The Conservative Cave
The Bar => The Lounge => Topic started by: bijou on April 04, 2008, 04:38:32 PM
-
A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.
In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.
Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.
...
link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,346408,00.html)
Just to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. :-)
-
A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.
In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.
Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.
...
link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,346408,00.html)
Just to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. :-)
Wardrobe malfunction??? I beileve her case lacks support. :-)
-
A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.
In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.
Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.
...
link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,346408,00.html)
Just to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. :-)
Wardrobe malfunction??? I beileve her case lacks support. :-)
I'm sure her lawyer can pad out the evidence for her.
-
A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.
In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.
Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.
...
link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,346408,00.html)
Just to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. :-)
Wardrobe malfunction??? I beileve her case lacks support. :-)
I'm sure her lawyer can pad out the evidence for her.
Is she strapped for cash?
-
A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.
In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.
Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.
...
link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,346408,00.html)
Just to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. :-)
Wardrobe malfunction??? I beileve her case lacks support. :-)
I'm sure her lawyer can pad out the evidence for her.
Is she strapped for cash?
Yes, but she's hoping to hook in some more with this lawsuit.
-
A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.
In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.
Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.
...
link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,346408,00.html)
Just to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. :-)
we believe you, bijou :wink:
-
what have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? :???:
-
what have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? :???:
Underwiring gone awry probably.
-
what have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? :???:
Underwiring gone awry probably.
I wasn't speaking about the specific means of injury, but, c'mon, a gash that big? something unusual
had to be happening in the first place. that was my point. :-)
-
what have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? :???:
Underwiring gone awry probably.
I wasn't speaking about the specific means of injury, but, c'mon, a gash that big? something unusual
had to be happening in the first place. that was my point. :-)
In the end it was only three inches. (I will resist the obvious there.) I am skeptical though, I can't imagine a bra causing even that much damage.
-
what have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? :???:
Underwiring gone awry probably.
I wasn't speaking about the specific means of injury, but, c'mon, a gash that big? something unusual
had to be happening in the first place. that was my point. :-)
In the end it was only three inches. (I will resist the obvious there.) I am skeptical though, I can't imagine a bra causing even that much damage.
:rofl: at the three inches appearing to be six inches thing.
that is exactly my point, though . . . they must have been having zoo sex, or something. :hyper: :-) :rotf:
-
Wardrobe malfunction. :rotf:
-
Wardrobe malfunction. :rotf:
the original "wardrobe malfunction" didn't result in actionable injuries. :-)
-
what have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? :???:
Underwiring gone awry probably.
I wasn't speaking about the specific means of injury, but, c'mon, a gash that big? something unusual
had to be happening in the first place. that was my point. :-)
In the end it was only three inches. (I will resist the obvious there.) I am skeptical though, I can't imagine a bra causing even that much damage.
So the first measurment was in man inches, while the second one was in real inches
-
Well they do make crappy bras. They are cheap, flimsy pieces of crap and way overpriced.
There, that's a woman weighing in. :-)
They say some bras lift and separate, some of us need ones that divide and conquer. VS bras don't do that . :-)
-
Well they do make crappy bras. They are cheap, flimsy pieces of crap and way overpriced.
There, that's a woman weighing in. :-)
They say some bras lift and separate, some of us need ones that divide and conquer. VS bras don't do that . :-)
:hyper:
-
Well they do make crappy bras. They are cheap, flimsy pieces of crap and way overpriced.
There, that's a woman weighing in. :-)
They say some bras lift and separate, some of us need ones that divide and conquer. VS bras don't do that . :-)
I have never met a man that questioned victorias secret.