The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on February 21, 2012, 02:16:20 PM

Title: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: franksolich on February 21, 2012, 02:16:20 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124049797

Oh my.

This is from a primitive campfire previously posted by dane, "Nads gives up on juries."

That campfire of course has since burned out of control, covering massive terrain.

Anyway.

Quote
Atman (23,545 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

145. I'm sorry, but I was on that jury. Nadin is not being entirely truthful.

She lists the post that seems to have started it all in Reply #17, then states in Reply #72 that it was a 6-0 decision to leave it alone. In fact...

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Feb 19, 2012, 07:00 PM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.

...it was a split decision. Hardly a ganging-up-on or an indictment of the jury system if she got half the people to agree with her. What I don't understand is why there is an even number of jurors. Doesn't seem to make much sense.

I tend to agree with one of the other posters above that a high degree of snark tends to be tolerated, and is not necessarily abusive or disruptive. In fact, I fact the practice of repeatedly, continually alerting on one particular poster is more "abusive," and tends to dilute the veracity of ones alerts.

Quote
zappaman (4,127 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

147. "Nadin is not being entirely truthful."

I, for one, am shocked.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,864 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

149. Alas there were two alerts on two different posts

so you know

One was six zero, the other was four two, to leave it alone.

Regardless I have tried to deal with this WITHIN the system. It is clear to me it is broken, and cases of serial stalking cannot be dealt through it.

It is also clear to me that I am not wanted by at least five people, one in particular and at this point, he wins.

I hate to relieve or fear relieving HS every time I post anything and to have this person SERIALLY harras.

Quote
zappaman (4,127 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

150. Ok, well goodbye and good luck...

again...and again...

Quote
Atman (23,545 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

158. I edited my post while you were replying

My point is, I don't think you are being "serially harassed." There are certain posters on DU who seem to disagree with everything I post, and dance around with word games to try and derail threads. I may consider them assholes, but if my post stands on its merits, the vast majority of DUers are generally intelligent enough to figure out who is just being a dick and who is making a serious argument. If a reply is truly offensive, usually someone else will hit alert. Unless a poster actually calls me some grossly offensive name or something, I very rarely use the alert button. I think you'd do well to back off the alert button for a while, too, and stop making yourself a target.

Fact checking and proof reading will also go a long way towards relieving your paranoia about being "stalked," as you'll most likely draw far fewer negative responses.

Nothing personal, Nadin, just my observation after seeing the type of things you alert on, and having been called to adjudicate one myself.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,864 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

167. Excuse me for not agreeing with you

I have a serial bully.. that serial bully.

He will post personal attacks on anything I post.

It has nothing to do with disagreement.

There is a difference, with all due respect.

Suffice it to say, that after I logg off tonight, there is a chance I am not coming back. Or at the very least I am taking some time off from HS Two.

I am tired of relieving my HS experience. All I am missing for that to be complete is a swift kick to the knees. I wish I was kidding.

And as far as I can tell, the system is even more broken now than it was on DU 2. If that was his objective, he's won. If that wasn't his objective, oh well. But I have had it...

Quote
Renew Deal (53,099 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

190. 5 people?

I'm probably not wanted here by more than 5 people.

My impression of "the system" on DU3 is that the Admins want nothing to do with this stuff anymore short of bannable offenses. There is no "forced ignore" anymore as far as I know. So does that make you right about the system being broken? Depends on how you look at it. I believed in the old system because moderators dealt with attacks in an unbiased and efficient manner.

My impression from reading your post is that there is a difference between what you view as "within the system" and what the admins view as "within the system." I think you want someone else to solve this problem. I don't think the admins want to be involved in these types of problems, but they have given you tools to deal with them. You still have other choices besides leaving. Why not put the people that make DU suck on ignore? Forget about what them and what they have to say. If you can't do that (and it makes sense to me considering I have no one on ignore), why not just not reply to the harassers? Let them say whatever they want. Anything that's really an insult will get hidden, but otherwise, don't reply.

I think DU3 is designed for this to be left up to the membership. I don't think it works as well as the mods, but it is what it is for now.

Quote
countryjake (3,587 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

223. Sorry, no, she was responding to the link in #28 and the post which I linked to...

So, were you on the jury for that one?

The offensive post was conveniently self-deleted last night, after I'd posted the link to it. In it, the poster replied to another's comment about the drunken and drugged condition of the woman who had tried to ram the VW Beetle, saying that he thought they were talking about Nadin.

High degree of "snark", indeed.

Quote
Atman (23,545 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

227. Well, if that's the case, it sounds out of line.

Were I on THAT jury, it sounds like some I would have hidden. But we don't get to choose our juries, do we?

Nadin linked to and discussed the post I did adjudicate, and as I said, it was a tie. I don't often vote to lock posts unless there is some direct personal attack, threat or call-out. I think grown-ups should be able to handle themselves in an argument, and that varied opinions make for fuller, livelier discussions.

Alerting on everything is what hurts this system. What I was pointing out is that jurors HAVE agreed with Nadin, even if the majority doesn't always. That should tell her something. Maybe it's not the jury system, maybe it's being overly sensitive and over-alerting.
.
.
.
.
.
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,864 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

170. Leaving the site, perhaps permamently

companies are starting to take this shit seriously. Facebook does as well.

So, leave.

Quote
Ruby the Liberal (13,231 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

174. Nadin, are you feeling physically threatened by this individual

and if so, have you called the authorities?

Seriously - if you are feeling threatened, that is your first step.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,864 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

175. Seriously cyber bullying which is different from cyber stalking, sorry for the wrong use, is directly related to some serious shit.

I am aware of it... but it is time that DU takes it seriously for what it is. I have options... and I see one of them is to leave DU permanently and let the bullying continue with new marks. As is this is quite broken and we really are no dealing with this in an adult, I am not even going to say progressive, just adult manner.

telling people to put people on ignore is telling a kid it does not matter and kids will be kids.

So you do understand he has not crossed into cyber stalking (technical definition) which means physically threatening. But even bullying is now starting to be treated as the equivalent of verbal assault in some communities. The law is evolving on this.

But I guess my best choice will be to log off, let the bully win, and not come back.

That is the only option with bullies when a problem like this is not taken seriously. I hope he does not find a new mark, but I am betting on it.

Quote
Ruby the Liberal (13,231 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

186. Nadin, no offense, but did you read that before you hit submit?

First, telling people to put a foe on ignore isn't telling a kid that other kids don't matter. It is telling an adult (who is not confined to a school atmosphere/ecosystem) that there is a system function that allows you to 'not see' someone being an asshole to you.

Secondly, again, if you are feeling physically threatened, you need to call the local authorities. Hell, call the FBI if it helps - but no one here in H&M is going to be able to fix this for you if that is the concern.

Third, logging off does not let the "bully win", it gives you some peace of mind.

Lastly - and most importantly - what is it that you are hoping to accomplish with this? Banning of this and all future entities? Shutting down other sites?

What is your goal here?

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,864 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

189. No goal whatsoever, goodbye

(Adult discussions on a very serious issue in the mental health arena are not fit for DU)
.
.
.
.
.
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,864 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

247. I have, where I post all the vebotten posts here

and I will now make my exit... after all, why care about a place where I have made friends for eleven years? I do care about those friends. but the place, not so much.

Quote
SidDithers (19,669 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

250. Oh. It's this thread again...

Quote
pintobean (5,180 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

251. There seems to be more GBs in this GBCW.

The Kali primitive (not to be confused with the bitter old Vermontese cali primitive) makes unkind comments about nadin too; 0bamanaut says he's deleted all of his comments in nadin campfires without telling the primitives why; the 1%er "BeHereNow" primitive comes to nadin's defense, and despite what is apparently common rumor, the "sabrina 1" primitive is not franksolich's mole......&c., &c., &c.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on February 21, 2012, 02:29:03 PM
She's an arrogant ass. This we already know.

Every post she makes is the mark of her ego.

To disagree with what she writes is to disagree with her personally.

To attack her shoddy work and outright absurdities is to attack her.

She can't be wrong, it must be you.

Seldom have I seen someone so invested in their ego. I daresay it has taken on a pathological dimension with her.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: jukin on February 21, 2012, 02:55:42 PM
You do have to give old Nada one thing, she is a true progressive fascist (BIRM).  Disagree with her, you should not speak. Point out her terrible grammar and spelling, you should not speak. Point out how she gets butt hurt so easily, you should not speak.  In short, don't act as she sees fit, you should not speak. The true colors of the nasty little totalitarian is on full display. This is the vision of a free society to a Liberal.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Skul on February 21, 2012, 03:23:38 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,864 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

167. Excuse me for not agreeing with you

I have a serial bully.. that serial bully.

He will post personal attacks on anything I post.

It has nothing to do with disagreement.

There is a difference, with all due respect.

Suffice it to say, that after I logg off tonight, there is a chance I am not coming back. Or at the very least I am taking some time off from HS Two.

I am tired of relieving my HS experience. All I am missing for that to be complete is a swift kick to the knees. I wish I was kidding.

And as far as I can tell, the system is even more broken now than it was on DU 2. If that was his objective, he's won. If that wasn't his objective, oh well. But I have had it...
Drink!!1! :cheersmate:  :rotf:
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: chitownchica on February 21, 2012, 03:27:11 PM
Quote
despite what is apparently common rumor, the "sabrina 1" primitive is not franksolich's mole.

All through that thread I was thinking Sabrina must be a mole. She said a few funny things that made me wonder.  :whistling:

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: dandi on February 21, 2012, 03:54:02 PM
Some anonymous person on a message board making fun of your posts is not "cyber-bullying". Cyber-bullying is when people you know try to make your real life hell by using the net as a tool to spread innuendo, libel, threats, and so forth that affect you at school, at work, in the community, etc. On an anonymous board the only threat is to your ego. If it's that fragile you can use the ignore function. Problem solved. In real cyber-bullying, ignore only hides the problem temporarily.

Nads problem is her narcissism. She believes she is infallible and so has to be universally loved. Anything less than that and she can't cope.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: dutch508 on February 21, 2012, 03:59:00 PM
Is... Is...is it...



Actionable?
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Airwolf on February 21, 2012, 04:05:20 PM
Good lord. Please make it stop and take away her keyboard. Frackin libs bitch about how gun owners should wait x number of days to buy a gun and yet she gets to keep posting like shes the Washington Post with unlimited rolls of paper.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: JohnnyReb on February 21, 2012, 04:08:40 PM
It is also clear to me that I am not wanted by at least five people, one in particular and at this point, he wins.

Isn't that the liberal way? Where one gets their way and the majority have to like it?
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Chris_ on February 21, 2012, 04:13:32 PM
They deserve each other. 
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: AllosaursRus on February 21, 2012, 04:42:54 PM
Good lord, call the waaaaaaaaaaambulance!!!!

Talk about bein' full of yourself! Anytime someone points out she's full of shit, she gets her panties in a wad! I don't think I've ever seen one so full of shit since TitBoy!

Ya know NadaBrain, spellcheckers are free nowadays! How lazy can you be not to at least proof read the vomit you post?

Let me know yer address and I'll send ya a quarter so you can call someone who cares! That, and I'll send ya a case of pampers! You without a doubt, need them!
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: jukin on February 21, 2012, 05:04:25 PM
This is meta cyber bullying that has passed the Rubicon of dot connection in a mega trend.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: chitownchica on February 21, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Careful there Allo, asking for address to send her a quarter = stalking according to Nadin and her groupies.  :lmao:.

I swear, either her parents did her a disservice by not teaching her that children outgrow this stage, or she has some type of mental disorder.  I learned the lesson early through a Brady Bunch episode. Jan was bitching that she was the middle child and was treated differently. The Brady parents oohed and aahed over her, so I thought I'd try it out on my parents. My mom just laughed in my face. She did me a favor that day.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: JakeStyle on February 21, 2012, 06:38:10 PM
Wow, she is still posting in that thread!

Quote
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 07:22 PM
 nadinbrzezinski
336. I gotta ask, after three years of ignore

and trying to adress this in other ways, what exactly did you want me to do at that point?

Finally something worked, but seriously this has been a LONG STANDING issue. I tried to adress this all the way to the actual OWNERS of the site.

I got to the point where the wookie was about to win... because literally I had it.

That was one of my last ways to try to deal with it.

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: franksolich on February 21, 2012, 06:46:15 PM
Wow, she is still posting in that thread!


Well, nadin lied again.

She promised us she'd leave, and she didn't,

Liar, liar, pants on fire.....
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: chitownchica on February 21, 2012, 07:27:44 PM
Wow, she is still posting in that thread!


I knew she couldn't stay away, but what does the First Lady have to do with this?
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Boudicca on February 21, 2012, 07:46:35 PM
Starting to think it's gonna take Seal Team Six to get in and drag Nads out of DUmmyworld. ::)

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: franksolich on February 21, 2012, 07:47:13 PM
Starting to think it's gonna take Seal Team Six to get in and drag Nads out of DUmmyworld. ::)



And an aircraft carrier to tow her away.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Boudicca on February 21, 2012, 07:55:00 PM
And an aircraft carrier to tow her away.

 :lmao:
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Traveshamockery on February 21, 2012, 10:35:29 PM
Nadin:  I can honestly say you are NOT wanted by way more than five posters at DU.  You are not wanted anywhere. 

Tone down the ego and things might be different.  You are not nearly as smart as you think you are. 
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Chris_ on February 21, 2012, 10:37:17 PM
Tone down the ego and things might be different.  You are not nearly as smart as you think you are.
It's just not going to happen.  You'll have to pry that crown from her cold, dead fingers.

It's her density. :-)
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Reality vs DU on February 21, 2012, 11:32:22 PM
No matter how many times she threatens to step away, Nads just can't help check to see what her fellow DUmbasses are saying about her and subsequently respond.

Quote
Response to Kaleko (Reply #344)Wed Feb 22, 2012, 12:03 AM
 nadinbrzezinski (101,870 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
345. I did

next...

This is not new... nor a new issue, nor did it start recently. It is literally at least 72 months long.

You have no access to PMs for example.

You have no idea... and quite honestly I do not expect you to. But confronting... I DID.

I even asked him and his friends for a voluntary mutual ignore before one was partially implemented under DU 2.

What you are asking or suggesting is exactly what was done.

But I guess it's ok.

It really is.

Now if you do not mind, back to work... fact checking pols can be all kinds of time consuming.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: franksolich on February 22, 2012, 07:28:07 AM
All through that thread I was thinking Sabrina must be a mole. She said a few funny things that made me wonder.  :whistling:

I was concerned, very concerned, when I first heard the rumor that the Sabrina 1 primitive is my mole.

You see, some time ago I revealed that my mole is one of nadin's most enthusiastic supporters on Skins's island.

I repeat, the Sabrina 1 primitive is not franksolich's mole.

I don't want a bona fide primitive mausoleumed because the primitives think it's me.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 22, 2012, 09:33:21 AM
I was concerned, very concerned, when I first heard the rumor that the Sabrina 1 primitive is my mole.

You see, some time ago I revealed that my mole is one of nadin's most enthusiastic supporters on Skins's island.

I repeat, the Sabrina 1 primitive is not franksolich's mole.

I don't want a bona fide primitive mausoleumed because the primitives think it's me.
But you always say that, to be successful, everything about a mole must be the opposite of what might be expected. So then, doesn't your protest here make it even more likely that DUmmy Sabrina number is in fact franksolich in deep cover?
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: Boudicca on February 22, 2012, 11:01:37 AM
Nadin:  I can honestly say you are NOT wanted by way more than five posters at DU.  You are not wanted anywhere. 

Tone down the ego and things might be different.  You are not nearly as smart as you think you are. 

You gotta speak her lingo and tell her to tone down the eggo...she'd probably understand you then.  Right now she's probably hovering over her toaster wondering how to tone down the waffles.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: franksolich on February 22, 2012, 12:16:13 PM
But you always say that, to be successful, everything about a mole must be the opposite of what might be expected. So then, doesn't your protest here make it even more likely that DUmmy Sabrina number is in fact franksolich in deep cover?


You gotta believe me, sir; the Sabrina 1 primitive is not my mole.
Title: Re: Pedro Picasso, nadin, squibble-squabble
Post by: chitownchica on February 22, 2012, 05:21:32 PM
I was concerned, very concerned, when I first heard the rumor that the Sabrina 1 primitive is my mole.

You see, some time ago I revealed that my mole is one of nadin's most enthusiastic supporters on Skins's island.

I repeat, the Sabrina 1 primitive is not franksolich's mole.

I don't want a bona fide primitive mausoleumed because the primitives think it's me.


She's gotta be someone's mole. I have a wild ass guess and I'm  :lmao: