The Conservative Cave
Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: Gina on September 13, 2011, 12:03:10 PM
-
look at image 16
Look at the difference in men
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Dramatic-Photos--129611048.html
-
#44
thanks Gina, these were great.
-
#44
thanks Gina, these were great.
Obama's nose is stuck so far up in the air. Laura looks like she has been really crying :bawl:
-
Obama's nose is stuck so far up in the air. Laura looks like she has been really crying :bawl:
Michelle looks bored.
-
Michelle looks bored.
she is probably looking at a fat kid :lmao:
-
#14, Good Lord, who dresses this woman, Santa's workshop?
FWIW I like #5 a whole lot better than #6. Years ago when designs for a memorial were first being considered I thought they had settled on a design that featured columns of light rising up where the towers had been for night time and fountains, also rising up for daylight hours. What happened to that?
I don't want to be misunderstood or misconstrued, I mean no disrespect but I just am not a big fan of the design they settled on. Two pits in the ground with water perpetually falling into two giant drains was a bad idea IMHO. I find it depressing and I would have much more liked to have seen fountains with water perpetually rising triumphantly upward in celebration of the lives lost and as a gesture of defiance to the terrorists.
I don't like the design of the memorial at all with the water disappearing into a black abyss like that, it's just depressing and smacks of defeat. Notice that the Arizona memorial in Pearl Harbor and the Viet Nam memorial in Arlington share similar features which I feel are much more appropriate. Both are depressed in the center signifying initial loss yet rise at the ends in memorial to those lost.
-
#14, Good Lord, who dresses this woman, Santa's workshop?
FWIW I like #5 a whole lot better than #6. Years ago when designs for a memorial were first being considered I thought they had settled on a design that featured columns of light rising up where the towers had been for night time and fountains, also rising up for daylight hours. What happened to that?
I don't want to be misunderstood or misconstrued, I mean no disrespect but I just am not a big fan of the design they settled on. Two pits in the ground with water perpetually falling into two giant drains was a bad idea IMHO. I find it depressing and I would have much more liked to have seen fountains with water perpetually rising triumphantly upward in celebration of the lives lost and as a gesture of defiance to the terrorists.
I don't like the design of the memorial at all with the water disappearing into a black abyss like that, it's just depressing and smacks of defeat. Notice that the Arizona memorial in Pearl Harbor and the Viet Nam memorial in Arlington share similar features which I feel are much more appropriate. Both are depressed in the center signifying initial loss yet rise at the ends in memorial to those lost.
I would have preferred they rebuild them bigger and better.
-
Thanks for linking, Gina.
What the hell is that gigantic bow on the Moose's chest? And #44, she is looking decidedly Aunt Esther-ish.
I miss GWB so much.