The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Varokhâr on January 16, 2011, 08:58:50 AM
-
“It’s political gamesmanship. The real case is that she [Giffords] had no security whatsoever at this event. So if she lived under a constant fear of being targeted, if she lived under this constant fear of this rhetoric and hatred that was seething, why would she attend an event in full view of the public with no security whatsoever?†he said. “For all the stuff they accuse her [Palin] of, that gun poster has not done a tenth of the damage to the political discourse as what we’re hearing right now.â€
Source (http://thinkprogress.org/2011/01/12/tucson-tea-party-blames-gifford).
Notice that, in reality, nothing is said at all about Trent or anyone else actually saying Giffords is to blame for her getting shot. All that is said is that if Giffords was so concerned about violence, then why did she not have security at a public event?
In no rational mind can that possibly equal "blaming" someone for getting shot. But in the typically irrational mind of the modern Leftist, anything that is not an attack on the Right is an attack on everyone and everything else.
What lowlifes some liberals are.
-
That is so sick like a rape trial where the victim is being blamed for her rape. They are a sick bunch of SOB's
-
That is so sick like a rape trial where the victim is being blamed for her rape. They are a sick bunch of SOB's
That's exactly what I was thinking when I first read the article. I knew there was BS-ery afoot when it sounded like that, and sure enough, the very quote the DUmmies put on that website proved it.
-
That is so sick like a rape trial where the victim is being blamed for her rape. They are a sick bunch of SOB's
Yeah but it wasn't "rape" rape.....
-
That is a legitimate question, If Giffords was so much in fear of that evil Sarah Palin why did she not have security?
It's not blaming her for what happened just a valid question. I know if I were in her position and that evil Palin wanted me dead I would have security.
-
the mind boggles at what liberals consider logical arguments and statements.
-
My translation of the claim Giffords failed to have security: she was bullshitting about being threatened. It was a lie from the beginning. Unfortunately, her lie turned prescient.
-
My translation of the claim Giffords failed to have security: she was bullshitting about being threatened. It was a lie from the beginning. Unfortunately, her lie turned prescient.
:II: Exactly. If someone is worried about threats to their person, they would try and minimize those threats.
-
:II: Exactly. If someone is worried about threats to their person, they would try and minimize those threats.
Which explains why so few on the left acted on their lurid fantasies about Bush despite labeling him fascist, imperialist who sodomizes hapless goat-herders.
The pussies know they're making up bullshit from wholecloth and they don't want to be gunned-down/incarcerated for the lies they made-up in an echo chamber.