The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Gina on February 11, 2011, 07:28:40 AM
-
I have seen a few people already say that if "their" candidate doesn't win the nomination they aren't going to vote for a Republican president. Does anyone here feel that way?
-
I have seen a few people already say that if "their" candidate doesn't win the nomination they aren't going to vote for a Republican president. Does anyone here feel that way?
I still have my clothes pin but I'd rather not have to use it.
-
No, I do not.
Lord Zero, the First Schmuck, has to go. Voting for anybody other than the Republican nominee will ensure his return to the White Mosque.
As distasteful as it is on occasion to look at the Republican candidate and know that he's dripping with RINO-itis, I'm going to have to pull the lever for him/her.
ABOVE ALL -- Zero has to vacate the White Mosque and give the poor bastard who flies AF1 around a well-deserved break.
-
I have seen a few people already say that if "their" candidate doesn't win the nomination they aren't going to vote for a Republican president. Does anyone here feel that way?
No, Gina, for the reasons that Eupher states.
JR, the reason I didn't use the clothespin last time was Sarah Palin's presence on the bottom of the ticket.
-
No, Gina, for the reasons that Eupher states.
JR, the reason I didn't use the clothespin last time was Sarah Palin's presence on the bottom of the ticket.
She was who I was actually voting for last time. I knew what John McCain was.
-
She was who I was actually voting for last time. I knew what John McCain was.
Yeh, I was voting for Palin last time also cuz I figured McCain would die in office.
I am just so worried that if we don't do this just right, Obama is going to slither back into office. :(
-
Yeh, I was voting for Palin last time also cuz I figured McCain would die in office.
I am just so worried that if we don't do this just right, Obama is going to slither back into office. :(
You get points for using the word slither.
-
speaking of, who the **** is bitchslapping me? that damn liberal, rubilw? :fuelfire:
-
speaking of, who the **** is bitchslapping me? that damn liberal, rubilw? :fuelfire:
Whining about being bitchslapped will prompt more bitchslapping.
Just sayin'.....
And no, it ain't me. I'm the proud owner of EVERY ONE of my bitchslaps. :-)
-
It would take a lot for me to vote for McCain, Romney, Huckabee, Newt. The only reason I voted for McPain was Sarah.
-
Whining about being bitchslapped will prompt more bitchslapping.
Just sayin'.....
And no, it ain't me. I'm the proud owner of EVERY ONE of my bitchslaps. :-)
Oh I don't care how many I get, I just want to know who the hell is doing it. I have been bitchslapping you every time I get on the internet, per your request :tongue:
-
Oh I don't care how many I get, I just want to know who the hell is doing it. I have been bitchslapping you every time I get on the internet, per your request :tongue:
Why, thank you! I don't care what mamacags says, you're tops in my book.
h5
-
I will vote for the Republican. Like Euph said, Obama has to go.
-
The only reason I voted for McPain was Sarah.
same here.
Zero HAS to go though and we need the Senate, too. I wish I could get a feel on who's going to be up against Menendez here but I haven't seen anything credible yet.
-
Ron Paul!
psyche!
-
Ron Paul!
psyche!
(http://i53.tinypic.com/29gc0b6.jpg)
-
I will not vote for Romney. If the Repubs do not put a real conservative in the WH, I feel we are screwed either way, and we will wind up in the same position as in 2008. The electorate wants to turn this freight train around. A RINO will just make the waters that much murkyer.
-
The republicans lost the last vestiges of any loyalty I might have had for them when they spiked the governor's race here in Colorado in favor of Pokenpooper.
If they want me to vote for their candy-date, then they'll show me a candy-date who stands for most of the same principles that I do.
-
I have seen a few people already say that if "their" candidate doesn't win the nomination they aren't going to vote for a Republican president. Does anyone here feel that way?
ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY NOT!!!!!!!!!!
It's all about so many things but it's especially about THE SUPREME COURT!
-
Like most people in 08 I voted for Palin, we got Obama, and we also got Sotomayor and Kagan.
-
ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY NOT!!!!!!!!!!
It's all about so many things but it's especially about THE SUPREME COURT!
The next 4-8 years are going to critical in that area. All the more reason that we weed the RINOs out of the senate, too.
-
Does anyone here feel that way?
No, I do not, I will not stay home, and I will certainly never vote for democraticks, fleas & tapeworms.
-
The bigger question is who will be nominated in 2012? I don't see Palin running in 2012. More likely she will probably be the head of the RNC.
-
(http://i53.tinypic.com/29gc0b6.jpg)
(http://i33.tinypic.com/6qdv80.png)
(http://i38.tinypic.com/11twkmh.png)
(http://i34.tinypic.com/f228b6.png)
(http://i41.tinypic.com/fc0baf.png)
-
(http://i33.tinypic.com/6qdv80.png)
(http://i38.tinypic.com/11twkmh.png)
(http://i34.tinypic.com/f228b6.png)
(http://i41.tinypic.com/fc0baf.png)
WTF?
-
The next 4-8 years are going to critical in that area. All the more reason that we weed the RINOs out of the senate, too.
It sure as hell is important! And I agree about the RINO's in the Senate.
-
WTF?
You see those all the time when I rail against filthy bunnies.
-
You see those all the time when I rail against filthy bunnies.
I don't remember seeing the self portrait pic before.
-
(http://i33.tinypic.com/6qdv80.png)
(http://i38.tinypic.com/11twkmh.png)
(http://i34.tinypic.com/f228b6.png)
(http://i41.tinypic.com/fc0baf.png)
(http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/3500000/Crying-Bunny-baby-bunny-3518644-579-518.jpg)
-
It's our responsibility to NOT have Romney be the nominee. We did it in the midterms by sheer determination and numbers. We can do it again because the intensity has not waned. Even independents want something completely different. I just want someone with balls who won't be afraid to say what needs to be said while campaigning.
Cindie
-
Honestly, I could care less if the potential candidate was a complete liar on the campaign trail. Go ahead; say the leftist code phrases the squishy, wishy-washy moderates love to swoon to. I just want that when the bastard plants his foot on principle, the leftist cocksuckers can pile up like cord wood around him and his knees don't buckle.
Make sure I see you do that, and I'll stand back to back with you, come hell or high water.
-
Ron Paul!
psyche!
That's "Dr. Ron," and you're not worthy.
-
speaking of, who the **** is bitchslapping me? that damn liberal, rubilw? :fuelfire:
Obligatory BS for asking who is BS'ing you.
-
It's our responsibility to NOT have Romney be the nominee. We did it in the midterms by sheer determination and numbers. We can do it again because the intensity has not waned. Even independents want something completely different. I just want someone with balls who won't be afraid to say what needs to be said while campaigning.
Cindie
I want the same thing. It does not have to be Palin but I honestly do not see anyone that will stand up to liberals like she does and has that fighting spirit. In order to make big spending cuts, lower taxes, become energy independent, take on entitlements, it is going to be a war. Make no mistake; liberals will dig in with their heels even if we get a Repub President and a 60 plus majority in the Senate. It is imperative that our candidate takes his/her policy to the people like Reagan did. None of the candidates except Palin and Christie have the backbone and the desire to fight fiercely for what they believe.
Boehner and the old dogs in the House only want to make 30 billion cuts in the budget while the new Tea Party candidates want 100 to 250 billion. I can see where this going and that is just the nibbling on the edges. If I could punch the asshole Republican thru the TV that states that 30 billion is a significant amount, I would. These chickenshit old dog Repubs need to be replaced cause they are just giving lip service and ignoring the will of the people in the last election. .
-
I was goin to sit out last election .. until Palin showed up. The I figured Id be voting for Palin. But to be honest ... I secretly hoped that McVain would lose. (I dont want Palin playing second fiddle for that dufus, it would destroy her reputation) Because I could see the trouble the country was in ... and I knew that not only would McDipstick screw it all up, but he would "work hard" with the democrats on about 90% of THEIR agenda. Then when it all fell apart as it surely would ... republicans would get the blame.(ie ... conservatives and conservatism). You can bet your last nickle the media would be on that trail like a bloodhound.
Secretly I thought ... America needs to see the "contrast". Americans need to see the difference between statism and conservatism. Between big govt and limited govt ideals. And McDingbat would have muddled the whole thing dramatically. Possibly setting the conservative movement back for decades (seeing as how the media loves to throw the republican/ conservative link in our faces when "moderates" muck up the whole works).
Well ... here we are. And I dont think the tea party movement would have got the tremendous boost it did get, if McDoofus had won the nomination. Even though he is not on our side, he does wear our label. And as President, he would be the presumptive head of the party. (Remember how conservatives in the House and the Senate had to tip-toe around Bush when they disagreed with him?) If your elected you dont come right out and discredit the head of your own party. At least not publicly .. unless your counting on a very short and painful career.
Anyways 0'Stinkey may be the best thing to ever happened to the conservative movement .... unlike that .. whats his name? Oh yeah ... McShame ... Like everybody else has said ... lets just make sure the media and the left dont decide our candidate for us again. Nobody I vote for seems to get elected anyways ... except for Rubio. (Reagan was ahead of my time)
-
speaking of, who the **** is bitchslapping me? that damn liberal, rubilw? :fuelfire:
I'll always H5 a hot redhead, just on GP.
Anyways, in general I agree with Eupher, but there are a few GOP hopefuls that I would have one Hell of a time leaving home for. However since hard-over Obamabot McCaskill is up for re-election this time, I'd pretty much need to go to the polling place anyway. Her union backers have already been hitting the airwaves trying to re-invent her as some sort of fiscally-repsonsible heroine for accepting the inevitable and following along with the GOP on earmarks, trying to make it sound like it was all her idea.
-
I've already told McCaskill via email that she's got to go.
Any senator that fawns over the president to the extent that she has isn't worthy of running a day care center, much less her own office.
(http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i317/Eupher6/mccaskill.jpg)
I'm sure she never got the memo, but what the hell.
-
I've already told McCaskill via email that she's got to go.
Any senator that fawns over the president to the extent that she has isn't worthy of running a day care center, much less her own office.
(http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i317/Eupher6/mccaskill.jpg)
I'm sure she never got the memo, but what the hell.
Yeah.....I kinda did the same. I wrote her a letter advising her that every major issue vote she casts between now and the election that was different from our "junior" senator, I was contributing $100 to her opponents campaign......I also mentioned that the "bounty" goes up to a grand if the vote is on Obamacare, reminding her that the Missouri voters overwhelmingly rejected it at the polls last November, and regardless of her party affiliation she WAS elected to represent the interests and opinions of the voters of this state, not spend her term kissing the president's posterior (yeah, I used those words).
I did receive the "token" one-paragraph response letter........"Thank you for your opinion, I will certainly keep it in mind........"
doc
-
ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY NOT!!!!!!!!!!
It's all about so many things but it's especially about THE SUPREME COURT!
:werd: :exactly:
Look at the slop Zer0 has already thrown into the judicial trough. :censored:
-
:werd: :exactly:
Look at the slop Zer0 has already thrown into the judicial trough. :censored:
Oh I know, which is why the Supreme Court is my #1 reason voting for a Republican no matter who the nominee is. The damage that could be done by Democrats having the ability to fill the Judiciary.
-
Well, my position is that if my candidate doesn't win the Republican nomination, then I will vote for the Republican nominee to try to keep the Democratic nominee out of office.
Half a loaf is better than no loaf at all.