US.
So, if I understand the Left correctly, they’re saying Catholics have no right to refrain from paying for contraceptives and abortificients for people who reject Catholic doctrine. Even during Prohibition there was a religious exemption for Communion wine but the Left won’t even concede them an exemption from what Catholics consider to be the taking of human life.
But we must adhere to every cockamamie scheme a bunch of lunatics whose most beloved prophet’s last wife didn’t need contraceptives because – at the tender age of 9 – she hadn’t reached puberty yet.
The Left can find common cause with hordes that take human life because a book was disposed of with the rest of the rubbish and you support US military personnel being punished—OFFICIALLY, ACTUALLY PUNISHED—to assuage a foreign religious law.
And yet they rail when laws are passed to prevent sharia from establishing itself here.
BTW – would sluts feel more inconvenienced by attending Georgetown or a madrassa?
Last month we had Keith Olbermann and Markos Moulitas joking that nobody cared about rapes occurring at the Occupy Wall Street camps around the country. After callously laughing about it they denied it ever occurred. When that failed they then parsed a few, select incidences into triviality; statutory rape, no less (perhaps that explains their comity with the Muhammedans).
During this on-going assault on Leftist women engaged in leftist protest actions in leftist governed shanty-panty towns the Left was silent. Apparently Sandra Fluke is only worth defending because she puts out willingly. To hell with rape victims, they just need to learn to take one for the team…from the team.
Let’s also talk about Rolling Stone writer Matt Tiabbi celebrating the death of Andrew Breitbart whom he calls a “douche.†Never mind the grave-dancing, if we take the Left’s standard that refusing to pay for someone else’s recreational activities is a “war on women†then by calling Breitbart a “douche†then Tiabbi shows an obvious disdain for feminine hygiene. Why does Tiabbi hate women or only love them if they’re scuzzy?
Actually, I lied. Let’s talk about the grave-dancing. If making tasteless statements is all that is required to land a job at Rolling Stone then let me just say Tiabbi will never be on the "caliber" of the other famous Rolling Stone writer, Hunter S. Thompson…unless he too decides to blow his brains out.
We certainly wish him all success but if his marksmanship is anything like his journalistic prowess I have my doubts.
Now, concurrently, we have radio talk show host Mike Malloy mocking people of faith and using the occasion of the tornadoes ravaging the southern US as his impetus. The god these people believe in has supposedly crushed them into “grease spots†with His almighty thumb.
Calling people by a common vernacular term when they proudly boast of engaging in uncommitted sex with an on-going series of partners is bad but the Left is silent about mocking people of faith while their families and lives are shattered. Apparently these country rubes earned their miseries for the sin of believing in God.
Unless they’re Muslims, that is; in which case we want any US service member who upsets them to suffer the weight of sharia. To hell with our constitution or Status Of Forces Agreement that make the US and its Uniform Code of Military Justice the sole governance of US armed forces. Now, suddenly, the Left demands religious sensibilities matter more than law.
Unless the Left is suggesting murderous riots is the only means to gaining their tolerance I’m not sure what message is supposed to be gained here.
Actually, I do.
You liberals are obviously not acting on principle but only political opportunism and for this I take umbrage. You have ruined the once noble cause of sluttery and turned it into a cheap political football.
Damn you! Damn you all!
-
Phew! I was worried you might remove my favorite sentence! Good job!
-
Or a Muslim university.
Oh wait, there are none.
The religion of peace has many terrorist camps where they can hone their practice of their religion of peace.
-
:clap:
-
Kind of hard to condemn Limbaugh for a term you embrace:
(http://tucsoncitizen.com/aging-hippie-dispatch/files/2012/03/slut-bumper-smaller-560x315.jpg)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002396964
-
Kind of hard to condemn Limbaugh for a term you embrace:
(http://tucsoncitizen.com/aging-hippie-dispatch/files/2012/03/slut-bumper-smaller-560x315.jpg)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002396964
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
If I was able to get a rep point, I would :rofl:
-
Kind of hard to condemn Limbaugh for a term you embrace:
(http://tucsoncitizen.com/aging-hippie-dispatch/files/2012/03/slut-bumper-smaller-560x315.jpg)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002396964
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
-
There are no sluts in Islam...no queers either....bloody pulps maybe but no sluts.