The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on February 05, 2012, 04:48:31 PM

Title: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: formerlurker on February 05, 2012, 04:48:31 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski
 
I notice a curios division here

It s between the conservadems and liberals concerning OWS. What makes me smile is that i am fully aware this is part of the process. For the moment debating going to the non existent OSD camp for a lecture, non existent as well, on the history of social movements. I mean some of the things I read here, that shit I ate for lunch is really powerful stuff!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002271742


Oh Nads, everyone knows you are a fraud.    Deal with it girl.

Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Traveshamockery on February 05, 2012, 04:50:16 PM
Oh brother. 

 :stoner:
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: BEG on February 05, 2012, 05:01:33 PM
Better check yo self before you wreck yo self Nadin.

[youtube=425,350]xEU7D8YSqvs[/youtube]
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Ballygrl on February 05, 2012, 05:06:12 PM
Quote
Obamanaut
4. curios = collectibles, curious = odd, hard to explain, or inquisitive nt

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: formerlurker on February 05, 2012, 05:06:52 PM
Quote
Obamanaut
4. curios = collectibles, curious = odd, hard to explain, or inquisitive nt

 :rofl:

I wish he would inquire why she self-deleted her explosive article on the dead facebook soldier.    
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: formerlurker on February 05, 2012, 05:13:27 PM
Quote
zappaman
12. I have no idea what the OP is even saying.

Could it be posted a little more coherently, please?
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Quote
Response to zappaman (Reply #12)Sun Feb 5, 2012, 06:12 PM
 pintobean
15. It's in code

for the curios.


 :rofl:

Love these guys.  Obamanaut has competition for the 2012 Most Magnificent Bastard award!!!!

Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: LC EFA on February 05, 2012, 05:34:53 PM
A curios division ?

Isn't that the section of the store that TomInTib works in ?
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Ballygrl on February 05, 2012, 05:41:44 PM
I wish Obamanaut and progressiveinaction would register here, if they're not moles then they have something most of the left sorely lacks, and that's a sense of humor and great sarcasm.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 05, 2012, 06:01:38 PM
South of the Border has a curios division.

It's right next to the plastic puke section.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: sharkhawk on February 05, 2012, 07:29:00 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author

Quote
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.


And so on.  I think Nads must be having a fit.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: LC EFA on February 05, 2012, 08:13:33 PM
(http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/lc_efa/uploads/b8face8b-fcda-4081-b7e5-fcf07d3ddb4b.jpg)
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 05, 2012, 09:05:36 PM
This one's been locked to stop the bloodletting, but man, are the DUmpmonkeys ever eating nutcase nadin alive!

They always try to destroy the DUmmy of the Year, but this goes way beyond the attacks that finally shut up Pam Dawson.

Of course, with the possible exception of TiTtyboy, we've never had a Top DUmmy as deserving of abuse.

I've always considered nadin to be beneath contempt, but apparently she isn't deep enough to avoid it.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 05, 2012, 09:29:47 PM
If there was a "Curios division" on DU, Vinca would've already stolen everything out of it and sold it all on eBay.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: commonguymd on February 05, 2012, 09:36:58 PM
This one's been locked to stop the bloodletting, but man, are the DUmpmonkeys ever eating nutcase nadin alive!

They always try to destroy the DUmmy of the Year, but this goes way beyond the attacks that finally shut up Pam Dawson.

Of course, with the possible exception of TiTtyboy, we've never had a Top DUmmy as deserving of abuse.

I've always considered nadin to be beneath contempt, but apparently she isn't deep enough to avoid it.


This one is not locked but I have no freakin clue what the hell she is babbling about. 
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: franksolich on February 05, 2012, 09:39:46 PM
If there was a "Curios division" on DU, Vinca would've already stolen everything out of it and sold it all on eBay.

Good one, sir.

Awesome.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 05, 2012, 09:49:45 PM
Nope, this one isn't locked, it was the other nadin bloodbath that got shut down.

A post from an obvious DUmp newcomer:
 
Quote
Sun Feb 5, 2012, 10:34 PM
Zalatix (1,424 posts) 
29. It made perfect sense to me. Except I don't know the definition of OSD

Hey Nadine, would you mind sharing some of what you hear from that lecture on social movements with the DU?

What a stupid noob! In addition to not knowing the definition of "OSD", he thinks nutcase nadin is going to listen to a lecture.

Anyone with half a brain knows she's going to give it.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: franksolich on February 05, 2012, 09:51:15 PM
A curios division ?

Isn't that the section of the store that TomInTib works in ?


You know, normally one forgives such spelling and grammatical errors on the part of those for whom English is not their first language.

But because of her overweening arrogance one can't forgive nadin.

If she's smarter than the rest of us, she wouldn't be making those mistakes.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Skul on February 06, 2012, 12:03:50 AM
Lawdy, them curios may be her up drop.
Her DOTY needs to be recinded out of mercy.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Wineslob on February 06, 2012, 09:39:29 AM
Quote
Quote
nadinbrzezinski
 
I notice a curios diversion here

It s between the conservadems and liberals concerning OWS. What makes me smile is that i am fully un-aware this is part of the process. For the moment debating going to the non existent OCD camp for a lecture, non existent as well, on the history of bowel movements. I mean some of the things I read here, that shit sandwich I ate for lunch is really powerful stuff!



Not much, but a little FIFY.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Skul on February 06, 2012, 12:50:27 PM
Quote
Quote
nadinbrzezinski
 
I notice a curios diversion here

It s between the conservadems and liberals concerning OWS. What makes me smile is that i am fully un-aware this is part of the process. For the moment debating going to the non existent OCD camp for a lecture, non existent as well, on the history of bowel movements. I mean some of the things I read here, that shit sandwich I ate for lunch is really powerful stuff!

Not much, but a little FIFY.
:lol: You ain't right.  :rotf: :lmao:
H5

Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Rugnuts on February 06, 2012, 01:08:22 PM
Better check yo self before you wreck yo self Nadin.


i wasnt expecting Ice Cube in here
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v230/sadiesinner/cat-dance.gif)
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Wineslob on February 06, 2012, 04:10:44 PM
Not much, but a little FIFY.

 :lol: You ain't right.  :rotf: :lmao:
H5




Hey, she's the bitch that keeps on giving.     :-)
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: miskie on February 06, 2012, 05:56:08 PM
Yes, here is a little something whyle Deep Googling Nadin and Curios - some crunchy truth, and yes, the name is correct.

(http://static.regretsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/nadine.jpg)

Quote
I know, I know.

You want this 3D portrait of Nadine, but it’s not for sale. And it hurts. It hurts a lot.

So what are you supposed to do? How are you supposed to quench that longing? How do you fill that goatse in your soul?

Well, I’ll tell you how.
http://www.regretsy.com/2011/02/03/not-for-sale/
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: formerlurker on February 06, 2012, 06:14:38 PM
Yes, here is a little something whyle Deep Googling Nadin and Curios - some crunchy truth, and yes, the name is correct.

(http://static.regretsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/nadine.jpg)
http://www.regretsy.com/2011/02/03/not-for-sale/

It does look like her facebook pic.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Chris_ on February 06, 2012, 06:46:00 PM
Quote
Posted on February 3, 2011 by Helen Killer
Can I buy a vowel, Pat?
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: franksolich on February 06, 2012, 07:16:56 PM

Now, that is awesome, what you found there.  Damn.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Traveshamockery on February 06, 2012, 08:00:17 PM
 :confused:

Why would anyone want to buy that?  Further, why would anyone post that on the internet? 

 :???:
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: thundley4 on February 06, 2012, 08:14:57 PM
:confused:

Why would anyone want to buy that?  Further, why would anyone post that on the internet? 

 :???:

Why would anyone create that? 
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Chris_ on February 06, 2012, 08:18:02 PM
Who's the DUmmy that was hawking those painted-turd sculptures for a hundred bucks a pop?

I think 'Hellen Killer' might be a nom de plume.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: BEG on February 06, 2012, 08:31:55 PM
:confused:

Why would anyone want to buy that?  Further, why would anyone post that on the internet? 

 :???:

I have subscribed to a lot of different "crafters" on YouTube. I watch them when I'm bored, you would believe some of the crap these people make. They also have viewers who feed their ego and I think it clouds their view of what is actually good. Also, some of the stuff they make makes me think, "WTF are they going to do with that?  Put it in their box of stupid shit they can't give away or display?". 
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: Chris_ on February 06, 2012, 08:41:51 PM
There was a PBS show that was on for a couple of years called Roadside Attractions or something.  It was a couple of goobers that would stop and look at every horrible art car, yard sculpture, or shitty "museum" they could find.  Kinda glad it's not on anymore.  They were terrible.
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 06, 2012, 10:59:26 PM
More unterprimitiven disrespecting Supperman:
Quote
Response to zappaman (Reply #12)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 06:41 AM
pecwae (7,527 posts)
54. No.

You are unworthy of the understandingness of the contentness. You have no comprehendingness.

 
Quote
Response to zappaman (Reply #12)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 08:46 PM
LeftyMom (43,074 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

76. Hopefully it'll get cleaned up before it goes in the Wig Party newsletter.



 
 
Title: Re: Nads: I notice a curios division here
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 07, 2012, 09:02:18 AM
There was a PBS show that was on for a couple of years called Roadside Attractions or something.  It was a couple of goobers that would stop and look at every horrible art car, yard sculpture, or shitty "museum" they could find.  Kinda glad it's not on anymore.  They were terrible.

"Rare visions [and some other phrase]," was the name of it, I think.  I kinda liked it.