The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on February 06, 2012, 06:56:44 PM
-
Star Member demtenjeep (20,313 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
View profile
many of my conservative friends have said that if the nominee is Newty or frothy they will sit out
this election cycle.
I said Well, you have to do what you think is the best for you.
Hehe. I love it. They don't even try to pretend anymore!
Sure they said that... :whatever:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002276476
-
Must be cyber friends at Free Republic.
-
Must be cyber friends at Free Republic.
Or, her 'lover' that's kept in her underwear drawer , , , :o
-
Star Member demtenjeep (20,313 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
View profile
many of my conservative friends have said that if the nominee is Newty or frothy they will sit out
this election cycle.
I said Well, you have to do what you think is the best for you.
Hehe. I love it. They don't even try to pretend anymore!
No way Pam the Plagiarizer has conservative friends. She may know of, or work with people of conservative persuasion, however none of them would classify Pam as friend.
Zero bongs, no cops, bushes, conversions, or applause.
-
Newty or frothy?
What the ****? WHO the ****?
-
Newty or frothy?
What the ****? WHO the ****?
It's a derogatory term the queers came up with when Santorum was in the Senate. It's juvenile, disgusting, and ridiculous, much like the people that coined the term and continue to use it.
-
Suuuuuuuuuure they will.
-
Pam lies again...
...assuming she ever told the truth about a damn thing in her life in the first place.
-
:bouncy:
Oh, and this:
Atman (1000+ posts) Tue Oct-11-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Bouncy" simpy relates to the emoticon. It's an ancient relic...when a poster would put up a positive story, they'd tend to add the "bouncy" emoticon. So any positive post is seen in the "lurking" circles as being a "BOUNCY" post. Remember, the freepers and cave dwellers are simple people, and need pictures to help them understand what is going on.
-
Once the consequences of 4 more years of Obama hits home with conservatives, they will come out to vote for Daffy Duck if that would stop Lord O.
-
Once the consequences of 4 more years of Obama hits home with conservatives, they will come out to vote for Daffy Duck if that would stop Lord O.
Honestly, that what Democrats said about Kerry in '04 and nominating Lurch got them nowhere.
-
Here, atman...here's another picture for you:
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_3cib3fK139M/TDceeATcYFI/AAAAAAAAFLk/RK7E_6uRTxg/s1600/god+think+you%27re+a+loser+too.jpg)
There, feel better now?
-
Sure they said that... :whatever:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002276476
If Mitt is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Newt is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Rick is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Ron Paul is the nominee, I may need to borrow some weed from a nearby Paulista in order to pull the lever.
-
Wait, what? Pam has friends? She lies in her very first sentence. :loser:
Oh, and Atman ------------------------> :bigbird:
:urmeds:
-
If Mitt is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Newt is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Rick is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Ron Paul is the nominee, I may need to borrow some weed from a nearby Paulista in order to pull the lever.
Same here, there isn't a person that could win the Republican nomination that I wouldn't take over the "O".
-
Must be cyber friends at Free Republic.
(http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/7205/imaginaryfriends.jpg)
-
Same here, there isn't a person that could win the Republican nomination that I wouldn't take over the "O".
Agreed. I think that there's a general attitude of ABBO this year.
-
If Mitt is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Newt is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Rick is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for him. If Ron Paul is the nominee, I may need to borrow some weed from a nearby Paulista in order to pull the lever.
Mark Levin calls them "Paultards". :lmao:
But I agree with you. ANYBODY (except Paul) on the Rep. side would be worlds better than Lord Zero. Paul reminds me too much of L. Ron Hubbard.
-
Mark Levin calls them "Paultards". :lmao:
But I agree with you. ANYBODY (except Paul) on the Rep. side would be worlds better than Lord Zero. Paul reminds me too much of L. Ron Hubbard.
I suspect that if Ron Paul were elected, enough of his craziness would be mitigated by the other branches of the Federal Governement that he would still be a far better choice than Obama.
-
I will crawl over broken glass to vote for Anybody But Obama.
-
I will crawl over broken glass to vote for Anybody But Obama.
Bingo.
And I felt the same way in 2008, anybody but the Magic One or Messalina Agrippina.
In 2004, I didn't have to worry about it.
And the same way in 2000, anybody but Alphonse Capote Gore.
And the same way in 1996, anybody but William Clinton.
In 1992, I didn't have to worry about it.
And the same way in 1988, anybody but Michael Dukakis.
In 1984, I didn't have to worry about it.
And the same way in 1980, anybody but Jimmy Carter.
By the time the Nebraska presidential primary comes around, the nominee's already been decided, and there isn't anything I can do about it. However, I must say that thus far in life, I've been eminently satisfied that the ultimate (R) nominee, whoever it is, is vastly superior to any Democrat. And that includes 2008, too.
-
I'm with you frank, however, I'll point out that IMHO the Republican "establishment" has given us another stinking pot of crap with these candidates, like they did with McLame.
I'll vote for my cat before I'd ever vote for obumble, but I'm going to be working with the local tea party a lot more in the future, I've turned my back on the Republican "party".
-
I'm with you frank, however, I'll point out that IMHO the Republican "establishment" has given us another stinking pot of crap with these candidates, like they did with McLame.
I'll vote for my cat before I'd ever vote for obumble, but I'm going to be working with the local tea party a lot more in the future, I've turned my back on the Republican "party".
Well, you know, BadCat, in 1980 I wanted George Bush, in 1988 I wanted Robert Dole, in 2000 I wanted Richard Cheney, in 2008 I wanted Duncan Hunter. Obviously, I didn't get them.
(This is no disparagement of the eventual Republican candidates those years--no way--it's just that such preference were made before Reagan beginning in 1981, Bush beginning in 1989, and the second Bush beginning in 2001, proved themselves remarkably good presidents, the best presidents in my entire life. Foresight, unlike hindsight, is not always accurate.)
Romney has what he needs, from the center and the left; inevitably he's going to turn right, and one's encouraged that he's ramping up his attacks on the Magic One (although he still has a long way to go).
But if one isn't confident about that, about Romney, well then, put one's efforts into getting senators and congressmen more conservative into office, so as to keep Romney going the right direction. Don't care for Romney?--well, then, work to get others into other offices who will keep forcing his hand in the conservative direction.
That's always been my attitude. It's more than just the presidency.
-
Ah yes, the return of the Conversion Bouncy. There's been a dearth of them since the ascendency of The Annointed One. It's about time they made a comeback. Although this isn't technically a "conversion", it's a good way to get the ball rolling. Pretty soon we'll all be hearing about lifelong Republicans who are voting Dim this year.
:bouncy: :bouncy: :bouncy:
-
Ah yes, the return of the Conversion Bouncy. There's been a dearth of them since the ascendency of The Annointed One. It's about time they made a comeback. Although this isn't technically a "conversion", it's a good way to get the ball rolling. Pretty soon we'll all be hearing about lifelong Republicans who are voting Dim this year.
:bouncy: :bouncy: :bouncy:
A good poll to have would be:
Which primitive will have the most conversion bouncies?
-
0bama is so bad that I will vote for Paul if he is our nominee.
-
Getting back to the OP . . .
In other news, water is wet, and the Sun rises in the East and sets in the West.
-
0bama is so bad that I will vote for Paul if he is our nominee.
I would vote for Donald Trump, or Dick Morris, or Nancy Grace. Hell, I'd vote for Vince, the ShamWow! guy, before I'd sit home, or vote for the muslim.
It isn't possible to make a mistake in voting against the jug-eared Kenyan.
-
Well, you know, BadCat, in 1980 I wanted George Bush, in 1988 I wanted Robert Dole, in 2000 I wanted Richard Cheney, in 2008 I wanted Duncan Hunter. Obviously, I didn't get them.
(This is no disparagement of the eventual Republican candidates those years--no way--it's just that such preference were made before Reagan beginning in 1981, Bush beginning in 1989, and the second Bush beginning in 2001, proved themselves remarkably good presidents, the best presidents in my entire life. Foresight, unlike hindsight, is not always accurate.)
Romney has what he needs, from the center and the left; inevitably he's going to turn right, and one's encouraged that he's ramping up his attacks on the Magic One (although he still has a long way to go).
But if one isn't confident about that, about Romney, well then, put one's efforts into getting senators and congressmen more conservative into office, so as to keep Romney going the right direction. Don't care for Romney?--well, then, work to get others into other offices who will keep forcing his hand in the conservative direction.
That's always been my attitude. It's more than just the presidency.
Yup. I would say you got it pretty well summed up Coach. There are three branches of government for a reason. We are a Constitutional Republic for a reason. It serves both winners and losers well. I have wanted a lot of things in my life that I found I really didn't like once I got, and, (conversely) got a lot of things that I really didn't want that I fell in love with. That is not to say one has to lie down, roll over, and accept ones lot in life, rather, as you point out, one has to accept those things one cannot change and then work to change those one can.
Put another way if you ain't rowing you shouldn't bitch about where the boat ends up.
-
No way Pam the Plagiarizer has conservative friends. She may know of, or work with people of conservative persuasion, however none of them would classify Pam as friend.
Zero bongs, no cops, bushes, conversions, or applause.
The only people she works with are felons. They have most likely lost their voting rights forever.
-
Whoever the nominee is gets my vote - Granted, Ive expected it would be Romney since the day after The One won the election (must have been some sort of arc, trend, or dots that I witnessed) and I still do.
Couldn't have been any wronger on Palin however. I did not expect she would be subject to unending leftist savagery.
My only lingering concern with Romney is that he is going to tap Ron Paul for VP to appropriate some of the TEA Party/college kid/Occupy votes. Ive noticed they have both stayed pretty clear of attacking each other.
-
The only people she works with are felons. They have most likely lost their voting rights forever.
Juvie felons. As long as they stay out of the Big House, they're the democrat base.