The Conservative Cave
Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: cavegal on November 29, 2010, 05:31:35 PM
-
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-next-wikileaks-will-be-about-a-major-bank-2010-11
The next Wikileaks will be about a major U.S. Bank.
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange told Forbes that early next year, a major U.S. bank will suddenly find itself turned inside out.
And now everyone's clamoring to find out which bank will be the subject of the massive data breach.
Will it be the biggest US bank? Asked Forbes' Andy Greenberg, who interviewed Assange.
Lets see.. this one will shut down banking.
edit to modify
-
It's past time for this guy to be taken out. The damage already done , more than justifies it.
-
It's past time for this guy to be taken out. The damage already done , more than justifies it.
The problem is this guy is backed by our WH and DOJ more than Likely Soro's to name a few. He has cover.
-
The problem is this guy is backed by our WH and DOJ more than Likely Soro's to name a few. He has cover.
Something is going on since the rape charges aren't talked about much.
-
The next Wikileaks will be about a major U.S. Bank.
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange told Forbes that early next year, a major U.S. bank will suddenly find itself turned inside out.
That's exactly what the commies/socialists and these wikileaks scumbags want. Anarchy. They do the "top down, bottom up, inside out" method. Van Jones is notorious for quoting those exact words.
-
Why is it that Wikileaks has been able to publish all kinds of classified State Dept. documents, but Obama’s Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard Law transcripts still remain confidential? Maybe we should have a university registrar’s office consult with the US government to ensure that secrets remain secret? I’m just wondering, that’s all.
http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/110597/
Owie :-)
-
Why is it that Wikileaks has been able to publish all kinds of classified State Dept. documents, but Obama’s Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard Law transcripts still remain confidential? Maybe we should have a university registrar’s office consult with the US government to ensure that secrets remain secret? I’m just wondering, that’s all.
http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/110597/
Owie :-)
OWNED is right! :cheersmate: H5!
-
That's exactly what the commies/socialists and these wikileaks scumbags want. Anarchy. They do the "top down, bottom up, inside out" method. Van Jones is notorious for quoting those exact words.
I dunno. They wouldn't survive in Anarchy. Too limp wristed and minded.