The Conservative Cave
Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: Crazy Horse on April 07, 2008, 07:39:12 AM
-
I'm still moving, but a I voted for * before I realized liberal has given me 5 reasons for impeachments. They are general, yet kinda specific. I didn't see the stuff in political ammo, and I really need to put this know it all liberal his place.
Here are his answers
1)Knowingly falsifying information Given as a reason for committing the Armed forces to Invade Iraq.
2)Knowingly conceiling the traitor, (his words) who exposed a secret Federal agent to public scrutiny.
3)Giving tacit approval to violate a legally signed and approved treaty with the Nations of the world.
4)Violating the Public law that permitted the commitment of United States troops in the Invasion of Iraq, by omitting some of the preconditions.
5)Violating some of the amendments to the Constitution, by violating certain conditions of the search and seizure laws.
-
I'm still moving, but a I voted for * before I realized liberal has given me 5 reasons for impeachments. They are general, yet kinda specific. I didn't see the stuff in political ammo, and I really need to put this know it all liberal his place.
Here are his answers
1)Knowingly falsifying information Given as a reason for committing the Armed forces to Invade Iraq.
2)Knowingly conceiling the traitor, (his words) who exposed a secret Federal agent to public scrutiny.
3)Giving tacit approval to violate a legally signed and approved treaty with the Nations of the world.
4)Violating the Public law that permitted the commitment of United States troops in the Invasion of Iraq, by omitting some of the preconditions.
5)Violating some of the amendments to the Constitution, by violating certain conditions of the search and seizure laws.
...and you think showing the 'tard proof is going to change his mind? I've stopped trying to change the opinions of those fools and have decided just to make fun of'em.
-
I'm still moving, but a I voted for * before I realized liberal has given me 5 reasons for impeachments. They are general, yet kinda specific. I didn't see the stuff in political ammo, and I really need to put this know it all liberal his place.
Here are his answers
1)Knowingly falsifying information Given as a reason for committing the Armed forces to Invade Iraq.
The entire world believed saddam had WMDs -- the deception, if any, was his, not Bush's. Also, there were WMDs and they were transferred to Sudan.
2)Knowingly conceiling the traitor, (his words) who exposed a secret Federal agent to public scrutiny.
Flame? She was outed many years before. And Scooter was NOT convicted of exposing anybody. He was convicted of "covering up" and it was bogus.
3)Giving tacit approval to violate a legally signed and approved treaty with the Nations of the world.
I have no idea what this means.
4)Violating the Public law that permitted the commitment of United States troops in the Invasion of Iraq, by omitting some of the preconditions.
There is no such law.
5)Violating some of the amendments to the Constitution, by violating certain conditions of the search and seizure laws.
Bush aggressively interpreted certain rules concerning completely foreign telephone calls. No USA people had their rights curtailed.
You should have been able to crush these on your own. They are the standard libtard talking points and have been debunked many times over.
-
I'm still moving, but a I voted for * before I realized liberal has given me 5 reasons for impeachments. They are general, yet kinda specific. I didn't see the stuff in political ammo, and I really need to put this know it all liberal his place.
Here are his answers
1)Knowingly falsifying information Given as a reason for committing the Armed forces to Invade Iraq.
2)Knowingly conceiling the traitor, (his words) who exposed a secret Federal agent to public scrutiny.
3)Giving tacit approval to violate a legally signed and approved treaty with the Nations of the world.
4)Violating the Public law that permitted the commitment of United States troops in the Invasion of Iraq, by omitting some of the preconditions.
5)Violating some of the amendments to the Constitution, by violating certain conditions of the search and seizure laws.
...and you think showing the 'tard proof is going to change his mind? I've stopped trying to change the opinions of those fools and have decided just to make fun of'em.
He told me he listed em six ago, yet as usual when faced with facts, I ran away............. :lmao: If not for the running away in the face of superior intellect I would as usual be ignoring his dumb ass
-
I'm still moving, but a I voted for * before I realized liberal has given me 5 reasons for impeachments. They are general, yet kinda specific. I didn't see the stuff in political ammo, and I really need to put this know it all liberal his place.
Here are his answers
1)Knowingly falsifying information Given as a reason for committing the Armed forces to Invade Iraq.
The entire world believed saddam had WMDs -- the deception, if any, was his, not Bush's. Also, there were WMDs and they were transferred to Sudan.
2)Knowingly conceiling the traitor, (his words) who exposed a secret Federal agent to public scrutiny.
Flame? She was outed many years before. And Scooter was NOT convicted of exposing anybody. He was convicted of "covering up" and it was bogus.
3)Giving tacit approval to violate a legally signed and approved treaty with the Nations of the world.
I have no idea what this means.
4)Violating the Public law that permitted the commitment of United States troops in the Invasion of Iraq, by omitting some of the preconditions.
There is no such law.
5)Violating some of the amendments to the Constitution, by violating certain conditions of the search and seizure laws.
Bush aggressively interpreted certain rules concerning completely foreign telephone calls. No USA people had their rights curtailed.
You should have been able to crush these on your own. They are the standard libtard talking points and have been debunked many times over.
Basically the sme thing off the top of my head. The UN thing has to be torture.
Thanks, though I'm looking for more specific to shut his damn mouth once and for all
-
...and you think showing the 'tard proof is going to change his mind? I've stopped trying to change the opinions of those fools and have decided just to make fun of'em.
Alas, what else can one do other than just make fun of the primitives?
The primitives are funny.
The primitives aren't worth taking seriously.
Oh, and the primitives are really stupid, just really stupid, too.
One might as well laugh at the primitives, because there's nothing else one can do for them.
-
I'm still moving, but a I voted for * before I realized liberal has given me 5 reasons for impeachments. They are general, yet kinda specific. I didn't see the stuff in political ammo, and I really need to put this know it all liberal his place.
Here are his answers
1)Knowingly falsifying information Given as a reason for committing the Armed forces to Invade Iraq.
2)Knowingly conceiling the traitor, (his words) who exposed a secret Federal agent to public scrutiny.
3)Giving tacit approval to violate a legally signed and approved treaty with the Nations of the world.
4)Violating the Public law that permitted the commitment of United States troops in the Invasion of Iraq, by omitting some of the preconditions.
5)Violating some of the amendments to the Constitution, by violating certain conditions of the search and seizure laws.
...and you think showing the 'tard proof is going to change his mind? I've stopped trying to change the opinions of those fools and have decided just to make fun of'em.
I think I would go with the standard "that's a load of bullsh*t" and go on ab out my business. rebel's right, you aren't going to change this guy's mind, so save yourself some time. you can't reason someone out of something that they didn't reason themselves into in the first place.
-
I'm still moving, but a I voted for * before I realized liberal has given me 5 reasons for impeachments. They are general, yet kinda specific. I didn't see the stuff in political ammo, and I really need to put this know it all liberal his place.
Here are his answers
1)Knowingly falsifying information Given as a reason for committing the Armed forces to Invade Iraq.
2)Knowingly conceiling the traitor, (his words) who exposed a secret Federal agent to public scrutiny.
3)Giving tacit approval to violate a legally signed and approved treaty with the Nations of the world.
4)Violating the Public law that permitted the commitment of United States troops in the Invasion of Iraq, by omitting some of the preconditions.
5)Violating some of the amendments to the Constitution, by violating certain conditions of the search and seizure laws.
...and you think showing the 'tard proof is going to change his mind? I've stopped trying to change the opinions of those fools and have decided just to make fun of'em.
I think I would go with the standard "that's a load of bullsh*t" and go on ab out my business. rebel's right, you aren't going to change this guy's mind, so save yourself some time. you can't reason someone out of something that they didn't reason themselves into in the first place.
It's not that................I just want him to shut the hell up. He belongs on skins island. This is a resident know it all on a fishing board with a politics forum :thatsright:
I don't care if he believes it or not.................I've been trying for him to list these reasons for 6 months.....but always got the "everyone knows what they're" "I'm not going to retype them all again"
well he has and he needs a boot in his ass