The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on December 05, 2010, 03:21:49 PM
-
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec-05-10 03:51 PM
Original message
A tax cut compromise that we can all get behind? Updated at 3:51 PM
After giving the current national debate about the so-called Bush Tax Cuts, specifically those geared toward the upper class, some more thought, I’ve decided that if the (upper-class) tax cuts are temporarily extended for, say, 1-2 years, then the compromise put forward by President Obama and Democrats should be that:
1.) Businesses need to be held accountable and demonstrate that they are utilizing the tax cuts during this time period to actually create jobs in order to receive any additional extensions. Any further extensions by Congress will be dependent on their ability to demonstrate at least some value of lowering tax rates for the upper class. After all, The Republicans are forever talking about the need to cut programs and stop spending money on programs that don’t work.
2.) Businesses need to commit to faithfully paying any past tax debts/arrears, as well as paying what they actually owe in taxes from here on out without resorting to any financial games or trickery such as keeping their money outside of the country. After all, doesn’t everybody need to pay their fair share in this day and age?
3.) Republicans need to be held accountable for proposing a plan- agreeable to everybody- to pay for the extension of tax cuts. After all, they demand that Democrats figure out how to pay for things all the time. Why should they be able to exempt themselves from this requirement and isn’t doing so demonstrating “fiscal responsibility�
http://www.examiner.com/liberal-in-indianapolis/a-tax-cut-compromise-that-we-can-all-get-behind
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9695969
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec-05-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. If we imposed mandatory hiring requirements upon businesses, I could get behind it
And they would have to be living wage jobs here in America.
Then I could get behind keeping their taxes down.
Hey great idea lets force all businesses to hire a bunch of people they can't afford too. The good news is that will add even more folks to the unemployment line and that should create a bunch of jobs there. :banghead:
added link to OP's OP -- Chris
-
Obama, Congress Maneuver to Extend Unemployment Benefits in Exchange for Current Tax Rates
Fox News (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/05/mcconnell-confident-tax-rates-remain/#ixzz17H7Pk5RO)
:whistling:
But don't let that stop you from coming up with all these great ideas!
-
Take a good look... this is what a 'proud liberal democrat' looks like --->http://www.examiner.com/liberal-in-indianapolis/a-tax-cut-compromise-that-we-can-all-get-behind
-
Take a good look... this is what a 'proud liberal democrat' looks like --->http://www.examiner.com/liberal-in-indianapolis/a-tax-cut-compromise-that-we-can-all-get-behind
I left a message for him. See if he is nuanced enough to realize he is being mocked.
No, no tax cuts at all. I'm tired of the rich bastards getting more and more money. According to Representative Grayson, Rush Limbaugh will get an extra 2.5 million dollars this year.
We should seize all his money and assets and take care of the poor in this country.
-
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sun Dec-05-10 03:51 PM
Original message
A tax cut compromise that we can all get behind? Updated at 3:51 PM
...
1.) Businesses Governments need to be held accountable and demonstrate that they are utilizing the tax cutsrevenue during this time period to actually create jobs in order to receive any additional extensions. Any further extensions by Congress will be dependent on their ability to demonstrate at least some value of lowering maintaining current tax rates for the upper class. After all, The Republicans Democrats are forever talking about the need to cutadd programs and stop increase spending money on programs that don’t work.
2.) Businesses Government need to commit to faithfully paying any past tax debts/arrears, as well as payingdelivering what they actually owe promised in taxes from here on out without resorting to any financial games or trickery such as keeping their money outside of the countryblaming business. After all, doesn’t everybody need to pay their fair share in this day and age?
3.) Republicans Democrats need to be held accountable for proposing a plan- agreeable to everybody- to pay for the extension of tax cutswanton spending. After all, they demand that Democrats taxpayers figure out how to pay for things all the time. Why should they be able to exempt themselves from this requirement and isn’t doing so demonstrating “fiscal responsibility�
...
FIFY
-
I think they're probably going to have a very bad week. And if they don't, I may be switching everything in my retirement fund from the S&P fund to the Fed securities funds before Noon EST on Friday.
:-)
-
There. Are. NO. F*cking. Orders.
I wish there was just one leftard brainiac that had ever, EVER run a business.
-
There. Are. NO. F*cking. Orders.
I wish there was just one leftard brainiac that had ever, EVER run a business.
That's because they haven't hired enough workers. :whatever:
-
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sun Dec-05-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. What reality do they live in?
1.) Businesses need to be held accountable
2.) Businesses need to commit to faithfully
And the best for last
3.) Republicans need to be held accountable
And you need to get your head out of the sand and finally admit that you and the other DUmmies are,...WRONG!
Your good pal, Bwaney Fwank sent the ball rolling down to financial ruin. Why did banks offer loans to people that couldn't afford them?
-
Take a good look... this is what a 'proud liberal democrat' looks like --->http://www.examiner.com/liberal-in-indianapolis/a-tax-cut-compromise-that-we-can-all-get-behind
Did anyone tell him that a fisheye lens is not going to enhance his already questionable looks? Also, he should get some shampoo and take care of that greasy-assed mop on the top of his head.
Ugh!
Oh, BTW DUmbass, your idea is crap.
:-)
-
Proud Liberal Dem
A tax cut compromise that we can all get behind?
Who cares what a bunch of primitives can "get behind" when it comes to economic issues? It has no bearing on reality, so you wasted the time it took for you to bang out that non-sense on the keyboard that could have been better utilized by you personally (that is with your own time and money and not through the gov't) helping someone who is poor.
.
-
And you need to get your head out of the sand and finally admit that you and the other DUmmies are,...WRONG!
Your good pal, Bwaney Fwank sent the ball rolling down to financial ruin. Why did banks offer loans to people that couldn't afford them?
Remember the democrat outrage over "redlining"?
-
This says it all, from a link;
The term "redlining" was coined in the late 1960s by John McKnight, a Northwestern University sociologist and community activist.
-
Click on the guy's picture and you get a brief bio AND his email address!
The guy doesn't even have a real job...he's a social worker! That must be why he has all them economic smarts.
-
Take a good look... this is what a 'proud liberal democrat' looks like --->http://www.examiner.com/liberal-in-indianapolis/a-tax-cut-compromise-that-we-can-all-get-behind
:lmao: :rotf: :rotf: :lmao:
HIS NAME IS DUGE?!?!
Is that pronounced DOO GEE? :rotf: :lmao: :lmao: :rotf:
-
:lmao: :rotf: :rotf: :lmao:
HIS NAME IS DUGE?!?!
Is that pronounced DOO GEE? :rotf: :lmao: :lmao: :rotf:
The funnier part is, he's a JR. That means there are 2 people with that name. :lmao:
-
The funnier part is, he's a JR. That means there are 2 people with that name. :lmao:
Reminds me of a punchline to a joke:
"It's a trick! There's two of them!"
-
Click on the guy's picture and you get a brief bio AND his email address!
The guy doesn't even have a real job...he's a social worker! That must be why he has all them economic smarts.
:lmao:
-
Remember the democrat outrage over "redlining"?
GOBUCKS, who kidnapped you for 6 months and what did they do with your Reagan avatar?