The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on June 10, 2011, 07:41:30 PM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1271849
Damn.
PCIntern (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-10-11 04:09 PM
Original message
Speaking of penises...
I guess I have your attention now...
We have a business-owner here in Center City Philly who's real South Philly, and used to be married to the craziest woman who wasn't institutionalized whom I've ever met. Anyway, this guy's brain also isn't wired too terrifically either, that's for sure...so the story goes:
When he got divorced, he sent pictures of himself naked to everyone he could think of (including his dentist, BTW.) and wrote a note that if we knew anyone for him, we should give her the picture which had his phone number on the back. Unbelievably, he got about five or six phone calls and eventually actually married one of the women who called him. Who, as it turns out, happens to be a very nice lady (too good for him - even he says that) and they are living 'happily ever after'.
I'm still picking my jaw up off the floor. Oh yes, and BTW, it's big, but not ALL THAT big. So that goes to show you that you can send pics of your dick around, and according to the Babe Ruth theory of this kind of 'dating', you may strike out a lot, but you'll hit some homers in the process.
So I suppose that Anthony Weiner(pronounced "ANTinee" in South Philly) knew what he was doing all along.
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-10-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ah, so it's like spam
You send it to millions of people, then if just one of them falls for it, you come out ahead.
Penis-spam.
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-10-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd have to say
That I wouldn't think much of any woman who was taken by a photo of me nekkid. Sort of like not wanting to join any club that would have me for a member.
Huh-uh-huh, I said "member."
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-10-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. At least you can be fairly certain that the woman you find will not be a sexual prude or secret religious fanatic. I'm a woman, but I happen to know that some marriages are ruined by overly virtuous souls, not always the woman.
Now, being very prudish is fine if both marital partners are happy with that arrangement. But, a man could do worse than you friend, PCIntern. There are worse ways to cull through the many potential mates in the world. Sexual compatibility is, of course, not the only, perhaps not the most important, prerequisite for a good marriage. Some "happy" marriages, I have heard, do not involve sex at all, but if your friend wanted a marriage with sex, he found a good way to let potential applicants know ahead of time.
It's a bit out there, but if it worked, great.
Better than pretending to be coy and surprising the poor girl after the wedding.
After which common sense, the usual campfire-douser, or thread-killer, on Skins's island:
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-10-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Was this fellow a Congressman or somebody else who could be extorted with his off-color pictures?
-
I see the janitor has been reading articles in Cosmo again.
.
-
We have a business-owner here in Center City Philly who's real South Philly, and used to be married to the craziest woman who wasn't institutionalized whom I've ever met
WTF?
-
More hoops have been jumped at the DUmp over the whole Weiner fiasco by the DUmmies trying to weasel their way around this whole thing, than was jumped by the International Brotherhood of Hoop Jumpers when they held their last hoop-jumping convention down the street from two hoop factories.
-
PC, let's get something out.
Take off the dress, and put some pants on.
Secondly, it's AN-thoo-nee, stop trying to be a metrosexual.
Third, you're just a little prick.
That's never going to change.
Get over it.
Hmm, maybe PC really does need to wear a dress.