The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: Gina on October 11, 2011, 02:20:06 PM

Title: Angry.
Post by: Gina on October 11, 2011, 02:20:06 PM
This shit makes me want to kill these piece of shits.  You know damn frucking well if a group of white kids were doing this to a black woman there would be hell to pay but I bet you won't hear a damn word out of those whiney ass liberals and the media.   :censored:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/sacramento-video-attack-098361
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Rugnuts on October 11, 2011, 02:23:47 PM
[speechless]
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on October 11, 2011, 03:14:34 PM
She had it coming.

She was white.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Karin on October 11, 2011, 03:15:10 PM
Sick pieces of shit.  I hope they get them.  
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Gina on October 11, 2011, 03:15:42 PM
I swear if I had been there and had a gun with me I would have blown some kneecaps off.  Gawd that pisses me off them hitting her like that. :mad:
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Rebel on October 11, 2011, 03:36:02 PM
Thugs. And they wonder why their "community" is in the shape it's in? Not a man among those punkass motherf'ers. A real man would try to find her help. Someone should have dropped this 120 LB beanstalk and cold-cocked that wannabe rap artist at the end.


This is how you treat thugs:




[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMx9ThXNxvU[/youtube]
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: seahorse513 on October 11, 2011, 03:43:43 PM
That poor woman, she looked kinda confused. Poor thing...
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Evil_Conservative on October 11, 2011, 04:02:51 PM
All of them are pieces of shit.  That poor woman.  I hope she's okay.  And I really hope someone was around to call the police and get her some immediate attention.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 11, 2011, 04:06:49 PM
I'm gonna call it like I see it.

That _______** needs an ass beaten.

**word removed by dixiebelle** I know you apologized but I still modified your post.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Eupher on October 11, 2011, 04:22:10 PM
I'm gonna call it like I see it.

That________** needs an ass beaten.

**original post modified and word deleted by Admin

No call to use that term here. None whatsoever.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 11, 2011, 04:49:41 PM
No call to use that term here. None whatsoever.

You know what?

You are right.

I apologize.

The video pissed me off.

So I will rephrase.

That young African-American punk needs an ass kicking.


Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Gina on October 11, 2011, 05:24:42 PM
Well I for one hope the police aren't niggardly with some justice for these pieces of crap when they catch them. :censored:
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: IassaFTots on October 11, 2011, 08:44:13 PM
Scum.  Low rent scum. Trash is trash.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: catsmtrods on October 12, 2011, 06:12:55 AM
Well I for one hope the police aren't niggardly with some justice for these pieces of crap when they catch them. :censored:

H5! I don't like the censorship I just witnessed on this site!
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: catsmtrods on October 12, 2011, 06:15:27 AM
The fact is the TRUTH should be told!

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCul2D8bog8[/youtube]
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Eupher on October 12, 2011, 07:22:11 AM
H5! I don't like the censorship I just witnessed on this site!

And I don't like the word -- it's offensive to me. And I'll express my view on that issue, whether it's liked or not.

Rich manned up and retracted the word and for that, I'm grateful.

Fact is, other words can be used to describe the same thing. No doubt the punk is trash and he needs a thorough asskicking. But that isn't reason enough to use the word in that way.

Of course, I'm not a mod so I have no "official" reason to condemn use of that word in that way. But I will say that when that word is used indiscriminately, visitors and others who come to CC and read that word without challenge might get the impression that it's acceptable. That's the kind of thing that libs love to use in defense of their own sick, twisted, warped way of looking at things.

I believe this issue has been raised in the past, with the corresponding "outrage" about "censorship".

There's simply a better way of getting things done. That word does not have to be used in the manner in which it was used -- pure and simple.

If it's time to rehash this argument, let's go.

Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Erasmus on October 12, 2011, 09:29:03 AM
There will be a day when this guy gets shot in the @#%ing face.  People will only put up with this for so long.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: catsmtrods on October 12, 2011, 10:21:05 AM
No argument from me that its an offensive word. There are lots of those. Its when we let them get banned I think we are loosing our freedom.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 12, 2011, 12:56:40 PM
The fact is the TRUTH should be told!

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCul2D8bog8[/youtube]

Home run all the way.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: wasp69 on October 12, 2011, 01:01:47 PM
The fact is the TRUTH should be told!

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCul2D8bog8[/youtube]

That was wonderful!  The unvarnished truth told by an average American.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Gina on October 12, 2011, 01:17:54 PM
That was wonderful!  The unvarnished truth told by an average American.

I want him to run as vp! :hyper:
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Rugnuts on October 12, 2011, 01:43:17 PM
I want him to run as vp! :hyper:
his 'stache matches cain's
:hyper:


there is so much truth in his rant that i cant even narrow the best of it to quote him on :bravo:
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Gina on October 12, 2011, 01:49:23 PM
his 'stache matches cain's
:hyper:


there is so much truth in his rant that i cant even narrow the best of it to quote him on :bravo:

I personally liked the "keep your legs closed" bit :naughty:
Title: Video Shows Brutal Attack At Sacramento Strip Mall
Post by: bijou on October 12, 2011, 02:53:20 PM
Quote
SACRAMENTO (CBS13) — A video shot in south Sacramento has gone viral and, in a word, it’s brutal.

It shows a mentally disabled woman being mocked, spit on, then punched in the face at a Sacramento strip mall on Mack Road.

Regular customers and neighbors weren’t surprised by the video. They say this type of disrespect, and abuse, goes on all the time.

But it’s difficult to watch. A woman who appears mentally impaired is punched in the face. ...
link (http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2011/10/11/video-shows-brutal-attack-at-sacramento-strip-mall/)

Just terrible.  :censored:
Title: Re: Video Shows Brutal Attack At Sacramento Strip Mall
Post by: thundley4 on October 12, 2011, 03:02:01 PM
Same story, different source.  http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,65423.0.html
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 12, 2011, 04:25:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEielC7V0bc&feature=related

Another home run.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: sybilll on October 12, 2011, 08:19:46 PM
That was wonderful!  The unvarnished truth told by an average American.
I'd like to shake the hand.......of that man's parents.  No way he got that from a teacher, or peer.  Bravo sir! 
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: DixieBelle on October 12, 2011, 08:50:01 PM
H5! I don't like the censorship I just witnessed on this site!
We can have a discussion without using the n-word. It's called intelligence; not censorship.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Ballygrl on October 12, 2011, 09:15:11 PM
This isn't shocking at all.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: NHSparky on October 12, 2011, 10:50:09 PM
This isn't shocking at all.

Pathetic and sad, yet no longer shocking.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: catsmtrods on October 13, 2011, 05:05:02 AM
We can have a discussion without using the n-word. It's called intelligence; not censorship.

Yes we can but what you did was censorship. Words are words and there are many offensive words. I personally don't like the big stigma attached to that word and the fact its used regularly by blacks to describe scum of the earth. I think the word should be used to describe any color scum!
 I remember in my youth the word "Blacks" was the bad one? Its a slippery slope when when you start to ban words. Every body and every group has words they find distasteful so when you start where does it end? I expected better from this site. Ban things they don't agree with is what what liberals do.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Gina on October 13, 2011, 06:46:25 AM
I have always been of the opinion that we have equal rights.  If "they" continue to use the word then "We" should also be able to.  It's a word.  If your life is dictated by a single word then you have bigger problems to deal with. 

If the word is so offensive then they would stop using it.  They use it as a crutch to keep being victims. 

Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Eupher on October 13, 2011, 07:33:54 AM
Words have meanings. Words convey thoughts and ideas. Words are powerful. We use words to argue, cajole, intimidate, and express love.

When I, as a Caucasian, use the N-word in the context that represents belittlement, oppression, and hatred, that lowers me to a level I don't want to be at.

If Blacks want to use that word to represent a portion of their population, hey, that's no skin off my nose. As the guy in the video states, there are "******s" and there are Blacks. And they know who they are.

I've got no dog in that fight. I don't need to get mixed up in that particular discussion. Ergo, I have no business using that word.

If the word weren't so inflammatory, maybe it would be a different thing altogether. But it is. The word represents everything that tears people down and serves no useful purpose.

So why use it? Just to prove a point? That the word, when used in the context in which it's often used - to insult, aggravate and cause problems - simply can be used when another word that doesn't cause so much grief and ill feeling can be used instead? Makes no sense to me.

Catmtrods calls it censorship when arguments are raised against using the word. I call avoiding use of that particular word simply good sense. Our language is rich enough without resorting to deliberate attempts to inflame and incite negative reactions.

Unless, of course, inciting anger and negative reactions is our goal to begin with. Then, I suppose, using the N-word is the thing to do.

For one, I won't use it.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Rebel on October 13, 2011, 07:38:52 AM
My take on it on memphistigers.org:

Quote
I live out in the burbs, I gotta say, I couldn't see any man, black or white, doing shit like this. It's pretty respectful out here in Evans, Ga. Of course, there are a lot of military people, and kids raised by their military parents. Add to that Evans (Columbia County) used to be rural and many of the kids are being raised by parents who were raised by "old school" southern country parents who wouldn't put up with that shit, again, both black and white. I'm not saying the burbs or rural areas are perfect, but most of this crap does seem to pale in comparison to what's seen in the urban settings.

This is urban "thug culture". Trash. ....that needs to be taken out and disposed of.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Gina on October 13, 2011, 08:19:27 AM
Words have meanings. Words convey thoughts and ideas. Words are powerful. We use words to argue, cajole, intimidate, and express love.

When I, as a Caucasian, use the N-word in the context that represents belittlement, oppression, and hatred, that lowers me to a level I don't want to be at.

If Blacks want to use that word to represent a portion of their population, hey, that's no skin off my nose. As the guy in the video states, there are "******s" and there are Blacks. And they know who they are.

I've got no dog in that fight. I don't need to get mixed up in that particular discussion. Ergo, I have no business using that word.

If the word weren't so inflammatory, maybe it would be a different thing altogether. But it is. The word represents everything that tears people down and serves no useful purpose.

So why use it? Just to prove a point? That the word, when used in the context in which it's often used - to insult, aggravate and cause problems - simply can be used when another word that doesn't cause so much grief and ill feeling can be used instead? Makes no sense to me.

Catmtrods calls it censorship when arguments are raised against using the word. I call avoiding use of that particular word simply good sense. Our language is rich enough without resorting to deliberate attempts to inflame and incite negative reactions.

Unless, of course, inciting anger and negative reactions is our goal to begin with. Then, I suppose, using the N-word is the thing to do.

For one, I won't use it.


Good for you! :cheersmate:
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: catsmtrods on October 13, 2011, 04:23:19 PM
"Catmtrods calls it censorship when arguments are raised against using the word. I call avoiding use of that particular word simply good sense. Our language is rich enough without resorting to deliberate attempts to inflame and incite negative reactions."

I didn't call it censorship when arguments are raised. I would call that freedom of speech.

I called the action of deleting the word censorship.

cen·sor
   [sen-ser] Show IPA
noun
1.
an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds.
2.
any person who supervises the manners or morality of others.

I find the censorship of the word more offensive than the word. Really what it is, is that the libs and lib media have demonized the word to the point it is a power trip over the white man. Everyone is terrified to use the word except the black man. Kind of an in your face thing I think! Look at the power I have over you! You are censored, I am not. Think about it!

Censorship= not good for freedom!
I rest my case.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: Eupher on October 13, 2011, 04:57:00 PM
"Catmtrods calls it censorship when arguments are raised against using the word. I call avoiding use of that particular word simply good sense. Our language is rich enough without resorting to deliberate attempts to inflame and incite negative reactions."

I didn't call it censorship when arguments are raised. I would call that freedom of speech.

I called the action of deleting the word censorship.

cen·sor
   [sen-ser] Show IPA
noun
1.
an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds.
2.
any person who supervises the manners or morality of others.

I find the censorship of the word more offensive than the word. Really what it is, is that the libs and lib media have demonized the word to the point it is a power trip over the white man. Everyone is terrified to use the word except the black man. Kind of an in your face thing I think! Look at the power I have over you! You are censored, I am not. Think about it!

Censorship= not good for freedom!
I rest my case.


Opinion noted. You quoted my post above, but I believe you're directing your angst to DixieBelle as she's the one who deleted the offending word. And, as she's an Admin, who has the power over whom?

It looks to me like censorship isn't an evil thing at all -- it's simply necessary from time to time. Leaving that word hang out there for untold numbers of people to read it does not do CC any good whatsoever. So it seems to me your right to use that particular word ends where this board begins.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: catsmtrods on October 13, 2011, 05:38:37 PM
A necessary evil IMO.  IYO they win!
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 13, 2011, 05:51:14 PM
PCism manages to keep creeping in and most don't even know it.

Death of a thousand cuts.

I grew up in the hood and I heard that N word daily.  Used more by blacks towards each other, than I ever did.

I can't count the times that I've been called a cracker or honky.

I never let those words offend me, nor have I ever understood why folks let a word offend them either.

It's only offensive if you choose to let it be.

IMO.

Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 13, 2011, 05:57:20 PM
BTW...

When I was a young kid I asked my grandmother what a "******" was.  She told me "a worthless person regardless of skin color".

I've used that definition ever since then in my own way of thinking.

There are "******s" of all skin colors IMO.

I personally don't relate it to a person of darker skin pigment.


Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: seahorse513 on October 13, 2011, 07:29:07 PM
I like to think of myself as a positive, optimistic person...

I have never liked that word, because it is hateful, negative and ignorant sounding word.
That one word has always bothered me....
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 13, 2011, 07:52:55 PM
I like to think of myself as a positive, optimistic person...

I have never liked that word, because it is hateful, negative and ignorant sounding word.
That one word has always bothered me....

What to you find hateful or ignorant about it?

I'm honestly not trying to stir the pot here...  I just can't comprehend why some folks consider certain words as offensive.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: seahorse513 on October 13, 2011, 08:12:59 PM
What to you find hateful or ignorant about it?

I'm honestly not trying to stir the pot here...  I just can't comprehend why some folks consider certain words as offensive.

If you go back in time to pre civil war, when slavery first started, it was probably a slang for negro , someone of African descent or dark coloured skin person. As time went on it developed a negative connotation. Racism reares its ugly head, and is assumed when that word is used....
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: DixieBelle on October 13, 2011, 08:21:32 PM
Yes we can but what you did was censorship. Words are words and there are many offensive words. I personally don't like the big stigma attached to that word and the fact its used regularly by blacks to describe scum of the earth. I think the word should be used to describe any color scum!
 I remember in my youth the word "Blacks" was the bad one? Its a slippery slope when when you start to ban words. Every body and every group has words they find distasteful so when you start where does it end? I expected better from this site. Ban things they don't agree with is what what liberals do.
If I wanted to practice censorship, I would delete your post.

Drop it. All of you. I am an Admin of this board and I stand by my decision.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: DixieBelle on October 13, 2011, 08:22:11 PM
BTW...

When I was a young kid I asked my grandmother what a "******" was.  She told me "a worthless person regardless of skin color".

I've used that definition ever since then in my own way of thinking.

There are "******s" of all skin colors IMO.

I personally don't relate it to a person of darker skin pigment.



That is your personal preference. Like I said, drop it.
Title: Re: Angry.
Post by: rich_t on October 14, 2011, 02:47:09 PM
That is your personal preference. Like I said, drop it.

Fair nuff.