The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Chris_ on December 03, 2010, 08:42:22 PM
-
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdcDjQz01z4&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
Gateway Pundit (http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2010/12/claire-mccaskill-promotes-violence-if-dems-dont-get-their-historic-tax-hikes-it-really-is-time-for-americans-to-take-up-pitchforks-video/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gatewaypundit2+%28Gateway+Pundit%29)
-
More of the demoocrat double standard. If a Republican said it, he would be charged for inciting violence.
-
Look at Schumer in the background nodding his head like he's having a seizure and his constant smirk. What a rat.
Tearing down the tax code for EVERYONE, Claire, is what you worthless POS in Washington should concern yourself with not constantly increasing your regulatory powers upon liberty and capitalism.
-
It is always the left that is violent and unstable.
-
Bring your pitchfork, Claire, and we'll bring a gun.
Double down.
-
Bring your pitchfork, Claire, and we'll bring a gun.
Double down.
Hi,
Why is it I suspect they want lots of civil unrest and riots like those in Europe? In that way, BO can declare martial law and try to suspend the Constitution. Bring it on, with each passing day it appears to be inevitable. Look at the red and blue distribution by county and see if Beck is right when he says we surround them.
As a kid on my grandfather's farm I used a pitchfork to move hay and dried cow dung. Let her bring her pitchfork and I will show her a new and improved use for a device she probably has never put her hands on her entire life.
regards,
5412
-
I tell you what here is a tax increase that I fully support. All of you people yammering on and on about how we need to take more of people's money from them get a tax increase. Claire can pay more taxes, Nancy Pelosi can pay more taxes, Harry Reid can pay more taxes. Put your money where your mouth is and impose a tax increase on all members of congress, the senate, and the white house. Lead by example start paying your "fair share" before you expect other people to do so. You people can afford it since most of you have more wealth than most of us will see in a lifetime. Until you put your money where your mouth is you should shut the hell up.
-
The funny thing that is going on right now, is that Obama has been told by Bernake and Geithner (both evil men, but neither are outright fools) that if the capital gains tax cut expires that the market will crash and Ben will be forced to print even more money to maintain pension funds.
Of course, given the geopolitical reaction to QE2, Ben printing more money while the developing world is trying to stop inflation will result in many confrontations and an unwinding of our alliances and agreements around the world.
At the same time this is going on, there is a coordinated attack occurring on JPMorgan domestically and from Asia in the silver markets which threatens to blow that bank up, and Bank of America is facing having 5 gigabytes of very embarrassing and possibly illegal behavior posted online.
Barack right now is sitting in the oval office reading memos that are talking about 2008 looking like a pleasant experience in the banking sector and the financial markets.
People like Schumer and McCaskill are political prostitutes and have no fundamental understanding of what is going on right now. I expect Schumer is about to get a phone call from his "sponsors" in Manhattan to explain to him the situation.
-
It is the left that is violent. Time and time again
-
It is the left that is violent. Time and time again
There is plenty of violence to go around.
We are living in some very bizarre economic times.
-
I tell you what here is a tax increase that I fully support. All of you people yammering on and on about how we need to take more of people's money from them get a tax increase. Claire can pay more taxes, Nancy Pelosi can pay more taxes, Harry Reid can pay more taxes. Put your money where your mouth is and impose a tax increase on all members of congress, the senate, and the white house. Lead by example start paying your "fair share" before you expect other people to do so. You people can afford it since most of you have more wealth than most of us will see in a lifetime. Until you put your money where your mouth is you should shut the hell up.
Great point!
-
Great point!
I'm angry at them can you tell? :-)
I'm sick of the constant lying coming from the democrat party.
How in the hell can Nancy keep a straight face while saying unemployment checks create jobs?
If we use that logic then why not send every person a huge check every month and tell them to spend?
-
I'm angry at them can you tell? :-)
I'm sick of the constant lying coming from the democrat party.
How in the hell can Nancy keep a straight face while saying unemployment checks create jobs?
If we use that logic then why not send every person a huge check every month and tell them to spend?
You are not alone. Nancy can keep a straight face because she has a illness. She is power hungry and if it helps her agenda, it is OK with her.
-
Claire McCaskill is a crook.........
She began her political career as the Chairwoman of the Missouri State Nursing Home Licensing and Regulation Commission, appointed by a Dem Governor. She and her husband ran a chain of nursing homes in the state, and she (allegedly) proceeded to use her office to harass and eliminate the competition to her and her husband's own operations. therefore making millions. It was rumored that she was on the verge of having a Grand Jury convened, and felony charges brought against her and her husband, when an election tossed her benefactor (the governor) out of office, and the incoming administration cleaned out the comission and replaced them.
She then (among other things) became an instate paid lobbyest for the SEIU, and other public employee and teacher's unions, and worked to organize state workers, including contractors. When Republican governor Matt Blunt was elected (McCaskill was his Dem opponent), he basically cancelled the mandated union organization for state workers, again putting her out of a job.
She was elected to the Senate seat by a fairly slim margin, mainly as a result of voter fraud on the part of the SEIU and ACORN (now gone) in St. Louis........she then became the state chairman for the Obama campaign (Obama lost in Missouri, narrowly), and one of the most outspoken supporters of ObamaCare. Judging from the recent 71/29 percent referendum against ObamaCare by the voters in the state, and the virtual complete purge of Democrats from state and national elected office in Missouri on November 2, she is painfully aware that when she stands for re-election in 2012, barring a miracle, she is toast......
Basically she is a stupid, corrupt, dishonest woman........close in intellect to Barbara Boxer in CA, she just has a slightly better staff of speechwriters.......
doc
-
You are not alone. Nancy can keep a straight face because she has a illness. She is power hungry and if it helps her agenda, it is OK with her.
The botox helps too... :whistling:
-
Witch said something almost sane last week, I knew it couldn't last.
Ditto on TVDoc's comments, she was actually State Auditor when her benefactor got evicted from the mansion, and appeared tomy jaundiced eye to misuse her office to relentlessly attack every other state elective office run by a Republican, I think there were maybe two 'audits' of Democrat-run offices during her tenure, which seemed to be just for show and not against anyone 'Important.'
She's a total Obamite robot, I just hope we can send her screeching ass into retirement in 2012...ideally to reside in the nursing home of one of the competitors she 'Allegedly' tried to drive under.
-
Witch said something almost sane last week, I knew it couldn't last.
Ditto on TVDoc's comments, she was actually State Auditor when her benefactor got evicted from the mansion, and appeared tomy jaundiced eye to misuse her office to relentlessly attack every other state elective office run by a Republican, I think there were maybe two 'audits' of Democrat-run offices during her tenure, which seemed to be just for show and not against anyone 'Important.'
She's a total Obamite robot, I just hope we can send her screeching ass into retirement in 2012...ideally to reside in the nursing home of one of the competitors she 'Allegedly' tried to drive under.
I forgot about the State Auditor job.......my (now departed) mother served on the State Nursing Home Commission for a number of years, and when she (McCaskill) chaired that group, my mother and several others resigned in protest from her actions.....she always maintained that Claire should be in jail, not in public office......
doc
-
Claire McCaskill is a crook.........
She began her political career as the Chairwoman of the Missouri State Nursing Home Licensing and Regulation Commission, appointed by a Dem Governor. She and her husband ran a chain of nursing homes in the state, and she (allegedly) proceeded to use her office to harass and eliminate the competition to her and her husband's own operations. therefore making millions. It was rumored that she was on the verge of having a Grand Jury convened, and felony charges brought against her and her husband, when an election tossed her benefactor (the governor) out of office, and the incoming administration cleaned out the comission and replaced them.
She then (among other things) became an instate paid lobbyest for the SEIU, and other public employee and teacher's unions, and worked to organize state workers, including contractors. When Republican governor Matt Blunt was elected (McCaskill was his Dem opponent), he basically cancelled the mandated union organization for state workers, again putting her out of a job.
She was elected to the Senate seat by a fairly slim margin, mainly as a result of voter fraud on the part of the SEIU and ACORN (now gone) in St. Louis........she then became the state chairman for the Obama campaign (Obama lost in Missouri, narrowly), and one of the most outspoken supporters of ObamaCare. Judging from the recent 71/29 percent referendum against ObamaCare by the voters in the state, and the virtual complete purge of Democrats from state and national elected office in Missouri on November 2, she is painfully aware that when she stands for re-election in 2012, barring a miracle, she is toast......
Basically she is a stupid, corrupt, dishonest woman........close in intellect to Barbara Boxer in CA, she just has a slightly better staff of speechwriters.......
doc
Well this explains much. Thanks TVDOC for that info.
-
I forgot about the State Auditor job.......my (now departed) mother served on the State Nursing Home Commission for a number of years, and when she (McCaskill) chaired that group, my mother and several others resigned in protest from her actions.....she always maintained that Claire should be in jail, not in public office......
doc
Doc, thanks to you and DAT for the bit of history on McCaskill - being relatively new to MO, I don't have the background on her and others like you two do.
Looking forward to 2012, I copied this from the Wiki link:
In this bellwether state, first-term Senator Claire McCaskill was elected with 49.6% of the vote in 2006, narrowly defeating then-incumbent Jim Talent. McCaskill will seek re-election in 2012, with businessman Samuel Lipari challenging her for the Democratic ticket.[4][24]
The only Republican to have declared their intent to run in 2012 is former State Treasurer Sarah Steelman.[25] Jim Talent is still considering a rematch.[26] Other potential Republican candidates include Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder, attorney and former U.S. House candidate Ed Martin, and Ann Wagner, former Chair of the Missouri Republican Party and former Ambassador to Luxembourg.[27]
A survey by PPP on December 1, 2010 showed McCaskill with an approval rating of 43%, with 44 % disapproving.[28] The same study showed her leading Steelman by 1% in a possible 2012 matchup, but trailing potential candidates Talent and Kinder both by 2% (with a ±4.3% margin of error).[29]
[edit] Jon Tester of Montana
Wiki link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2012#Claire_McCaskill_of_Missouri)
That's quite a cast of characters more than ready to give McCaskill the heave-ho.
The biggest thing about that video in the OP that pissed me off was Schumer's smirk and head-nodding which should be a blatant signal to everybody listening to her diatribe that her words are as empty as her head.
-
Damn, that is an impressive array of potential candidates:
The only Republican to have declared their intent to run in 2012 is former State Treasurer Sarah Steelman.[25] Jim Talent is still considering a rematch.[26] Other potential Republican candidates include Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder, attorney and former U.S. House candidate Ed Martin, and Ann Wagner, former Chair of the Missouri Republican Party and former Ambassador to Luxembourg.[27]
I'm not familiar with either Martin or Wagner, but that is the kind of talent pool that we need for EVERY seat coming up in 2012........
I think that Talent is busy making himself a "kingmaker" to a lesser degree than Sarah Palin, but Peter Kinder would be my choice out of the bunch if Talent doesn't run. Jim Talent was a great senator for the partial term that he served.
doc
-
Eupher, it's important to know by way of background that the year she was elected, there was minimum wage referendum question on the ballot here, which got the bottom feeders, errrmmm, excuse me, the 'Democratic base,' to turn out in extraordinary numbers. Her victory had nothing to do with her having any actual popularity.
-
Eupher, it's important to know by way of background that the year she was elected, there was minimum wage referendum question on the ballot here, which got the bottom feeders, errrmmm, excuse me, the 'Democratic base,' to turn out in extraordinary numbers. Her victory had nothing to do with her having any actual popularity.
Again, thanks for the background. Mrs E and I were not here in MO in 2006, so we missed that particular election.
-
Not for this upcoming race for McCaskill's seat (because his father now holds the other one), but there is a "dark horse" out there.......
My wife and myself both served as "Senior Campaign Advisers" to Matt Blunt during his run for governor, and still remain in touch......he's young, dynamic and charismatic, extremely conservative, and an excellent orator. He's GOING to run for something in the relatively near future, but he won't own up to exactly what.
Right now I believe that he is finishing up his committment as a Naval Reserve officer, and we noticed that he was recently elected to the Board of the NRA, so he's staging for something.......I wouldn't be a bit surprised if he came out of nowhere and decided to challenge Obama in 2012.
doc
-
It is the left that is violent. Time and time again
And they will be the ones who start any new civil war in this country (at least if they cannot bait the right into it with their top-down-bottom-up-inside-out method).
-
It is always the left that is violent and unstable.
Even when they try to be "rational" and claim that "everybody does it, both sides are corrupt"...
-
There is plenty of violence to go around.
Bullshit.
The left (the people you help put into office) are the ones who have developed and fostered the entitlement mentality which runs rampant through these "gimme" zombies. They have dumbed down the electorate and use propaganda to feed their hatred; much like the imams of the "religion of peace".
Look on your handiwork and despair, leftist.
-
Bush tax cuts are being extended (at least temporarily). No pitchforks and torches yet broken out.
Looks like you're screwed, Claire.
-
When the left says they are fighting for the middle class, I believe they mean that like one fights for a possession.
-
There is plenty of violence to go around.
We are living in some very bizarre economic times.
Yeah, you can thank the democraps, I mean, socialists and communists within the gubberment for the violence. They are the ones calling for violence. What are the real Americans to do? Stand by and watch the scum take over our Country? Not going to happen.
We are living in bizarre economic times. Again, thanks to the socialists/communists within the gubberment.
-
Bullshit.
The left (the people you help put into office) are the ones who have developed and fostered the entitlement mentality which runs rampant through these "gimme" zombies. They have dumbed down the electorate and use propaganda to feed their hatred; much like the imams of the "religion of peace".
Look on your handiwork and despair, leftist.
Well there is that violent movement known as the Tea Party. :lmao:
The funny thing is, the libs believe that.
-
Bullshit.
The left (the people you help put into office) are the ones who have developed and fostered the entitlement mentality which runs rampant through these "gimme" zombies. They have dumbed down the electorate and use propaganda to feed their hatred; much like the imams of the "religion of peace".
Look on your handiwork and despair, leftist.
Yes and Rush and Glenn have added so much to the national dialogue.
As far as me being a leftist, my positions on most issues don't differ much from Eisenhower or Nixon.
As I've stated, I find the entire tax debate laughable while the Federal Reserve has agreed to print money into infinity.
When the Central Bank says it will no longer monetize debt we will have a serious discussion on taxes and spending. A very serious hard discussion.
While the Central Bank is printing money, what is going on is a side show. An entertaining one where two groups of ideologues scream and rant and rave at each other.
The adults come into the room when the currency collapses or the Federal Reserve realizes their current shenanigans have some epic consequences.
Right now, I'll laugh at the Children on the right and the children on the left argue about a deficit that is being monetized by the central bank.
-
Yes and Rush and Glenn have added so much to the national dialogue.
Really? And when, exactly, have they used their platforms to motivate their audience to direct violence against those that disagree with them?
Hmmmmm?
You need to drop this everybody-does-it act of yours, it's pure bullshit.
As far as me being a leftist, my positions on most issues don't differ much from Eisenhower or Nixon.
Secretary Powell, is that you?
:whatever:
But you vote liberal democrat. That makes your claim of having "positions on most issues" like "Eisenhower or Nixon" a load of crap. You can have positions like Thomas Jefferson but if you vote to put bolshevik turds into office, that makes you about as Jeffersonian, or Nixonian, or Eisenhowerian as a stack of wet drywall.
Claiming to be these things and voting liberal democrat doesn't seem to make you very smart. On the contrary, voting for a group whose goal is complete control over the masses through money, health, food, travel, and manufacturing would mean that you are doing something (voting democrat over and over) and expecting a different result (fiscal sanity) each time.
I tend to believe that makes you a bit of a retard.
As I've stated, I find the entire tax debate laughable while the Federal Reserve has agreed to print money into infinity.
When the Central Bank says it will no longer monetize debt we will have a serious discussion on taxes and spending. A very serious hard discussion.
While the Central Bank is printing money, what is going on is a side show. An entertaining one where two groups of ideologues scream and rant and rave at each other.
I'm curious, why the hell should any of us listen to a leftist ex-accountant? You were in a position to affect change and exercise influence (or whatever else) and you decided to quit. Now, you sit on the sidelines and pretend you're some kind of all knowing sage when you are truly nothing but a damn whiner.
I have zero respect for anyone who quits something to stand on the sidelines and bitch.
The adults come into the room when the currency collapses or the Federal Reserve realizes their current shenanigans have some epic consequences.
Well, the people you supported for elective office are doing their damnedest to collapse us right in to economic and strategic vulnerability and the "adults" are trying to reverse the damage your people have wrought. It would appear that the first step to this is to try and calm the market and get things headed in the right direction (ie tax law). The next step would be to investigate and strangle the Harvard cabal/NY-DC shuttlers and keep them from ever getting their hands on the fruits and labors of the citizens of this country again.
That would be a good start and that was what the last election was all about. Taking a stand on taxation is part of that; it's where the adults start to push back, Jake.
People have spilled their blood and sacrificed their treasure in this country over taxation, Jake. In America, taxation is where it starts.
Right now, I'll laugh at the Children on the right and the children on the left argue about a deficit that is being monetized by the central bank.
Sit on the sidelines (where you put yourself) and bitch, got it.
A craftsman works with his hands and his mind. A whiner just works his mouth.
Where do you fit in, Jake?
-
This entire notion you have that people can make a difference in the system is odd to me.
People will generally take the path of least reasonable resistance.
That path has been to cut taxes and spend more money. Mostly because the populous hates paying taxes and likes getting government services.
The country has a very large cultural problem and it isn't confined to the left or the right. It is confined to people who don't live in reality.
Now when faced with a situation where you are stuck living with 330 million people who a majority prefer what they want to hear, to what is real you have only one option.
As for what I'm going to do about it. Drop out of the culture, take care of my family, and laugh at the absurdity.
The thing I'm loving, is that what I stated was going to happen with the GOP, they would compromise with the President by extending tax cuts and not cutting spending is happening before your very eyes. In fact, the compromise involves increased spending :rotf:
-
This entire notion you have that people can make a difference in the system is odd to me.
Considering you chose to quit instead of trying, I'm not surprised at all you find it odd.
People will generally take the path of least reasonable resistance.
:whatever:
You are truly ignorant of American History and know nothing of American Exceptionalism.
That path has been to cut taxes and spend more money. Mostly because the populous hates paying taxes and likes getting government services.
That alone shows you to be nothing more than a DUmmie leftist. This is the same line of crap that the oral hemorrhages at the DUmp love to repeat.
I thought you were supposed to be better than that?
At any rate...
The "populous" hates seeing their hard earned tax money wasted on bullshit programs that are designed to enslave the ignorant and create a dependent voting bloc that keeps returning bolsheviks (democrats) to elected office.
The "populous" hates seeing their hard earned tax money thrown around the world only to have useless bolsheviks come back and demand more in the name of "fairness" and "social justice" and "spreading the wealth".
The "populous" is ready to force the goverment to have to live within it's means like they do. That was a clear message sent in this last election; apparently it is one you missed entirely.
The decent, hard working American taxpayer is not an entitlement zombie, Jake, no matter how many times you try and wish it so.
The country has a very large cultural problem and it isn't confined to the left or the right. It is confined to people who don't live in reality.
Well, Jake, those of us that do recently voted to start getting rid of the problem; a small fact you seem to have missed.
Now when faced with a situation where you are stuck living with 330 million people who a majority prefer what they want to hear, to what is real you have only one option.
You're pathetic. Your position assumes that you are one of just a few smart people in this country; an affliction that seems to permeate leftist dogma and thought.
Got news for you, sugar, you're not that bright. You are most definitely unjustifiably arrogant, but not that bright. The more you type, the more clear it becomes.
As for what I'm going to do about it. Drop out of the culture, take care of my family, and laugh at the absurdity.
Sit and bitch.
The thing I'm loving, is that what I stated was going to happen with the GOP, they would compromise with the President by extending tax cuts and not cutting spending is happening before your very eyes. In fact, the compromise involves increased spending :rotf:
A deal cut between RINOs and the bolshevik in chief that has yet to be signed into law.
Considering your people still own the House and Senate, the GOP is in no real position to claw back anything.
Yet.
What they have done, though, is derail some of the big government shit that your people were trying to shove down our throats at the last minute and have exposed more congresscrats that need to be targeted in 2012.
Right now, I'll take that.
-
This entire notion you have that people can make a difference in the system is odd to me.
People will generally take the path of least reasonable resistance.
That path has been to cut taxes and spend more money. Mostly because the populous hates paying taxes and likes getting government services.
<snip>
Jake, you seem to be a "one trick pony", turning every thread into a discussion of what you perceive as the flaws in management of the country's monetary policy.
We've got that.......there is no need to repeat it over and over again......
You've taken this thread way off-topic, and it would be my firm suggestion that either you reread the OP, get back on topic, or take your opinions to the thread(s) you started on YOUR pet subject.
If nobody is responding to them, I'm gonna guess that they have (as mentioned above) gotten your message, and basically aren't interested.
Thank you.......
doc
-
Yes and Rush and Glenn have added so much to the national dialogue.
As far as me being a leftist, my positions on most issues don't differ much from Eisenhower or Nixon.
As I've stated, I find the entire tax debate laughable while the Federal Reserve has agreed to print money into infinity.
When the Central Bank says it will no longer monetize debt we will have a serious discussion on taxes and spending. A very serious hard discussion.
While the Central Bank is printing money, what is going on is a side show. An entertaining one where two groups of ideologues scream and rant and rave at each other.
The adults come into the room when the currency collapses or the Federal Reserve realizes their current shenanigans have some epic consequences.
Right now, I'll laugh at the Children on the right and the children on the left argue about a deficit that is being monetized by the central bank.
Hi Jake,
You know I am tired of the bullshit. The libs spend into oblivion and then bitch when the republicans decide they do not want to raise taxes. If you want to put people back to work you damn sure better do two things. Cut taxes instead of raise them and reverse the damn entitlement spending. Start by stopping aid to dependent children which encourages more and more to bear children on the government dole.
The democrats could care less about the deficit, only becomes important when they are prevented from taxing the few remaining Americans who are working their asses off to make ends meet.
regards,
5412
-
Jake, you seem to be a "one trick pony", turning every thread into a discussion of what you perceive as the flaws in management of the country's monetary policy.
We've got that.......there is no need to repeat it over and over again......
You've taken this thread way off-topic, and it would be my firm suggestion that either you reread the OP, get back on topic, or take your opinions to the thread(s) you started on YOUR pet subject.
If nobody is responding to them, I'm gonna guess that they have (as mentioned above) gotten your message, and basically aren't interested.
Thank you.......
doc
Well I'll stop thread jacking than. Was unaware I was pissing everyone off. I apologize.