The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOP Congress on November 03, 2010, 08:48:52 PM
-
Where do I start. Hmmmm....
First, He (assuming BTG is a male) is CELEBRATING a huge democratic win!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x567778
LOL...love his logic: because the GOP only won a (record number) 60 seats, and they were supposed to win 100, that's a net democrat gain of 40. Nice. Just like the logic they use for calling lower tax rate increases as tax cuts.
NEXT, he's establishing DU's first major enemy: John Boehner!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x567809
No surprise there. To hell with his issues, he needs to be destroyed. Literally in his post title.
Finally, he's got a recommendation for the Lame Duck congress: Pass everything, then appoint liberal judges.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x567877
Yep, yep, yep...looks like our boy is back in town!!
-
That's the sort of logic I use when I spend X amount of dollars; if all the items are on sale, I have SAVED a ton of money.
So, because the Republicans "only" won 60 seats in the House, they're losers?
I think we all know who the real losers are here. ;)
-
John Boehner's a nice guy, one of the nicest guys one can ever hope to meet, and so franksolich is going to have to keep his eye on this BanTheGoop primitive.
<<talent scout always looking for primitive talent.
-
John Boehner's a nice guy, one of the nicest guys one can ever hope to meet, and so franksolich is going to have to keep his eye on this BanTheGoop primitive.
<<talent scout always looking for primitive talent.
I have his blog on speed dial.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/BanTheGOP
-
I have his blog on speed dial.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/BanTheGOP
I'll check that in the morning and get back to you, sir.
But for the meantime, you think this one's got talent?
I'm getting kind of bored by my usual primitives, and need some new ones.
-
I'll check that in the morning and get back to you, sir.
But for the meantime, you think this one's got talent?
I'm getting kind of bored by my usual primitives, and need some new ones.
I love reading BTGOP's screeds, but it's really too hysterical to make a good DUmmy of the Year.
In one breath, it'll excoriate Republicans for wanting to put Dems in concentration camps and then say the only way to solve the problem is to put Republicans in concentration camps.
It may need a special achievement award though.
-
I love reading BTGOP's screeds, but it's really too hysterical to make a good DUmmy of the Year.
In one breath, it'll excoriate Republicans for wanting to put Dems in concentration camps and then say the only way to solve the problem is to put Republicans in concentration camps.
It may need a special achievement award though.
By the way, we are going to have a new award this year.
I haven't discussed it yet with my esteemed colleague Mr. Wiggum, but I'm sure he'll like it.
-
I'll check that in the morning and get back to you, sir.
But for the meantime, you think this one's got talent?
I'm getting kind of bored by my usual primitives, and need some new ones.
He's pretty out there...so much so that I would normally think that he would be a troll. I mean, review his posts in his blog. If you, me, or our friend behind the tree tried to join DU and post like this idiot, we would probably be kicked out long ago. Talented, "eh." I mean, if he truly believes what he writes, then he's more psychotic than talented. But if he IS a troll, then he's a genius, frankly. And THAT is something I most definitely am NOT.
-
He's pretty out there...so much so that I would normally think that he would be a troll. I mean, review his posts in his blog. If you, me, or our friend behind the tree tried to join DU and post like this idiot, we would probably be kicked out long ago. Talented, "eh." I mean, if he truly believes what he writes, then he's more psychotic than talented. But if he IS a troll, then he's a genius, frankly. And THAT is something I most definitely am NOT.
My definition of "talent" differs between talents of decent and civilized people, and primitive talent.
Primitive talent has to be really bad, really lousy.
I give you the example of Pedro Picasso, the "Atman" primitive.
Others might cite more the poetess CalPig primitive, though.
-
Where do I start. Hmmmm....
First, He (assuming BTG is a male) is CELEBRATING a huge democratic win!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x567778
LOL...love his logic: because the GOP only won a (record number) 60 seats, and they were supposed to win 100, that's a net democrat gain of 40. Nice. Just like the logic they use for calling lower tax rate increases as tax cuts.
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Nov-03-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey Cleopatra, let me know when you're back from your trip up denial. n/t
;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
-
;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
You know, sir, this "BantheGoop" primitive might have talent worth scouting.
Of course, talent in a primitive is "anti-talent" in a non-primitive.
-
I'll check that in the morning and get back to you, sir.
But for the meantime, you think this one's got talent?
I'm getting kind of bored by my usual primitives, and need some new ones.
the nadinebrzinski (or whatever) primitive has been coming in the top 5 of Violator counts a lot lately.
-
the nadinebrzinski (or whatever) primitive has been coming in the top 5 of Violator counts a lot lately.
You know, I read the Zbigniew primitive all the time, but unless it's a "health issue," she's pretty bland.
I think it's because she's so sloppy in her lies, it's no fun.
-
You know, sir, this "BantheGoop" primitive might have talent worth scouting.
Of course, talent in a primitive is "anti-talent" in a non-primitive.
It IS an interesting specimen of the lower orders of life on Skin's Island. If nothing else, we should at least apply to the VRWC Committee for the Study of Liberalism for funding and support.
-
I love reading BTGOP's screeds, but it's really too hysterical to make a good DUmmy of the Year.
In one breath, it'll excoriate Republicans for wanting to put Dems in concentration camps and then say the only way to solve the problem is to put Republicans in concentration camps.
It may need a special achievement award though.
Yep, he's/she's/it's "special" all right. :shortbus:
That kind of thinking come from being dropped on your head (repeatedly) as a child.
-
BTG = The Allan Greenspan of Potatonomics?
-
Are we sure BanTheGOP isn't Alan Grayson's sock? The stuff Grayson posted under his own name was far too tame to really be him.
-
Who said we were supposed to gain 100 house seats? The range I heard was anywhere from 45 to 60.
BanTheGOP has been on my radar for a while, he/she/it is bat-shit crazy.
-
ROFL!!!!
Some gems from BanTheGOP:
Yes, the House was lost. But we only lost by 60! Considering many experts, including myself, were predicting up to a HUNDRED seats lost, and you can see that we really GAINED FORTY SEATS from the scenario a lot of people were predicting!
You're an expert?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, expect to be totally destroyed. By the time WE get done with you, YOU will be in prison for LIFE.
Um, on what grounds, sparky?
This guy/it/gal is looney-tunes.
-
The third link was most entertaining. The second got locked for being too threatening. He doesn't get a big following in his OPs. I think that he's too crazy even for the Dump. For that reason, he's on my tentative list.
-
I have suspected that Ban The GOP is a mole.
No one and I mean no one could be that stupid and be able to read and write.