The Conservative Cave

The Bar => The Lounge => Topic started by: mamacags on April 21, 2008, 05:08:10 PM

Title: Franksolich
Post by: mamacags on April 21, 2008, 05:08:10 PM
I just saw a new word for you.  I have never in my entire life seen this word used in any sort of way but it was used today in a LTTE about Bill Clinton's legacy.

pusillanimity

pu·sil·la·nim·i·ty      /ËŒpyusÉ™ləˈnɪmɪti/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[pyoo-suh-luh-nim-i-tee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun the state or condition of being pusillanimous; timidity; cowardliness. 

n.   The state or quality of being pusillanimous; cowardice.

contemptible fearfulness
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 05:12:50 PM
I just saw a new word for you.  I have never in my entire life seen this word used in any sort of way but it was used today in a LTTE about Bill Clinton's legacy.

pusillanimity

pu·sil·la·nim·i·ty      /ËŒpyusÉ™ləˈnɪmɪti/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[pyoo-suh-luh-nim-i-tee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun the state or condition of being pusillanimous; timidity; cowardliness. 

n.   The state or quality of being pusillanimous; cowardice.

contemptible fearfulness

Alas, madam, I've known that word since the 5th grade; used it in a paper to describe a medieval king of Portugal.

I don't recall however using it on the internet anywhere.

I did notice in a medical advice column in the newspaper last week however that "boryborygmia" seems to be catching on, even though the physician writing the column insisted no one uses that word any more, or has used it since 1842 or something. 

I sent him him an e-mail to correct the matter, and if I ever hear back, I'll pass it on.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: mamacags on April 21, 2008, 05:18:34 PM
Dang, I thought I found a new one. :bawl:
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 05:28:02 PM
Dang, I thought I found a new one. :bawl:

Actually, the deal was that because no one had any idea how to educate franksolich, much of his grade-school work from the second grade on was what one might call "independent study."

I used to read encyclopedias; I wasn't any child prodigy or anything.

I learned early on how to relate to words.

Unfortunately, I didn't learn much about how to relate to people.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: mamacags on April 21, 2008, 05:45:28 PM
I liked to read them too when I was little.  I had an obsession about weird diseases and could only find them in encyclopedias and the adult section of the library.  I knew way more about small pox, elephantitis, and syphilis than any kid should ever know. :-)
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Lord Undies on April 21, 2008, 05:48:02 PM
The word is not knew, but really, what word is?  It is also the origin of "oh, don't be such a *****!".
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Chris_ on April 21, 2008, 05:50:47 PM
Dang, I thought I found a new one. :bawl:

Actually, the deal was that because no one had any idea how to educate franksolich, much of his grade-school work from the second grade on was what one might call "independent study."

I used to read encyclopedias; I wasn't any child prodigy or anything.

I learned early on how to relate to words.

Unfortunately, I didn't learn much about how to relate to people.

Well, FWIIW, most words are pretty neat and most people suck.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: mamacags on April 21, 2008, 05:51:17 PM
I know it isn't new, but I had never heard or read it before in my life.  I was just impressed with it enough to share. :-)
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Amityschild on April 21, 2008, 06:00:43 PM
Now, children, if we were to play a game called stump Franksolich would a word such as Snollygoster do the trick?  Now, not fair using the dictionary! 

Snollygoster has always been one of my very favorite words and how very appropos in this season of electing!

Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 06:02:15 PM
Now, children, if we were to play a game called stump Franksolich would a word such as Snollygoster do the trick?  Now, not fair using the dictionary! 

Snollygoster has always been one of my very favorite words and how very appropos in this season of electing!



"Snollygoster" conjures up a picture, an image, not a definition, in me.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 21, 2008, 06:04:52 PM
Exsanguination.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 06:05:05 PM
Okay, I have not looked up the word.

I've seen the word before, but never paid attention.

The word suggests something both complicated and ridiculous at the same time, perhaps some pomposity in it.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Amityschild on April 21, 2008, 06:05:26 PM
Now, children, if we were to play a game called stump Franksolich would a word such as Snollygoster do the trick?  Now, not fair using the dictionary! 

Snollygoster has always been one of my very favorite words and how very appropos in this season of electing!



"Snollygoster" conjures up a picture, an image, not a definition, in me.


Would that image be winged?
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 06:06:36 PM
Exsanguination.

I am sitting nowhere near a dictionary, and I don't google.

I've seen this word too, but never paid attention.

It has something to do with wisdom, or the lack thereof, I suspect.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Amityschild on April 21, 2008, 06:08:35 PM
Okay, I have not looked up the word.

I've seen the word before, but never paid attention.

The word suggests something both complicated and ridiculous at the same time, perhaps some pomposity in it.

Now that is quite good!  When I first encountered this word (oh so long ago) it was in the New American Standard Dictionary.  I never find quite that definition anymore.  They defined it as a mythical creature that preyed on small children and poultry.  The more common usage is a shrewd, unprincipled person.  Especially a politician (see Messalina Agrippina).
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 06:16:21 PM


Now that is quite good!  When I first encountered this word (oh so long ago) it was in the New American Standard Dictionary.  I never find quite that definition anymore.  They defined it as a mythical creature that preyed on small children and poultry.  The more common usage is a shrewd, unprincipled person.  Especially a politician (see Messalina Agrippina).

Well, I definitely goofed.

For some reason, the first "picture" that came into the mind when seeing the word, was the Bostonian Drunkard.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Chris_ on April 21, 2008, 06:17:52 PM
Exsanguination.
Bleeding to death.
Twisted little ****er I am, I learned this at 11...
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 06:21:26 PM
Exsanguination.
Bleeding to death.
Twisted little ****er I am, I learned this at 11...

Damn, you're right.

Remember, I'm just sitting here, not looking anything up.

Sanguine suggests red, which suggests blood.

I was thinking of sanguine in the sense of "wise," which was wrong I guess.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Amityschild on April 21, 2008, 06:23:25 PM


Now that is quite good!  When I first encountered this word (oh so long ago) it was in the New American Standard Dictionary.  I never find quite that definition anymore.  They defined it as a mythical creature that preyed on small children and poultry.  The more common usage is a shrewd, unprincipled person.  Especially a politician (see Messalina Agrippina).

Well, I definitely goofed.

For some reason, the first "picture" that came into the mind when seeing the word, was the Bostonian Drunkard.

The Bostonian Drunkard could be mistaken for either a mythical creature, a small child OR poultry!
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 06:26:13 PM
The Bostonian Drunkard could be mistaken for either a mythical creature, a small child OR poultry!

Or, one supposes, his preference for high school girls.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: mamacags on April 21, 2008, 06:51:16 PM
I think we need a word of the day here!
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: DixieBelle on April 21, 2008, 07:12:02 PM
Well I've been waiting for a thread to post this in! :-)

http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/booksellers/press_release/100words/

A sampling -

abjure
abrogate
abstemious
churlish
expurgate
facetious
fatuous
jejune
moiety
pecuniary
supercilious
tautology
ziggurat
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: delilahmused on April 21, 2008, 07:14:16 PM
I liked to read them too when I was little.  I had an obsession about weird diseases and could only find them in encyclopedias and the adult section of the library.  I knew way more about small pox, elephantitis, and syphilis than any kid should ever know. :-)

So, you're an autodidactic!

Cindie
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 07:18:58 PM
I liked to read them too when I was little.  I had an obsession about weird diseases and could only find them in encyclopedias and the adult section of the library.  I knew way more about small pox, elephantitis, and syphilis than any kid should ever know. :-)

You know, when I was a little lad, in the second grade I think (because I have some unfond memories of that teacher, so it must have been the second grade), I decided to make some money, and took three books out of my father's library to school.

One of them was a very large book with transparent plates, showing the layers of the human eye.  Another of them was a small manual about dealing with women in labor.  A third was about contagious diseases, profusely illustrated with photographs.

At first, I charged classmates five cents a peek for any of the three books.

Then I had to adjust my rates for the market.

A look at the human eye was still five cents, but I upped a look at the contagious diseases to ten cents, and oftentimes had to offer a look at the naked women in distress as a "free bonus" for looks at either one of the other two books.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: mamacags on April 21, 2008, 07:26:11 PM
I liked to read them too when I was little.  I had an obsession about weird diseases and could only find them in encyclopedias and the adult section of the library.  I knew way more about small pox, elephantitis, and syphilis than any kid should ever know. :-)

So, you're an autodidactic!

Cindie

I have to say that I learned at least 80% of what I know by reading.  I am addicted to reading like some people get addicted to coffee or exercise.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Amityschild on April 21, 2008, 07:27:29 PM
I liked to read them too when I was little.  I had an obsession about weird diseases and could only find them in encyclopedias and the adult section of the library.  I knew way more about small pox, elephantitis, and syphilis than any kid should ever know. :-)

You know, when I was a little lad, in the second grade I think (because I have some unfond memories of that teacher, so it must have been the second grade), I decided to make some money, and took three books out of my father's library to school.

One of them was a very large book with transparent plates, showing the layers of the human eye.  Another of them was a small manual about dealing with women in labor.  A third was about contagious diseases, profusely illustrated with photographs.

At first, I charged classmates five cents a peek for any of the three books.

Then I had to adjust my rates for the market.

A look at the human eye was still five cents, but I upped a look at the contagious diseases to ten cents, and oftentimes had to offer a look at the naked women in distress as a "free bonus" for looks at either one of the other two books.

E gads!  The picture of the little Franksolich mercenary selling visuals of Contagious Diseases Illustrated boggles the mind  :beer:
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 07:30:46 PM
E gads!  The picture of the little Franksolich mercenary selling visuals of Contagious Diseases Illustrated boggles the mind  :beer:

For some reason, the guy with leprosy sticks out most clearly in the mind.

I wasn't aware leprosy gives one leonine features.

That is, until I went to the socialist paradises of the workers and peasants with free medical care for all, and suddenly and abruptly I recalled all those photographs of people with contagious diseases.

These were medical textbooks, not general books, I had seen, meaning they were explicitly and clearly shown, and it all came back to me when I was over there.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: DixieBelle on April 21, 2008, 07:34:37 PM
Frank, the elderly gentleman that lived down the street from my grandparents was an OB/GYN. I'll never forget how shocked we were when he gave us money to clean out his storage shed! Oh my......those textbooks!!! I don't think he realized they were in there him being so old and all.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 07:48:15 PM
Frank, the elderly gentleman that lived down the street from my grandparents was an OB/GYN. I'll never forget how shocked we were when he gave us money to clean out his storage shed! Oh my......those textbooks!!! I don't think he realized they were in there him being so old and all.

Yeah, these things were pretty explicit, and the photographs clearer and sharper than one usually finds in even the best of photography magazines.

They (the photographs) did have an influence upon me that lingers yet today; whenever peering into the dark depraved soul of a primitive, I suddenly see a, uh certain, photograph resurrected in the mind.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: Amityschild on April 21, 2008, 08:05:03 PM
Frank, the elderly gentleman that lived down the street from my grandparents was an OB/GYN. I'll never forget how shocked we were when he gave us money to clean out his storage shed! Oh my......those textbooks!!! I don't think he realized they were in there him being so old and all.

Yeah, these things were pretty explicit, and the photographs clearer and sharper than one usually finds in even the best of photography magazines.

They (the photographs) did have an influence upon me that lingers yet today; whenever peering into the dark depraved soul of a primitive, I suddenly see a, uh certain, photograph resurrected in the mind.
I wonder where UGP falls within those tomes?
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2008, 08:07:49 PM
I wonder where UGP falls within those tomes?

The leprosy, of course, and never mind a characteristic of leprosy being that one slowly develops crude leonine features.

The first time I read the subway cat, I thought of leprosy, that dread evil eating away at her soul.
Title: Re: Franksolich
Post by: morningAngel on April 21, 2008, 09:45:08 PM
I liked to read them too when I was little.  I had an obsession about weird diseases and could only find them in encyclopedias and the adult section of the library.  I knew way more about small pox, elephantitis, and syphilis than any kid should ever know. :-)

You know, when I was a little lad, in the second grade I think (because I have some unfond memories of that teacher, so it must have been the second grade), I decided to make some money, and took three books out of my father's library to school.

One of them was a very large book with transparent plates, showing the layers of the human eye.  Another of them was a small manual about dealing with women in labor.  A third was about contagious diseases, profusely illustrated with photographs.

At first, I charged classmates five cents a peek for any of the three books.

Then I had to adjust my rates for the market.

A look at the human eye was still five cents, but I upped a look at the contagious diseases to ten cents, and oftentimes had to offer a look at the naked women in distress as a "free bonus" for looks at either one of the other two books.
you spoiled little snot!  All I had were old True Detective magazines and my extended vocabulary of swear word which I would share for the appropriate amount of pocket change.