The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on March 19, 2011, 09:21:42 AM

Title: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: CC27 on March 19, 2011, 09:21:42 AM
Quote
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Mar-19-11 07:45 AM
Original message
Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons
   
at least not largely. Gadaffi (or however you spell his name) was/is more than willing to play. Other countries in the region (Bahrain, for one) are cracking down on their own citizens.

I think it's for a reason that sounds a bit ridiculous: Gadaffi (or however you spell his name) has been pissing off the west and quite a few nations in his own neighborhood for decades.

Why a buick? Its comfy seats and large living space?

Shut up Cali. If this was anybody with an R next to their name you would be bitching it was for oil.  :whatever:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x687836
Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: BlueStateSaint on March 19, 2011, 09:33:38 AM
I'll tell you why Libya--it's because Obama has subscribed to the "Bush Doctrine." :tongue: :fuelfire:
Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: jukin on March 19, 2011, 10:38:34 AM
I'll go with assisting a muslim caliphate of hardcore theocracy for $2000 Alex.
Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: Ballygrl on March 19, 2011, 01:09:14 PM
In reference to Libya? I prefer the devil I know as opposed to the devil I don't know.
Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: thundley4 on March 19, 2011, 07:28:10 PM
I'll go with assisting a muslim caliphate of hardcore theocracy for $2000 Alex.

Exactly. 
Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: ReaganForRushmore on March 19, 2011, 07:29:57 PM
I'll go with assisting a Muslim caliphate of hardcore theocracy for $2000 Alex.

Bingo!....you don't think that the Muslim Brotherhood doesn't have any jihadists in among the "rebels"?

Will history judge Obama as the person that lost any chance of peace in the Middle East? Because when North Africa falls, The Med becomes an Islamist lake and forget any chances of the Suez Canal being any type of international water way.

Some times it is better to deal with the devil you know rather than the devil you don't know.(See Jimmy
Carter and his handling the Shah of Iran versus Khomeini.)
Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: Freeper on March 19, 2011, 08:47:04 PM
I'll go with assisting a muslim caliphate of hardcore theocracy for $2000 Alex.

But, caliphate is happy fun times, just ask the assperts at DUmmyland.
It's those evil Christians who go to the voting booth in NOV who are destroying the planet.

Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: NHSparky on March 19, 2011, 09:23:46 PM
Quote
Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons

Well it ain't for the ****ing beachfront property, shitdick!
Title: Re: Why Libya? I don't think it's for oil or humanitarian reasons (cali)
Post by: thelaughingman on March 19, 2011, 10:37:03 PM
Quote
I think it's for a reason that sounds a bit ridiculous: Gadaffi (or however you spell his name) has been pissing off the west and quite a few nations in his own neighborhood for decades.

Uh...  You mean like Saddam did?  Clueless dickwipes.