The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: ScubaGuy on March 14, 2011, 04:02:27 PM
-
Dummie Nadin must be goggling like a mad woman and she's posting everything she sees trying to look like the DUmp nuke expert.
Funny tidbit in this thread (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x642788) where she shows the world how smart she is.
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-14-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. How much radiation was released from the Fukushima complex?
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 03:02 PM by Nederland
Does anyone know the actual readings?
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-14-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. at the plant site they released
1000 msiverts... that is 10 rads
1 msievert= 0.02 rads...
At the outside of the plant they got 400 Msieverts.
That is the max release we have seen.
No, this is not a joke, but it is not YET even close to deadly. What it is... well... any exposure is not healthy...
They have released these technical things with the International Atomic Energy commission
So far they admit a L-4 disaster, IMO is getting close to a 6
1000 * 0.02 is WHAT? :lmao:
-
They all have to attempt to sound like experts on everything, yet they display their cluelessness when they try. :mental:
-
Obama will soon appoint her head of the Nuk-lear Regulatory Agency......with a side line in higher education(math dept.).
ETA: Nadin, the Nuke-lear Fizzy-ist-tis.
-
Obama will soon appoint her head of the Nuk-lear Regulatory Agency......with a side line in higher education(math dept.).
ETA: Nadin, the Nuke-lear Fizzy-ist-tis.
Since she apparently knows everything he should appoint her as head of EVERY agency except maybe the National Give Me a Mansion Agency and the Federal Department of Male Cats Stuck in Human Female Bodies.
-
Since she apparently knows everything he should appoint her as head of EVERY agency except maybe the National Give Me a Mansion Agency and the Federal Department of Male Cats Stuck in Human Female Bodies.
Brilliant, then he could live at the golf course....away from
Me-Shell.
-
New math just sucks, doesn't it? :lmao:
-
I have no idea what Nadine is ranting about so I looked it up and realize there is a good reason I am not a nuclear scientist. I don't understand a lick of it. Some of what I read suggested that sieverts don't convert into rads but when I use google's calculator it says:
1 millisievert = 0.1 rads
So, Nadine is simply spreading confused and false information. She's wrong on everything.
-
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Mon Mar-14-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. Conversions
SI multiples and conversions
Frequently used SI multiples are the millisievert (1 mSv = 10−3 Sv) and microsievert (1 μSv = 10−6 Sv) or (1 mSv = 0.001 Sv) and (1 μSv = 0.000001 Sv).
An older unit of the equivalent dose is the rem (Röntgen equivalent man). In some fields and countries, the rem and millirem (abbreviated mrem) continue to be used along with Sv and mSv, causing confusion. Here are the conversion equivalences:
1 Sv = 100 rem
1 mSv = 100 mrem = 0.1 rem
1 μSv = 0.1 mrem
1 rem = 0.01 Sv = 10 mSv
1 mrem = 0.00001 Sv = 0.01 mSv = 10 μSv
This thread is hilarious! The DUmmies, led by the corpulent wizard nadinbrzhzhzhzski, argue about micro- versus milli-, rems, sieverts (whatever in hell that is), conversion factors, exposure limits, and not one of them has any idea what they are talking about. These are people who can't keep straight the difference between tax returns and tax refunds. They have no idea whether to add an apostrophe to spell a plural. They don't know how to use "their", "they're", and "there", and they always spell "losing" as "loosing". In short, they're morons, discussing nuclear science. The only measurement conversion they are expert at would be grams to ounces, in a baggie.
-
This thread is hilarious! The DUmmies, led by the corpulent wizard nadinbrzhzhzhzski, argue about micro- versus milli-, rems, sieverts (whatever in hell that is), conversion factors, exposure limits, and not one of them has any idea what they are talking about. These are people who can't keep straight the difference between tax returns and tax refunds. They have no idea whether to add an apostrophe to spell a plural. They don't know how to use "their", "they're", and "there", and they always spell "losing" as "loosing". In short, they're morons, discussing nuclear science. The only measurement conversion they are expert at would be grams to ounces, in a baggie.
All I remember is rems and rads. I have no clue what the sieverts are.
-
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-14-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. at the plant site they released
1000 msiverts... that is 10 rads
1 msievert= 0.02 rads...
At the outside of the plant they got 400 Msieverts.
That is the max release we have seen.
No, this is not a joke, but it is not YET even close to deadly. What it is... well... any exposure is not healthy...
They have released these technical things with the International Atomic Energy commission
So far they admit a L-4 disaster, IMO is getting close to a 6
How much is a RAD?
How much in a REM you stooooooopid SCRUNT?
Why is the NRC REM dose level set at an annual level of 5.0 and each nuke plant is set at 2.0 REM AND, why do you know shit?
-
I have no idea what Nadine is ranting about so I looked it up and realize there is a good reason I am not a nuclear scientist. I don't understand a lick of it. Some of what I read suggested that sieverts don't convert into rads but when I use google's calculator it says:
1 millisievert = 0.1 rads
So, Nadine is simply spreading confused and false information. She's wrong on everything.
Do NOT worry about it....
You could receive MORE radiation exposure from carrying a Coleman lantern mantel in your pocket for one day than you would receive from working in a nuke plant for five years!
-
Do NOT worry about it....
You could receive MORE radiation exposure from carrying a Coleman lantern mantel in your pocket for one day than you would receive from working in a nuke plant for five years!
I think they stopped making lantern mantles like that a long time ago. However, people living in Denver and other high altitude places get more radiation exposure than most nuke workers do.
-
All I remember is rems and rads. I have no clue what the sieverts are.
1000 Rem = 1 Sievert. Convert from there. Rad is hardly used as it doesn't take into account biological damage, whereas Rem (and Sievert) does.
And another thing--the DUmmies don't know the difference between radiation and contamination, let alone the difference between dose and activity.
Stupid little DUmmies wouldn't have made it past the Week 3 academic board in "A" school, let alone made it to Nuclear Power School.
Oh, ****--who am I kidding--they wouldn't have made it past 1-5 day in Boot Camp.
-
I think they stopped making lantern mantles like that a long time ago. However, people living in Denver and other high altitude places get more radiation exposure than most nuke workers do.
You are correct. Coleman stopped using Iridium in their lantern mantles in the early 80's as did the wrist-watch dial makers.
However, the DUmmy's are terminally clueless so I ran with it...
-
You are correct. Coleman stopped using Iridium in their lantern mantles in the early 80's as did the wrist-watch dial makers.
However, the DUmmy's are terminally clueless so I ran with it...
Actually, it was Thorium. Alpha-emitter.
-
Actually, it was Thorium. Alpha-emitter.
Correct!
Watch dials were made with Iridium many years ago.
Alpha emitters can be nasty shit though while they can be blocked with a sheet of paper, if they are inhaled, they can lodge in the lungs or liver and cause long-term damage.
Of course I know YOU already know that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_mantle
-
100 Rem = 1 Sievert. Convert from there. Rad is hardly used as it doesn't take into account biological damage, whereas Rem (and Sievert) does.
And another thing--the DUmmies don't know the difference between radiation and contamination, let alone the difference between dose and activity.
Stupid little DUmmies wouldn't have made it past the Week 3 academic board in "A" school, let alone made it to Nuclear Power School.
Oh, ****--who am I kidding--they wouldn't have made it past 1-5 day in Boot Camp.
ETA--correction to previous post.
-
Call Obama!!!!!
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Mon Mar-14-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
45. Just sent an email to the WH
asking them to stop lying about this. No, all is not ok... and they should be doing a bottom up review on it...
He'll get right on that, depending on tee-times. :lmao:
-
Call Obama!!!!!
He'll get right on that, depending on tee-times. :lmao:
Who knew that Nadin has the presidents ear....must be the right one because he sure leans way to the left.
-
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Mon Mar-14-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
45. Just sent an email to the WH
asking them to stop lying about this. No, all is not ok... and they should be doing a bottom up review on it...
"YES WE CAN!!!111"
"YES WE CAN!!!111"
"YES WE CAN!!!111"
As the bong begins again to bubble at the `puter desk, off in the distance, hauntingly, a dog barks...normality in DUmmyLand resumes...
<insert cabbage head joke here>
-
Obama will soon appoint her head of the Nuk-lear Regulatory Agency......with a side line in higher education(math dept.).
ETA: Nadin, the Nuke-lear Fizzy-ist-tis.
Well, she can always fall back on Alka Seltzer commercials! She probably has the build for it!
Skinny top and bottom, and round in the middle! Kinda like 32-54-46!
-
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Mon Mar-14-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
45. Just sent an email to the WH
asking them to stop lying about this. No, all is not ok... and they should be doing a bottom up review on it...
When that e-mail hits the White House, heads will roll.
-
When that e-mail hits the White House, heads will roll.
...and their mail will be sent to /dev/null for prompt action.