Playinghardball (583 posts) Wed Jun-01-11 02:51 PM
Original message
Weiner ‘can’t say with certitude’ that lewd picture was not of him
<snip>
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-01-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. spin what?
you mean if it turns out the top part of the picture is him and the bottom part is a screencap from the internet somewhere --that Weiner has to know/explain all this perfectly?
why?
first, if it were him, unmanipulated, there is no legal reason to do so.
and if it's been manipulated, how can he even know precisely how.
but to you, if Weiner doesn't perfectly explain even aspects that he doesn't know --he's spinning.
tell you what...when you have your character assassinated, and don't know precisely how to respond, we'll just all assume whatever they've said about you is true.
that's fair.
Lex (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-01-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think he's reeling in the press real good . . .
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-01-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wouldn't put anything past the CONS...
they may have paid someone to put a secret camera in a locker room of him changing clothes,it could be photoshopped they are so full of shit. This is suppose to be a message to Dems to not fight back yet again. They can't handle the truth..
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-01-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. There is another possibility
and Weiner might not have known about it, it could be that a member of his staff was using his account and sent it out, although the evidence being presented on the blogs seems to prove the account was hacked.
If, however, it was a member of his staff, and he found out after his initial statements, with everyone blaming Breitbart, I could see why he would just want to drop it.
Just not sure why he has gone from being certain his account was hacked to the position he is now taking.
I am praying it was Breitbart and his gang of criminals. And I feel certain that Weiner did think his account was hacked initially.
Marr (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-01-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Your laptop has a camera on it, and computers can be hacked.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-11 04:06 PM by Marr
Weiner has legal council involved in this now. How could he assert that an image was not one of himself if there is no way to identify the individual in the picture, and no way to know for certain that the image was not originally captured from your own laptop? I can't say with certitude that the image is not of ME.
He says that he never sent the image, and that, to me, is the relevant piece of information.
Playinghardball (583 posts) Wed Jun-01-11 02:51 PM
Original message
Weiner ‘can’t say with certitude’ that lewd picture was not of him
So, in other words, he's got pecker shots out there, but he's not sure this is one of them?
DUmbasses bending over backwards for weiner
I can proudly said my pecker has never recieved media coverage. I assume you can say the same, Skul? :pNo, sir, it hasn't.
So, in other words, he's got pecker shots out there, but he's not sure this is one of them?
He's claiming erection fraud.
:rimshot:
So, in other words, he's got pecker shots out there, but he's not sure this is one of them?
DUmbasses bending over backwards for weiner
All this will just get him higher up in the democrat party.Someone needs to fill the void the Teddy Kennedy left.
He's not sure if that's his pecker?
How many more are out there?
Is that idiot that stupid?
butterfly77
3. I wouldn't put anything past the CONS...
they may have paid someone to put a secret camera in a locker room of him changing clothes,it could be photoshopped they are so full of shit. This is suppose to be a message to Dems to not fight back yet again. They can't handle the truth.
That is classic! We "can't handle the truth," but this dolt believes someone put a secret camera in a locker room and hacked his twitter account to send a photo just to send a message.
:mental:
.
No, sir, it hasn't.
Rev, I'm with ya.
:lmao: :rotf: :lmao: :rotf: :lmao: :rotf:
I had to H5 you for that, Coach. Just too damned funny.
Sorry Frank, but :lmao:@ the story.
There was no big deal made about it, but people did talk.I'm deeply disappointed that the crash of the table wasn't followed by the screaming of a terrified soil scientist back in the bedroom.
"What were you doing, being naked?"
"It was the middle of the night. I sleep that way."
"Oh."
I'm deeply disappointed that the crash of the table wasn't followed by the screaming of a terrified soil scientist back in the bedroom.
So, Frank, you tried to club him?
They insisted I was more likely to use a gun (pistol) as a club instead of as a gun, bashing in a culprit's skull with the other (i.e., the non-barrel end of it) end, rather than aiming and shooting it.Don't forget that when you use a gun as a club, the end where the bullet comes out is pointed at you.
Don't forget that when you use a gun as a club, the end where the bullet comes out is pointed at you.
I'd never use my guns as clubs. It could damage some really nice walnut on the non-barrel ends.
So, Frank, you tried to club him?
I'm deeply disappointed that the crash of the table wasn't followed by the screaming of a pretty, young, and terrified soil scientist back in the bedroom.
FIFY, and so am I, GOBUCKS, so am I . . . :naughty:
FIFY, and so am I, GOBUCKS, so am I . . . :naughty: