The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on January 01, 2011, 09:17:15 PM
-
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 08:52 PM
Original message
Shouldn't they have gotten a puppy instead?
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:02 PM by GoneOffShore
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/magazine/02babymaking...
Story today in the NYT magazine about a couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.
All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption".
Mrs GoS and I have never wanted children so we don't get that impulse. We have adopted shelter cats and if we wanted a dog we would have gone the same way. Yes, I know that a puppy or a kitten is not a child, but still, why must one go to such extremes, spend so much money and go through the sturm und drang of finding donors, surrogates, etc, when adoption, even with the obstacles cited, is still an option?
Probably better that the author of the piece didn't get a puppy, because she would have bought from a breeder rather than getting a shelter dog.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x103372
For being pro choice you sure seem quite interested in running other people's lives.
I also can't help but ask how many kids you adopted since you think they are selfish for not doing so.
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Selfish" and "adoption" get my votes, too. n/t
How many have you adopted?
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, God, not this judgmental shit again. Updated at 6:40 PM
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PM by Warren DeMontague
Jesus. Live your own ****ing life and make your own ****ing decisions. Don't presume to be placed on this Earth to sit in judgment of what other people do. ****.
Enjoy your stay at DU it won't be long.
Now if this couple had aborted a baby, they would be heroes at DUmmyland.
-
How does the DUmp feel about Nadya "Octomom" Sullemen. I'm pretty sure her last name is spelled wrong, but you get the point.
-
How does the DUmp feel about Nadya "Octomom" Sullemen. I'm pretty sure her last name is spelled wrong, but you get the point.
They hate her. Say she is selfish, destroying the planet, blah blah blah.
-
They hate her. Say she is selfish, destroying the planet, blah blah blah.
Yeah, but she's on welfare and probably food stamps too. In Nancy Pelosi's perfect world, she is helping the economy.
-
Yeah, but she's on welfare and probably food stamps too. In Nancy Pelosi's perfect world, she is helping the economy.
Even though she is helping to boost the economy, she made the wrong choice by having all those kids and not having a doctor suck their brains out and throw the remains in the trash.
I found this thread where they think she needs to pay back all the benefits from book deals etc.
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,22221.msg255553/highlight,nadya.html#msg255553
-
Even though she is helping to boost the economy, she made the wrong choice by having all those kids and not having a doctor suck their brains out and throw the remains in the trash.
I found this thread where they think she needs to pay back all the benefits from book deals etc.
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,22221.msg255553/highlight,nadya.html#msg255553
Interesting.
Not really sure what to make of all that. :rofl:
-
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, God, not this judgmental shit again. Updated at 6:40 PM
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PM by Warren DeMontague
Jesus. Live your own ****ing life and make your own ****ing decisions. Don't presume to be placed on this Earth to sit in judgment of what other people do. ****.
Name removed (0 posts)
Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
What rule did they break?
-
What rule did they break?
Common sense.
Speaking the truth.
Using 'God' in the post.
Using 'Jesus' in the post.
Possibly another one.
-
What rule did they break?
Maybe he bathes.
-
So, "CHOICE" is only important when the choice is to have an abortion?
-
Maybe hey wanted to adopt but all the kids had been reserved for hollyweird stars and queers.
-
While I don't personally agree with their choice its none of my business and if they can provide for their children then the power to them.
-
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 08:52 PM
Original message
Shouldn't they have gotten a puppy instead?
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:02 PM by GoneOffShore
http://www.nytimes.com/20.../02/magazine/02babymaking...
Story today in the NYT magazine about a gay couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.
All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption".
Mrs GoS and I have never wanted children so we don't get that impulse... blah blah blah blah blah...
Listen DUmbshit, would you still be thinking "selfish" if the writer inserted just that one little word in red into his article?
That's right; now shut your prissy ass up. :bigbird:
-
Story today in the NYT magazine about a couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.
All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption".
Yet it's perfectly ok by Liberal standards when a gay or lesbian couple does the same thing.
-
Not just any puppy, but a shelter rescue puppy only. Another example of the "tolerant, loving" liberals forcing their opinions upon the world. :whatever: But somehow, in lib speak, conservatives are the judgmental ones????? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
-
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 08:52 PM
Original message
Shouldn't they have gotten a puppy instead?
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:02 PM by GoneOffShore
http://www.nytimes.com/20.../02/magazine/02babymaking...
Story today in the NYT magazine about a couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.
All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption". Mrs GoS and I have never wanted children so we don't get that impulse. We have adopted shelter cats and if we wanted a dog we would have gone the same way. Yes, I know that a puppy or a kitten is not a child, but still, why must one go to such extremes, spend so much money and go through the sturm und drang of finding donors, surrogates, etc, when adoption, even with the obstacles cited, is still an option?
Probably better that the author of the piece didn't get a puppy, because she would have bought from a breeder rather than getting a shelter dog.
Wow. This is what the DUmmies want to associate themselves with? :mental:
-
Wow. This is what the DUmmies want to associate themselves with? :mental:
What do you expect from idiots who refer to people who have children as "breeders"?
-
Probably better that the author of the piece didn't get a puppy, because she would have bought from a breeder rather than getting a shelter dog.
It's great when the DUmp's trailer park genes surface in print. It's just so much better to have a mongrel (we used to call them "alley dogs") than a purebred dog. Of course, a purebred dog is okay with democrat DUmmies if it's a slow greyhound or a cowardly pit bull. Rejects, just like the DUmmies.
-
It's great when the DUmp's trailer park genes surface in print. It's just so much better to have a mongrel (we used to call them "alley dogs") than a purebred dog. Of course, a purebred dog is okay with democrat DUmmies if it's a slow greyhound or a cowardly pit bull. Rejects, just like the DUmmies.
:-) :lmao:
-
Speaking of trailer parks, it does seem like it would have been a whole lot simpler to just move into one and get the divorcee next door pregnant, the end result is about the same as egg-donor-plus-surrogate.
:popcorn: