The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Archives => Politics => Election 2012 => Topic started by: Ptarmigan on December 24, 2011, 05:41:18 PM

Title: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: Ptarmigan on December 24, 2011, 05:41:18 PM
What do you think will be the outcome of 2012 Election?
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: docstew on December 24, 2011, 06:56:14 PM
A) 0bama wins in a squeaker with stories of massive voter intimidation and vote fraud, which is all swept under the rug by the MSM and DOJ; 0bama claims a "massive mandate" to finish his transformative efforts

OR

B) 0bama loses in an Electoral College landslide, demands multiple recounts of only democrat stronghold counties (with the attendant "found votes"), and refuses to vacate the WH.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: DLR Pyro on December 24, 2011, 11:32:38 PM
A) 0bama wins in a squeaker with stories of massive voter intimidation and vote fraud, which is all swept under the rug by the MSM and DOJ; 0bama claims a "massive mandate" to finish his transformative efforts

OR

B) 0bama loses in an Electoral College landslide, demands multiple recounts of only democrat stronghold counties (with the attendant "found votes"), and refuses to vacate the WH.
Ditto
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: BlueStateSaint on December 25, 2011, 06:13:33 PM
A) 0bama wins in a squeaker with stories of massive voter intimidation and vote fraud, which is all swept under the rug by the MSM and DOJ; 0bama claims a "massive mandate" to finish his transformative efforts

OR

B) 0bama loses in an Electoral College landslide, demands multiple recounts of only democrat stronghold counties (with the attendant "found votes"), and refuses to vacate the WH.

I think B) will be the more likely outcome.  Thing is, if he refuses to leave, would the military, whose oath is to the Constitution, not the President, get involved?
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: DefiantSix on December 25, 2011, 06:45:59 PM
I think B) will be the more likely outcome.  Thing is, if he refuses to leave, would the military, whose oath is to the Constitution, not the President, get involved?

Probably not; trespassing is a law enforcement matter, not a military matter.

I also am hopeful that (B) is the more likely of the two presented scenarios, but I have to say that - what with all the ACORN spin-offs gearing up for a major season of election fraud, Donald Trump, Ron Paul and a couple of others threatening to launch independent/third party runs, and all the stimulus money The ReichsMessiah has poured into union coffers over the past 3 years - option (A) is still a very real possibility.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 25, 2011, 06:53:13 PM
I think B) will be the more likely outcome.  Thing is, if he refuses to leave, would the military, whose oath is to the Constitution, not the President, get involved?

It's inconceivable to him that he might not win reelection....he will flat refuse to believe that he lost and will have to be physically thrown out of the Whitehouse....Moochelle will be loading up AF#1 with all the goodies she can carry because Hillary told it was OK.

Better sharpen your bayonets, it could be hand to hand before it's over.

You know what bothers me the most, this S.O.B. could live to be a ripe old age and become Jimmy Carters replacement as a big mouth mill stone around out necks.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: Boudicca on December 25, 2011, 06:59:26 PM
It's inconceivable to him that he might not win reelection....he will flat refuse to believe that he lost and will have to be physically thrown out of the Whitehouse....Moochelle will be loading up AF#1 with all the goodies she can carry because Hillary told it was OK.

Better sharpen your bayonets, it could be hand to hand before it's over.

You know what bothers me the most, this S.O.B. could live to be a ripe old age and become Jimmy Carters replacement as a big mouth mill stone around out necks.

I think it more likely that the US taxpayer will have to spring for the crew of Hoarders to pack them up and haul them away.

And I will lay odds when Bo's served his photo op time it's off to the pound for him.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: a777pilot on December 25, 2011, 09:52:51 PM
I hope that he sees that he is going to lose and lose big than he will pull an LBJ and quit.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: Boudicca on December 25, 2011, 10:41:17 PM
I hope that he sees that he is going to lose and lose big than he will pull an LBJ and quit.

LBJ had a wife who didn't feel she was entitled to EIGHT years of expensive jet setting vacations on the taxpayers' dime.  Even if he wanted to quit, and I can quite picture him sobbing himself to sleep over his low approval ratings, the harpy would never allow it. 
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: BlueStateSaint on December 30, 2011, 09:11:45 AM
I hope that he sees that he is going to lose and lose big than he will pull an LBJ and quit.

I don't see that happening--he'd be ceding power to Hillary, and that's the last thing he wants to do.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: a777pilot on December 30, 2011, 11:08:59 AM
I don't see that happening--he'd be ceding power to Hillary, and that's the last thing he wants to do.

You could be right.  We have time to see what happens.  In 1968 LBJ did not "quit" till the end of March.  Let's see what the next three months brings in the way of failures of this Fool, Bobo, the Post Turtle.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 30, 2011, 03:12:22 PM
If BoBo wins reelection, will he appoint a Czar to fill his office? Hey, he's got 30+ Czars already, another one won't hurt....much.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: DefiantSix on December 30, 2011, 03:25:19 PM
If BoBo wins reelection, will he appoint a Czar to fill his office? Hey, he's got 30+ Czars already, another one won't hurt....much.

If he does so, they're coming out if his own pocket.

Quote from: The Washington Times link=http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2011/feb/17/house-votes-eliminate-funding-czars/
The House of Representatives voted to pass an amendment, proposed by Rep. Steve Scalise, Louisiana Republican, to the H.R. 1 budget. The amendment would effectively defund the White House Czar program.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: Lacarnut on December 30, 2011, 06:34:16 PM
Obummer gets stomped for reelection and the Repubs take over the senate.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: a777pilot on December 31, 2011, 02:14:20 PM
Obummer gets stomped for reelection and the Repubs take over the senate.

I like that one.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: formerlurker on December 31, 2011, 03:40:04 PM
I do think it is a very legitimate concern on what Obama will do from his loss in November through January.    Trashing the White House is not something I can honestly say is beneath him. 

Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: CG6468 on December 31, 2011, 03:48:30 PM
I do think it is a very legitimate concern on what Obama will do from his loss in November through January.    Trashing the White House is not something I can honestly say is beneath him.

Brazingly trashing this nation is more like it.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: a777pilot on December 31, 2011, 04:50:21 PM
Brazingly trashing this nation is more like it.

He might try but no one will listen to him, let alone follow his orders at that time.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: DefiantSix on December 31, 2011, 05:02:12 PM
Obummer gets stomped for reelection and the Repubs take over the senate.

It'd be nice, but the Republicans are going to have to play a much more smash mouth game this time around to make it happen.  Barry is already fronting his "It's the Congress's fault" campaign.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: BlueStateSaint on December 31, 2011, 06:00:40 PM
It'd be nice, but the Republicans are going to have to play a much more smash mouth game this time around to make it happen.  Barry is already fronting his "It's the Congress's fault" campaign.

I think that the Republican-oriented PACs are going to do exactly that.  They aren't connected with any candidate, so the candidate has "plausable deniability."
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: DefiantSix on December 31, 2011, 06:06:45 PM
I think that the Republican-oriented PACs are going to do exactly that.  They aren't connected with any candidate, so the candidate has "plausable deniability."

Good as that will be, the candidates will need to be on camera, saying the same message, if the rank and file conservatives are to believe they aren't just being pandered to for another vote which will be wasted just as soon as the bastards go back to bending over and grabbing the ankles in committee for the Dhimmi'Rats, the moment their job is secure for another two years.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: Lacarnut on December 31, 2011, 08:38:19 PM
I do think it is a very legitimate concern on what Obama will do from his loss in November through January.    Trashing the White House is not something I can honestly say is beneath him. 



He might not do it but the punks that work for him like the ones that worked for Clinton will. I hope the next Repubs President will not be a wimp like Bush. Prosecute those that damage federal property to the fullest extent of the law. That should look good on their resume.
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: thundley4 on December 31, 2011, 08:40:56 PM
I shudder to think of the damage he could do with the power of his pardon.  I believe it is absolute , is it not?
Title: Re: 2012 Election Outcome
Post by: a777pilot on January 01, 2012, 10:03:50 AM
I shudder to think of the damage he could do with the power of his pardon.  I believe it is absolute , is it not?

Yes, it is absolute.

I wish people would think of the consequence of their vote, like Supreme Court appointments and pardons, before they vote.