The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on June 05, 2011, 03:19:58 PM
-
Lets say your wife wanted to take some sexy pics for you, all dolled up in her favorite lingerie, looking all hella sexy. It's for your birthday. She wants to give you something sexy to look at. She's gonna go to a studio and have some pro pictures taken, she'll be posed all provocative like, in some very racy clothing. Maybe even a little nipple peaking out here and there...maybe some see through "boy" shorts....
Just for you.
Catch? The photographer is male, presumably heterosexual and you won't be there to oversee it.
You cool with that?
Simple yes or no poll.
we have pictures
course we took them ourselves and are in a very safe place
Professional? I mean, busting out the ol' Cannon is one thing, but getting pictures taken with professional lighting and make up is another.
I only ask because it's come up before. My wife joked with the idea, but it made me think. Would I be ok with that?
Not sure that I would....
Although, having those pics would be pretty freaking hot...
NO, I wouldn't be comfortable with that but I think hubby would like the results...
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=244160
Pam has pictures. In a safe place in her 4 story house of course.
-
Dude,
I was fixing to eat dinner. Now you've runet it, :whistling: probably going to have nightmares now too. :bird:
:-)
-
Hell no, and that is ten miles closer to 'Yes' than my wife would go. The dress-up part is cool, but committing anything compromising to hard copy or even worse (shudder) digits is the King of Bad Ideas.
-
Hell no, and that is ten miles closer to 'Yes' than my wife would go. The dress-up part is cool, but committing anything compromising to hard copy or even worse (shudder) digits is the King of Bad Ideas.
Uh huh.
-
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=244160
Pam has pictures. In a safe place in her 4 story house of course.
Oh Jeebus H. Christmas . . . . I feel horrible for the poor photographer -- there's NO possible way he could have been compensated fairly for that monstrosity of a pic!!!
-
Well, until a few decent and civilized people warned her about it, Pam had ALL her pictures in a Photobucket account without a password. Many pages. But I don't remember any Pam porn, and you know it would have been there if it existed. I'd surely still be having nightmares. I think this porn story is just another Pam Dawson lie.
-
Well, until a few decent and civilized people warned her about it, Pam had ALL her pictures in a Photobucket account without a password. Many pages. But I don't remember any Pam porn, and you know it would have been there if it existed. I'd surely still be having nightmares. I think this porn story is just another Pam Dawson lie.
Excellent point! She'd have had it all there at Photobucket so she could slip one in once in awhile at the DUmp and claim she was in some such mag or another.
-
Excellent point! She'd have had it all there at Photobucket so she could slip one in once in awhile at the DUmp and claim she was in some such mag or another.
Which one--Mental Health News?
-
Which one--Mental Health News?
If she could get away with claiming they have a centerfold! :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :cheersmate:
-
Which one--Mental Health News?
I was thinking National Geographic - in one of their topics on primitive tribes - with her armpits in full wiggle-waggle.
-
I was thinking National Geographic - in one of their topics on primitive tribes - with her armpits in full wiggle-waggle.
It's really sad about National Geographic. Every issue used to have black-and-white photos of topless savages from one tribe or another. Good stuff.
Now, it's turned into a glossy full-color global warming magazine for environuts.
-
Would you let your wife take risqué pictures for you?
Oh, not of, for. Never mind. :whatever: