The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on February 05, 2011, 02:22:29 AM
-
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 02:24 PM
Original message
For those who don't see overpopulation as a problem...
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 02:48 PM by Taverner
And believe that its nothing to worry about:
- As population continues to grow in the US, that will mean more will own cars, use fossil fuel products, etc
- That will mean we will need more land to grow food for those new people
- With China and India industrializing, overpopulation in those countries will lead to more fossil fuel use as well
- Cities will become more and more cramped, leading to more crime, more aggression, etc
- Our highways are already overtaxed, and we really can't make them any wider. We will have to start making double and even triple decker highways like Japan. And we see what those look like after an earthquake.
- Projections show the population leveling out around 8-10 billion, however these estimates leave a lot of things out of the equation (exponential growth in developing countries, exponential growth in the US among the hidden underclass, etc) I find their numbers to be a bit skewed.
- Our oceans are being depleted of resources, and dead zones are popping up everywhere. With demand rising (due to more people, of course) we are on a runaway train, leading to disaster food wise
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x348261
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very true. But we will run out of potable water before we run out of food.
Population growth has got to stop all around the world, or we are all toast.
Well, if Bush murdered gazillions of people around the world, couldn't it be said that he was helping control the population? :whatever:
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I've never heard the potable water crash problem explained
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 02:53 PM by Taverner
Is it because rainwater can't be trusted anymore, the poisoning of the water table?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 03:17 PM
Original message
Supposedly it's due to climate change, but I suspect it has more to
do with big corporations buying up potable water and poisoning of what good water is left.
That is a new one. Corporations stealing all the water and poisoning what's left. :lmao:
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nope, the population should be half of what it is now.
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 03:03 PM by tabatha
Climate change will eventually resolve that problem - a really stupid way to fix it.
Then how is climate change bad if it will correct this problem?
Pisces (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Or a plague will hit that reduces the population. This is a huge fear, hence swine flu pandemonium.
We are overusing antibiotics and creating stronger MRSA bugs, stronger flu strains etc. There are so many things we can't control. We could also all go sterile from overuse of chemicals and hormones
ala "Children of Men".
I think we will be constantly be surprised how the earth cleanses itself of the locusts and parasites that feed off of it.
No wonder DUmmies are so miserable, instead of seeing human beings as something wonderful they view us all as fleas on a giant dog.
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. This is how Idiocracy is born...
Intelligent people know that we're having too many babies, and stop. The rest continue to procreate... and the average human IQ suffers.
Well shit maybe we should mandate abortions for the next 20 years. :whatever:
All this pissing and moaning that so many people is killing the earth yet they want free health care so they can live longer. Tell you what DUmmies call your senators and demand we repeal Obamacare, outlaw food stamps and outlaw unemployment insurance. That alone will starve off millions of people and help save mother earth.
Then we can mandate that everyone smokes, require high fat and salt diets, mandate unprotected sex with multiple partners, stop all anti pollution laws so the water is poisoned, nuke the mid east and line up every other citizen against a large wall and shoot them. In no time mother earth can be saved. :mental:
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
66. The solution to overpopulation is clear
Come up with some sort of pill that virtually guarantees the conception of a male child. Sell it subsidized on the black market in the Third World.
Eventually, the most sexist and backwards societies will breed themselves out of existence. Those societies that value girls/women will survive.
Why do you hate Muslims?
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
71. There should be tax incentives for not breeding, yet it's the other way around. Plus,
free schooling, free daycare, free food, free healthcare for kids.
Wait you want to reduce population yet you want all those freebies for kids? Wouldn't it be better if we starved off the kids?
Celeborn Skywalker (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #71
78. So you think kids shouldn't get all that?
Especially disadvantaged ones? I think we all should have that which you listed above, but if not, then at least kids and elderly should get all that.
Ohh maybe the DUmmy above was saying that those should be denied, I'm not sure, but this primitive is saying that these people should be taken care of when it would make more sense to starve them off to save the planet.
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. Well........
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 11:44 PM by Shagbark Hickory
I know it's a republican philosophy to deny the essentials to children but when it comes to the subject of overpopulation, in my view, people have children who can't afford to have children.
I'm not saying children should just be for the wealthy, but you should be able to provide the basics at least, without relying on assistance. And it's common knowledge that there are some benefits that become available to parents of disadvantaged children that people without children would not be eligible for.
I'm not saying there should be any assistance for people that are down on their luck.
What I am saying is there should be far fewer financial rewards for having children.
If we are to find real solutions, we must go head to head with this tough subject.
How about we tax births, and give tax credits for abortions? :whatever:
-
The liberal women are tramps who believe in free love with anyone at the drop of the hat. They get knocked up and have two choices. Either have the kid and get a bigger welfare check or get an abortion.
The solution is to have liberal women fixed at birth.
-
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-04-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
71. There should be tax incentives for not breeding, yet it's the other way around. Plus,
free schooling, free daycare, free food, free healthcare for kids.
Nothing is free idiot....someone has to pay.
-
Nothing is free idiot....someone has to pay.
It's free to them, they don't have to lift a finger to get it. They couldn't care less that someone else is working their fingers to the bone to take care of them.
-
Well, I certainly agree there are 'way too many Leftists.
-
Genocide starts at home, Taverner.
-
I agree with the DUchebag.
First we cull the human heard by killling every person that is not disabled but not working or receiving government benefits.
Secondly, set a minimum amount of tax per person per year. If they do not pay that then we kill them.
This would push the mean of the bell curve toward the upper end and not the lower end like the communist democrat party initiatives do. Of course the lowest peaches in this plan will be posters at the DUmp, kos, firedog lake, ...
-
I agree with the DUchebag.
First we cull the human heard by killling every person that is not disabled but not working or receiving government benefits.
Secondly, set a minimum amount of tax per person per year. If they do not pay that then we kill them.
This would push the mean of the bell curve toward the upper end and not the lower end like the communist democrat party initiatives do. Of course the lowest peaches in this plan will be posters at the DUmp, kos, firedog lake, ...
Except for those that lived a productive and are retired after working their whole lives.
-
Except for those that lived a productive and are retired after working their whole lives.
I was goin' to say, "Gee thanx!", but I see you covered it! I did more work and contributed more to society in 35 years than a DUmmie will do in 100! Don't see why I should be culled because my body wore out.
-
Oh, no! The Four DUmmies of the Apocalypse!
-
I agree with the DUchebag.
First we cull the human heard by killling every person that is not disabled but not working or receiving government benefits.
Secondly, set a minimum amount of tax per person per year. If they do not pay that then we kill them.
This would push the mean of the bell curve toward the upper end and not the lower end like the communist democrat party initiatives do. Of course the lowest peaches in this plan will be posters at the DUmp, kos, firedog lake, ...
Add some quick-acting poison to the illegal drugs coming in from Mexico, lower the population of DUmmies instantly and reduce Mexican violence as a side-benefit.
::) This was such a constant worry in the '70's...by now, 1/2 of us should have starved to death. Instead, we're working to combat an obesity epidemic. The DUmmies don't love Mother Earth, they just hate people.
-
First we cull the human heard by killling every person that is not disabled but not working or receiving government benefits.
Wow, that would empty our colleges pretty quickly... :lmao: :lmao:
-
Wow, that would empty our colleges pretty quickly... :lmao: :lmao:
See? It'd make education more affordable for the survivors. :-)
-
I think Taverner should set an example and off himself and his family...you know, instead of being a keyboard kommando. Set a good example for the rest of us. :-)
Also, posts like this make me want to go out and breed like a bunny.
-
I think Taverner should set an example and off himself and his family...you know, instead of being a keyboard kommando. Set a good example for the rest of us. :-)
Also, posts like this make me want to go out and breed like a bunny.
Now you're going to get Snugs all worked up . . . ::) :fuelfire:
-
Now you're going to get Snugs all worked up . . . ::) :fuelfire:
And piss Ptarmy off. :lmao:
-
And piss Ptarmy off. :lmao:
It's not as if the saying goes, "breed like ptarmigans," ya know? :tongue: :fuelfire: