The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 14, 2011, 01:47:35 PM

Title: $703 BN in unobligated funds? Cut! NOW!
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 14, 2011, 01:47:35 PM
Quote
Senator Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) holds the treasure map. He and his team cite an Office of Management and Budget document with the riveting title “Balances of Budget Authority — Budget of the U.S. Government — Fiscal Year 2011.”

On page 8, Table 1 indicates in black and white that this fiscal year’s federal budget contains $703,128,000,000 in “unobligated balances.” Thus, more than $703 billion languishes on department, agency, and program ledgers. This includes $12.2 billion unspent at the Agriculture Department, $16.4 billion at Labor, $25.2 billion at Housing and Urban Development, $71.4 billion at Defense, and $309.1 billion at Treasury.

While unspent obligated money must be stewarded for specific purposes for up to five years, these unobligated funds “have not yet been committed by contract or other legally binding action by the government,” OMB explains.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/259528/federal-government-s-unspent-billions-deroy-murdock
Title: Re: $703 BN in unobligated funds? Cut! NOW!
Post by: RightCoast on April 14, 2011, 02:37:32 PM
Big Business Is Sitting On Trillions Of Dollars!!!!!!!!11111!!!!!!111111
Title: Re: $703 BN in unobligated funds? Cut! NOW!
Post by: Eupher on April 14, 2011, 02:45:16 PM
snag that $309,100,000,000 from Treasury, at least.

What are they gonna do with it? Bail out Fannie and Freddie again?  :whatever:

ETA: missing a set of zeroes.
Title: Re: $703 BN in unobligated funds? Cut! NOW!
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on April 14, 2011, 02:52:36 PM
Some if it, sure; if there are any pending contract disputes or suits they ultimately have to pay on, it comes out of the funds from the year to which the case relates, though.   
Title: Re: $703 BN in unobligated funds? Cut! NOW!
Post by: JohnnyReb on April 14, 2011, 03:35:29 PM
They're sitting on those funds until Obama needs to spend them right before election time.
Title: Re: $703 BN in unobligated funds? Cut! NOW!
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 14, 2011, 04:22:53 PM
Some if it, sure; if there are any pending contract disputes or suits they ultimately have to pay on, it comes out of the funds from the year to which the case relates, though.   
That would be encumbered though, I presume.

OMB is talking about unencumbered funds.
Title: Re: $703 BN in unobligated funds? Cut! NOW!
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on April 14, 2011, 05:09:29 PM
That would be encumbered though, I presume.

OMB is talking about unencumbered funds.

Yes and no, they aren't formally 'Committed' in fiscal-law-speak, but the accounting geeks keep tabs on what the probable bill is going to finally be, and informally fence off what they think will be enough.