The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: thundley4 on January 27, 2011, 05:19:19 PM

Title: Time Magazine Slanders Ronald Reagan, by putting him and ObeyWon on cover
Post by: thundley4 on January 27, 2011, 05:19:19 PM
Quote
Xenotime (1000+ posts)           Thu Jan-27-11 12:52 PM
Original message
Why is TIME putting President Obama and Ronnie Raygun together on the cover?!?!
   
Edited on Thu Jan-27-11 12:54 PM by Xenotime
What the **** is happening?!?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x285173

Quote
SugarShack (332 posts)           Thu Jan-27-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. It is the propaganda ensured to make him a one term louie, as they show you they're the same!

You're half right , half-wit. It's propaganda to make people believe that Obama is a centrist and a decent president.

Quote
Safetykitten (961 posts)           Thu Jan-27-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. Oh yes, propaganda will do it. That's what will make him a one term.

Truth and his own actions will do him in , unfortunately the MSM reports neither of those.

Quote
27inCali (1000+ posts)           Thu Jan-27-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Because Obama is the Liberal Reagan
   
TIME is saying Obama has started a new Progressive era in American politics just like Reagan started a Conservative one.

Quote
Bluebear   (1000+ posts)             Thu Jan-27-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
65. No. Obama hearts Reagan because he changed the "excesses of the 60's & 70's" in govt.
   
'I don't want to present myself as some sort of singular figure. I think part of what's different are the times. I do think that for example the 1980 was different. I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it. I think they felt like with all the excesses of the 1960s and 1970s and government had grown and grown but there wasn't much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating. I think people, he just tapped into what people were already feeling, which was we want clarity we want optimism, we want a return to that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing.'

Quote
Beacool   (1000+ posts)             Thu Jan-27-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #65
91. That a Democratic president feels this way is very disheartening.
   
"I think they felt like with all the excesses of the 1960s and 1970s and government had grown and grown but there wasn't much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating."

Yeah, the excesses of the 60s that allowed him as an AA man to run for president decades later. Without the fight for civil rights, he and Hillary would not have been able to run for the presidency in 2008. Did he forget that history lesson?

If AA stands for Affirmative Action, then you're right. He didn't run on qualifications, nor ability.

Title: Re: Time Magazine Slanders Ronald Reagan, by putting him and ObeyWon on cover
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 27, 2011, 05:24:55 PM
Quote
SugarShack (332 posts)           Thu Jan-27-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. It is the propaganda ensured to make him a one term louie, as they show you they're the same!

Picturing Obama next to a popular, revered and re-elected president is a plot to keep Obama from being re-elected?

How does that even work?

Maybe if they were facing each other and leering but they look like old drinking buddies.

The only people who would be subliminally motivated to not vote for Obama would be those with an irrational hatred of Reagan.
Title: Re: Time Magazine Slanders Ronald Reagan, by putting him and ObeyWon on cover
Post by: AllosaursRus on January 27, 2011, 05:41:02 PM
Picturing Obama next to a popular, revered and re-elected president is a plot to keep Obama from being re-elected?

How does that even work?

Maybe if they were facing each other and leering but they look like old drinking buddies.

The only people who would be subliminally motivated to not vote for Obama would be those with an irrational hatred of Reagan.

"Ah'm from the gubmint, and Ah'm here to help!"
Title: Re: Time Magazine Slanders Ronald Reagan, by putting him and ObeyWon on cover
Post by: Duke Nukum on January 27, 2011, 05:54:38 PM
Funny how the only time the Hate-America-First left like Reagan is when they think they can trick us into believe slavery is freedom.
Title: Re: Time Magazine Slanders Ronald Reagan, by putting him and ObeyWon on cover
Post by: FaC on January 27, 2011, 06:08:30 PM
The only people who would be subliminally motivated to not vote for Obama would be those with an irrational hatred of Reagan.

Wait..wut...whoops...

I thought that Time was toward the left side of the spectrum...
Title: Re: Time Magazine Slanders Ronald Reagan, by putting him and ObeyWon on cover
Post by: Freeper on January 27, 2011, 06:17:27 PM
Wait..wut...whoops...

I thought that Time was toward the left side of the spectrum...

Here's a hint, there aint a single conservative comparing Obama to Reagan.
We conservatives all realize Obama is the anti-Reagan.

Title: Re: Time Magazine Slanders Ronald Reagan, by putting him and ObeyWon on cover
Post by: zeitgeist on January 27, 2011, 06:21:36 PM
Wait..wut...whoops...

I thought that Time was toward the left side of the spectrum...


Only in the Vegan Nebula once you exit the worm hole. :-)