The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: franksolich on June 16, 2011, 11:31:20 AM

Title: New York, New Jersey, California, least free states
Post by: franksolich on June 16, 2011, 11:31:20 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003910/New-York-New-Jersey-California-come-individual-freedoms-study.html

Oh my.

Story at the link above.

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/dummiedestroyer/free.jpg)

Title: Re: New York, New Jersey, California, least free states
Post by: NHSparky on June 16, 2011, 11:51:10 AM
LINK TO ACTUAL STUDY (http://mercatus.org/freedom-50-states-2011)

State Freedom Rankings
1. New Hampshire
2. South Dakota
3. Indiana
4. Idaho
5. Missouri
6. Nevada
7. Colorado
8. Oregon
9. Virginia
10. North Dakota

14. Texas

33. Maine

46. Massachusetts

48. California

Gee, I'm shocked--SHOCKED!

Quote
New Hampshire is, by our count, the freest state in the country. Depending on weights, however, it really shares the slot with South Dakota. New Hampshire does much better on economic than personal freedom and on fiscal than regulatory policy. Under unified Democratic control in 2007–2008, the state saw a respectable increase in freedom. A smoking ban was enacted, but so were same-sex civil unions. Taxes, spending, and fiscal decentralization remain more than a standard deviation better than average, and government debt actually went down slightly. Gun laws are among the most liberal in the country, but carrying a firearm in a car requires a concealedcarry permit. Effective retail-tax rates on wine and spirits are zero. Marijuana laws are middling; lowlevel possession could be decriminalized like it is in Maine, while low-level cultivation could be made a misdemeanor like it is in both Maine and Vermont. New Hampshire is the only state in the country with no seatbelt law for adults. It lacks a motorcyclehelmet law but does have a bicycle-helmet law and authorizes sobriety checkpoints. State approval is required to open a private school. Homeschool laws are slightly worse than average; standardized testing and recordkeeping requirements are stricter than those in most states. Eminent-domain reforms have gone far. The state’s liability system is one of the best, but campaign-finance regulations are quite strict. The drug law-enforcement rate is low and dropping, while arrests for other victimless crimes are high and dropping. Asset-forfeiture law is definitely subpar, with potential for abuse.
Title: Re: New York, New Jersey, California, least free states
Post by: BattleHymn on June 16, 2011, 11:52:52 AM
#5, Missouri, represent!  :rocker:


Quote
I am suspect of any report's conclusions when I read uninformed bias like - "NY should legalize same-sex partnerships", or the "liability of the Deep South". What is the "deep South"? Southern states are "right to work states" which do not require membership in some thuggish labor union to work. They also have liability caps for frivolous lawsuits. What do same sex partnerships have to do with the "price of eggs"?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003910/New-York-New-Jersey-California-come-individual-freedoms-study.html#ixzz1PSlagnpe
Interesting comment that brings up a couple of good points.
Title: Re: New York, New Jersey, California, least free states
Post by: Mike220 on June 16, 2011, 12:02:26 PM
Wow. NH and SD look pretty good right now.
Title: Re: New York, New Jersey, California, least free states
Post by: IassaFTots on June 16, 2011, 01:02:15 PM
Wow. NH and SD look pretty good right now.

I am beginning to regret not taking that job oppty in Aberdeen.
Title: Re: New York, New Jersey, California, least free states
Post by: CG6468 on June 16, 2011, 01:04:44 PM
Illinois still sucks big time.
Title: Re: New York, New Jersey, California, least free states
Post by: Karin on June 17, 2011, 09:50:53 AM
No. 50.  New Freakin York.