The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dane on February 19, 2012, 06:29:22 PM

Title: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: dane on February 19, 2012, 06:29:22 PM
Link  http://www.democraticunderground.com/124049797

nadinbrzezinski (101,827 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
Well time to throw up hands on the jury system.
Not only will I remove myself from juries, but will no longer alert on obvious personal attacks and cyber stalking.

As far as I am concerned the system is useless. 
---------------------
Hands are being thrown up.  A new resume entry - "Hand Tosser"
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Skul on February 19, 2012, 06:30:49 PM
Nads lies.
Nads always lies. :mental:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Mr Mannn on February 19, 2012, 06:41:53 PM
Nads. You have a camera. Post a pic of your self holding your breath until you are blue.
-------that always works------------------------------------
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 19, 2012, 06:50:01 PM
Again, her lack of humility, which goes against the ancient wisdom that sustained her ancestors.

nadin acts as if she doesn't participate in primitive "juries", her absence takes something away from it.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ballygrl on February 19, 2012, 07:39:27 PM
I was just going to ask if it's Obamanaut, read a little further down and yep it is!

Quote
nadinbrzezinski
14. Calling names is against tos. You know that, I know that

Here is the OP...if I get banned so be it, notice Obamanaut's two posts.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002329581

These are but two of so many examples, it id just nuts.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ballygrl on February 19, 2012, 07:41:36 PM
I think she's annoyed at this post from the link I posted:

Quote
Obamanaut
18. We are saved! The comment drought has been lifted. No longer must we roam aimlessly and uninformed

through the peaks and valleys of non-information and uncrunchiness. Once again we have guidance.

Suffice it to say it is the dawn of a new patter.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ballygrl on February 19, 2012, 07:44:07 PM
Another thread where they're fighting:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002268968#post4
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: JakeStyle on February 19, 2012, 07:45:57 PM
Elvis has left the building, again.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski
54. Did that for close to 15 months, no seriously.

They just got worst...so that does not work...Ignore gives cover for worst behavior.

No, at this point I think I will do what they want. One person in particular has made the experience here insuferable, and alerts are mostly ignored...so at this point..,seriously why bother? The system is truly broken. I m not going to fix it, but I think at the very least I need a vacation.

I see I am not the only one seeing it, but there is no solution... But the problem is serious, and text book.

So a vacation it is. When I logg off tonight I have no idea how long I will be gone...a day, a week, a month...a lifetime. I don't know...but literally this is one person who has been repeteadly alerted for serially disrupting. The message I get is that this is ok regardless of the supposed terms of service.

Suffice it to say I also contacted the owners at one point since cyber stalking can get them in trouble. But at this point it's ok...that is my conclussion...from ten years plus, that is what I have to conclude. Oh and I hope somebody does not do something stupid.

 :panic:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ballygrl on February 19, 2012, 07:46:42 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski
54. Did that for close to 15 months, no seriously.

They just got worst...so that does not work...Ignore gives cover for worst behavior.

No, at this point I think I will do what they want. One person in particular has made the experience here insuferable, and alerts are mostly ignored...so at this point..,seriously why bother? The system is truly broken. I m not going to fix it, but I think at the very least I need a vacation.

I see I am not the only one seeing it, but there is no solution... But the problem is serious, and text book.

So a vacation it is. When I logg off tonight I have no idea how long I will be gone...a day, a week, a month...a lifetime. I don't know...but literally this is one person who has been repeteadly alerted for serially disrupting. The message I get is that this is ok regardless of the supposed terms of service.

Suffice it to say I also contacted the owners at one point since cyber stalking can get them in trouble. But at this point it's ok...that is my conclussion...from ten years plus, that is what I have to conclude. Oh and I hope somebody does not do something stupid.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BEG on February 19, 2012, 07:47:50 PM
Quote
sabrina 1
41. Yes, she has. And she most definitely has a point. Especially since she is being stalked

on a vile, rightwing site where they record every post over here that attacks her. This is a very creepy thing, for a woman to be the target of such a site. Especially considering that most DUers know that some of their members took their obsessions with DUers offline and interfered in a life and death situation of a DUer causing his surgery to be delayed.

I would think that when a woman is being subjected to this kind of stalking, at least here on a Democratic board there would be some support for her. Actually there is, thankfully.

Loser
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ballygrl on February 19, 2012, 07:48:38 PM
You know, I'm kind of feeling sorry for her.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: sharkhawk on February 19, 2012, 07:49:58 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski
54. Did that for close to 15 months, no seriously.

They just got worst...so that does not work...Ignore gives cover for worst behavior.

No, at this point I think I will do what they want. One person in particular has made the experience here insuferable, and alerts are mostly ignored...so at this point..,seriously why bother? The system is truly broken. I m not going to fix it, but I think at the very least I need a vacation.

I see I am not the only one seeing it, but there is no solution... But the problem is serious, and text book.

So a vacation it is. When I logg off tonight I have no idea how long I will be gone...a day, a week, a month...a lifetime. I don't know...but literally this is one person who has been repeteadly alerted for serially disrupting. The message I get is that this is ok regardless of the supposed terms of service.

Suffice it to say I also contacted the owners at one point since cyber stalking can get them in trouble. But at this point it's ok...that is my conclussion...from ten years plus, that is what I have to conclude. Oh and I hope somebody does not do something stupid.
 
 
 

I'm betting the "vaction is measured in hours rather than weeks
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BEG on February 19, 2012, 08:03:09 PM
You know, I'm kind of feeling sorry for her.

I do too, then she opens her "mouth" again.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Skul on February 19, 2012, 08:08:10 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski
54. Did that for close to 15 months, no seriously.

They just got worst...so that does not work...Ignore gives cover for worst behavior.

No, at this point I think I will do what they want. One person in particular has made the experience here insuferable, and alerts are mostly ignored...so at this point..,seriously why bother? The system is truly broken. I m not going to fix it, but I think at the very least I need a vacation.

I see I am not the only one seeing it, but there is no solution... But the problem is serious, and text book.

So a vacation it is. When I logg off tonight I have no idea how long I will be gone...a day, a week, a month...a lifetime. I don't know...but literally this is one person who has been repeteadly alerted for serially disrupting. The message I get is that this is ok regardless of the supposed terms of service.

Suffice it to say I also contacted the owners at one point since cyber stalking can get them in trouble. But at this point it's ok...that is my conclussion...from ten years plus, that is what I have to conclude. Oh and I hope somebody does not do something stupid.

 
Drink!!! Yay!
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 19, 2012, 08:08:36 PM
Whow.

I wonder what the story is, behind this:

Quote
Especially considering that most DUers know that some of their members took their obsessions with DUers offline and interfered in a life and death situation of a DUer causing his surgery to be delayed.

Anybody know?

Details, anyone?
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 19, 2012, 08:35:08 PM
Oh my.

I got out the boat and rowed over to Skins's island to see the whole campfire, which by now's pretty big.

It's way too much to copy-and-paste for here, and yes, it definitely is worth going over via the link at the top.

Damn, it's hilarious.

I'd rate this campfire as one of the finest ones, if not the finest one, of 2012, thus far.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 19, 2012, 08:41:07 PM
Whow.

I wonder what the story is, behind this:

Anybody know?

Details, anyone?
She may be talking about that time when poor, stupid Beth and a handful of other DUmmies got together with the round red Sodomite and fleeced the DUmp for several thousand dollars.

This DUmp thread is long as your leg but worth reading through. It's hilarious. Another GBCW from nutcase nadin, along with incredible self-absorbed whining from the most arrogant halfwit in DUmp history. It's still February and she's already lapped the field for the 2012 DUmmy of the Year award.

Suffice to say.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on February 19, 2012, 08:46:24 PM
Dear Dog in Heaven, sabrina1 is such a ****ing sychophatic boot-licking little toadie.

But conservatives are supposed to be the easily lead type.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: JakeStyle on February 19, 2012, 08:52:41 PM
Quote
sabrina 1
105. Funny, I did not see this OP as 'playing the victim'. I saw it as a genuine appeal
from a woman who IS being stalked and apparently for a very long time. And considering that, I give her credit for maintaining any kind of restraint. It's sad that anyone would dismiss her attempt to get something done about it. If only to stop providing sick entertainment for that 'site that shall not be named' which everyone seems to know about.

I just don't understand how quoting nadins own posts and mocking them based on her blatant ignorance, and general weirdness, could be considered stalking.  DU is a public forum!  She is making an ass of herself in front of the whole world.  :hammer:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Mr Mannn on February 19, 2012, 08:59:24 PM
I just don't understand how quoting nadins own posts and mocking them based on her blatant ignorance, and general weirdness, could be considered stalking.  DU is a public forum!  She is making an ass of herself in front of the whole world.  :hammer:
It all boils down to basic Liberal Philosophy 101.
Truth to a liberal is like holding a cross to a vampire. Quoting their own words and speaking the truth makes them hiss and back away.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: JakeStyle on February 19, 2012, 09:03:33 PM
I would argue that she's to blame.  I tried to ignore her garbage for the longest time but the stupid was too strong with her and since those little Hitlers won't let me reply to her at DU, I was forced to do it here.  Stop stalking me nadin!  :mad:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Airwolf on February 19, 2012, 09:10:33 PM
Nads. No one is stalking you. You post the most stupid ,ignorant shit in the History of the Internet and sometimes it's it's not even true. To get called on it is not being bullied it's called being held accountable,something a so called journolist shouldn't have to face. This constant crybaby bullshit you pull everytime someone points out your failures should have been taken as something to learn from. But no you decide that you can do no wrong and attack the person for pointing out that your about as dumb as a row of fence post. I'd hate to be as miserable as you are .
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Mike220 on February 19, 2012, 09:12:57 PM
Hands are being thrown up.  A new resume entry - "Hand Tosser"

So nads is French? Who knew?
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Chris_ on February 19, 2012, 09:26:29 PM
How do you stalk someone who posts on not one but THREE public websites, invites people to read said websites repeatedly, writes for a weekly paper that is free to read online, and posts the minutiae of her every passing day?

You might as well accuse the bus driver of stalking those kids that get picked up and delivered to school every morning. 
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 19, 2012, 09:32:32 PM
How do you stalk someone who posts on not one but THREE public websites, invites people to read said websites repeatedly, writes for a weekly paper that is free to read online, and posts the minutiae of her every passing day?

You might as well accuse the bus driver of stalking those kids that get picked up and delivered to school every morning. 

I blame stupid Beth for this trend.

It was seven years ago she accused people who simply read and quoted her of "stalking."

Before that, I'm not aware there was such a wide latitude in the definition of "stalking."

Usually, one had to do something to warrant a charge of stalking.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: miskie on February 19, 2012, 09:53:10 PM
I noticed she has suffered from another conclussion - Damn that has to hurt..

http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,62388.msg720062.html#msg720062

conclussion (n) :(conclussioning, conclussed)  Coming to a conclusion on a pressing matter by banging one's head against a hard surface for inspiration, such as a wall. E.G. - 'Nadin conclussed that the radioactive milk would poison all of society.'
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 20, 2012, 01:26:32 AM
I want to find out who's been picking on nutcase nadin. Suffice to say, them pricks will be in trouble.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 20, 2012, 05:18:40 AM
I want to find out who's been picking on nutcase nadin. Suffice to say, them pricks will be in trouble.


Even though I stopped drinking, I think a clarification of the "Nadinism drinking game" is in order.  For example, in the above example, even though GOBUCKS typed it, he's plainly obvious that he's (rightfully) mocking the Round Mound of Knowledge over there.  Should the participants in the drinking game drink over that one, because it's closely linked to the RMK, or not? :???: :???: :???:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 20, 2012, 05:31:21 AM
Even though I stopped drinking, I think a clarification of the "Nadinism drinking game" is in order.  For example, in the above example, even though GOBUCKS typed it, he's plainly obvious that he's (rightfully) mocking the Round Mound of Knowledge over there.  Should the participants in the drinking game drink over that one, because it's closely linked to the RMK, or not? :???: :???: :???:

I vote yes,  :cheersmate:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 20, 2012, 05:36:31 AM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,827 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
Well time to throw up hands on the jury system.
Not only will I remove myself from juries, but will no longer alert on obvious personal attacks and cyber stalking.

As far as I am concerned the system is useless. 
---------------------
Hands are being thrown up.  A new resume entry - "Hand Tosser"

Oh my dearest Nads,  you brought this on yourself.    You post.  People reply and question.   You throw a complete tantrum.   

Responding to questions, defending your position (with something more than "I know things") - that is what debate is all about.   Surely a trained historian would know that? 

Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 20, 2012, 05:41:13 AM
Quote
Ohio Joe
20. I gotta be honest here

First, those are links to the same post... Did you mean to put a different one?

About that post... Making a claim that Cronkite was a right winger with no actual evidence... And I think that claim requires some good evidence... Is not going to bring out many good comments. Do they break Community Standards? I expect it was a close vote.

See Joe, that's the problem.   Never before on DU has anyone been called to actually defend their position with facts.... come on.    Skinner is just being mean allowing this to occur at all.

Obamanaut is the front runner for 2012 Magnificent Bastard award, and honestly?  it's only February but I don't see anyone claiming the prize from him.    He could be a progressive communist for all I care, but the man questions and demands others be accountable for their positions for the first time at this site.    What's not to love here? 
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: diesel driver on February 20, 2012, 05:45:27 AM
Whow.

I wonder what the story is, behind this:

Anybody know?

Details, anyone?

Freepers?

Could this have been a reference to the "Beth and Andy" show?   :???:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 20, 2012, 05:53:00 AM
That was the longest and most pathetic opus I have ever seen, and have no doubt folks - the trained historian will be back within hours for more. 

Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: diesel driver on February 20, 2012, 06:09:25 AM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (101,861 posts)
75. I would not do that to people

But I am dead tired of this being allowed.

As in dead tired.

And at this point I just need to consider my mental health. I let it go too far on usenet.

Dear, that boat sail out of sight a LONG time ago.     :lmao:

Got to keep up the "bad, mean ol' conservative" image, donchaknow!   :lmao:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ogre on February 20, 2012, 07:09:03 AM
Quote


Response to Renew Deal (Reply #182)

Mon Feb 20, 2012, 01:04 AM

 nadinbrzezinski

188. That was an attempt to shame him







not interact with him.

I have literally tried everything in the book. Alerts don't work, asking him nicely to stop harassing does not work, sending emails to Skinner or Elad, or both, does not work, so at this time I only have one more option... loggin off this site permanently... or at least for a long time.
 
Sadly, after eleven years, my relationship with this site may be coming to an end... and it is due to a very select group of individuals, but in particular ONE.
 
This very select group is at most ten, most likely five... but really, it is ONE.
 
So there is the door, there is the log off button... and that is that.

I have tried to do this in the most adult of ways... but until DU (owners) start taking this shit seriously, it is a serious and very real problem... I have no reason to bother with the site any longer. Sadly, it will not happen until... I suspect, they get sued. That is what made FB take it seriously, that and it was kids doing it to kids. I mean adults would never do that, right?
 
But unfortunately it takes at times... lawsuits.

For the record, we had some good conversations, and for that I am thankful.

and have a good one... and the same goes for a more than a few here... more than a few.
 
But I fear that at this time I have only one more thing to do, and that is for my own sake.
 
For the record, no I am not the one even thinking of this. But somebody will...

I wonder how long before she's back?

She is pure comedy gold, and the superior, condescending, know-it-all attitude is what makes her so "crunchy".

Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: whiffleball on February 20, 2012, 07:26:53 AM
Loser!  She was active this morning and I'd bet my life she's busily reading and re-reading her opus right this minute.  The only thing she made good on was her "threat" to relieve herself of jury duty; something she's already partaken in 55 times.  And all the veiled threats to do herself harm in some way!  Loser, loser, loser!
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 20, 2012, 08:01:58 AM
You know, I'm kind of feeling sorry for her.

No.

We already know, madam, that the length and depth of your compassion, your charity, your goodwill, your love, for others puts even the late Mother Teresa in the shadows.

nadin has the sensitivity of a rock; she wouldn't even flinch if slammed in the side of the head with a shovel, she's that insensate to the feelings of others.  In comparison with nadin, a rock is a tender, soft, caring thing.

Use your compassion on those worth your compassion--such as murdered about-to-be-born infants for whom nadin has no consideration; for children suffering under totalitarian socialism for whom nadin has no feelings; for children imprisoned in inner-city ghettos because nadin wants to keep them on the plantation, keep them in line; for children denied illumination of God and hope because nadin thinks they need to worship the State (and herself) instead, &c., &c., &c.

No matter how despondent, how low nadin falls, she isn't worth any more care than whatever your neighbor next door dropped into his commode two months ago.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BEG on February 20, 2012, 08:06:46 AM
Would you leave already lady!?!  Have you ever wondered why you seem to have issues at every MB you are on?  Could it be YOU?
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 20, 2012, 09:25:20 AM
Would you leave already lady!?!  Have you ever wondered why you seem to have issues at every MB you are on?  Could it be YOU?

Any admission of guilt--or even the shred of culpability--for her having to move from one MB to another would require humility.  She's not secure enough in herself to allow humility into her life.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Chris_ on February 20, 2012, 09:31:56 AM
The life of a DOTY winner is never easy. :(
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: whiffleball on February 20, 2012, 10:12:01 AM
She still hasn't left!  I knew she was monitoring her thread.  She's sick!:  http://www.democraticunderground.com/124049797#post246

Star Member nadinbrzezinski (101,862 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
246. And that was done so you know, for two and a half years

View profile
to the point of not even seeing who it was. The behavior continued on DU3

That is not the way a mature site handles it... a mature site should realize we have some people who will do this... and that there has to be a METHOD to deal with it beyond the la, la, I am not listening.

But that is ok. I am definitely gone. Even though I must thank Obamanaut for FINALLY, after three years, putting me on ignore, I suggested that solution as well, at this point I have zero interest in truly relieving HS experiences. Which this is quickly becoming

You know what I was told when growing up, EVEN AFTER physically attacked by one of my bullies in school? Ignore it, it will go away. It did indeed go away, when I left the school. Well it will indeed go away when I leave DU.

I guess you have never experienced this...

So I guess you really do not understand this.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Mike220 on February 20, 2012, 10:15:16 AM
Star Member nadinbrzezinski (101,862 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

and that there has to be a METHOD to deal with it beyond the la, la, I am not listening.

Anyone else catch the irony of the nadster saying this?
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: JakeStyle on February 20, 2012, 10:20:25 AM
She's still at it...

Quote
nadinbrzezinski
249. How is IGNORING goading somebody?

It seems to me that you are giving the exact same advise that DID NOT work in School even after I was physically assaulted. Ignore it, it will go away. Indeed it did go away, when I transfered.

As to Cronkite, we all know that the Republican Party of 1960 was the exact same political party of 2012... and that things are always static. We also know that people do not change... and they are the same as they were fifty years ago. Suffice it to say, he became a LIBERAL hero, but when he was REPORTING at the height of his career, you were NOT supposed to know. The value was HONEST UNBIASED reporting... not what passes today.

He even himself said that the Republican Party changed, radically.

And we are not talking of making mistakes once again... but thanks for your "concern."

You remind me of my Junior HS principal. The same one who wanted to expel me after I finally defended myself when one of the kids kicked me hard on the knees and I responded with a backpack to his knees, sorry, oopps, it folded the wrong way.

Thankfully there were witnesses who came to bat. That my dear was the last straw. I transfered the next year... and to this day, when I see those bullies, rarely in the streets, when I go visit Mexico City, I cross the street. I have zero interest to know what happened to them, or how they live. They are in a way, dead to me.

So have a good life here in the old DU... I will be closing the door behind me, just as I did when I finally left that toxic environment... and no thanks to the administrators, who blamed for it, and the principals, who blamed me for it. I mean those dears could do nothing wrong.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 20, 2012, 10:31:06 AM
I have to admit it, had I known nutcase nadin when I was a schoolboy, I would definitely have kicked her fat knees. Kudos to the kids who did.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: miskie on February 20, 2012, 10:35:25 AM
Supperman weeps...

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Dhnmaza-05w/TVseE2wGizI/AAAAAAAAAOw/ZHkCthLCCiE/s320/Watkinsville-20110210-00643.jpg)
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Gina on February 20, 2012, 10:37:49 AM
 :lmao:  This thread had me all vestalike   :panic:

I would love to see vesta and nadin in a post off  :lmao:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: miskie on February 20, 2012, 10:42:50 AM
:lmao:  This thread had me all vestalike   :panic:

I would love to see vesta and nadin in a post off  :lmao:

Vesta would win. Easily.-- HOWEVER, I'm not exactly certain what that means.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Chris_ on February 20, 2012, 10:43:48 AM
I don't think "win" is the word you're looking for. :p
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Toastedturningtidelegs on February 20, 2012, 10:53:05 AM
:lmao:  This thread had me all vestalike   :panic:

I would love to see vesta and nadin in a post off  :lmao:
The typos alone would make me want to kill myself.The disjointed,rambling and off topic asides would signal The Rapture!
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 20, 2012, 11:03:16 AM
:lmao:  This thread had me all vestalike   :panic:

I would love to see vesta and nadin in a post off  :lmao:
It would go on forever. Neither would ready a word of what the other wrote.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Gina on February 20, 2012, 11:04:04 AM
OMg!  Is it possible they are one in the same.  Have we been DUped?   :o
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Rugnuts on February 20, 2012, 11:22:14 AM
OMg!  Is it possible they are one in the same.  Have we been DUped?   :o
vesta never mentioned her rig.....

they are either not the same person or she has really good mole skills
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ogre on February 20, 2012, 12:10:52 PM
Quote
Response to pecwae (Reply #229)

nadinbrzezinski

Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:09 AM
 
247. I have, where I post all the vebotten posts here and I will now make my exit... after all, why care about a place where I have made friends for eleven years? I do care about those friends. but the place, not so much.

 :whistling:

Oh my, Queen Nad's has fled, the Queen has fled!!!!

The DUmmies will now have to wallow in their ignorance without Nad's of the Arc, spotter of the trend, and connector of the dot.

How will DU ever overcome losing her vast wealth of knowledge?


Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Gina on February 20, 2012, 12:15:14 PM
:whistling:

Oh my, Queen Nad's has fled, the Queen has fled!!!!

The DUmmies will now have to wallow in their ignorance without Nad's of the Arc, spotter of the trend, and connector of the dot.

How will DU ever overcome losing her vast wealth of knowledge?




 :ohnoes:  What will we do from now on?!!!!!  :ohnoes:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: RWKindaGuy on February 20, 2012, 12:19:50 PM
A veiled threat to sue ... Obamanaut?  Skinner?  Good luck with that, Nads.

Quote
And when do sites take this shit seriously? Given the history of facebook and myspace, only after they get sued. This is the US... the land of personal responsibilty until well, it becomes a legal matter.

Suffice it to say there is a track that they were warned, so when they get sued they cannot pretend they were not,

http://nadinbrzezinski.posterous.com/
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ogre on February 20, 2012, 12:41:54 PM

Quote
A veiled threat to sue ... Obamanaut?  Skinner?  Good luck with that, Nads.

I can hear the dialogue between her and a lawyer.

Lawyer:  So please tell me why you're here to see me.

Nada's:  I'm being bullied and cyber-stalked.

Lawyer:  That is serious, can you give me some background?

Nada's:  There's this person who constantly points out misspellings, improper use of words, questions my sources, and is over critical of my written work.  I am a credentialed report you know.

Lawyer:  So the individual is someone you work with, your editor....

Nada's:  Um, no he is a poster at a public forum that I post at....

Lawyer:   :mental: Okay....How about I review the case studies on this and get back to you.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Mike220 on February 20, 2012, 12:53:01 PM
Vesta would win. Easily.-- HOWEVER, I'm not exactly certain what that means.

No matter who wins, we all lose...
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: RWKindaGuy on February 20, 2012, 01:22:19 PM
I can hear the dialogue between her and a lawyer.

Lawyer:  So please tell me why you're here to see me.

Nada's:  I'm being bullied and cyber-stalked.

Lawyer:  That is serious, can you give me some background?

Nada's:  There's this person who constantly points out misspellings, improper use of words, questions my sources, and is over critical of my written work.  I am a credentialed report you know.

Lawyer:  So the individual is someone you work with, your editor....

Nada's:  Um, no he is a poster at a public forum that I post at....

Lawyer:   :mental: Okay....How about I review the case studies on this and get back to you.

Exactly
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: jukin on February 20, 2012, 01:45:42 PM
Quote
You remind me of my Junior HS principal. The same one who wanted to expel me after I finally defended myself when one of the kids kicked me hard on the knees and I responded with a backpack to his knees, sorry, oopps, it folded the wrong way.

<<<<RESUME UPDATE ALERT>>>><<<<RESUME UPDATE ALERT>>>><<<<RESUME UPDATE ALERT>>>><<<<RESUME UPDATE ALERT>>>>

Knee capper. I wonder if she worked on a Black & Blue Collection Crew? No I don't, of course she did.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: JakeStyle on February 20, 2012, 01:46:33 PM
Quote
But as far as I am concerned there is a time to say **** it... throw up arms and move on. This is one of them. Will I miss some friends, likely, as in very likely... but the wookie wins.

http://nadinbrzezinski.posterous.com/

(http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTkwHfBvstmIoj1dCBOkGjgFG1owJNdX6RHByegrF9sr8KYNykuLucP-Upy)
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: SarasotaRepub on February 20, 2012, 01:52:06 PM
I wonder it she'll go back to Mike Malloys place??? Assuming she ever left there too... :rotf:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 20, 2012, 02:19:36 PM
http://nadinbrzezinski.posterous.com/

(http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTkwHfBvstmIoj1dCBOkGjgFG1owJNdX6RHByegrF9sr8KYNykuLucP-Upy)


 :rofl:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 20, 2012, 02:22:16 PM
Nads the only bullying I have seen is from you with your condescending, elitist, bullshit attitude to anyone who dares questions your posts. 

Obamanaut isn't cyberstalking you misfit, he is standing up to you.   There's a world of difference.

Of course you are more than welcome here.  We would all love to respond to your posts.    Pretty please.  :)
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 20, 2012, 02:31:11 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_KVRrVyY1pjE/SwT6ri35E8I/AAAAAAAAAB4/89Q5zRY4Gfw/s1600/GoodnightOpus.jpg)


Good bye dearest Nads, we hardly knew ye......

Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: AllosaursRus on February 20, 2012, 02:41:03 PM
vesta never mentioned her rig.....

they are either not the same person or she has really good mole skills

Niether one is quite that clever!

(edited to add)

Nads the only bullying I have seen is from you with your condescending, elitist, bullshit attitude to anyone who dares questions your posts.  

Obamanaut isn't cyberstalking you misfit, he is standing up to you.   There's a world of difference.

Of course you are more than welcome here.  We would all love to respond to your posts.    Pretty please.  :)

That twat would never have the nerve to actually debate anything! She prefers the totalitarian form of argument.

If ya look up idiot in Websters, her picture takes up the whole page!!!
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Airwolf on February 20, 2012, 03:17:16 PM
Like I said before,I want to know how she got out of High School with a passing grade with that kind of mentality. I don't know of any teacher that wouldn't do the samethings we have and others at the DUmp have by pointing out how wrong she is in all aspects of what she has posted . If her homework looked anything like her post, I swear the you couldn't give enough failing grades to set her straight because she would argue every one of them and demand an A+ for the effort.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 20, 2012, 05:49:53 PM
She will be posting tomorrow like nothing ever happened. Remember, last time, when she took her talents to Crazy Andrea's place for two or three days, she made an elaborate ritual of deleting cookies and removing every trace of the DUmp from her computer. This is nothing.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: WinOne4TheGipper on February 20, 2012, 05:57:59 PM
Whow.

I wonder what the story is, behind this:

Anybody know?

Details, anyone?

I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you. :tongue:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Rebel on February 21, 2012, 09:06:03 AM
Vesta would win. Easily.-- HOWEVER, I'm not exactly certain what that means.

Be like two midgets playing Horse at Madison Square Garden.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Aristotelian on February 22, 2012, 07:05:52 AM
Oh no - is this the end of the fun?

Quote
Obamanaut
228. By popular request, the OP is now on 'ignore'. nt
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 22, 2012, 07:21:12 AM
Oh no - is this the end of the fun?


Not a chance.  Obamanaut knows that he can read her droppings here. :-) O-) :fuelfire:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: wasp69 on February 22, 2012, 08:53:00 AM
Quote
Obamanaut
228. By popular request, the OP is now on 'ignore'. nt

Let a bitchy, screeching, harpy of a "woman" get her way with a tantrum, huh?  Yeah, you're definitely a lib "male".
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 22, 2012, 12:13:27 PM
Let a bitchy, screeching, harpy of a "woman" get her way with a tantrum, huh?  Yeah, you're definitely a lib "male".

Yeah, I was t-o-t-a-l-l-y disappointed in that, when he deleted all his posts.

Obviously there was some "pressure" behind the curtain that we didn't see.

Let this be a lesson to all decent and civilized people, too--never never never express any sort of admiration for a primitive one finds admirable.  It's the same as signing the primitive's death warrant, because if we like a primitive, then the other primitives don't.

Never never never say anything good about a primitive one likes.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: thundley4 on February 22, 2012, 12:17:53 PM
Obamanaut should sign up over here and post his comments about nadin. Of course he'd have to use a different name.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 22, 2012, 12:21:55 PM
Yeah, I was t-o-t-a-l-l-y disappointed in that, when he deleted all his posts.

Obviously there was some "pressure" behind the curtain that we didn't see.

Let this be a lesson to all decent and civilized people, too--never never never express any sort of admiration for a primitive one finds admirable.  It's the same as signing the primitive's death warrant, because if we like a primitive, then the other primitives don't.

Never never never say anything good about a primitive one likes.

Confine it to PMs, then?
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 22, 2012, 12:46:54 PM
Confine it to PMs, then?

Just so any kind words aren't out where lurking primitives can see it.

I tell you, if we started saying nice things about Pedro Picasso, for example, the other primitives would start eating him alive.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Rugnuts on February 22, 2012, 12:57:11 PM
if we started saying nice things about Pedro Picasso, for example, the other primitives would start eating him alive.


sounds like fun
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 22, 2012, 01:11:04 PM
I tell you, if we started saying nice things about Pedro Picasso, for example, the other primitives would start eating him alive.

I'll PM you . . . :evillaugh: :fuelfire:
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Skul on February 22, 2012, 01:37:27 PM
She will be posting tomorrow like nothing ever happened. Remember, last time, when she took her talents to Crazy Andrea's place for two or three days, she made an elaborate ritual of deleting cookies and removing every trace of the DUmp from her computer. This is nothing.
Ahem  :rotf:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002309984#post70
Quote
Response to kctim (Reply #88)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 02:26 PM nadinbrzezinski (101,877 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

89. So a frame used by Rush Limbaugh is NOW a democratic frame?

That be news to me... and I am sure a few in the party elite.

Now you are, by your own admission a blue dog. I respect that. I also understand that MANY blue dogs are former republicans, not that you are or not, it matters little. What matters is that many left the RNC and went to the DNC, this is a provable fact, since the RNC went crazee.

But that does not mean Blue Dogs are ascendant, or at least ascendant in certain regions of the country. Yes, some regions, where you live that might be the case, are more "conservative" than others. I use quotation marks since I have found that most people really do not know the meanings of the words any more... and that goes for conservative, liberal, communist, socialist, fascist... any ism. That is another discussion and it is not the people's fault, but forty years of propaganda.

But members of one party joining another is part of the process on how parties and coalitions change. And now that is starting to be pulled away from the "conservative" side to the "Liberal side"

But you may want to be careful about NOT using Rush Limbaugh's frames... or at least when I see them, I will call you on it. Mostly these frames are damaging, and I am sure you do not realize why. But they are part of a forty year propaganda campaign against the middle, and I will add, working classes.  


A new one today.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002339069
Quote
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:21 PM
 nadinbrzezinski (101,877 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

 And here is why the media mostly does not fact check things
even if they should...

Yesterday I covered the CD 52 debate... I fact checked all statements made by all four candidates... I just finished doing the write up. Forty minute debate took over eight hours to fact check. 9     
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: wasp69 on February 22, 2012, 01:51:50 PM
Yeah, I was t-o-t-a-l-l-y disappointed in that, when he deleted all his posts.

Obviously there was some "pressure" behind the curtain that we didn't see.

Let this be a lesson to all decent and civilized people, too--never never never express any sort of admiration for a primitive one finds admirable.  It's the same as signing the primitive's death warrant, because if we like a primitive, then the other primitives don't.

Never never never say anything good about a primitive one likes.

More simply put:  What did you expect?  He's a DUmmie, that's what they do.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 22, 2012, 03:30:08 PM
Quote
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:21 PM
 nadinbrzezinski (101,877 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

 And here is why the media mostly does not fact check things
even if they should...
la
Yesterday I covered the CD 52 debate... I fact checked all statements made by all four candidates... I just finished doing the write up. Forty minute debate took over eight hours to fact check. 9
 

Shame she didn't do this prior to running the facebook piece.    She is completely out of her mind. 
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: wasp69 on February 22, 2012, 03:41:14 PM
Quote
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:21 PM
 nadinbrzezinski (101,877 posts)

 And here is why the media mostly does not fact check things
even if they should...

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_4FfIgXAIzJo/TThGx7_6teI/AAAAAAAACVk/Lb3_tCRyzfU/s1600/pot+kettle.jpg)
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: wasp69 on February 22, 2012, 03:47:04 PM
Shame she didn't do this prior to running the facebook piece.    She is completely out of her mind. 

No she isn't, she's pulled the perfect fascist alinskyite play - she used their own rules against them.  She bitched, whined, moaned, stamped her chubby feet, and nagged until she got her detractors to give in.  Now she can roll on without a worry in the world.

She beat obamanaut, mineral man, zappaman, et al into submission and she'll be worse than she's ever been.  Any opposition will be ground under the shrieks of "cyber bully!".
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Ogre on February 22, 2012, 04:09:27 PM
No she isn't, she's pulled the perfect fascist alinskyite play - she used their own rules against them.  She bitched, whined, moaned, stamped her chubby feet, and nagged until she got her detractors to give in.  Now she can roll on without a worry in the world.

She beat obamanaut, mineral man, zappaman, et al into submission and she'll be worse than she's ever been.  Any opposition will be ground under the shrieks of "cyber bully!".

She has completely hijacked the definitions of bullying and cyber stalking and twisted them to suit her agenda.

The DUmbasses being, well DUmbasses cannot see this for what it is.  It completely parallels their desire to relabel everything they don't agree with.

I didn't think Queen Nad's had it in her to survive the attempted coup.  I should have never underestimated the Countess of Condescending.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: formerlurker on February 22, 2012, 04:47:44 PM
Immediately thought of Nads when seeing this:

(http://explosm.net/db/files/Comics/guest6/CRW_jay_a_reaction.png)
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: ChuckJ on February 22, 2012, 04:54:24 PM
I just read the two posts that Skul brought over. I didn't see a single "and yes", "and no", "oh", or "suffice to say". Are you positive this is the real nadin?
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Newsweek on February 22, 2012, 06:43:20 PM
The multiple fires in Help and Meta are out of control.  Looks like Obamanaut has been badly damaged if not destroyed.  Amazing the support that came out for Nads.  She will be impossible.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 22, 2012, 07:05:57 PM
She will be impossible.

I dunno.

Skins's island can take some really weird twists-and-turns, the unexpected.

nadin may think she's "won," but I doubt it.

Keep the television turned on, because something unusual usually happens.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: franksolich on February 22, 2012, 07:34:21 PM
You know, the primitives really need to do a better job of scheduling their discombobulations.

This one here's probably a pretty major one for the year, but who's going to remember it in late November, when nominations and voting for the Top DUmmies of 2012 takes place?

Who's going to remember who nadin was, or who 0bamanaut was, by then?

This reminds me of 2010, when the bobbling primitive got the Bostonian Drunkard mausoleumed, but as it was done in May, rather than later in the year closer to nominating-and-voting time, the bobbling primitive lost to the Die alte Sau for Top DUmmie.  Better had the bobbling primitive waited until September or October to do that, when she and the event she instigated would've still been fresh in people's minds.

And now this is only February 2012; way too early in the year.

Far far better had nadin refrained from bullying 0bamanaut until frost was on the pumpkin, in which case she'd be a repeat Top DUmmie.  But no, she's blown her chance to repeat, because by late November, nobody's going to remember who she was.
Title: Re: Nads gives up on juries
Post by: Newsweek on February 22, 2012, 08:47:47 PM
So much love is being showered on Nads in H&M right now that I don't see how she can leave.  Sabrina 1 and BeHereNow  are ready to watch for any one "bullying" or "stalking" - as they define the terms.  It will be interesting to see what happens the next time N posts something off the wall.  Will any one call her on it?