The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on October 14, 2011, 06:25:15 PM

Title: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: CC27 on October 14, 2011, 06:25:15 PM
Quote
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Fri Oct-14-11 06:48 PM
Original message
OWS doesn't need leaders but they need leadership...
   
They don't have to have one leader but they need many leaders. Each leader could be in charge of a cell. A cell could consist of about 100 people or less. They should be able to coordinate information with each other. People need to know what is going on within the movement. New people could join the cell of their choice. They would only have to give their email address or ph# in order to stay informed. Without leadership or coordination, I fear they will lose the battle. Information is vital. We need many leaders. This is just my opinion.

My head hurts from reading that.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2119031
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: beefeater on October 14, 2011, 06:44:09 PM
My head hurts from reading that.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2119031


Hey there kentuck, found your leader

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSo-MEiMbac&feature=colike[/youtube]




Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: BEG on October 14, 2011, 06:48:30 PM
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.urlesque.com/media/2009/04/chris-crocker-leave-britney.jpg)
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: Duke Nukum on October 14, 2011, 06:49:22 PM
I thought Van Jones hit the nail on the head when he said we conservatives think individually and act collectively. Whereas the left somehow thinks collectively ( I have no idea how this is possible) and acts like dumbshits.

Well, he said something like that. That's the best I can remember it.
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: RWKindaGuy on October 14, 2011, 06:57:09 PM
Hey there kentuck, found your leader

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSo-MEiMbac&feature=colike[/youtube]


I'm pretty sure I saw them crying about dead trees in another video ...  :loser:
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: Ballygrl on October 14, 2011, 07:26:03 PM
Oh you do have leadership and you're being used for nefarious purposes:

http://biggovernment.com/thomasryan/2011/10/14/the-email-archive-of-the-occupywallstreet-movement-anarchists-socialists-jihadists-unions-democrats/

Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: Doubleplusungood on October 14, 2011, 07:54:06 PM
Quote
They don't have to have one leader but they need many leaders. Each leader could be in charge of a cell. A cell could consist of about 100 people or less. They should be able to coordinate information with each other. People need to know what is going on within the movement. New people could join the cell of their choice. They would only have to give their email address or ph# in order to stay informed. Without leadership or coordination, I fear they will lose the battle. Information is vital. We need many leaders. This is just my opinion.

Jihadists use a similar organizational approach.
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: Ballygrl on October 14, 2011, 09:03:42 PM
From Ann Coulter's Twitter :lmao:

Quote
AnnCoulter Ann Coulter
Occupy protest will have a "Mass March on Chase Bank” Saturday to close their accounts. Chase expected to lose well over $100.
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: USA4ME on October 14, 2011, 10:49:49 PM
The bluegrass primitive's message will not be adopted by the OWSers on the ground.

They try so hard to tell Americans how things would be much better if they would just do what the primitives say, but no one cares to listen to a bunch of self-proclaimed know-it-alls that have proven to just be stupid.  Now, even the worthless dolts at OWS won't listen to them.

You'd almost feel sorry for them if you didn't know they have a track record of being ignored.

.
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: miskie on October 15, 2011, 05:20:03 AM
Jihadists use a similar organizational approach.

That was exactly my first thought upon reading that
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 15, 2011, 09:20:45 AM
I thought Van Jones hit the nail on the head when he said we conservatives think individually and act collectively. Whereas the left somehow thinks collectively ( I have no idea how this is possible) and acts like dumbshits.

Well, he said something like that. That's the best I can remember it.

I'm sure your take is more factually correct than his.  As far as how it's possible for them to do that, there's a good reason why some of us refer to DU as "The hive.:
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 15, 2011, 07:14:32 PM
I thought Van Jones hit the nail on the head when he said we conservatives think individually and act collectively.
Plugs Biden had the best take on that: "Who is Van Jones?"
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: miskie on October 15, 2011, 07:42:53 PM
I'm sure your take is more factually correct than his.  As far as how it's possible for them to do that, there's a good reason why some of us refer to DU as "The hive.:

(http://miskie.net/DUborg.jpg)
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: I_B_Perky on October 15, 2011, 11:07:36 PM
Quote
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Fri Oct-14-11 06:48 PM
Original message
OWS doesn't need leaders but they need leadership...
   
They don't have to have one leader but they need many leaders. Each leader could be in charge of a cell. A cell could consist of about 100 people or less. They should be able to coordinate information with each other. People need to know what is going on within the movement. New people could join the cell of their choice. They would only have to give their email address or ph# in order to stay informed. Without leadership or coordination, I fear they will lose the battle. Information is vital. We need many leaders. This is just my opinion.

Well get off your ass and lead then, dumbass!!! Oh, I forgot who I was dealing with. Kinda hard to lead when ya all are too lazy to even support yourselves!!!







From Ann Coulter's Twitter :lmao:
AnnCoulter Ann Coulter
Occupy protest will have a "Mass March on Chase Bank” Saturday to close their accounts. Chase expected to lose well over $100.

Now that made me spew beer all over my monitor.

Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 16, 2011, 10:03:49 AM
Jihadists use a similar organizational approach.

All underground organizations do, and have for a long time.  Except every single one of them does it better.  100 people in a cell?  Ridiculous.
Title: Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
Post by: AprilRazz on October 16, 2011, 11:01:45 AM
The ones that Hannity had on his radio show the other day were a riot. None of them even had a real clue why they were there and how hypocritical they look. :rofl: