The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on October 24, 2011, 08:03:04 PM

Title: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: CC27 on October 24, 2011, 08:03:04 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Mon Oct-24-11 08:52 PM
Original message
No it is not war   Updated at 6:30 PM
   
Edited on Mon Oct-24-11 08:57 PM by nadinbrzezinski
On the nurses arrested. But this is just a very short primer on protected emblems.

(http://www.redcross.lk/images/emblem/Emblem_08.jpg)

The red cross, the red half moon and yes the non religious connotations red crystal. Alas I miss the lion.

No wearing a black sweater with a alf assed red cross don't confer any neutrality even when there is an actual well...war.

Why does this matter? For the record I hope this is the closets we ever get to an actual internal civil war, we need to start establishing bona fides and demanding that neutrality be respected. That might matter if we should descend into that horror film.

But let's start by marking things correctly. Realize the only RECOGNIZED Red Cross IS the American Red Cross. From my experience they belong in actually at least keeping and eye but unless it's rank and file...well that happened in El Salvador and will leave it at that. But given the ARC does not have actual hospitals and ambulances if we descend into that hell it will have to pull them out of ass...another story.

Oh and the star of life

(http://www.ems.gov/vgn-ext-templating/ems/sol/images/BlueStar.gif)

is not among protected emblems so kindly replace that on your medic bag with a red cross, or crystal.

Now time to actually write that primer...in English.


What the hell is wrong with her?  :mental:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2179069
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: JakeStyle on October 24, 2011, 08:05:33 PM
Good grief  :thatsright:

Quote
From my experience they belong in actually at least keeping and eye but unless it's rank and file...well that happened in El Salvador and will leave it at that.
 What the hell does that mean?

Quote
Now time to actually write that primer...in English.
  Good luck with that you crazy bitch.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: Chris_ on October 24, 2011, 08:10:09 PM
:drunksailor:

lol closets.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: Evil_Conservative on October 24, 2011, 08:26:58 PM
I really do not understand what she is talking about.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: JakeStyle on October 24, 2011, 08:27:43 PM
I really do not understand what she is talking about.

You are not alone.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: Delmar on October 24, 2011, 08:29:47 PM
I think she composed this post using those refrigerator word magnets.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: JakeStyle on October 24, 2011, 08:33:28 PM
I'd rag on her at her crappy blog but she disabled comments again.  She is very sensitive to criticism.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: ChuckJ on October 24, 2011, 08:39:01 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Mon Oct-24-11 08:52 PM
Original message
No it is not war   Updated at 6:30 PM
  
Edited on Mon Oct-24-11 08:57 PM by nadinbrzezinski
On the nurses arrested. But this is just a very short primer on protected emblems.



The red cross, the red half moon and yes the non religious connotations red crystal. Alas I miss the lion.

No wearing a black sweater with a alf assed red cross don't confer any neutrality even when there is an actual well...war.

Why does this matter? For the record I hope this is the closets we ever get to an actual internal civil war, we need to start establishing bona fides and demanding that neutrality be respected. That might matter if we should descend into that horror film.

But let's start by marking things correctly. Realize the only RECOGNIZED Red Cross IS the American Red Cross. From my experience they belong in actually at least keeping and eye but unless it's rank and file...well that happened in El Salvador and will leave it at that. But given the ARC does not have actual hospitals and ambulances if we descend into that hell it will have to pull them out of ass...another story.

Oh and the star of life

No wearing a black sweater with a alf assed red cross don't confer any neutrality

Nadin hasn't used The Google properly as the above statement is incorrect. On the planet Melmac a black sweater with a red cross with Alf's ass does INDEED confer neutrality. Alf is much beloved on Melmac.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: Celtic Rose on October 24, 2011, 08:40:12 PM
I really do not understand what she is talking about.

I think she is talking about the nurses that were arrested today at Occupy Chicago
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 24, 2011, 08:47:28 PM
Quote
From my experience they belong in actually at least keeping and eye but unless it's rank and file...well that happened in El Salvador and will leave it at that.

Now that right there is a classic statement from nutcase nadin. She's speaking brzhenglish.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: JakeStyle on October 24, 2011, 09:00:51 PM
She edited her post and it still makes zero sense.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: NHSparky on October 24, 2011, 09:05:00 PM
Okay, so vesta = nadin?

Don't tell me it's beyond the realm of possibility.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: ChuckJ on October 24, 2011, 09:09:28 PM
Okay, so vesta = nadin?

Don't tell me it's beyond the realm of possibility.

Speaking of vesta, what's see been up to? I haven't noticed her posting lately. When I check the member's list it says her last activity was on 11-10.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: delilahmused on October 25, 2011, 01:59:52 AM
Speaking of vesta, what's see been up to? I haven't noticed her posting lately. When I check the member's list it says her last activity was on 11-10.


I was wondering about that too. I've grown rather fond of her!

Cindie
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: formerlurker on October 25, 2011, 04:39:51 AM
I really do not understand what she is talking about.

Military medical equipment is marked clearly as such, as is American Red Cross, etc.  (so you can see them from the air).   Those medical military units who are acting in support of UN missions are supposed to be immune from combat strikes.  

She is a freak who loves the futuristic war figurines isn't she?   She believes this to be war.   She is truly  :mental:.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 25, 2011, 09:39:44 AM
I really do not understand what she is talking about.

She is talking about the Geneva Convention-recognized symbols for protected medical providers, and the fact that the goofy blue thing isn't one, apparently based on the implicit assumption that full-scale war will break out here in the USA anytime now (Though possibly her remarks are intended to also refer to Libya, God knows why, since she seems to refer to it). 

The tiny point she is trying to make is buried in a lot of BS she puts out attempting to puff up her own cred as a 'Veteran' (cough) of the Central American internecine bloodshed of the 70s and 80s.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: AprilRazz on October 25, 2011, 09:41:46 AM
Corpsman do not wear any of those in battle. We called them targets because the enemy likes nothing better than to take a Corpsman out.
Take out your medical person then you can effectively double the casualties.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: docstew on October 25, 2011, 11:43:48 AM
Corpsman do not wear any of those in battle. We called them targets because the enemy likes nothing better than to take a Corpsman out.
Take out your medical person then you can effectively double the casualties.

On our vehicles, we covered the crosses. No sense advertising what we were.

Doesn't matter anyway, our enemies don't respect Geneva Conventions anyway. They have no honor.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on October 25, 2011, 11:59:12 AM
When I was AD we had the cross on the side of the M113 (the tankers referred to it as a mobile bore-sight), wore white arm bands with red crosses and carried M1911's.

Now, we have none of the markings except for Medevac vehicles and we carry assault rifles.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 25, 2011, 12:01:34 PM
On our vehicles, we covered the crosses. No sense advertising what we were.

Doesn't matter anyway, our enemies don't respect Geneva Conventions anyway. They have no honor.

Yeah, to you and April too.  We used to refer to them as 'Boresight crosses,' kind of a technical armor joke.  With the 105mm main gun, the initial step of boresight and zero was to pick a highly visible right-angle target at as close to 1200 meters as possible, the big red cross on the medic tracks filled the bill nicely.  We didn't expect the Red Army to give them any more heed back in the Cold War days than the Muj do now, either.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: FlaGator on October 25, 2011, 02:02:13 PM
There is a profound alcohol induced element to her writting style.
Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: Airwolf on October 25, 2011, 05:09:38 PM
To quote Eddie Murphy


"The Bitch is crazzzzy!!!!!!"

Title: Re: nadinbrzezinski has lost it...
Post by: AprilRazz on October 25, 2011, 06:33:10 PM
Alas looking at the thread title again I can only come to one conclusion....
You can't loose what you never had to begin with.