The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Archives => Politics => Election 2012 => Topic started by: CG6468 on February 13, 2012, 10:48:26 PM

Title: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Post by: CG6468 on February 13, 2012, 10:48:26 PM
Quote
From Tommie Thompson:

This is a copy of my response to motion to dismiss in my Alabama case. It would hope others will use this or parts of it in their cases:

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Comes now the Plaintiff, Tommy Thompson. The defense for Mark Kennedy is requesting the dismissal of this case under 17-16- 44 of the Code of Alabama (1975) and Rule 12(b) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. I contend that 17-16-44 Code of Alabama was not intended to be used in this particular situation. In fact, in a recent letter from the office of Secretary of State, Beth Chapman, her letter states “Alabama law gives the Alabama Courts the authority to issue injunctions”. This was in direct reference to these cases challenging Barack Obama’s placement on the Alabama State ballot.

1. Plaintiff seeks for the defendant to provide proof of his eligibility to be placed on the Alabama State ballot as a candidate for the office of President of the United States. All candidates must meet the requirement for the office they seek, that includes Mr. Obama. The mere fact that he is now President and was elected in 2008 only “assumes” that he is a qualified citizen for the office of President of the United States. We contend that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born citizen” as required for the office of President. If the public had been made aware of his ineligibility, he would not have been elected, nor placed on the ballot.

According to a 1948 Supreme Court opinion, every Federal office holder bears the burden of proof as to her or his eligibility to hold office. If there are doubts concerning a presidential or vice presidential candidate’s “natural born citizen” status, the candidate is obligated to resolve those doubts before taking office.

Now that Obama’s [natural born] citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders. The “burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States … is upon those making the claim.” Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948).

Response to Motion to Dismiss Obama's Alabama Ballot Challenge (http://obamaballotchallenge.com/response-to-motion-to-dismiss-alabama-ballot-challenge)
Title: Re: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Post by: Rugnuts on February 14, 2012, 09:28:02 AM
who is tommie thompson and mark kennedy?
Title: Re: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Post by: CG6468 on February 14, 2012, 10:03:58 AM
Thompson is a former Republican governor of Wisconsin.

Kennedy (a CPA) was a Republican representative from Minnesota.
Title: Re: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Post by: Rugnuts on February 14, 2012, 10:11:11 AM
so a wisconsin is a plaintiff and a minnesotan is the defendant in an alabamese (lol) case about the national president's legitimacy

i am ****ing lost
Title: Re: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Post by: CG6468 on February 14, 2012, 10:12:57 AM
Quote from: Rugnuts on February 14, 2012, 10:11:11 AM
so a wisconsin is a plaintiff and a minnesotan is the defendant in an alabamese (lol) case about the national president's legitimacy

i am ****ing lost

Welcome to the world of politics!
Title: Re: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Post by: Gina on February 14, 2012, 10:29:49 AM
I'm from TN!    :tinfoil2:
Title: Re: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Post by: CG6468 on February 14, 2012, 10:33:39 AM
Quote from: Gina on February 14, 2012, 10:29:49 AM
I'm from TN!    :tinfoil2:

and.................  :???:  :panic: