The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on June 11, 2011, 07:17:44 AM

Title: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: franksolich on June 11, 2011, 07:17:44 AM
Oh my.

No link, alas, but it IS from the Wilderness.

Quote
ima_sinnic on May 31, 2011, 07:42:53 AM

I noticed when googling her current username, that RW site is still obsessed with tracking her every post. I think I learned at some point that she was married or "romantically involved" with someone at CC? Or maybe mixing her up with someone else.

Doug's stupid ex-wife?

Quote
AllentownJake on May 31, 2011, 09:30:32 PM

Frank likes to poke Doug for being married to a democrat.  It isn't as much about her as Frank poking Doug on how stupid he is for marrying someone who was a democrat.

Quote
loudnproud on May 31, 2011, 10:56:37 PM

That's sfexpat. She's now eferarri.

Quote
ima_sinnic on June 01, 2011, 07:54:58 AM

Oh, that's right, and I do apologize. This isn't the first time I've had to retract mistaken comments about DUers based on a senior memory that becomes more sieve-like each day.

If you're a friend of demtenjeep's, these remarks are probably painful (I notice you've defended her in this thread) -- it's just that she's been consistently unquestioning of Obama and his cruel, misguided, cowardly, and frequently illegal actions and policies.

The OP, however, notes a change, but this doesn't seem sincere.

Have any insights about that?

Quote
loudnproud on June 05, 2011, 01:53:27 PM

Yes I have insight but I'm not willing to share since she is being attacked here as well. I find that very sad. And since she has been so savagely attacked on right wing sites, it's disappointing to see the same crap posted here. I was thinking this site was more tolerant. I guess I was wrong.

I'm no Obama fan myself but have lots of friends who are. I just see them in a different spot on the information curve. It seems more appropriate to educate than to belittle.

Quote
Andrea on June 08, 2011, 01:19:16 PM

I understand your concern, Loudnproud, but please keep in mind that most of our members have been relentlessly abused by those of the bog mindset and have been tombstoned from DU simply because they refused to grant Obama unquestioning loyalty.

It was a traumatic experience for many. We found that it was just asking too much to have them drop the subject of their mistreatment. Hence we created this private area where venting about their mistreatment at DU is allowed. If this type of conversation bothers you, just avoid Pizza Party. This is not tolerated elsewhere at OET. For clarification, please check out our Consolidated Rules and Mission.

Quote
loudnproud

I am not aware of her relentlessly abusing anyone on DU or here. I understand your concern but it seems inappropriate to label just any Obama supporter as a relentless abuser. Isn't that engaging in the same behavior you are criticizing by the BOGs? And as I said, what I see here is no different from what I see on Conservative Cave, where this person has been relentlessly attacked.

Oh-kay.

The EMatahari-franksolich love affair began during the Scamdal six years ago.

Everybody involved with Scamdy, left and right, was assigned certain primitives to watch (on Skins's island only, as we respected boundaries), but because franksolich generally works out of home, I got two of them, not just one.

Pity the poor guy who got the Bostonian Drunkard.

Anyway, I was assigned to read EMatahari--at the time, sfexpat2000--and my fellow alum Skins.

I had to read everything they'd ever written on Skins's island, going back to January 20, 2001, to discern if there were any patterns suggestive of less-than-honest conduct. 

My fellow alum passed with flying colors; he's never been less than honest.

EMatahari, on the other hand, was something else, but never mind.

Because EMatahari was so prolific, so promiscuous, so generously giving, in her comments--she's one of the top posters on Skins's island, despite that she's belonged only since November 2004--it was a lot of reading, tons of readings, enormous huge masses of reading.

(Her comments on Skins's island only--remember that, lurking primitives.)

If one reads so much of another person, one inevitably develops a fondness for that person, and that's what happened here.  EMatahari and franksolich might as well be twins, for all they know about each other (ditto for Pedro Picasso--the "Atman" primitive--and franksolich).

I notice the greenbriar primitive, the Top Primitive of 2009, found her way into the discussion out in the Wilderness; for the record, franksolich rarely bothered with Pam, personally finding her abysmally dull.
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: Tucker on June 11, 2011, 08:27:03 AM
Quote
AllentownJake on May 31, 2011, 09:30:32 PM

Frank likes to poke Doug for being married to a democrat.  It isn't as much about her as Frank poking Doug on how stupid he is for marrying someone who was a democrat.

Doug was/is no conservative. I've been to his website. He's a raving lunatic. What made him seem like a conservative to moonbats is the fact that he was married to Beth. Everybody is to the right of her.
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 11, 2011, 09:25:01 AM
Doug was/is no conservative. I've been to his website. He's a raving lunatic. What made him seem like a conservative to moonbats is the fact that he was married to Beth. Everybody is to the right of her.
The mentally-ill dwarf thinks he's being clever with his reference to Doug. He may think it's freeper doug from upland, a decent and civilized person in all respects, though the mentally-ill dwarf is so mentally ill it's hard to know what he really thinks.

Doug Ferarri, poor, stupid Beth's ex-husband, was and is a hopeless alcoholic and drug addict, every bit as irredeemable as the plagiarist Pitt. He was and is a performer, a comedian of no talent whatever, whose entire act consisted of lewd, obscene references to President George W. Bush, his wife, and his daughters. Since he and Beth lived in the sodomy capital of the world, there was for a short time a market for his brand of humor. The Ferraris lived a comfortable life in the City, at least when Doug wasn't beating hell out of poor, stupid Beth during his frequent drug-fuelled rages.

The booze and drugs won out, of course, and even before President Bush left office, the Ferraris were divorced, and Doug was homeless, living in San Francisco AIDS shelters and on the sidewalk. Poor, stupid Beth held onto the apartment for a short while, then lost it and moved into the tiny camper in the desert with her mother and two big, smelly dogs. Her mother had also been living comfortably, owning her own home near San Francisco, but as age took its toll, she began to accept financial advice and guidance from poor, stupid Beth, with the predictable result that she lost her home to the bank and had to take refuge in the tiny camping trailer in the desert, her last remaining asset.

The mentally-ill dwarf is confused even about his fellow moonbats.
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 11, 2011, 10:24:36 AM
And what's up with Pam at OET?
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: Tucker on June 11, 2011, 10:42:29 AM
And what's up with Pam at OET?

Is she a member?
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: franksolich on June 11, 2011, 12:38:26 PM
The newest, from this morning, apparently.

This of course is in reference to my request for a third-party independent evaluation of a certain, uh, photograph of franksolich, to answer the question, "would a primitive hit on franksolich?"

(http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/g419/Eferrari/second.jpg)

This is from the same person, identity unknown to me, who offered to evaluate the photograph.

The use of the word "reader" bothers me; an internet-savvy person would use "lurker."

The second line is illuminating, but not a whole lot; this is a person who knows franksolich in real life, and who has received regular U.S. mail correspondence from franksolich.....which is a whole lot of people.

Other people put their name, sometimes their address, on their custom-printed linen stationery, but franksolich, who thinks it's bad luck (for him) to put his name on anything material of his, has always only ever used a fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupus instead, this "the precipice in front, the wolf behind" thing.

I dunno.  No copy of the photograph sent to this person for evaluation yet.
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 11, 2011, 02:05:18 PM
The newest, from this morning, apparently.
This is from the same person, identity unknown to me, who offered to evaluate the photograph.

The use of the word "reader" bothers me; an internet-savvy person would use "lurker."
I dunno.  No copy of the photograph sent to this person for evaluation yet.
Not a good idea. It's either Weiner, Chris Hansen, or a 17-year-old girl. Bad news either way.
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: vesta111 on June 11, 2011, 02:23:10 PM
The newest, from this morning, apparently.

This of course is in reference to my request for a third-party independent evaluation of a certain, uh, photograph of franksolich, to answer the question, "would a primitive hit on franksolich?"

(http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/g419/Eferrari/second.jpg)

This is from the same person, identity unknown to me, who offered to evaluate the photograph.

The use of the word "reader" bothers me; an internet-savvy person would use "lurker."

The second line is illuminating, but not a whole lot; this is a person who knows franksolich in real life, and who has received regular U.S. mail correspondence from franksolich.....which is a whole lot of people.

Other people put their name, sometimes their address, on their custom-printed linen stationery, but franksolich, who thinks it's bad luck (for him) to put his name on anything material of his, has always only ever used a fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupus instead, this "the precipice in front, the wolf behind" thing.

I dunno.  No copy of the photograph sent to this person for evaluation yet.

Frank, what the heck have you done to get people stalking you ????

What do you think 'they' will do do if they find you ???

Do You believe they will in any way discredit you or dump off loads of feral cats that you will feed??

Who really cares who or what you are, are you a danger to someone???    Your posts are a highlight of our day, fun and chock full of information and a view point  we seldom get.

Have no fear, if your identity is revealed as --------- we will forgive you and fight for you------You are a family member to us, and we need you.  


Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: BattleHymn on June 11, 2011, 02:28:03 PM
Not a good idea. It's either Weiner, Chris Hansen, or a 17-year-old girl. Bad news either way.

I don't know... I wouldn't rule 13/F/CA out of the running just yet.

(http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s233/ignitethefire65/fatguy.png)



Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: Tucker on June 11, 2011, 02:36:01 PM
I don't know... I wouldn't rule 13/F/CA out of the running just yet.

(http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s233/ignitethefire65/fatguy.png)





What's the black thing on the wall? A Gerbil extractor perhaps! Maybe a Volkswagen removal apparatus!
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: franksolich on June 11, 2011, 02:43:14 PM
Frank, what the heck have you done to get people stalking you ????

Oh now, vesta, madam, no one's stalking franksolich.

It's a parody of the paranoia of the primitives, who think franksolich is stalking them.

This however, is a slightly different issue, involving a photograph of franksolich in real life.

The question being: "would a primitive hit on franksolich?"

Perhaps you, madam, would like to give your take on the matter?
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: Ballygrl on June 11, 2011, 03:19:41 PM
No way is Doug a conservative, or even a moderate.
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: JLO on June 11, 2011, 10:55:44 PM
What's the black thing on the wall? A Gerbil extractor perhaps! Maybe a Volkswagen removal apparatus!

Looks like a 'grabber' to me.  He' s probably not able to bend and pick up things and needs an extension-arm helper.    :o
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 11, 2011, 11:27:02 PM
Looks like a 'grabber' to me.  He' s probably not able to bend and pick up things and needs an extension-arm helper.
He'd probably just tell Jeanette to pick it up.
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: BattleHymn on June 12, 2011, 12:56:34 AM
He'd probably just tell Jeanette to pick it up.

H5.  I was thinking it, but didn't want to say it.  :rotf:
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: vesta111 on June 12, 2011, 09:55:24 AM
Oh now, vesta, madam, no one's stalking franksolich.

It's a parody of the paranoia of the primitives, who think franksolich is stalking them.

This however, is a slightly different issue, involving a photograph of franksolich in real life.

The question being: "would a primitive hit on franksolich?"

Perhaps you, madam, would like to give your take on the matter?

Prime beef you are to a primitive female. 

 Having been a Primitive --sort off- until my son began to debate me and actually show interest in his mothers religious and political leanings and gave my mind a good ass wooping, pointed out to me that I was actually a Conservative.   Who would have thunk it???

Conservatives seem to have their ideas stuck in glue-----All abortion is wrong sort of thing, [ a side light] Mom often told me to beware of anyone with a hard luck story, most people bring it on themselves.

Even the story of Jesus when upbraided by Mary Magdalen for wasting precious oil on himself was said to have replied," The Poor will all ways be amongst us."

A primitive female would indeed hit on you Frank, first off you are self sufficient, no worry about money, your intelect and learning would intrigue them.  Then there is the quirks you have collecting china and interests in history.   

The right person would not care if you were  5'2" bald, 50 pounds over weight with warts on your face.  YUP you are prime meat for someone out there.    The very challenge of living with a person one has to face to communicate with not to mention their odd quirks for you to get use to.---- running through the fields stark naked when the moon is full.

I take it you are being hit on Frank, what the heck, you have a preference for woman with Greek features ???  So the female is completely different from your dreams, perhaps she is so ugly she runs off the cats, if she is a loving and caring person what do you have to loose at this time in your life.??

Best thing I ever did in my life was to marry a man that at was at that time so ugly it made my dog howl, strange but as each year went by the better looking he became to me.    Today he is so handsome to me I wonder where the ugly man went and this man came from.







 
Title: Re: EMatahari-franksolich relationship discussed out in the Wilderness
Post by: franksolich on June 12, 2011, 10:05:41 AM
I take it you are being hit on Frank, what the heck, you have a preference for woman with Greek features ???

Actually, no, vesta, dear.

Unless she has the personality, wit, and character of Clare Boothe Luce--in which case appearances don't count, appearances are nothing--franksolich's taste in women is for those with dark brown hair, brown eyes, pale skin, long slender fingers, an aquiline nose, and with distinctively Hebraic features.

I dunno why, but there you have it, there it is.

Women who do not meet either criteria as listed above are safe, utterly safe, from any carnal lusts on franksolich's part.